Economics, Politics & Panic - A Rant!
Sep. 25th, 2008 | 03:01 pm
I have largely come to the conclusion that abdicating from the world of matter and men may be the very best thing a warrior can do - though I am fairly certain many here will disagree at some level. And yet...
Several years ago, it began to occur to me that I had essentially become segregated from the world and, as a result, from most people. At first, I experienced a small amount of alarm at this realization - I have no friends by the traditional definition, no social groups with whom I interact regularly (or even irregularly), nor do I watch television, listen to the radio, or go to church. My initial reaction to that observation was to scold myself - "Self, you've become a hermit! Not only do you not HAVE any friends, you do not appear to MISS having friends!"
And yet...
When I was brutally honest with myself, I also came to realize that this seemingly "sad" state of affairs had been arrived at solely through my own choices AND my own desires. And, perhaps worst of all, I was and AM quite content with this. In other words, it wasn't that I had "lost" all my friends, or even lost interest in the world at large. More accurately, I have found that once a warrior sees through the illusions, delusions, political dramas, world wars, pseudo-terrorism, economic crises and the like, the warrior has a tendency to end up living somewhere in an isolated environment, not unlike don Juan and his little shack in the desert. And, in my opinion, that is a good thing in the grand scheme of things if one is truly serious about BE-ING a warrior, as opposed to just talking like a warrior.
I can honestly say that I would know nothing of the current economic crisis (oh, those fearful words!) if others had not brought it to my attention. That's one of the perks of not being plugged into the consensus reality through the comforting teat of the terror-tube. Gives new meaning to the old cliche - "What we don't know won't hurt us." *heh* And, again, I'm fairly certain many here will raise the argument of "Forearmed is forearmed," or something to the effect...
And yet...
Over the past year, our business has continued to do well, even though we are what might be called a "luxury"-based business - IOW, the things we sell are definitely NOT essentials. Clothing, jewelry, little indulgences for the kiddies... absolutely nothing of value whatsoever. And obviously, those are the types of business which are the first to fail in a bad economy.
So I ask myself... to what extent does my own mindset contribute to all of this? In other words, had I been more aware of "The Economic Crisis" (be afraid, be very afraid), is it possible that my own fears would have caused me to take a different course of action, and perhaps ended up thwarting myself in the process? For example, a lot of our acquaintances in the business have said they "cannot afford to restock" because they are essentially hoarding what little money they make for "survival". On the other hand, Wendy and I have restocked freely over the past few months (even moreso than usual, it seems), and as a result, we have the merchandise to offer to customers, whereas our competitors may be beginning to appear shopworn - IOW, victims of their own fears. By failing to restock, a self-fulfilling prophecy comes into being... and I have to wonder if it ever would have happened in that manner had they NOT been so keenly aware of that Economic Crisis (be afraid, be very VERY afraid!)
We like to tell ourselves that awareness is always the key - and, indeed, that is a true statement. And yet... when stalking the consensus reality, it certainly seems to me that there are times when one simply needs to walk away from the fear, turn a deaf ear to the blathering media, ignore all the predictions of doom and gloom by the analysts, and simply DO the right thing in whatever one's individual position might be. It's when we start living in fear that we start hoarding - so the seeds for next year's harvest may be squirreled away for times of famine, and one has to ask, is the famine even REAL at the level where we ourselves exist? And if the seeds are never planted, where will next year's crops come from?
I've said before, with regard to politics, that I no longer vote, nor do I give a fat rat's patootie about who will end up in the white house in November. It isn't because I am an irresponsible fuck that I walked away from all of that - it's BECAUSE of the warrior-stalker's ever-present awareness, the brutal knowledge that my vote is not going to change the world, nor is yours. Idealistically, it could be argued otherwise. But reality has proven otherwise just within the past few years - i.e., the guy who actually WON the last election was shoved aside when the electoral college (aka "The Fixers") were called in to clean up the mess made by the American public (read: we didn't vote the way we were "supposta").
So... having clearly seen what happens when the people go against the powers that be, it just seems to me that ANY investment of energy in the process of voting or politics is entirely folly - and not the least bit "controlled" folly. Simple. Folly. Period. The ultimate no-win scenario. No matter which way you bend over, you're still going to get... well... you get the picture, yes?
Okay... that being the said, it also seems to me that this current Economic Crisis (run for the hills! pur your money in a sock! be afraid, be very very VERY afraid!) is being played up with all the usual pomp and circumstance that precedes any major election, but may not be any more "real" than the gas shortage of '73 or the notion of a lone gunman in the Kennedy assassination. I mean - really! - what would happen if they gave a crisis and nobody bought into it? What would happen if we all just turned off our television sets and went about our day to day affairs as if none of it were happening?
Well, Della, that's a bit naive, isn't it?
I dunno. IS it? My point here is simply this: are there times when too much information - particularly too much FALSE information - may actually cause us to panic, and in our panic, create that self-fulfilling prophecy which says, "The sky is falling!?" IOW, would the sky fall at all if everyone could just carry on, doing their impeccable best, rather than trying to speculate and prepare for some imagined crisis that seems to be far more of shell game for the power brokers than anything else? We hear terms like bail-out and economic collapse and the like, but is there anything we can actually DO about it? Pull our money out of banks and stick it in the mattress? And, what would that solve? And what other problems would it create in the big picture? Self-fulfilling prophecies are the most dangerous of all, for there is a certain grim satisfaction in being able to say, "See, I told you so!" And yet... somehow I don't think I'd feel right predicting the sinking of a ship if I then went out and sank the ship just so I COULD say, "see... told you so!"
