twistedchick ([info]twistedchick) wrote,
@ 2004-04-30 14:41:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
written slowly and with apologies for typos, but because it feels important for me to say this:

In this country, we have a tradition of recognizing the deaths of soldiers, by name. If you drive anywhere where there was a battle in the past 200+ years, you will see roadside signs that tell who lived and died there, and a little of why. A lot of the deaths are in ones and twos; a few are larger, but most are fewer than a hundred people. The handful of men who died in Boston when the British fired on a crowd are remembered by name there. So are the people who died at Gettysburg in 1862. They are remembered by name on plaques and markers and statues. Chunks of marble sprout up across acres of battlefield to note which company was there, who died, when. The one civilian casualty, a woman baking bread for Union soldiers who was killed by a Confederate sniper's bullet that came through the walls of the house and hit her as she worked in her kitchen -- she is remembered. Confederate or Union dead, we remember them.

We remember them by name. They're not anonymous.

Nobody who dies while serving in the military is anonymous. They are not living private lives, but official ones; their deaths are public whether they occur at the point of a sabre during Pickett's Charge or under napalm or on a land mine in Vietnam or as a result of a British raid on a settlement in 1779. We remember them by name. We know them. Sometimes, for reasons of security, the circumstances of their deaths are secret and even the names are not made public, but they are still remembered and known by someone, and when it is possible their stories are told.

The Vietnam War memorial on the Mall names everyone who fell and everyone who disappeared and did not come back. People visit there quietly, looking for the names of people they knew, and leave tokens -- a letter, a child's toy, a Purple Heart or Silver Star. It is one of the two quietest places in that noisy city; the other is National Cathedral, where the dead who rest there are also known by name, every one of them. For many years, every time I went down to the Vietnam Wall, I looked through the book of names (located at either end of the wall) to check on one or another friend who went over but whom I couldn't remember coming back. Each time I remembered a different one. Each time I was fortunate; they were not listed. But when I go down to the Wall, I also look each time for the older brother of someone I went to school with, who went missing in action in 1966. He's still missing. I don't think he'll come back, and neither does anyone else, but until his death is accounted for he'll be listed there as missing, just in case.

We remember them by name, every one of them.

We don't recall them as perfect or sanctified, but human. Their deaths do not dwarf their lives, they just complete them. We remember the ones who didn't get home and the ones who are buried in other countries, beneath the poppies in Flanders, but we bring home whoever we can, because they're family. They're ours. Even if they have no relatives, they're ours. If our government had an ounce of conscience, it would do a hell of a lot better job taking care of veterans instead of cutting benefits; sometimes it seems that only the dead are treated well -- but at least what they've done is acknowledged, known. Remembered. Even the Unknown Soldiers from past wars are, actually, known to someone and remembered by someone, even if their names are not public. Their tombs are guarded, day and night, by someone who keeps watch, keeps them company so that they are not alone in the dark. It is a matter of keeping faith and respect, but it is also a matter of memory.

Remembering the dead by name is the purpose of history. Without memory, or names, we become lost , ahistorical, ignorant of who we are, how we came to be here and the cost of that movement from the past to the present. It matters that we remember who was here, what they did, how they lived. It matters.

Nightline is carrying on a tradition more than two centuries old tonight, as Ted Koppel reads aloud the names of those who have died in Iraq. It is remembering, with us, those who have died while serving the country. This is something that occurs outside of party affiliation, regardless of politics or protest. This is an American tradition. We are not an old country, as countries go. As an independent entity, only a couple of centuries; as a colonial entity, a couple more; before that, there are still memories and names and stories but few monuments. We are not borne down by the weight of our history yet, as older countries may be, but still new enough that every one of those names matters.

By pre-empting this broadcast, Sinclair Broadcasting is committing an act that is ahistorical, disrespectful to those who have died, and profoundly unAmerican.



(Post a new comment)


[info]shelaghc
2004-04-30 06:56 pm UTC (link)
Please send this to MoveOn.org.

It is one of most eloquent things I've read about this whole situation.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]neadods
2004-05-01 12:15 am UTC (link)
I second the motion. Send this out, it's brilliant.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]twistedchick
2004-05-01 01:13 am UTC (link)
I have emailed it to Sinclair Broadcasting, with a copy to Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting. I couldn't find anywhere on the MoveOn site that seemed suitable -- and I didn't want this to be about me, because it's not.

However, given that, if anyone wants to forward it or post it elsewhere, that's fine with me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]omimouse
2004-04-30 07:10 pm UTC (link)
Thank you. Thank you so very much for writing this. I may be crying, but thank you.

