The Blogosphere
« previous entry | next entry »
Feb. 22nd, 2005 | 08:03 pm
mood:
upbeat
I'm currently working on this small paper on Opportunities in the Blogosphere, meant to be used as a document to get out-of-touch business decision makers interested in the world of blogs. It's my last project here, and I'm doing it under Prof. Sandeep Krishnamurthy, a visiting faculty from the Univ. of Washington, Bothell.
One thing that this paper talks of is the growing influence of the blogosphere as a publishing medium, and its effect on the publication chain. Instead of the traditional [[ author-> editor-> publisher-> reader ]], the blogosphere has a very interesting [[ author-publisher-> reader-editor ]] chain. The author himself is the publisher; and the reader of the blog is the editor, in that he decides what posts gain prominence (by linking to them, etc). The democratic nature of the blogosphere, and its economics (zero-cost), have led to this structure. The implications of this on the current publishing world are immediately obvious.
Another idea in the paper is that of a content summarization service. Google News, for example, aggregates news from known sources, performs a pseudo-summarization, and displays results on a single page. True summarization would be when the web service can actually summarize all the news and present content on a single page. I guess this involves a lot of natural language processing etc, which may be beyond the scope of today's technology, but it's a very useful thing to develop. It would look great sitting on top of Technorati, providing content summarization for searches on the blogosphere. What do you guys think of this?
Yup! I believe this is how newspapers would look in2020 the future. The blogosphere is surely gonna be the publishing medium of the future, and that also explains why I think Google should acquire Technorati .. and very soon!
One thing that this paper talks of is the growing influence of the blogosphere as a publishing medium, and its effect on the publication chain. Instead of the traditional [[ author-> editor-> publisher-> reader ]], the blogosphere has a very interesting [[ author-publisher-> reader-editor ]] chain. The author himself is the publisher; and the reader of the blog is the editor, in that he decides what posts gain prominence (by linking to them, etc). The democratic nature of the blogosphere, and its economics (zero-cost), have led to this structure. The implications of this on the current publishing world are immediately obvious.
Another idea in the paper is that of a content summarization service. Google News, for example, aggregates news from known sources, performs a pseudo-summarization, and displays results on a single page. True summarization would be when the web service can actually summarize all the news and present content on a single page. I guess this involves a lot of natural language processing etc, which may be beyond the scope of today's technology, but it's a very useful thing to develop. It would look great sitting on top of Technorati, providing content summarization for searches on the blogosphere. What do you guys think of this?
Yup! I believe this is how newspapers would look in

from: s0ylentgreen
date: Feb. 22nd, 2005 03:30 pm (UTC)
Link
It's like Orson Welles's War of the Worlds saga that prompted legal authorities and Washington to restrict(and ban) certain freedoms associated with radio and telivision.
It's cool that you're doing this project. :)
Reply | Thread
Re: kewl!
from:
vinodkumarvc
date: Feb. 22nd, 2005 03:32 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: kewl!
from: s0ylentgreen
date: Feb. 22nd, 2005 03:34 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
yodha
date: Feb. 22nd, 2005 03:33 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Thread
(no subject)
from:
vinodkumarvc
date: Feb. 22nd, 2005 03:50 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
yodha
date: Feb. 22nd, 2005 04:01 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
vinodkumarvc
date: Feb. 22nd, 2005 04:14 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
yodha
date: Feb. 22nd, 2005 06:37 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
fugney
date: Feb. 22nd, 2005 03:51 pm (UTC)
Link
Not to all of us :P
Reply | Thread
from:
vinodkumarvc
date: Feb. 22nd, 2005 04:00 pm (UTC)
Link
if the writer doubles up as the publisher, and the reader is also the editor, people who do just editing and publishing are all made redundant. they aren't needed anymore! the whole structure of the publishing industry would change ..
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
slashank
date: Feb. 23rd, 2005 04:01 am (UTC)
Link
I hate music labels, publishing houses, art galleries and such.
These middlemen add to the cost of the product with no additional benefits.
What we need is direct interaction between the artist and the consumer.
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
fugney
date: Feb. 23rd, 2005 07:09 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
vinodkumarvc
date: Feb. 23rd, 2005 09:26 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
fugney
date: Feb. 23rd, 2005 10:37 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
vinodkumarvc
date: Feb. 24th, 2005 10:23 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
hyperbrain
date: Feb. 25th, 2005 05:39 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
vinodkumarvc
date: Feb. 25th, 2005 08:32 am (UTC)
Link
fugney spoke abt the most popular version gaining visibility. i'm saying that the most credible version (from a credible person) gains visibility. quality of course is important, coz reputation develops only through quality.
Reply | Parent | Thread
FWIW:
from:
eddd
date: Feb. 28th, 2005 06:15 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Thread
Re: FWIW:
from:
vinodkumarvc
date: Feb. 28th, 2005 01:23 pm (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread