Mayhem Parva ([info]raincitygirl) wrote,
@ 2005-09-10 19:10:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: apathetic
Entry tags:bsg

Thoughts on BSG 2.08 and also Cylon notions of individuated self v. the collective self
Thoughts on BSG 2.08 and also Cylon notions of individuated self v. the collective self:

Hmmmm. Not sure one way or another how I feel about this ep. There was a ton of great stuff in it, but it didn't seem to fall into place as a coherent whole. The kind of ep I can see myself rewatching for certain terrific scenes and FF-ing through other bits, rather than rewatching the whole ep start to finish as I do when I really like an episode as a whole. It felt like some stuff had been left on the cutting room floor, and maybe that was why the end product was a bit disjointed. But as I said, some really great scenes.

Cutting for spoilers:

Interesting notes re: the movie theatre scene: Both the Boomer model and the Biers model use the word "I" when referring to another copy of their model. The Boomer (wearing the white cropped jacket we saw on a Boomer copy in the mini, and then again on the Boomer whom Turncoat-Boomer shot in the scene outside Koerner Library in Colonial Day. I guess that model really likes that jacket) first said "I", referring to Turncoat-Boomer, then amended it to "she" in her next line. But her gut reaction upon seeing her wayward 'twin' was to say "I". Maybe she said "she" after she got over the shock because Sharon rebelled and ran away, and she wanted to dissociate herself from a disloyal copy. Also, Caprica-Biers said "I" when referring to getting the information in the documentary and the deleted footage to Caprica by using those Raiders. But since Fleet-Biers can't be in the Fleet and on Caprica at the same time, Cap-Biers must be another copy of the same model.

Interesting that Sharon is the only model who consistently uses third person pronouns when referring to other copies of her model. And yet in Home Part II she says "I" when referring to Galactica-Boomer's memories of life on Galactica before the attacks. Maybe innocuous memories are easier for her to consider herself as sharing with other copies than current or recent events. She may be dissociating for practical reasons, given that Galactica-Boomer hardly endeared herself to the Colonials by shooting Adama. She says, "That wasn't me," or "They thought of her as a thing," or "They probably threw her in the brig." But this copy does consistently draw a line between herself as an individuated Sharon and the choices she's been making lately as a self-declared individual with free will, though she goes back to I for 'safe' things like fond memories. But she seems to be thinking more like a human, observing in Home Part II that it's "weird" she can remember Gal-Boomer's memories as though they happened to her. But the movie theatre scene suggests that it's not weird at all for Cylons, in fact it's commonplace.

Note: I don't know yet if this Sharon really does have free will. It's possible she has programming of which she is not yet aware (I doubt it, though, simply because they've gone that route already with Gal-Boomer). But the movie theatre scene suggests that at least one faction of Cylons were not expecting to see her on Galactica, and lends credence to the idea that she has been acting out of more-or-less benign motives. When I say more-or-less, it's because I don't think Sharon is on the Colonials' side. She's on the side of whoever will keep her lover and herself alive. I enjoyed the character's calculating sincerity in The Farm and Home Parts I and II. She makes very calculated moves in order to manipulate people into trusting her, but she is sincere in her intentions. Very like Roslin, "playing the religion card" in The Farm. Roslin genuinely believes the prophecy is true, but she still refers to it cynically, and uses it cynically. They both know that sometimes it's not enough simply to be sincere, you must also appear sincere.

But getting back to the CYlons and this notion of the collective self, note that it doesn't appear to go between different models. I think of the Cylon copies as being like identical twins. Genetically identical, and with extremely similar personalities, but gradually becoming distinguishable from one another as a result of their experiences. I'm betting the longer they're around the more idiosyncratic and individual they become. Note that Six-in-Baltar's-head was on a deep cover mission on Caprica for at least two years prior to the attacks, and as we've seen, she has a deep attachment (not a very healthy attachment, but definitely deep) to Gaius which none of the other Sixes seem to have. But how much do they share in the way of memories? I can buy Galactica-Boomer's memories all being accessible to all other copies, because she's a sleeper agent. She didn't know if what she was seeing is useful to the Cylon cause, so somebody has the job of sorting through her downloaded memories for the important stuff(maybe she was set to automatically download every time another Cylon came within a certain range?). Do non-sleeper copies of the same model share all their memories, though? There does seem to be an element of choice in the matter, given that Sharon was able to avoid being tracked by her handlers.

I wonder if the Sharon now on Galactica has memories from all the Boomer copies. Or do they merely download useful information? If one copy works in a 'farm' and learns a lot about reproductive medical technology, or flies Raptors, or studies scripture, or builds neutron bombs, is that knowledge shared with all the other copies so only one of them has to go through the process of learning it in person? That would make them easy to replace. Obviously the theoretical knowledge might not be enough to flawlessly step into a role which involves manual dexterity, but certainly any training time would be sufficiently reduced.

