Laszlo Q. V. St-J. Xalieri ([info]vidicon) wrote,
@ 2004-10-11 12:41:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:on target
Current music:Thomas Dolby - Weird Science

World Politics v/s Weird Science

Indymedia raided by FBI, hard-drives seized.
I missed this on Friday, being on a brief, but necessary, vacation from the newsweb.

Rumor has it that a sub-site of theirs hosted pictures taken of people suspected to be undercover Swiss police officers photographing protesters at a French event. Further digging has discovered hints that the subpoena to yank their Rackspace hosting drives came originally from Italy and Switzerland, and the only reason the US FBI was involved was due to a multinational agreement that calls for international cooperation on terrorism investigations. An apparent gag order prevents Indymedia from knowing exactly why their data and their host's hardware was seized.

There could easily be nothing wrong with this, but the seizure also silences an awful lot of voices of independent journalists who have something to say about recent and upcoming elections worldwide (among other things) that otherwise wouldn't make it to the outside world.

I suspect the government allies of the tamed conservative press won't be in a hurry to return Indymedia to operation.

(somewhat more legitimate source)


The United Nations is to investigate alleged irregularities in Afghanistan's presidential election.
These poor bastards are going to have a busy year.

I wonder if I should leave some milk out for the vote-fraud elves on Election Day Eve.


Researchers find off-switch for cancer. No goddamn kidding.
This has personal relevance to me. In a big way.

Researchers at Stanford, using concepts based on research done elsewhere—in civilized countries where medical science isn't crippled by deranged religious-based political interference—found a way to turn cancer on and off like a faucet. Liver cancer, specifically, which is a complete bastard to treat. The liver is amazingly good at regenerating damaged tissue, which is why it truly sucks when it starts replicating cancerous cells.

My oldest sister died of liver cancer not quite fourteen years ago. She was 29. She left two children that needed raising. My mom has had her own brush with breast cancer.

I participated in the 2003 Blogathon to raise money for the Association for International Cancer Research. International—where the money would not go to US researchers, students, or facilities nor provide a tax write-off—because our brain-dead President, backed by the Religious Right (and having appointed Anti-Doctor Leon Kass to his cabinet, less as a biosciences adviser and more as an "expert" to help him propagandize his otherwise inexplicable position), switched off US medical research in this arena like one would stamp an annoying bug.

All ten lines of stem cells he is pretending to fund research on are tainted and useless for medical research, and Bush knows it. Any research on untainted lines of stem cells has been banned for years. Here. Where you can see we still have the hottest teams of doctors and scientists, chomping at the bit to do whatever science it's legal to do in order to save lives.

It's quite literally sickening.

Click here to send your donations abroad. Where your money can do some good.

(More good news from stem cell research can be found here.)


New giant ape discovered in Central Africa
I expect these tribes of killer apes will be blamed for the ongoing little genocide problems in the region.


CO2 levels soaring beyond all expectations
Scientists who have been studying the problem for fifty years are starting to suspect that some natural CO2 sink has become saturated and that we've reached a "tipping point" that will accelerate the problem tremendously.

Does it matter what's causing it? We should likely do something to keep from aggravating the problem.

Anyone have any old copies of SimEarth lying around?


Murphy's Law has been quantified:
The chance that something will go wrong equals
                                A        
U + C + I * (10 - S)     ----------------
--------------------  *           / F  \ 
        20               1 - sin | ---- |
                                  \ 10 / 

where urgency (U), complexity (C), importance (I), skill (S) and frequency (F) are each given a rating between one and nine and aggravation (A) gets a number between 0 and 1.


Oliver Cromwell's Space Program
Dr. John Wilkins, brother-in-law to Oliver Cromwell, "drew up plans for what he called a flying chariot powered by clockwork and springs, a set of flapping wings coated with feathers and a few gunpowder boosters to help send it on its way."

That's not really unreasonable. Wilkin's math said that gravity petered out about 20 miles up, but Newton and company were around to correct him as necessary. If there had been a concentrated European push, however, things might have turned out very differently....

I have a novel in the works in which I try to explore how to get seventeenth century explorers into space without bending too many principles of science as we understand it. I'm thinking of a blimp-launched, mostly wooden "diving capsule" accelerated into orbit by a thermite-heated jet of steam (basically a solid-rocket booster) and maneuvered by hydrogen/liquid oxygen jets. All of this technology was technically available back then.

My theme is to explore how the past few hundred years of history would have unfolded without the Dark Ages—with religion supporting science instead of blockading it.

I need to take a month or so off of work to work on this novel. Anyone want to spot me a couple of grand to live on while I do something more socially important than data entry?

Otherwise I might have to sign up for this employment program.

