Soliton ([info]saintbryan) wrote,
@ 2005-04-02 04:39:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current music:Aha- Take On Me

Oil! Oil! A kingdom for some oil!
SUMMARY: It has been brought to my attention that this post is very long, and most of you are too fucking lazy to read long posts.

Well, fuck you, you lazy sons of bitches. If you're not aware of peak oil (or if you think it's a bunch of horse shit), this post may be one of the most important posts you'll ever read. But nevertheless, I will sum up it's entirety right here. If you plan on reading this entire post, you may skip this summary. There's nothing new here.

Peak Oil is an issue that refers to the point at which world oil production peaks and declines. This decline causes oil to become increasingly expensive and scarce will be a time punctuated with war, famine, and lots of death.

Many countries' productions have already peaked and it is merely a matter of time before total world production does. It's not "if" but "when".

We are not going to discover any new oil wells that will hold the peak off for very long. Predictions for when the peak is coming range from 2006-2025. The majority are sooner than later.

Relying on the market to save us from this is not going to work. Waiting until the actual peak before we start to invest heavily in alternative fuels is not going to work either.

There are many alternatives, but only if we combine them will it do us any good. And any useful alternatives would take at least 15 years to come online. So, we must get to work on them 15-20 years BEFORE oil peaks. That means now. it is possible that we may be too late to avert a disaster. If oil peaks before 2010, our civilization may be fucked forever.

I say if you're prepared for the worst, you're prepared for anything. The absolute worst that could happen, as nature and history shows, is a 90% die off of the human population within one generation (ours).

So, here's how to prepare: research, research, educate, change your lifestyle to a less oil/economy dependent one, begin accepting death, chill.

Now, as a warning, I will not tolerate anybody commenting on this entry saying "well I heard we have so and so fuel alternatives" or "well the oil in the arctic/caspian sea will save us" unless you have

A) read my ENTIRE ARTICLE, and
B) have your sources of information ready to give me.

Happy reading! ;D

[EDIT 4.27.07: I haven't updated this thing in 2 years. Things have changed since I first wrote this, and not necessarily for the better.]




So, I’ve been talking an awful lot about something called Peak Oil for a while now. The past several weeks, I’ve been spending a lot of time sitting in front of my computer reading as much about it as I can, so I’ve become quite the little expert. Peak Oil is an issue that is very important to me, and indeed, should be to all of you as well. It is probably the single most important political/economic issue in over 100 years, yet very few people outside the oil trade and government are aware of it. Why? Because the possible implications of Peak Oil are so god damn terrifying to most people, that if the media were to publicly announce it, investment in the stock market would evaporate, the economy would plunge, and chaos would ensue. The average American is not emotionally prepared to deal with Peak Oil. So, let this serve as a warning to those who wish to read on. And if you choose to ignore this warning, please don’t kill the messenger (me). Jimmy Carter found out in 1980 that making something like this into an issue is political suicide. So if after reading this post, you are frightened, don’t blame me. If it motivates you to do something about it, then be glad. This post may have saved your life.

There is a saying that goes “The truth will set you free, but first it will make you sick.” Well, here we go:

First, what is “peak oil”? Peak Oil is the point at which total world oil production reaches it’s halfway point. It is not about running out of oil, it is about reaching the halfway point. I wish it were as comforting as that sounds. Once total world oil production reaches it’s halfway point, the remaining oil in the wells become increasingly harder to extract. It takes longer, uses more energy, and thus costs more. Exit Mundi (fun website) has a great analogy for this phenomenon,
“Think of it like eating yogurt out of a carton. At first, you’ll have no trouble to bring out spoonfuls of yogurt at all. But after a while, you’ll carefully have to maneuver your spoon around along the sides and corners of the carton to bring the last bit out. In oil wells, it goes the same way.”
Once again, it must be stressed, this so not about “running out of oil”. It is about running out of CHEAP oil.

As oil becomes more difficult to extract, the rate at which we are able to produce it declines at roughly the same rate at which it grew. Oil production currently rates grow every year because of increasing demand. However, soon, our ability to produce oil will not be able to keep up with the growing demand. Excess production capacity will shrink. The stability of the oil market will begin to disappear. Prices will begin to rise drastically and fluctuate. Production rates will begin to decline. Once oil becomes too expensive, demand will begin to shrink as people are forced to use less of it. Under normal circumstances, within 4-5 years of such a sink in demand, the oil market would stabilize, and production would be able to continue to rise again. However, the peak of world oil production is not a normal circumstance. Production would continue to decline, prices would continue to rise, and oil will no longer be a viable energy source.