Is sharing emotions and unimportant experiences (unimportant in the sense of furthering Cylon goals) with other copies technically optional but strongly encouraged, so as to encourage loyalty and the sense of the collective self? Did they even have a concept of loyalty before Sharon's defection? I mean, as far as we know she's the first Cylon who knows what she is (and always has known it) who has chosen to betray her 'siblings'. She prioritized her lover's life over the Plan, and presumably is intending to raise her child (the baby Six-in-Baltar's-head refers to as her own baby, suggesting the Cylons think of it as belonging to all of them) among the enemy. Do they even have a frame of reference to understand such behaviour? And will such behaviour happen more often, maybe in other copies? We've already seen that Six-in-Baltar's-head does not always appear to be 'on message'. However, unlike with Sharon, the other Cylons don't seem to be aware that her loyalty is questionable. Yet, anyway. Human 'contamination' seems to be a pretty important factor in developing a sense of selfishness, indeed a sense of self as apart from the other copies of one's model.

Also, while Cylons seem to have a childlike view of romantic and sexual love, do they have a sense of sibling-type love? If they're that close to other copies of their own model, do they experience nurturing from the other copies? Remember, they have no parents to provide nurturing. In KLG Part II when Gal-Boomer was confronted with what I like to call The Whole Bloody Chorus Line of Boomers, they said they loved her. Do Cylons turn to other copies of their own model for emotional support, or do they try and suppress their need for it, and behave efficiently?

Note: Lucy Lawless is a very beautiful woman. That having been said, however, she should not try to be a blonde. Her hair looked brassy. Sadly, I had been spoiled for the big reveal re: her true nature, so that didn't come as a surprise. Grrrr. I wasn't spoiled on purpose, you understand. I've never watched Xena, so I don't know much about her as an actress, but I liked what she did.

I liked Tigh's ordeal, and the way he dealt with it. He's a deeply flawed man, but he's not a coward. And strangely enough, he and Ellen seem to genuinely love each other, in their own toxic, Baltar-and-Six-type way. Ellen may well cheat on him for the sake of sexual variety, and push him to make 'bold' career decisions (and sweetie, you're not smart enough to play with the big kids. You try for Lady Macbeth, but you don't have her brains or grasp of strategic realities), but she was genuinely worried for him. I still think they should get a divorce and stay the hell away from each other, because that is one frakked-up marriage and they bring out the worst in each other, but I'm starting to see what keeps them together as well as what should keep them apart.

I very much liked the way continuing fallout from the Gideon is affecting relations between Galactica and the rest of the fleet. It makes sense that it would,b ut it's nice to see a show with good continuity. Adama's non-reaction (in the sense of an investigation or disciplinary action) is consistent with his usual desire to ignore situations he dislikes until they shut up and go away. But the point first made in Litmus that he can't afford to discipline competent personnel for infractions because he needs them doing their jobs is re-emphasized, both with Adama's own reactions, and other crew members pointing out that there is no relief, they need every trained body they have.

I'm also annoyed that we didn't get a scene in which the Fleet's PTB (i.e. Roslin, Adama, and Co.) discussed the improbability of a human managing to impregnate a Cylon, given that the Cylons are supposed to be a whole separate species, and by the way, synthetically created, though from biological materials! I'm stealing this line from someone else but it's odd how in Home they were perfectly willing to accept the unlikely tale that she was pregnant, while highly skeptical of the slightly more likely tale that she had changed sides. I mean, given that the Cylons were TRYING to get her pregnant, you'd think TPTB could muster a little bit of worry about what this development could mean. Nothing the Cylons do on purpose has worked out very well for the humans so far, after all.

Also, why wasn't Adama worried that Biers would talk in public about Galactica's resident Cylon even after he took what he thought was the tape in question? I mean, she could've gone on the air and said, "There's a Cylon on Galactica and the military is conspiring to keep it a secret. I had footage but they confiscated it." He seemed to think it was game over as soon as he had physical possession of the tape. Why not simply answer Biers by saying, "We're not harbouring her, she's a prisoner, and we're keeping her presence on board classified for good reason. Kindly forget you saw her, please." instead of just doing the Stare of Death.

I loved that a civilian character was allowed to say that they disliked their patriotism being brought into question just because they happened to disagree with the military or the civilian government on an issue. LOVED! It's a shame the character who got to say that turned out to be a bad guy, though, because it lessens the impact.

So what's the deal with Turncoat-Boomer? Is Sharon telepathic now, capable of beaming distress signals into Helo's brain even when she's all woozy from blood loss? He looked freaked out from the moment he arrived, and presumably visiting hours aren't usually in the middle of the night.

How come she didn't have so much as spotting when she spent most of her first trimester hiking cross-country, hauling Helo through sewers, getting SHOT, hiking cross-country some more, stealing a heavy Raider, getting thrown against walls, wrestling a guy for a grenade launcher, hiking through ravines in pneumonia-inducing conditions, and getting thrown down onto the ground and strangled, but now suddenly she starts haemmoraging for no reason at all? It seemed like they just tacked on those scenes without any context so they could have the movie theatre scene on Caprica in the end. Were there other scenes which got cut for length?

From the movie theatre scene it appears as though Six-in-Baltar's-head has been less than forthcoming with her buddies elsewhere. Maybe she's off the reservation, and not transmitting all the info she knows back to the others. ORemember, prior to Sharon being brought to sickbay, very few people would've probably known she was onboard. That info would've likely been VERY classified. Maybe that particular Six wants to keep the BoomerBaby for herself. Sharon and Helo should both watch their backs once that kid's born, because methinks Six will find them disposable.

Events in 33, Six Degrees of Separation, and KLG suggest Six has some level of communication with other Cylons, but apparently she hasn't been giving them all the info she has. How, I wonder, did she know about Sharon's pregnancy and predict that Sharon would be in that cell? Presumably her pregnancy has been common knowledge at the Cylon parties for a while. Note the Cylons in the movie theatre weren't surprised she was pregnant, just surprised she was still alive and on Galactica.

Maybe Six-in-Baltar's-head knew Sharon was on Kobol because she was the closest other Cylon around, and correctly predicted that after the fleet was reunited, they'd put Sharon in the cell designed for her dead 'twin'. Sharon says she's not "wired in" and this ep would suggest she was telling the truth. Maybe, though, she communicated by accident (dropped her concentration or something? I wish we knew how Cylon communication worked) and Six, being relatively close by, was the only one who picked up on it. Or maybe Six-in-Baltar's-head is communicating with only one faction of the Cylons, and the ones in the movie theatre are in a different faction. Or Six-in-Baltar's-head is making predictions based on a prophecy.

It's all very mysterious.

Cross-posting to [info]13th_colony and [info]hidden_elysium




(Post a new comment)


[info]meret
2005-09-11 06:21 am UTC (link)
In KLG Part II when Gal-Boomer was confronted with what I like to call The Whole Bloody Chorus Line of Boomers, they said they loved her.

I've always wondered if all those naked Boomers were having orgies in their free time. *g*

And strangely enough, he and Ellen seem to genuinely love each other, in their own toxic, Baltar-and-Six-type way.

I was impressed/surprised by that too.

My current theory about 6 is that Baltar is a cylon but doesn't know he is. He's gone nuts from teh guilt of being responsible for the cylons breaking the humans defense network, and 6 is the psychotic manifestation of his cylon programming trying to get through to him.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]solarbird
2005-09-11 07:02 am UTC (link)
I have something that's not so much as a "theory" but speculation.

The original series is a combination of history and mythology for the new series. As the original series went on, they started getting heavily into some weird variants on Mormon mysticism, and actually encountered some very high-powered (godlike) beings who were playing out conflicts on higher levels, but using the humans (and possibly the Cylons) as part of that contest. (Not a unique idea, but go with me here.)

It's possible we're seeing some of the first hints of that here. The Cylons have a religion. They had to come up with it somewhere I suggest that perhaps as they left known Colonial space, they found something - or more correctly, perhaps, something found them.

And maybe that "something" calls itself, at least to the Cylons, the one true God.

If all that is true, then it's entirely possible that Baltar!Six really is a direct agent of that entity, whatever it is. Not a Cylon at all, but an extension of the same power that has been influencing the Cylons since they left the Colonies after the (First) Cylon War.

This would explain several things. It would explain why she's given Baltar data about Cylon culture - correct data - that Baltar didn't already know and had no way of knowing, helping rule out the "he's just nuts" theory.

Another element helping rule the "nutso" theory out: in the cell sequence episode before last, where suddenly Six goes all Starbuck on him, we see parts of that scene from an external-observer standpoint. Note that when Six moves the chair she was sitting on, the external-observer standpoint shows the chair as having moved. That's physical impact. And it was shot and framed really carefully, so I don't think it was an accident. This also provides evidence against the chip-in-the-head-they-can't-find theory. I think, in both cases.

So I don't think that's something the Cylons can do. I begin to think that we're heading into that phase of the plot, and she might actually be an "angel" of this Cylon god.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]meret
2005-09-11 10:15 am UTC (link)
she might actually be an "angel" of this Cylon god

You may be right, but personally, I really hope they don't go there. That's one of the reasons I hope Sharon has a miscarriage. I vaguely remember the star-child stuff and higher beings from the first one, didn't like it, and don't want to see them do it on this show.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]solarbird
2005-09-11 04:00 pm UTC (link)
Oh, I don't think for a second that's where they're going with Sharon's kid - okay, I worried about it for a second. But that's all.

The thing is - in the original, they genuinely were Higher Beings (tm), in that deeply religious sense. But I sincerely doubt they'll go that way again, because, well, that goes against the way they do things in this series. But a powerful sapient force of some sort? I could see that. Particularly if, say, they've read A Fire in the Deep. It could be really cool.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]raincitygirl
2005-09-11 10:04 pm UTC (link)
What is A Fire in the Deep?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]solarbird
2005-09-12 04:26 am UTC (link)
This book, by Vernor Vinge. Read it. Read it now. You know you want to.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]raincitygirl
2005-09-11 10:00 pm UTC (link)
Ooh, interestinger and interestinger. Now, I never watched the original series, and all I know about Mormonism is that it was featured in Angels in America and Eliza Dushku was raised as one. And the US Senate's minority leader is one. Hey, I know three things about Mormonism!

It's quite possible that something found them (good distinction there) out in deep space. They clearly have scriptures and commandments with which the Colonials are unfamiliar, as well as using Colonial scriptures, so where did they get the new stuff about the One True God and how to best worship Him? It could also explain how their technology is so far advanced compared with the Colonials' (granted, a fair bit of the Colonials' relatively primitive level of technology can be traced to de-technologizing to protect themselves as a result of the First Cylon War, and to apparent governmental bans on certain types of scientific research).

Another element helping rule the "nutso" theory out: in the cell sequence episode before last, where suddenly Six goes all Starbuck on him, we see parts of that scene from an external-observer standpoint. Note that when Six moves the chair she was sitting on, the external-observer standpoint shows the chair as having moved. That's physical impact. And it was shot and framed really carefully, so I don't think it was an accident. This also provides evidence against the chip-in-the-head-they-can't-find theory. I think, in both cases.

I had been thinking that Six was a "chip" of a type Colonial medical technology couldn't pick up (if it takes such elaborate testing to determine Cylon from human, when Cylons clearly have more advanced brain capacity than humans, a "chip" could actually be nanotechnology or some sort of biological 'wetware'.

But your point about the chair moving is an excellent one I hadn't noticed. If Six-in-Baltar's-head IS a manifestation of the being the Cylons think of as God, I'm willing to bet it's not a totally benign deity, though. And may not even be a deity at all, may be a lifeform significantly more advanced than either the Colonials or the Cylons. Another commenter to this entry theorized that maybe the Gods of Kobol were also examples of this advanced lifeform.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]solarbird
2005-09-11 10:14 pm UTC (link)
If Six-in-Baltar's-head IS a manifestation of the being the Cylons think of as God, I'm willing to bet it's not a totally benign deity, though.
Um - yeah. I think that's quite clear.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]raincitygirl
2005-09-11 11:01 pm UTC (link)
On the other hand, if this Six *isn't* a manifestation of the Cylon God, then it's perfectly possible that the scriptures and commandments are ambiguous, and have been misinterpreted by the Cylons. I mean, if "Be fruitful" is one of the commandments, well, that's not quite the same thing "Be fruitful by trying to use human women as comatose lab rats" or "Be fruitful by convincing a human to fall in love with one of your agents, but if he shows the slightest sign of independent thought once he's fallen in love, order said agent to kill him".

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]solarbird
2005-09-11 11:12 pm UTC (link)
There's been on-screen talk about how the Cylons are supposed to eliminate their god's one mistake: humanity. Tasty genocide!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]raincitygirl
2005-09-11 11:27 pm UTC (link)
You mean Ragnar Leoben, right? But Flesh & Bone Leoben indicated that both Cylons and humans have souls, according to their theology. Maybe genocide is okay because the humans worship false idols and thus their souls are already damned, according to said theology.

It looks like at least one faction of the Cylons wants the remaining humans kept alive (or at least most of them). They keep nibbling at the edges, keeping the Fleet from getting complacent, keeping them in crisis mode at all times, but they don't appear to want them all to die. Or maybe one faction does want them all dead, while another faction wants some of them to survive for observation purposes (the Cylons seem to be conducting a similar sociological experiment on the Fleet as they did on Helo, except on a much larger scale of course) and to help create a new race of hybrids. Six's "the end of the human race" was ambiguous, as so much of what Six says is. It could refer to genocide, or it could refer to the end of the human race as it is now and the beginning of a new race.

It's all a big question mark. Which is why I love this show! Lots of ambiguity, moral and otherwise.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]raincitygirl
2005-09-11 09:46 pm UTC (link)
I've always wondered if all those naked Boomers were having orgies in their free time. *g*

Giggle.

My current theory about 6 is that Baltar is a cylon but doesn't know he is. He's gone nuts from teh guilt of being responsible for the cylons breaking the humans defense network, and 6 is the psychotic manifestation of his cylon programming trying to get through to him.

Ooh, interesting theory.


(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]faroutgal
2005-09-11 02:37 pm UTC (link)
"I'm also annoyed that we didn't get a scene in which the Fleet's PTB (i.e. Roslin, Adama, and Co.) discussed the improbability of a human managing to impregnate a Cylon, given that the Cylons are supposed to be a whole separate species, and by the way, synthetically created, though from biological materials"

Yes! Remember when GalBoomer was being hauled off, the Chief was upset because they were going to experiment on her. Find out what she actually was. What happened to that mission?

Why haven't we had somekind of pow wow with the Doc about Sharon and experimentation...finding out what a bio Cylon is, how can a human/cylon pregnancy be possible? Why hasn't she been interrogated about the cylon purpose? Remember Leoben? Maybe I'm just chomping at the bit too early.

I was also intrigued that Sharon said "i'm still alive". I wonder if a cylon's sense of self is altered if the individual is removed from the collective. So within the collective the "I" actually means "we". But away from the collective, a cylon realizes an individual self. It seems very borg like and I wonder if these "self realized" cylons could infect the whole.

I also noted Six's childlike admiration for the human's resilency. This Six seemed not as bitter as the others we've encountered. It seems that Cylons are conflicted when it comes to humans. They think they are too violent to continue, that they are blasphemous. Sharon has conveyed a sense that humans are limited..inferior. And so they wipe them out..leaving a small group alive for purpose unknown. And yet, Sharon loves Helo, Six loves Baltar. Six admires their resilency. Humans are their parents and they need them to procreate (how oedipal is that?!). Ultimately, its not rational which is ironic since they are "machines".

I think solarbird may have something about another race intervening with the Cylons. Sharon made a refence to Athena, something like...."whatever she was"...indicating that she was not a god but not a human. I don't think this is a throw away line.


Ach! when I think about cylons it makes me dizzy!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]raincitygirl
2005-09-11 11:46 pm UTC (link)
I was also intrigued that Sharon said "i'm still alive". I wonder if a cylon's sense of self is altered if the individual is removed from the collective. So within the collective the "I" actually means "we". But away from the collective, a cylon realizes an individual self. It seems very borg like and I wonder if these "self realized" cylons could infect the whole.

I think they already are infecting them. Note Cap-Six and Cap-Doral's conversation at the end of Tigh Me Up, Tigh Me Down, and their distress and envy. And they hadn't even had direct contact with a human. Also, in the Farm, it's indicated that Simon isn't 100% happy with a decision re: Starbuck. Neither of these incidents show enough self-realization to drive those Cylons to reject the collective goals, but they're certainly a start.

I imagine that the Cylons who are immersed in the collective still have free will (otherwise how could the human-"infected" ones exercise said free will), but they keep getting positive reinforcement to be good Cylons and do as they're told by their fellows. Once they're on their own, having to make independent decisions, having highly individuated experiences (i.e. two Sharon copies who have different jobs on the Cylon homeworld are having different experiences, but not to nearly the same extent as, say, Pregnant-Sharon versus the copy in the movie theatre). And good point about how this Six seems impressed by the humans' resilience.

Another good point re: Athena. Re: wiping them out, maybe they want to achieve parity of numbers, or maybe they have some notion that those who survive the initial holocaust (and the vast majority survived through luck) are somehow more worthy than the rest, marked by God or something. Because at least one faction of Cylons doesn't appear to want to actually wipe them all out.

I don't know that total rationality is possible even in an artificially intelligent mind. The Cylons seem to have a high degree of free will and independent decision-making ability. Which makes sense purely from a practical point of view. You don't want them running to the collective every time they have to figure out which colour paper clips to use. It'd be incredibly time consuming and make them useless as independent actors when and if they were separated from the collective either by accident or design. But the more complex a system is, and a system with free will would be pretty darn complex, the more opportunity there is for unanticipated effects to influence the system. So they could have the capacity for emotional response built in even by accident.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ravenstarwind
2005-09-11 03:47 pm UTC (link)
Ultimately, its not rational which is ironic since they are "machines".
Has everyone forgotten the phrase "garbage in, garbage out"? It's an old programming term, meaning a machine is only as good as it's programming. Instructions are followed literally to the letter.

Back on topic: It seems like the more intense the contact with humans, the more individual the copy becomes. Both Baltar!Six and Sharon obviously have their own agendas. Both apparently love their humans. Perhaps love is the key not only to procreation, but to Cylon individuality as well.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]raincitygirl
2005-09-11 11:53 pm UTC (link)
Maybe their programming is too complex for them to be able to predict that they might have emotional responses and individuation. I don't know that total rationality is possible even in an artificially intelligent mind. The Cylons seem to have a high degree of free will and independent decision-making ability. Which makes sense purely from a practical point of view. You don't want them running to the collective every time they have to figure out which colour paper clips to use. It'd be incredibly time consuming and make them useless as independent actors when and if they were separated from the collective either by accident or design. But the more complex a system is, and a system with free will would be pretty darn complex, the more opportunity there is for unanticipated effects to influence the system. So they could have the capacity for emotional response built in even by accident.

Good point about the intensity of the contact with humans being connected to the degree of individuation. Romantic love is probably a very new thing to the Cylons, so it's no wonder those who experience it are fundamentally changed by it. They seem to have love of their siblings and love of God, but romantic love would be uncharted territory.

So, perhaps is parental love. Sharon originally wanted to get pregnant to fulfil the collective desire to obey God's commandment. But I doubt that when her baby is born she'll want to hand it over to a collective. She'll likely want to raise it herself, and even if she hadn't defected she'd probably feel that way. Maybe if more Cylons are able to get pregnant or father children in the future, they too will have a very individuated love for their children. Not to mention that as their children grow up, they'll have an influence on the Cylons around them. Because they're born and not made, nobody's going to know in advance what their baseline personalities will be, unlike with copies of the twelve models, who all seem to start out the same.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ar_feiniel_
2005-09-11 06:15 pm UTC (link)
But this copy does consistently draw a line between herself as an individuated Sharon and the choices she's been making lately as a self-declared individual with free will, though she goes back to I for 'safe' things like fond memories.

Good observation! Sharon definately mixes around the pronouns a lot...but there does seem to be a pattern.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]raincitygirl
2005-09-12 05:41 am UTC (link)
The pattern definitely seems to be that she's starting to think of herself as an individual. It's odd, though, that we haven't seen any grief from her at having made herself an outcast among her own people. She must be lonely, but perhaps the independence is worth it. And given that romantic love seems to be pretty new for Cylons, the emotion is probably quite intoxicating.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

I'm sorry I don't have an LJ.
(Anonymous)
2005-09-11 07:01 pm UTC (link)
In Litmus the suicide-bomber-Doral was probably headed for Baltar's lab. This idea shocks Baltar as Six originally told him to build the cylon detector. Six says, "Yes, but they don't know about me or our life together."

I don't think this Six-in-Baltar's-Head is wired in either. How she knows the future, I don't know. But I also don't know how Leoben knew they would find Kobol and then Earth. Perhaps they really do see the "foreshadowing that precedes every moment."

Forgive bad physics, but I believe that the reason it's impossible to predict the future is that we have no way of measuring where particles, etc., are without knocking them off course, and we have no way of knowing when a particle will pop into existence. If these conditions were not true, the future could be predicted.

Just a thought. Thanks for the really interesting essay.

Rebecca.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: I'm sorry I don't have an LJ.
[info]raincitygirl
2005-09-11 11:15 pm UTC (link)
Maybe Leoben knew because the Cylons (or one faction thereof) were *herding* the humans towards Kobol. The actions of Cap-Six in KLG Part 2 strongly suggest that the Cylons wanted Starbuck to get the Arrow of Apollo. The Raptors were doing recon, making jumps to nearby star systems to look for supply sources and/or planets. If you have a Cylon agent on Galactica, they could send them a Raptor team to Kobol and make them think it was luck that they found a habitable planet so quickly. A lot of people have pointed out that in KLG Part 1 when Gal-Boomer and Crashdown find Kobol, Boomer indicates that Gaeta gave them the coordinates. Some people have theorized that Gaeta is a Cylon. Now, going on the Agatha Christie theory that it's never the obvious suspect, I personally doubt that. But someone involved in plotting coordinates could be a Cylon, or Gal-Boomer could've had another blackout and stuck that particular set of coordinates in with the others Gaeta later gave her and Crashdown.

In Litmus the suicide-bomber-Doral was probably headed for Baltar's lab. This idea shocks Baltar as Six originally told him to build the cylon detector. Six says, "Yes, but they don't know about me or our life together."

Yeah, but events in Six Degrees of Separation and KLG suggest some level of coordination between Six-in-Baltar's-head and the other Cylons. They don't *prove* said coordination, so it's possible they don't realize Six is there, but it's also quite possible that they do, and she's simply not telling them everything she knows b/c she wants to keep the baby to herself. Moore & Co. have left it ambiguous. Solarbird has suggested upthread that Six-in-Baltar's-head isn't a "chip", but a manifestation of the advanced entity the Cylons call God.

I don't think this Six-in-Baltar's-Head is wired in either. How she knows the future, I don't know. But I also don't know how Leoben knew they would find Kobol and then Earth. Perhaps they really do see the "foreshadowing that precedes every moment."

Forgive bad physics, but I believe that the reason it's impossible to predict the future is that we have no way of measuring where particles, etc., are without knocking them off course, and we have no way of knowing when a particle will pop into existence. If these conditions were not true, the future could be predicted.


I don't think the Cylons can actually see the future. I do think, though, that they are clever enough to use their superior knowledge base and their ability to herd the humans to give the impression that they can see the future. I could be wrong on this, but as you say, correctly predicting the future is extremely difficult. I like the logical explanation versus the mystical one every time. Ex: I'm okay with love being the missing ingredient in the Cylons' unsuccessful 'farm' breeding program, provided we're eventually told that some chemical produced by Cylon bodies when they're very happy must be present during conception or implantation for them to be fertile. Because that's a logical explanation. It may not be logical in the real world, but it makes sense if you assume the existence of Cylons and various other things not present in the real world.

P.S. You can get a LiveJournal for free, you know.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: I'm sorry I don't have an LJ.
(Anonymous)
2005-09-12 07:38 am UTC (link)
I know I can - I probably should. I don't mean to be rude, posting anonymously. There are a couple of reasons I'm not so keen on it, and normally, I strictly lurk. But I really loved your essay. If I find myself posting again, I'll probably sign up.

You make good points about Six Degrees. And yes, she is an unreliable narrator. I've never been sure whether she orchestrated Shelley Godfrey's appearance, whether she simply made use of it, or whether she *was* Shelley Godfrey (perhaps transmitting her consciousness from Gaius' head to a "spare" body in the fleet?) Any of those would be believable to me.

I also agree that the cylons are herding the humans and that's the most likely explanation for how Leoben knows what will happen. I just like mysticism too much. I hope that there isn't an external entity the cylons think of as a god. I like the ambivalence, that actually, the cylon religion is just as valid as the humans'. Making the god something that's not a god, just an advanced being, pulls a little bit of a Stargate and invalidates the religion. JMHO.

Rebecca.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: I'm sorry I don't have an LJ.
[info]raincitygirl
2005-09-15 05:43 am UTC (link)
Making the god something that's not a god, just an advanced being, pulls a little bit of a Stargate and invalidates the religion. JMHO.


Mmm, good point. I like the way it's kept ambiguous. Making it an advanced being who gets worshipped as a god is kind of a copout. It wouldnt' necessarily be a copout on a show like Stargate, but BSG is a different type of show, different type of attitude towards religion in general.

Okay, new theory. Just over forty years ago the armistice is agreed. The Cylons head out into deep space looking for a new home. Let's say they find Kobol. And on Kobol they find texts which refer to the 12 Lords of Kobol, but talk about false idols, the one true God, etc. Actually, it doesn't even have to be Kobol. They could find 'em anyplace, but Kobol seems logical, since they obviously know where it is. Maybe the texts say the one true god abandoned Kobol and left only the texts behind. So they set out and find another home planet, along the way studying this god stuff very carefully. And pretty soon they go from spiritual questioning to full-blown religion, springing from the religion of their Colonial "parents", but rejecting its central tenets.

If what they find isn't a being but information, that leaves it vague enough that we don't really know who wrote this stuff down and why.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]igglewiggle
2005-09-11 11:36 pm UTC (link)
great essay. and in relation to baltar!six:
there's an interesting bit--in the episode where Doral2 blows himself up--that baltar's freaking out, thinking he's been found out, and six notes, "they don't know about me or us or our life together." so it would seem that six hasn't been transmitting any information at all, though she may well be receiving it.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]raincitygirl
2005-09-12 05:43 am UTC (link)
Yeah, I remember that bit in Litmus, but I'm not sure Six is a reliable narrator. Events in Six Degrees of Separation would imply some level of collusion between her and other Cylons. Events in other eps where she seems prescient could be put down to her receiving info but not transmitting it, but Six Degrees is a toughie.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Hi Raincitygirl
[info]weissman
2005-09-12 01:27 pm UTC (link)
To raincitygirl, morning

Hi There , Morning, I loved reading your esay. Here are my thoughs, basically we agree on everything.

Some basic things I believe
Cylon have emotions, they are for the most part undeveloped and because of that they have very lttle understanding of what love means. In addition even though the cylons we see are adults, they really don’t have very muck life experience, so to speak, in some way they are very childlike.

For the cylons world view to work, they can’t think of themselvs as individuals because then they would not be able to function the way they are asked to function. ( In a word what that means is that the individuals life has no value or any value beyond a specific purpose, that’s basically what they did to C-Sharon)


“They probably threw her in the brig." But this copy does consistently draw a line between herself as an individuated Sharon and the choices she's been making lately as a self-declared individual with free will, though she goes back to I for 'safe' things like fond memories. But she seems to be thinking more like a human, observing in Home Part II that it's "weird" she can remember Gal-Boomer's memories as though they happened to her. But the movie theatre scene suggests that it's not weird at all for Cylons, in fact it's commonplace.”