[*]
Inspected by: Furfur


(Post a new comment)


[info]butterflysneeze
2004-10-11 09:50 am UTC (link)
the tamed conservative press

Any pointers? I'm getting pretty fed up with the flaming liberal bias of most of the press that I'm getting these days...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]vidicon
2004-10-11 10:07 am UTC (link)
Well, I'd say to start with Fox News and any infochannel owned by Clear Channel, then the Wall Street Journal editorial page, then the Washington Times, then the American Spectator, and then the rest of the list of news outlets slammed by Al Franken in his ubiquitous Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them ... except I've noticed the whole scene (except fot maybe the Spectator) shifting leftwards lately. As has general public opinion.

I think this is a lesson in the fact that news sources's natural bias—even more than left-leaning or right-leaning—is to print what they think people want to read in order to sell advertising space. Bush's popularity has finally slipped concretely below the 50% tipping point, so now the general atmosphere of pandering is drifting, too....

But you can always turn on Rush.

[*]

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]vidicon
2004-10-11 11:00 am UTC (link)
Ooo! Ooo! Ooo!

Add Sinclair Broadcast Group to that list.

Wow.

[*]

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]butterflysneeze
2004-10-11 11:18 am UTC (link)
Now, now...Sinclair offered Kerry a chance to respond, which they are under no obligation to do. Do you think that Bush will get the same opportunity when F9/11 airs?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]vidicon
2004-10-11 11:29 am UTC (link)
There's a big difference between broadcast news and pay-per-view dude.

Sinclair is way out of line here.

[*]

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]butterflysneeze
2004-10-11 11:34 am UTC (link)
What makes Sinclair out of line? Newspaper editorial pages routinely endorse candidates (overwhelmingly leftist candidates, but that's only tangentially the point) -- what makes a television station owner (or the owner of many television stations) any different?

(The difference used to be the FCC and the 'equal time' rules. Fortunately, the FCC abandoned them as being a remarkably bad idea.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]vidicon
2004-10-11 11:46 am UTC (link)
The equal time rules haven't been abandoned—but the remaining rules are very complex. The FCC dropped the Fairness Doctrine back in '87, but other regulations (ratified by congress, not just FCC policy) have been enacted since. Otherwise there wouldn't have been a stink about California TV stations running Swarzenegger movies during their gubernatorial elections.

The Equal Time rule and the FCC Fairness Doctrine were designed to keep the public airways from turning into a single-party-controlled propaganda machine. How could removing the restrictions preventing that possibly ever be considered a good thing? What would you think about that if it were Soros in charge of those stations instead of Sinclair?

[*]

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]crwilley
2004-10-11 10:00 am UTC (link)
Actually, I do have an old copy of SimEarth lying around. I think I'd have to put a 5.25" floppy drive into one of my computers in order to use it, though...one of which I've also got lying around.

Hmm. Project for the evening...

(Reply to this)


[info]10dimensions
2004-10-11 10:12 am UTC (link)
Hey you.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]vidicon
2004-10-11 10:32 am UTC (link)
Howdy.

[*]

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]10dimensions
2004-10-11 10:38 am UTC (link)
Stranger.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]vidicon
2004-10-12 09:05 am UTC (link)
Hard to get any stranger than I am. ;) So I hear.

When's lunch?

[*]

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]10dimensions
2004-10-13 02:23 pm UTC (link)
Hmm. Good question. My classes on Tues & Thurs let out around 2. Is that too late for you?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]t3knomanser
2004-10-11 10:13 am UTC (link)
The Cromwell thing is extra funny considering I'm currently reading Quicksilver by Neal Stephenson- set shortly after the Civil War that brought cromwell to power.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]vidicon
2004-10-11 10:29 am UTC (link)
Heh.

I would have already read Confusion and System of the World if I had more money lying around. The local library seems unable to get their copies back from borrowers.

Grf.

[*]

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lee_in_limbo
2004-10-11 12:14 pm UTC (link)
I like that story idea immensely. I suspect you could probably imagine why. Please keep me updated as to how it's coming along. I look forward to reading it someday.

L o L,
smiling

(Reply to this)


[info]secretmasters
2004-10-14 02:32 am UTC (link)
You might be joking about the whole "support me while I write" thing, but in fact I've just done exactly that -- organised six months investment funding to write a thriller. I've got ten people donating between £50 and £200 a month each -- ie credit-card bill type money -- for six months, in return for a good ROI and then 50% of the sales. Some details are over at </a></b></a>[info]oldmotherchaos if you haven't noticed. If you want to actually discuss it in detail, email me at my real first name at benzo8, which is an ORG.

Tim.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]vidicon
2004-10-14 12:44 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I'm serious. Sent you e-mail this morning. (Check your spam filters for it.)

[*]

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…