(Reply to this)


[info]maygra
2004-04-30 07:33 pm UTC (link)
This made me cry and I thank you for that.

(Reply to this)


[info]wcg
2004-04-30 07:37 pm UTC (link)
Semper Fidelis, ma'am. Thank you.

(Reply to this)


[info]mos_self
2004-04-30 07:58 pm UTC (link)
Remembering the dead by name is the purpose of history. Without memory, or names, we become lost , ahistorical, ignorant of who we are, how we came to be here and the cost of that movement from the past to the present. It matters that we remember who was here, what they did, how they lived. It matters.

well said. and the entire essay is beautifully stated. wish i weren't so choked up, otherwise i would say a lot more besides "thank you so much."

(Reply to this)


[info]sollersuk
2004-04-30 08:09 pm UTC (link)
My mother was born in 1913; her father died in the later days of WWI. A defining part of her life was the presence of her father's name on the war memorial. From this side of the Pond, I do really see what you're saying.

(Reply to this)


[info]thenetwork
2004-04-30 08:46 pm UTC (link)
*very deep bow*

thank you.

(Reply to this)


[info]wolfshark
2004-04-30 08:46 pm UTC (link)
*cries*

thank you. that was beautiful.

sharkie

(Reply to this)


[info]icanreadyourmnd
2004-04-30 09:03 pm UTC (link)
thank you for this.

I'm linking this to my journal too (if that's okay) because you sid it so well and so eloquently and it needs to be read by a wider audience.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]twistedchick
2004-04-30 09:18 pm UTC (link)
It's public. I sent a copy to Sinclair Broadcasting Corp. myself. Feel free to link or forward.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]icanreadyourmnd
2004-04-30 09:37 pm UTC (link)
cool.

and thank you for being so articulate and outspoken.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]betnoir
2004-04-30 09:21 pm UTC (link)
Pyrate Revolutionary Radio has turned the mike over to you today. :>



(Reply to this)


[info]trinker
2004-04-30 09:24 pm UTC (link)
Run for office. I'd vote for you.

I'm adding this post to my memories, so I can dust it off on Memorial Day this year and the next and the next.

(Reply to this)

everything you say is true
[info]kormantic
2004-04-30 10:01 pm UTC (link)
but I do wish it wasn't sweeps week. Still, I've got hopes that it will help get Bush out office.

(Reply to this)


[info]lolaraincoat
2004-04-30 10:11 pm UTC (link)
Like other commenters here, this made me cry.

Remembering the dead by name is the purpose of history.

Yes, that's true. It's why archivists and social studies teachers and historians and librarians do our jobs. Thank you for the reminder.

(Reply to this)


[info]witchwillow
2004-04-30 10:42 pm UTC (link)
TwistedChick,

I don't support the war. I don't support war in general and in this case in particular. But war is not just about heads of state and differing ideologies; it's about the men and women who shoulder the burden of defending their ideology and call that burden a priviledge.

The time I've spent in America as a non-citizen, has strangely enough been time surrounded by members of the military; from going to school near a Navy base, to being casually adopted by a Navy family ( father and mother are officers) to seeing fellow graduates of my highschool join the Marines to my ex seriously contemplating signing up as well.

There is no way, whatever my feelings on the ideology are, that I could ever forget the people who forge ahead with courage in a strange land under dire conditions.

Your words spoke eloquently of something that I only knew viscerally.

Thank you for writing it.

Willow

(Reply to this)


[info]elke_tanzer
2004-04-30 11:58 pm UTC (link)
[info]astolat passed this along, and I'm spreading the word, too. I'm in Los Angeles, but I want anyone in NYC who might want to attend to know about this:


> 11:35pm in Times Square, 44th & Broadway.

> You are probably already aware of ABC's decision to broadcast the
> names and faces of the "more than 500 troops killed in the Iraq war"
> as tonight's episode of Nightline. (There are over 200 others who
> did not die in direct combat.)
>
> And you might also know about Sinclair Broadcast Group's orders to
> its ABC affiliates, "not to air the program." This is non-trivial,
> measured by both intention and effect. These are extraordinary
> measures to pursue, to pretend that the war in Iraq has neither
> victims nor consequences. Sinclair (the officers of which have
> donated generously to the Bush/Cheney campaigns) reaches 24% of US
> households. That's a lot of bodies to hide, and a lot of people to
> hide them from.
>
> This email is only to tell all of you in NYC that Nightline will
> broadcast in New York tonight on ABC's big TV screen in Times
> Square, at 11:35 tonight. It's just to say that seeing all those
> faces in public, together, will be very different than just watching
> them alone at home. Also that looking at the names that others can't
> see, and looking at them together in public, might have something to
> do with democracy.
>
> So I'll be there tonight, and hope maybe to see you there, amongst
> Friday night's Times Square crowd, and also all the other faces.
> Call it a flash mob if that helps, and otherwise, don't; just
> forward as you see appropriate, and maybe see you there. East side
> of Broadway and 44th, or close to it, ABC.

