6/30/05 07:36 pm - Intel Mac AMD.....Intel ?!?The straw that broke the camel's back was the Apple/Intel annoucement. Conventional wisdom was if either Intel or AMD was going to have chips in Macs, it would be AMD for many reason(64-bit chips, collaboration on HyperTransport, image of the most powerful CPUs, etc). Since AMD got shut out of that, they had enough, and are claiming monopoly(if the Dept. of Justice can't get M$, how are they going to get Intel?).
Based on the allegations, this is how the Intel/Apple negotiations went. Intel: Steve, I hear you keep a build of OS X on x86. Jobs: Yeah, why? Intel: We want you to switch to Pentium 4 processors. Jobs: We're not interested. We're sticking with the PowerPC. Intel: IBM made you look like an idiot, with your 3GHz by 2004 prediction. Jobs: They gave us a roadmap, they just have been a little busy making chips for game consoles. Intel: Wouldn't you like to finally break away from "The MegaHertz Myth"? Jobs: We've done a good job dispelling that myth. Intel(losing patience): Steve, we want you to change to our processors. Jobs: N... Intel rep opens a brief case, full of $100 bills, with a P4 chip sitting on top of the bills. Intel: You will switch to the P4. |