I belive that C-Sharon was initially created for a very specif purpose, to make Helo fall in love with her and then get pregnant. Once she spent time with Helo, and felt what it was like have have somebody love her and then love that perosn in return, that basically destroyed her cylon world view and she started to adopt a human world view. Remembering what I said above about, the cylons don’t have very muchk life experience, the more time they are alive the more human they become, and the more they exist to serve the own individual motives. (That’s what I belive is going on with the Six in Baltars head, either that or he is just nuts)


“But the movie theatre scene suggests that at least one faction of Cylons were not expecting to see her on Galactica, and lends credence to the idea that she has been acting out of more-or-less benign motives. When I say more-or-less, it's because I don't think Sharon is on the Colonials' side. She's on the side of whoever will keep her lover and herself alive.”

Speaking in a larger sense, that’s all anybody can ask of anybody. Why do being is Helo and the baby is a noble a motive as any.

“I think of the Cylon copies as being like identical twins. Genetically identical, and with extremely similar personalities, but gradually becoming distinguishable from one another as a result of their experiences. I'm betting the longer they're around the more idiosyncratic and individual they become”

That’s is nails on, and creates a baisc flaw in the cylon psyche. They all think of themselves in the sense of we. As stated by the Sharon model in the theater scene when she said “I am alive” that’s how they think initially. The longer a particular model (person) is alive the more that becomes an” I”.

MY two cents, in this case probably five cents…

Bob Weissman- Hooah!

By the way where is rain city ?

(Reply to this)

Hi
[info]weissman
2005-09-12 01:29 pm UTC (link)
To raincitygirl, morning

Hi There , Morning, I loved reading your esay. Here are my thoughs, basically we agree on everything.

Some basic things I believe
Cylon have emotions, they are for the most part undeveloped and because of that they have very lttle understanding of what love means. In addition even though the cylons we see are adults, they really don’t have very muck life experience, so to speak, in some way they are very childlike.

For the cylons world view to work, they can’t think of themselvs as individuals because then they would not be able to function the way they are asked to function. ( In a word what that means is that the individuals life has no value or any value beyond a specific purpose, that’s basically what they did to C-Sharon)


“They probably threw her in the brig." But this copy does consistently draw a line between herself as an individuated Sharon and the choices she's been making lately as a self-declared individual with free will, though she goes back to I for 'safe' things like fond memories. But she seems to be thinking more like a human, observing in Home Part II that it's "weird" she can remember Gal-Boomer's memories as though they happened to her. But the movie theatre scene suggests that it's not weird at all for Cylons, in fact it's commonplace.”

I belive that C-Sharon was initially created for a very specif purpose, to make Helo fall in love with her and then get pregnant. Once she spent time with Helo, and felt what it was like have have somebody love her and then love that perosn in return, that basically destroyed her cylon world view and she started to adopt a human world view. Remembering what I said above about, the cylons don’t have very muchk life experience, the more time they are alive the more human they become, and the more they exist to serve the own individual motives. (That’s what I belive is going on with the Six in Baltars head, either that or he is just nuts)


“But the movie theatre scene suggests that at least one faction of Cylons were not expecting to see her on Galactica, and lends credence to the idea that she has been acting out of more-or-less benign motives. When I say more-or-less, it's because I don't think Sharon is on the Colonials' side. She's on the side of whoever will keep her lover and herself alive.”

Speaking in a larger sense, that’s all anybody can ask of anybody. Why do being is Helo and the baby is a noble a motive as any.

“I think of the Cylon copies as being like identical twins. Genetically identical, and with extremely similar personalities, but gradually becoming distinguishable from one another as a result of their experiences. I'm betting the longer they're around the more idiosyncratic and individual they become”

That’s is nails on, and creates a baisc flaw in the cylon psyche. They all think of themselves in the sense of we. As stated by the Sharon model in the theater scene when she said “I am alive” that’s how they think initially. The longer a particular model (person) is alive the more that becomes an” I”.

MY two cents, in this case probably five cents…

Bob Weissman- Hooah!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Hi
(Anonymous)
2005-09-12 02:39 pm UTC (link)
sorry this ended up being posted twice , DAM govenment computers

hahaah

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]iteagle03
2005-09-13 04:58 am UTC (link)
Icon

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]raincitygirl
2005-09-15 05:45 am UTC (link)
Thanks! It's shareable, provided you give keyword credit to [info]infinitemonkeys and shoot him an email letting him know you're using it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…