(Reply to this)

thank you
[info]nagasvoice
2004-05-01 02:06 am UTC (link)
As beautiful a eulogy as I've ever heard.

MoveOn.org got the message, whoever sent it to them, and through that, led me to come back here to check your earler post (of course earlier!! This is Twisted we're talking about!)

I checked on the ABC News site (from a link in the MoveOn.org email) and foudn nothing about the Nightline story, and did not take time to go off to Nightline itself.
What jumped out at me first was this story, as part of the news on Iraq.
My apologies if you already posted it, as I haven't been on lj for awhile and haven't rechedk everything I missed.
Besides, it doesn't hurt to catch it up with folks who haven't heard about it, either. A brief excerpt:
".. The CBS News program "60 Minutes II" on Wednesday broadcast photos taken at the Abu Ghraib prison late last year showing American troops abusing some Iraqis held at what was once a notorious center of torture and executions under toppled President Saddam Hussein.

The pictures showed U.S. troops smiling, posing, laughing or giving the thumbs-up sign as naked, male Iraqi prisoners were stacked in a pyramid or positioned to simulate sex acts with one another..."

http://www.abcnews.go.com/wire/US/reuters20040430_141.html

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: thank you
[info]twistedchick
2004-05-01 02:10 am UTC (link)
I have seen the articles on the tortured prisoners, but I haven't seen anything definitive about it; what I've found so far has had more "rumor" than fact to it, so I wanted to wait and make sure I knew more of what was happening before commenting. But thanks for forwarding the link.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

CNN update
[info]nagasvoice
2004-05-01 02:13 am UTC (link)
Mom just found now found CNN reporting on the Sinclair controversy.
Now, only seven of the Sinclair stations will not air the show tonight, as a result of public pressure. CNN also aired an excerpt of John McCain's letter to Sinclair criticising refusing to air such a Nightline as unpatriotic censureship. And finally, they also stated that a Democratic senator (not which one) was going to ask Congress/FCC to investigate this as a political act contrary to the public interest. (That last was vague on details in the first place, needs more corroboration, and I haven't caught all the details as I wiashed to. But I woudl think CNN should be airing that story again in the rotation tonight.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: CNN update
[info]twistedchick
2004-05-01 02:24 am UTC (link)
If the Fairness Doctrine were still in effect, Sinclair wouldn't be able to do this anywhere without losing its broadcast license. Times have changed.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tsjafo
2004-05-01 06:30 am UTC (link)
Thank you.

(Reply to this)

YES!
[info]winterhart
2004-05-01 06:35 am UTC (link)
Like many others, I have tears in my eyes from reading this...

I just got off the phone with my husband, who's in the National Guard. 45 minutes every two weeks. He's in Baghdad.

some people just don't get it... 'How long is he going to be there?' Until 2005.

I always want to add, when they're surprised, 'There's a strong chance he may NEVER come back, except in a flag-covered box!' (Yes, usually collectors)

(Reply to this)

Thank you for this.
[info]starwatcher307
2004-05-02 03:23 pm UTC (link)
-
Even on my third reading, I'm sniffling and tearing up. This eulogy is the most moving thing I've ever read. I'll post it to my LJ as well, with a link back to you.

Now -- you have given permission to share this, but I want to be sure. I plan to send copies to the local newspapers, and the local VFW halls, and pass to my brother and sister (both ex-military) to do the same. If you have objections please let me know.

Once again, thank you for your moving and heartfelt words.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Thank you for this.
[info]twistedchick
2004-05-02 05:34 pm UTC (link)
I have no objections, but I would like to know where it goes to. Would you send me the list of people/places you send it to? I'd appreciate knowing. If it goes to newspapers and they want to print it, they want to contact me -- it's customary to get the author's direct permission. If that happens, let me know and I'll send you the phone number so they can call me directly.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Thank you for this.
[info]twistedchick
2004-05-02 05:35 pm UTC (link)
You might want to take the version that's at http://concatenation.blogspot.com, Kit's Concatenation (my blog), as I fixed a few typos there.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…