Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

[cryptic]

  • Aug. 27th, 2005 at 12:13 AM
I do _not_ have a harem!

Tags:

Comments

( Leave a comment )
[info]gandalfgreyhame wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 04:16 am (UTC)
What is psinging anyways? 'tis a term I've been curious about. :)
| Reply | Thread
[info]wispfox wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 04:18 am (UTC)
A group of people who get together every other Friday to sing together, mostly folk songs, but also other stuff. 'Tis fun. :)
| Reply | Parent | Thread | Expand
(no subject) - [info]mactavish - Aug. 27th, 2005 05:59 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 27th, 2005 06:34 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]jasra wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 05:10 am (UTC)
Are you sure? :D
| Reply | Thread
[info]shadesong wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 02:46 pm (UTC)
That's what I'm sayin'.
| Reply | Parent | Thread | Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 27th, 2005 06:38 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]wispfox wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 06:37 pm (UTC)
...

No?

Harem, in my head, implies things like there being a lack of equality. And that I'm supporting them. And that there is more defined relationship structure than there was in [info]australian_joe's definition of such (see my reply to [info]ratatosk for that). [info]randysmith's definition is just funny. :)

By their definitions? Sure, I do. But by my interpretation of the word? No, I don't.
| Reply | Parent | Thread | Expand
(no subject) - [info]shadesong - Aug. 27th, 2005 07:38 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 27th, 2005 09:15 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]jasra - Aug. 27th, 2005 11:57 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 29th, 2005 06:32 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]wispfox wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 06:37 pm (UTC)
And, by my definition, I don't _want_ one.
| Reply | Parent | Thread | Expand
(no subject) - [info]jasra - Aug. 28th, 2005 02:17 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 29th, 2005 06:32 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]underwatercolor wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 05:25 am (UTC)
Heh. A friend/ex of mine used to refer to me that way... :)
| Reply | Thread
[info]randysmith wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 05:32 am (UTC)
Language is adaptive and evolves. Words mean one thing today and a different thing tommorow. Things shift and flow around you. And you do too have a harem :-}.
| Reply | Thread
[info]ratatosk wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 07:24 am (UTC)
I assert that Randy is right here, and I have an actual degree in linguistics. :P There is no way to wrest the definition of "harem" away from the way it is used in your social circle in a way that will let you escape.
| Reply | Parent | Thread | Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 27th, 2005 06:40 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]ratatosk - Aug. 27th, 2005 09:26 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 29th, 2005 06:18 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]randysmith - Aug. 28th, 2005 02:07 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 29th, 2005 06:19 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]mactavish - Aug. 27th, 2005 07:23 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]wispfox wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 06:38 pm (UTC)
*laugh* By my definition, I don't. By both yours and [info]australian_joe's, I do. See my reply to [info]jasra for why my definition makes it hard for me to agree. :)
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]wolfkitn wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 06:13 am (UTC)
*ahem*

i beg to differ. *nodnod*
| Reply | Thread
[info]wispfox wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 06:40 pm (UTC)
*snorting laughter* You realize that I have no idea when you arrived, so no idea if you have the context? :)
| Reply | Parent | Thread | Expand
(no subject) - [info]wolfkitn - Aug. 27th, 2005 07:50 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 27th, 2005 09:11 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]randysmith - Aug. 28th, 2005 02:13 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 28th, 2005 02:40 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]randysmith - Aug. 29th, 2005 09:41 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 30th, 2005 02:28 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]randysmith - Aug. 28th, 2005 02:14 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wolfkitn - Aug. 28th, 2005 06:44 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 28th, 2005 02:42 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]ratatosk wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 07:27 am (UTC)
Of course, as you noticed, it's less obvious when you don't have everyone in the same place. Among other things, your toes are also safer when you don't have everyone in the same place. :)
| Reply | Thread
[info]wispfox wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 06:30 pm (UTC)
The most amusing part? Even by [info]australian_joe's definition (people I've at least kissed, with there being mutual interest in, if not actual action of, more than that), rather than [info]randysmith's definition (people I'm comfortable with cuddling in public), they weren't all there. (that list, I can at least enumerate!)

By [info]randysmith's definition, I'm not sure they would all fit in that space. ;) Not sure, because I'm not sure I can list who that would be!
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]jim_p wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 07:30 am (UTC)
Hmmm... psounds like I have to drag my ass to psinging one of these days ;)

(not this week, I was seriously out of it today, some stomach bug that kept me home... of course now I'm awake and full of energy at 0330, go figure...)
| Reply | Thread
[info]wispfox wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 06:41 pm (UTC)
*grin* Well, it's definitately more entertaining, at least in terms of me being picked on, if [info]australian_joe is around.

Oh! You should be at work on Monday for lunch; he'll be around for the morning, and for lunch.
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]bridgetester wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 08:06 am (UTC)
No, that's Joe. He's JoeKCupid after all. :)
| Reply | Thread
[info]wispfox wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 09:11 pm (UTC)
Joe having a harem does not mean that I do not, however. ;)
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]sinboy wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 11:13 am (UTC)
Do you want one?
| Reply | Thread
[info]wispfox wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 06:42 pm (UTC)
*laugh* Depends on whose definition is being used!

By mine, no. By either [info]australian_joe or [info]randysmith's, I already _have_ one, and enjoy it. :) (see above for the respective definitions)
| Reply | Parent | Thread | Expand
(no subject) - [info]sinboy - Aug. 27th, 2005 07:06 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]dajt wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 01:08 pm (UTC)
It's a harem. If it looks like a duck. . .
| Reply | Thread
[info]wispfox wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 06:43 pm (UTC)
But they _don't_ quack! They mostly meow! ;)
| Reply | Parent | Thread | Expand
(no subject) - [info]johnpalmer - Aug. 27th, 2005 08:00 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 27th, 2005 09:12 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]ian_gunn - Aug. 28th, 2005 12:45 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]randysmith - Aug. 28th, 2005 02:11 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]jasra - Aug. 28th, 2005 04:00 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]randysmith - Aug. 28th, 2005 02:10 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 29th, 2005 06:21 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]randysmith - Aug. 29th, 2005 09:46 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 30th, 2005 05:19 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]uberjay wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 08:46 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I'm pretty sure you do. But, the good kind of harem!
| Reply | Thread
[info]wispfox wrote:
Aug. 27th, 2005 09:13 pm (UTC)
*snort* I feel ganged up upon. ;)
| Reply | Parent | Thread | Expand
(no subject) - [info]uberjay - Aug. 27th, 2005 09:46 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 29th, 2005 06:21 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]ruth_lawrence wrote:
Aug. 29th, 2005 08:11 am (UTC)
:::expresses dismay:::

What have you done to them, missy???
| Reply | Thread | Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 29th, 2005 06:31 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]ruth_lawrence - Aug. 30th, 2005 12:31 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wispfox - Aug. 30th, 2005 05:17 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]ruth_lawrence - Aug. 30th, 2005 09:18 pm (UTC) Expand
( Leave a comment )

Tags