This is no minor issue. Nearly everything our way of life depends upon comes from oil. Your food comes from oil (fertilizers, gas to bring food to your grocery store), oil is needed to deliver your fresh water, health care relies upon oil, sewage disposal, garbage disposal, street maintenance, police, fire services, national defense. Drastic rises in oil price effects much more than just how much you pay for gas.

Now that I’ve gotten your attention, here’s a colorful picture:



I compiled this graph from 3 separate graphs, plus a bit of my own doodling for the sake of illustration. I’ll explain.

The Various Non-OPEC history/projection was pulled from a report by the Department of Energy on the strategic significance of oil shale resource. Their graph stopped at 2010, so I had to add my own projection. Pardon me if it’s inaccurate or something...

The history/projection of the rest of the world’s oil production was pulled from ASPO’s (Association for the Study of Peak Oil) March 2005 Newsletter.

The red line representing the history/projection of growing oil demand was taken from Exit Mundi’s article on peak oil. As entertaining as that site is, the author has the unfortunate habit of never citing his sources. So really, it’s not the best place to get information and graphs from. So sue me. Judging by the fact that it lines up perfectly with ASPO’s graph, and the fact that it accurately depicts the International Energy Agency’s projection that world oil demand will reach 32.7 billion barrels in 2010 (1), I’m going to guess it’s pretty reliable.

Anyhow, here we are in the year 2005. Everything on the graph that you see before the “now” marker is actual history (don’t believe me, you can look up plenty of the data on the Energy Information Association’s web page). For now, ignore everything past the “Now” marker, as it is only projection. Cover that side of the graph up with your hand if you like.

Now, as you can see, world oil production as a whole in on an increase. However, the oil production of many nations is in decline. Their production has already peaked. US oil production peaked in 1970 and is now in perpetual decline. The Middle East peaked in 1974, although that major decline was artificially generated (2) and not due to geological constraints, which is the case with all other production peaks. Russia peaked in 1988, although as of around ’99, their production as been increasing slightly. Various non-OPEC and European countries peaked in 2000. The other countries have been declining since last year. This does not mean that they have reached their peak yet. Unfortunately, we cannot know when a country (and indeed the world) has actually peaked until 4-5 years after the fact, since for all we know, any decline could just be a temporary one. History has shown that no temporary decline lasts longer than 5 years, because demand lowers in order to compensate. But if a decline continues longer than 5 years, it’s a pretty sure sign that the production has officially hit peak. This inability to see a peak even when we are right on top of it is a major problem, which I will discuss later.

[EDIT 4.27.07: Here's an updated version of this graph from the latest Assiciation for the Study of Peak Oil newsletter
]


I have been researching critique on the Peak Oil theory, and one of the weaker arguments against it is that oil production does not actually peak and we will continue to be able to extract the same amount of oil as we do today for many decades to come. Well, the people who this simply do not know much about oil production. It is a well known that the amount of oil you can physically pull out of a well over a certain amount of time does indeed begin to decrease at or around the halfway point. Production peaks happen, no doubt about that. So, will world oil production reach a peak and begin to decline at some point in time? Yes.

The dispute lies not in if global oil production will peak, but in how much time we have before it does. When will we hit peak? Many people believe that if we discover more major oil wells, we will be able to hold off the peak for a very long time to come. They believe the earth is still full of vast, undiscovered wells. Unfortunately, the likelihood of that is very low judging from the fact that the discovery of large oil wells is declining fast, despite the current sweaty scramble to find new oil sources. Oil preserves are being depleted 3 times as fast as they are being discovered (1).


We are consuming much more oil than we are discovering.

(This graph’s data ended in 2000, so I updated it according to information found in these places 2001-2005 production update, 2001-2004 discoveries, and 2005-2009 discovery estimations)

[EDIT 4.27.07: Here's an updated version of that graph, from the latest ASPO newsletter.
]


So when ARE we going to peak? The Gloomy Gusses at the Association for the Study of Peak Oil (according to my colorfully terrifying) graph up top), say it’s coming some time next year [4.27.07: Indeed, they believe oil peaked some time 2006]. Let’s hope they’re wrong. There are many different estimations (4):
  • A.M.S. Bakhitari (Iranian Oil executive) says 2006-2007 [as of 4.27.07, He believes oil peaked in 2006]
  • Matthew Simmons (Bush’s energy advisor) says 2007-2009 [4.27.07, now says it's probably peaking in 2007]
  • Kenneth Deffeyes (oil company geologist) says before 2009 [4.27.07, He now says it happened in May, 2006.]
  • Collin Campbell (oil company geologist) says around 2010
  • The US Department of Energy says 2016
  • Shell Oil company says 2025 or later [4.27.07, Many top Shell executives now imply that the peak has already passed.]
  • [Saudi Aramco says in 140 years

    But those last two are oil companies, who have vested interest in denying developments that might increase demand for alternatives to oil, as the last article points out. So who can blame them, really.]


    Anyway, average those predictions together and you get about 2011-2012 (hey, maybe on Dec 21st LOL!).

    Although it is widely agreed that the peak is coming at some point, not everyone is very worried about it. Among economists and the like (such as Charles H. Featherstone), I have found a popular claim is that a Market Solution will save us.

    What is a Market Solution? Well, economics is kinda confusing for those not familiar with it, but I’ll try to make it plain to the best of my ability. First, take a look back at the graph way up top. See the red line? That represents global demand for oil. Notice how in the graph, when oil starts to decline, demand is not affected and keeps climbing? Well that's not what would really happen. If demand for oil was "perfectly inelastic", then people would demand the same amount of oil no matter how expensive or scarce it gets. However, oil demand is not perfectly inelastic. And neither is it perfectly elastic (i.e. demand lowers as soon as prices rise). As we speak, oil prices are getting higher and higher, But our demand for oil is increasing at a relatively constant rate. Prices are not effecting demand. YET. Eventually, say the economists (and they are correct), when oil prices get too high, demand will be reduced. But how high do the prices have to go before demand begins to drop? Goldman Sachs Investment Group says, "Based on our analysis of gasoline spending and the economy... we estimate that U.S. gasoline prices may need to exceed $4 per gallon," before the average citizen starts to cut down on fuel. That's about $105 per barrel. And they won't do it because they decide to, they'll do it because they have no other option.

    Ok. So at some point, when prices get too high (thus a drop in oil production), say market solution advocates, it will motivate people to start investing more in energy alternatives and start conserving fuel. And when we start conserving fuel (lowering demand), oil prices will go down, thus lowering prices again, and production will start to climb again and everyone will be happy and the sun will be shining and birds chirping, blah blah chirp chirp blah.

    Well, it's true that when prices get too high, demand will decrease because people won't be able to afford it. Economists are very optimistic people. In the economic world, there are always alternatives. An economist believes that a group of the 5 smartest humans on earth, when locked in an empty vault, will find a way to make a sandwich if the demand for one is great enough. They believe that high oil prices will send people looking for alternatives. This is true. They believe that as alternatives WILL be found if demand is great enough, and when they begin to come online, demand for oil will comfortably go down. This is silly.

    That's not a very realistic view, as I will soon discuss. By the time we are already thirsty for oil, it may be too late to start looking for alternatives. We have to start investing in them long before high oil prices force us too. The real reason our demand would drop if prices got too high, is because people would be forced to not use as much. Some call it rationing. But that's like calling famine "food rationing".

    There are definitely alternatives and ways that we can ease out of our dependence on conventional oil. There are many, many methods people have talked about. Some of them realistic, some not. Because this journal entry isn’t meant to be comprehensive, I’ll omit discussing the unrealistic options. You can figure out which ones they are, cause they’re the ones I’m not going to mention. If you’re curious though, ask me about them.

    The best and most realistic options for cushioning the fall of conventional oil include:
    1. Gasoline conservation. Vehicle gasoline accounts for around 45% of daily US oil consumption, so naturally, this is one of the most important steps. Improving efficiency using existing technologies such as switching to diesel engines, and/or hybrids is an option;
    2. Improve oil recovery technology. This could slow the rate at which production would decline;
    3. Improve Heavy oil/oil sands production technology. This a large resource of lower grade oil, now produced primarily in Canada and Venezuela;
    4. Coal liquefaction, an established technique for producing clean substitute fuels from the world’s abundant coal reserves; and
    5. Increase use of clean substitute fuels produced from remote natural gas.

    All this information, by the way, was taken from a study for the Department of Energy by Dr. Robert L. Hirsch entitled The Mitigation of the Peaking of World Oil Production.

    Anyhow, even with these realistic options, there are a couple catches. Devastating catches:
    1. It must be noted that these are NOT long term solutions. They are only meant to hold off a peak in order to prevent a global economic catastrophe long enough to develop new, renewable energy sources. In the long term, increased oil usage efficiency such as hybrid cars, and better oil recovery technology could simply increase consumption, thus allowing demand to increase. Also, I will not even go into the catastrophic environmental impacts some of these options may have… [4.27.07, don't get me started on how fucking terrible an idea Biofuels are:
      EU biofuel push my damage rainforests,
      Oil from palms: scientists weigh the downside of a once-popular alternative,
      Biofuels won't dent fossil fuel use: Report
      Ethanol-blend auto emissions no greener than gasoline: study]


    2. According to the study, if we were to begin implementation of all 5 of those options this year (which is not happing [4.27.07 sort of starting to happen]), a cushion of 8.4-9.1 billion barrels might be possible in a minimum of 15 years. Refitting oil refineries, building new ones, replacing the engines in 100 million vehicles, building hundreds more oil production facilities, etc would cost a whole lot of time and energy. And hopefully, you’ve figured out by now that energy = oil. So obviously, if we wait until oil hits $105 per barrel or more before we decide to take action, well who knows... That’s like waiting until you’re thirsty before you begin to dig a well.

    Which brings me to an important point. As I said in the beginning, our inability to see Peak Oil even when we are right on top of it is a major problem. We don’t know when it is coming. Could be next year, could be in 20 years. If we want to avoid a worldwide energy crisis unlike anything seen before, we must act immediately. Because the cushion plans take about 20 years to come into full effect (including the planning process), we would need to get to work ideally 20 years before the peak actually arrives. Dr. Hirsch’s study proposes 3 scenarios; a scenario for beginning the crash program 20 years before the peak, 10 years before the peak, and one for beginning it during the peak.

    • Scenario 1- Mitigation begins 20 years before peaking:
      We would manage to avoid any major oil supply shortfalls for a significant time, allowing more time to develop renewable fuel alternatives.

    • Scenario 2- Mitigation begins 10 years before peaking:
      Would help considerably (compared to what would happen if we did nothing), but would still leave roughly a 10 year period of oil supply shortfalls. The situation would be 2-3 times as bad as the energy crisis in the 1970’s, but after about a decade of world-wide economic recession, things would begin to get better (if we didn’t kill each other in a world war during that time).

    • Scenario 3- Mitigation begins at the time of peaking:
      This would leave the world with severe oil supply shortfalls for 2 decades or longer. This could result in permanent damage to our world’s economy. You thought the Great Depression was fun, try this on for size. It is even possible in this scenario, that the price of energy may become so expensive, the crash mitigation programs themselves could grind to a halt due to lack of funding. After all, in a depression on this scale, who has the money to replace their engines with diesel, or buy a hybrid? And what government struggling to keep its citizens alive has the economic power to build hundreds of tar sand and oil shale refineries? It would be much cheaper to go to war to get the oil.

    Let’s look at a hypothetical application of all this. First, let’s pretend that later this year, the peak oil issue gains enough attention that in 2006, the governments of the world begin to earnestly take action. Mitigation officially beings in 2006 [4.27.07, lookin' good so far]. In this case, the only wild card remaining is WHEN will oil peak.

    If oil peaked in 2025, like Shell Oil company predicts, then we’d be right as rain. Hooray, we saved civilization!

    If oil peaked in 2016, like the Department of Energy predicts, then we’d be up for some moderately rough times 15-20 years down the road. Refer to Scenario 2.

    …However, if in this scenario where the world gets cracking RIGHT AWAY, and oil peaks within the next 5 years [or last year], like the majority of the predictions say, refer to scenario 3…

    BUGGER! In other words, it is indeed possible that we are already too late. But since there’s no sense in worrying and peeing our pants, let’s take the optimistic road and pretend oil will peak in 2025 or later. Nevertheless, we need to get started yesterday.

    "Is anyone taking any serious actions?" you may ask. Before 2005, the answer would have been no. However, on February 28, this year, the International Energy Agency (who’s members include the US, Japan, Germany, UK, France and more) are proposing drastic policy measures to cut back on car usage in the event of an oil supply disruption. These measures range from making public transportation free, to police-enforced driving bans. You can read a news article about the proposition a here, and I managed to find a PDF of the actual 120-page proposal here. According to the information in the proposal (pg. 84), the amount of gasoline IEA member countries use is around 26% of the world’s total petroleum consumption. And even the most rigorous and draconian plans they propose (such as banning even/odd numbered license plated cars from being on the road every other day, and enforcing it with an enlarged police force), would reduce the IEA countries’ fuel usage by 10%. That means world-wide, a 3% cut in petroleum usage. But then again, this isn't really meant to be a mitigation tactic anyway, simply a response to a possible sudden supply shortfall.

    [4.27.07 Other actions are now being taken. As you are probably aware, since 2005, the ears of the public have definitely swiveled in the direction of energy concerns. Bush seems to know what's up (after all, his energy adviser believes oil is possibly peaking this year), and I suspect this to be the primary reason for the recent attempts to loosen the US dependency on foreign oil. Yet of all the countries in the world, Sweden seems to be the most dedicated to ensuring a sustainable future free of oil.]

    This shit-fest is getting shittier every day. In March, 2004, a report by the department of energy noted that most of the world’s oil production has already peaked, but "World production has not peaked yet because output from Russia is growing and, at this point in time, OPEC has excess capacity." (1 pg. 8)

    Well, bad news. On March 16, 2005, OPEC announced that they have run out of excess capacity (5 ). OPEC, which produces 40% of the world’s oil is no longer able to keep up with demand. [4.27.07, well, OPEC hasn't lost all its excess capacity, just most of it. They pretend now that everything is rosy, and yet they refuse to increase production in anticipation of the summer driving months, which they usually do. This is because they simply can't. The fact that many experts are now saying we've already passed peak isn't very comforting either.]

    Shush sush now, calm down, it's not the end of the world. (Just civilization.) Breathe. Go for a walk around the block. I’m about to talk about the worse case scenarios versus the most realistic scenarios here, so if you're freakin the hell out, you might wanna calm down a bit before you read on.

    —Interlude so you can walk around the block—
    How bout some funny pictures:

    HEHEHE! Lookit him with the bag over his silly little head! HEHEHE!


    And HERE is a happy little dwarf! Hey look! He is probably made out of plastic, which is a petroleum product! HEHEEHE!


    Hey look! It’s New York in 35 years! So funny! HEHEHE!

    Anyhow, that ends the interlude.


    So, if hard times ahead are very possible, what is it that we’re most likely going to experience? And how bad could it possibly get?

    To tell you the truth, right now, I don’t know what the “most likely” future is. All I can say is that the majority of the predictions say the peak is coming within the next 5 years [or has passed]. In that case, things could get very hectic. Very, very hectic. But it truly is hard to say since there are so many wild-cards. For instance, there is a chance the Middle East oil reserves are much larger than publicly stated [4.27.07 such as Iraq having twice as much oil as previously thought]. This would hold off the peak maybe a couple years to a couple decades, depending. There is also the chance some catalyst in years to come creates more political instability in major oil producing countries, resulting in unexpected, artificially generated oil shortages [Hello Iran]. But the boy scout motto is “be prepared.” And if you’re prepared for the worst that could happen, you’re prepared for anything. So, I’d say keep reading.

    Worst case scenario. Oil peaks in 2005 or 2006. 1-5 years post peak, we begin to see an economic recession comparable to those seen during the energy shortages of the ‘70s [4.27.07, Consumer confidence crumbled in April, GAO Chief Warns Economic Disaster Looms]. Many people will say world oil production has peaked, many will say the recession is temporary. Strict fuel rationing and driving bans could be put into place. According to the Olduvai Theory, in 2012, "an epidemic of permanent blackouts spreads worldwide, i.e. first there are waves of brownouts and temporary blackouts, then finally the electric power networks themselves expire." But that’s pretty extreme. Assuming that doesn't happen, 5-15 years post peak, we could see the recession worsen into a second Great Depression. Maybe as it becomes evident that our mitigation programs aren’t going to help, people begin to resort to burning coal for energy, which greatly increases CO2 levels in the atmosphere, not doing our worsening environmental situation any good. In any case, we could see major economic collapse, world war(s), widespread famine (from high food prices as well as climate-change related crop losses). 15-20+ years post peak, banditry, pandemics, war, war, civil war, cannibalism. Yum yum! A mass die-off of the human population. And by “mass die-off” I mean 70%-90% of our current human population could die within our lifetime. And I’m not pulling this information from my ass. Read about what happened to the Easter Islanders when they depleted their key resource. Or how bout the St. Matthew Island reindeer Herd. Or the Irish Potato Famine. [Or the Mayan civilization. Rather simple mathematics are involved in general population models which succinctly demonstrate that when a population is near its top capacity, and a something disrupts the source of such a high birthrate (in our case, oil), the population is going to crash pretty hard. Ask me about this subject if you want more detail/want to discuss.]

    So there’s the worst it could get. No wait, that’s not the worst. If legions of undead aliens from Dimension X with foot-long dongs and a hankering for some sweet human ass showed up just as we're scampering about like starving rats and decided to film a genocidal snuff porno starring our rear ends, that would probably by worse. Especially if it was like, raining acid on us at the time and a 20-foot tall resurrected cyborg Hitler shouts into a megaphone that he just killed God. WORSE THAN PEAK OIL! MAN!

    Anyway, back to being serious. This all sounds pretty terrible. And unless you’ve already dismissed me as some silly apocalypse nut who doesn’t know what he’s talking about, you’re probably feeling pretty helpless about this whole situation. Well don’t. There are things you can do. Buying some guns and canned food and hiding in the woods is not one of them.
    1. Educate yourself about peak oil and it’s ramifications. THE MOST IMPORTANT ADVICE I can give you is to NOT take my word for it. I’ve cited most of my sources throughout this article. Go back and check them out. Be skeptical. Doubt and discover.

    2. Keep up with the news. Pay particular attention to news relating to oil prices and production. Some major stories of great importance will not be ones you can find on the front page of the NY Times or on CNN. Here are some news sources that I use:

    3. Educate others about what you have learned. This can be very difficult, as I have learned. Most people just don’t want to hear it, and that’s very understandable. Civilization may be coming to an end in our generation, and it’s hard to talk about it without sounding like a fucking nut. Here’s some useful words on strategies for delivering the energy decline message. People need to be made aware of this serious issue. Write to people in leadership roles asking them to user their position to open dialog and expand awareness of peak oil. Write to letters to the editor of local newspapers. Here’s a model letter for friends, family and leaders. It’s a little over simplified and unscientific, but it’s a start. Also, here’s a useful one-page Peak Oil summary suitable for printing. [4.24.07, there's also some pretty good documentaries on the subject that have surfaced since 2005. Crude Awakening: The Oil Crash and The End of Suburbia]. Although you can try your best to make others aware of peak oil, ultimately, large scale solutions are going to be out of your hands. And solutions you have control over will likely be local, or even internal. Your understanding of what this means is of paramount importance. In other words, we’re going to have to save ourselves.

    4. Seriously consider changing your lifestyle voluntarily within the next few years. This does not mean grab a gun and go live in a cabin in the woods. As a matter of fact, in major economic depression, the rural areas are the first places to get bad. In a situation like this, cooperation is key. Centralized, cohesive communities are the best places to be. Towns, small cities, and the like. Even if you live in the middle of a large city, you still might be able to survive a major economic collapse, however, the key to prospering in such a situation is to rely as little as possible on the government. NEVER BECOME A REFUGEE [4.27.07, Katrina has illustrated this as plain as day. Government institutions are the very thing that peak oil threatens the most. To put your life in the hands of these institutions is a really bad idea.] Over time, try to decrease your dependence on the economy around you. Ways to do this include:

      • Begin growing your own food or learning how to forage for wild vegetables. Food is all around us.
      • Ride your bike or use public transportation.
      • If depend on a car for your transportation, consider relocating to a place where you don't have to drive as much, like closer to work, or to a smaller city.
      • Reduce your debt load as much as possible.
      • Educate your self about home and natural remedies for illnesses.
      • Begin thinking how you are going to survive through blackouts, food/water shortages, disease pandemics, or with little to no income. Plan ahead, even if you never end up carrying out such a plan, you will not regret it.

      Here's a useful website that can help get you started.

    5. Begin learning basic emergency medical procedures.

    6. Begin accepting death. Even if you survive through the hardest times, you will witness an unprecedented amount of death and suffering in the later stages of an oil crash. Also, no matter what, even if we completely mitigate the oil crash, you’re still going to die. Eventually, the survival rate of everybody drops to zero. Learn to love the idea of your own death, and you will enjoy life even more.

    7. Seriously, chill out. Life is completely absurd. Learn to love the absurd. Don't take it all so seriously. Do things like listening to Aha while you write articles about the end of civilization.
      [4.27.07. "Treat matters of great concern lightly, and matters of small concern greatly."
      The more menacing and formidable the adversary, the greater one's triumph must be. Whether one lives or dies is immaterial. The true winners are those who remain happy in spite of physical discomfort- in spite of death even. Living in despair is no life at all.
      Don't despair over the possibility that you'll never own a massive house with a 3 car garage and a white picket fence. People focus far too much on the "great rewards" that they think lie in the future. With their eyes fixed only on the horizon (which never nears), they forget completely that all the rewards you ever need are right here in this moment. Everything is beautiful. You just have to quiet yourself.

      "Remember all ye that existence is pure joy; that all the sorrows are but shadows; they pass & are done; but there is that which remains."
      -Liber Al vel Legis

      "Love, and do what thou wilt."
      -St. Augustine.]



Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]ixnayonthetimma
2005-04-02 01:31 pm UTC (link)
If an intelligent person does enough pondering over the subject, that person would eventually come to the conclusion that something like this will happen.

Greatest entry ever!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]infernobushishi, 2005-04-08 09:58 pm UTC

[info]lilirose
2005-04-02 04:29 pm UTC (link)
Thanks for this. It was exactly what I needed to read right now- factual without being alarmist- and I'll be passing on the link to several people who also are in need of a reality check.

BTW, have you ever lived in Texas? You look (and sound) a lot like a dude named Bryan who used to be best friends with my brother back in Texas. Just thought I'd ask.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-02 09:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lilirose, 2005-04-02 09:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-02 09:30 pm UTC

[info]batmessiah
2005-04-03 12:29 am UTC (link)
Didn't read it all, but I have heard about it and understand the concept.

But, a lot of people also don't know that George Bush signed in an alternative energy bill soon after he started his first term, stating that all new cars in production need to run off of a non-petroleum based fuel, hopefully hydrogen, by the year 2025.

Not sure if that is exactly what the bill does, or if it really happened, but if so, it would pretty much take away the scariness peak oil.

That, and they are starting to drill up in Alaska and northern Canada, and they also just found a huge ass oil reserve in Utah, so hopefully those will also help offset the damage.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 02:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 02:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 02:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 02:58 am UTC
Accepting death
[info]venuspluto
2005-04-03 06:46 am UTC (link)
I recommend that everyone read about Near-Death Experiences as studied by such authors as Raymond Moody, Kenneth Ring, and Melvin Morse. This popsickle stand of a world is not all there is.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Accepting death - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 07:12 am UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-03 07:45 am UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 07:52 am UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-03 08:02 am UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 08:10 am UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-03 08:31 am UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 08:51 am UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-03 09:15 am UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 09:45 am UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-03 06:32 pm UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-03 09:18 am UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-03 07:10 pm UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 08:02 pm UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 08:05 pm UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-03 08:19 pm UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 08:34 pm UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-03 10:10 pm UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 10:45 pm UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-03 11:17 pm UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-04 01:04 am UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-04 01:43 am UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]thaedes, 2006-03-23 11:17 pm UTC
Re: Accepting death - [info]saintbryan, 2006-03-24 07:48 pm UTC
Hmmmm, maybe ignoring environmental concerns isn't such a good idea after all
[info]venuspluto
2005-04-03 07:43 am UTC (link)
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/012705_global_warming.shtml

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Hmmmm, maybe ignoring environmental concerns isn't such a good idea after all - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 07:57 am UTC
Re: Hmmmm, maybe ignoring environmental concerns isn't such a good idea after all - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-03 08:05 am UTC
Re: Hmmmm, maybe ignoring environmental concerns isn't such a good idea after all - (Anonymous), 2005-09-05 08:16 am UTC
Another consideration
[info]venuspluto
2005-04-03 08:33 pm UTC (link)
The planet is so far past its sustainable carrying capacity of two billion that even if we were able to pull our proverbial chestnuts out of the fire and continue on as we've been continuing so far by harvesting energy from the very subatomic structure of the universe itself ("zero-point energy"), that would merely give us the ability to continue expanding economically and in population. The resulting resource-extraction would likely leave our beautiful blue-and-green very much in the condition of Mars or Venus.

So the die-off kind of has to happen if there is any hope of humanity surviving into a projected sustainable future.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Another consideration - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 08:51 pm UTC
Re: Another consideration - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-03 08:55 pm UTC
Re: Another consideration - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-03 09:33 pm UTC
Re: Another consideration - [info]arwyn, 2005-04-05 01:26 am UTC
but back to the subject at hand....
[info]fallenarches
2005-04-04 02:52 am UTC (link)
And because I'm limited in the response I can make to the actual subject of this post (as opposed to the digression that went wandering off into the wilderness), I've posted your "economistic" relation's thoughts on the matter to my site:

"Bryan: ... Your research is important stuff and you seem to be reading relatively widely. You have the makings of an econ major. (Which, of course, I was not.)

First off, I try not to live in a fantasy world. Give my education and career, I tend to see the world in economistic terms and I find that it generally (but not always) does a pretty good job of explaining what I see happening. As an empiricist, however, I don't have "faith" in the magic of the market any more than a biologist "worships" natural selection. As Reagan said about Gorbachev, I "trust, but verify" when it comes to economic, or any other, theory.

I'll save for another day a digression on the principles and history of neoclassical economic philosophy. It's at least as interesting as, and rather more relevant than, theosophical discourses. Better yet, sign up for Econ 101 fall semester. But make sure that it is an intro to theory course by a hardcore Chicago Schooler, not one of those wastes of time where some Keynesian wus babbles about issues of the day without explaining the world view. Learn the theory, see whether it helps makes sense out of the world, then reject some or all as you see fit, based on experimental evidence."


The rest of the story

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Oh yeah, Reaganomics will save us! - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-04 05:51 am UTC
Re: Oh yeah, Reaganomics will save us! - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-04 06:18 am UTC
Re: Oh yeah, Reaganomics will save us! - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-04 06:25 am UTC
Re: Oh yeah, Reaganomics will save us! - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-04 06:37 am UTC
Re: Oh yeah, Reaganomics will save us! - (Anonymous), 2005-04-04 12:17 pm UTC
Re: Oh yeah, Reaganomics will save us! - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-04 06:07 pm UTC
Re: Oh yeah, Reaganomics will save us! - (Anonymous), 2005-04-05 10:15 am UTC
Re: Oh yeah, Reaganomics will save us! - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-05 03:41 pm UTC
Re: Oh yeah, Reaganomics will save us! - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-05 03:47 pm UTC
Re: Oh yeah, Reaganomics will save us! - (Anonymous), 2005-04-05 06:47 pm UTC
Re: but back to the subject at hand.... - (Anonymous), 2005-04-05 06:40 pm UTC
My "for real" reply, part one - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-08 07:11 am UTC
Re: My "for real" reply, part one - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-08 07:22 am UTC
Re: My "for real" reply, part one - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-08 07:25 am UTC
Re: My "for real" reply, part one - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-08 07:33 am UTC
Re: My "for real" reply, part one - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-08 07:41 am UTC
Re: My "for real" reply, part one - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-08 07:48 am UTC
My "for real" reply, part two - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-08 07:11 am UTC
Re: My "for real" reply, part two - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-09 05:17 am UTC
Re: My "for real" reply, part two - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-09 05:29 am UTC
Re: My "for real" reply, part two - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-09 05:52 am UTC
Re: My "for real" reply, part two - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-09 06:34 am UTC
Re: My "for real" reply, part two - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-09 06:55 am UTC
Re: My "for real" reply, part two - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-09 07:08 am UTC
So what do you think of my Peak Oil screed?
[info]venuspluto
2005-04-04 05:27 am UTC (link)
http://www.livejournal.com/users/venuspluto/40891.html#cutid1

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: So what do you think of my Peak Oil screed? - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-05 06:24 am UTC
Re: So what do you think of my Peak Oil screed? - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-05 08:03 am UTC

[info]fallenarches
2005-04-04 06:36 am UTC (link)
hu.

I guess Robert is right. The LJ universe is full of eeediots. So is our corporeal universe, of course, but at least on LJ, I can show my true, demonic colors, not necessarily feeling the constraints of polite society. When someone is as dumb as a fencepost, I can just come right out and say it.

(Not you, my darling Little Toot. You are clearly much smarter than a fencepost, and I don't think my bias is distorting my perception of this matter.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-04 06:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-04 07:10 pm UTC
In the land of indiscreet hotheads - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-04 07:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-04 08:39 pm UTC
I've friended you - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-04 11:51 pm UTC

[info]zv
2005-04-04 06:54 am UTC (link)
nice summary. it's so much-way more than we were ever were brainwashed -er -taught- in school. why not grab a gun and head for the woods? we still have awhile to convince our families, and that is pristine farmland.

even if it wernt for this, there would be global warming, widespread hunger; when you remove the forests- the rain does go away ..

(Reply to this)


[info]hopefulworeason
2005-04-04 06:37 pm UTC (link)
And during the world wars, people will flock join the armies of the world just for the cheaper food.

(Reply to this)


[info]hatchelt
2005-04-05 07:19 am UTC (link)
nice writing, covers pretty much everything.

f) begin thinking how you are going to survive through blackouts, food/water shortages, and economic breakdowns.
here's a useful website that can help get you started.


this link in this one isn't working mind

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-05 07:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hatchelt, 2005-04-05 07:35 am UTC

[info]jezebel873
2005-04-07 10:08 pm UTC (link)
I think I love you.
That was one of the best, most accurate, most accessible summaries of the situation that I've read, and I've read a lot lately. I'm linking to this entry in my journal, if that's ok.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]saintbryan, 2005-04-07 10:24 pm UTC

[info]peace873
2005-04-08 03:49 pm UTC (link)
This is truly a great essay. Thanks so much for putting this together and sharing it.
I wonder, however, (and I've been wondering for a while) if it is really advantageous to "us" (those who are aware of the problem) to educate those who are not considering how many people need to die for a few people to live.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]venuspluto, 2005-04-08 04:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-08 08:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]peace873, 2005-04-08 08:57 pm UTC
The point: reject the greening of hate before it seeps into your thought processes while you’re sl - [info]fallenarches, 2005-04-08 09:17 pm UTC
<