The point is simply this. Do. Not. Engage.
Or, if you are going to insist on believing that your vote matters or your awareness of every detail of The Economic Downfall of America is going to somehow make you a better person, then at least try to keep it in perspective. A warrior's perspective. Which states, very simply: "In a thousand years, it won't make any difference."
Folly.
There are some who do not like to acknowledge that everything in our world is folly, because once we acknowledge that, it is a huge blow to our ego, and often a crushing blow to our self-importance. We want-to-believe we are going to make a difference, our vote will count, rah rah rah and wave the flag for freedom, but the ultimate (and ugly) reality is that we'd might as well be playing with Monopoly money and moving our litle chits along the board game of Life.
A grim outlook? Hardly! When a warrior is finally able to *see* that it's all just a crazy game, there is a sense of freedom which goes beyond the ability of words to express. Sure, I still maintain my responsibilities to my life, my family and the things I care about - but I do so largely BECAUSE I am "in" this world, but no longer "part" of this world. I make no apologies. I feel no remorse. I don't accept guilt trips. I simply do not find it beneficial or productive to "care" about the things I cannot change, particularly when it is so blatantly obvious that the problems which have been created at the highest possible level will not be solved as a result of me turning my attention to it.
I realize (and respect) that there are many warriors out there who believe that our "involvement" in such things are part of the path, but that has not been the case for me, and to be brutally honest, I'm not sure it's the case for anyone who is wholly committed to the path of self-evolution. Reason being - if I were to devote the kind of time and energy it would require to address the "problems of the here and now" (economics, war, famine, meth, illiteracy & stupidity, just to name a few), I would have no time at all to devote to my own pursuits. And let's face it: when it's just me and the eagle, I'm not going to have a whole lot of concern about what I did to try to 'save the world'. The eagle ain't keeping score, and death isn't advising me to go out and campaign for the latest joker in the three ring circus. I have more important things to do - and so do you.
So in that regard, I have to say that a warrior chooses her battles and her battlefields. When I place myself in alignment with "the right way to live" in regard to these issues, what inevitably comes to me is that our responsibility is not to "the world" (which is little more than a series of illusions strung together like so much xmas popcorn), but to the self, and to those who might cross our path. I have always found that there is never a shortage of problems "close to home" as it were - people (and I consider animals to be people, too) who just seem to naturally come into my field of vision, and whom I might actually be able to help on some minor level.
I don't have to go out looking for souls to save or causes to engage. It's all right here - as Dorothy said - "right in my own back yard." Sure, even that is only controlled folly, but at least it may actually serve to enhance my own awareness while simultaneously serving another's, so there is some mutual benefit to the engagement, which seems to indicate an efficient use of energy - far moreso than banging one's head against the political arena or trying to vaguely understand or even wrap one's mind around the sum of trillions of dollars of debt.
In the 60s, there was much talk of "getting involved." Luckily, I have grown older and hopefully somewhat wiser. The only winning move is not to play.
Your mileage may vary.
All material in this blog (essays, rants, images, poetry, et al) is copyright © by Della Van Hise, and may not be reprinted elsewhere without the prior written permission of the author. Quantum ShamanTM is a trademark of QuantumShaman.ComTM and reserves all rights
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
On the question of baptism...?
Sep. 4th, 2008 | 07:24 am
Condensed from a debate on an online forum...
______________
While religion and its accompanying rituals may be a comfort to some, it is important to take a step back and remember that the things we believe today are often little more than a program uploaded into our awareness through our culture, our parents, our peers, our history, and our society. In the big picture, to believe that the act of immersing someone in water is going to have an effect on their immortal soul is no different than believing a common rock may become a diamond if one just wishes for it hard enough, or that the moon is made of green cheese because that is what their great-grandmother thought. Believe what you will, but know that your belief will not affect the reality of what-is.
As a little girl, I was baptized at the age of 7. The whole shebang. The whole big ritual in the tradition of the Southern Baptist Church. For those unfamiliar with the ceremony, it goes something like this: The preacher stands in the pulpit for an hour on Sunday morning, shouting hellfire and brimstone. Yes, literally. No exaggeration. Sometimes he even speaks in tongues. On a really good day, he faints. At the end of the performance, the organist begins to play and sinful parishoners are encouraged to walk down the long red aisle and "accept Jesus into your heart and be baptized in his name." We are told our sins will be washed away and we will be born again and gifted with eternal life in the kingdom of heaven, forever and ever, amen.
What does that really mean? On the one hand, we have parents struggling with whether or not to let their kids believe in Santa Claus, with psychologists citing the potential anxiety the child may suffer when s/he discovers the truth. And on the other hand, we have those same parents uploading their children with a fantasmagorical religious mythos that offers immortality, forgiveness from on high, and a mansion in the sky, yet never stopping to consider the anguish the child will suffer when s/he comes to realize that fairy tales are fairy tales, whether presented under the guise of good, clean cultural fun, or under the heavy cloak of religion. The truth is, that while some may believe absolutely in their gods and devils, there is no more proof for either than there is proof for Santa Claus - and so to program children with such belief systems may be as detrimental as any lie told with intent.
To those inside an existing belief system (such as Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, or any other organized religion), the belief system itself will most often blind the believers to any other interpretation, leading to the old adage, perception is reality. My mother believed whole-heartedly that the right thing to do was to have her 7-year-old daughter baptized in the name of Jesus, and yet even at the time it was all happening, I kept looking around, wondering when the guys from Candid Camera were going to jump out and say, "Just kidding, kid! No one REALLY believes that dunking you in that cold water on an otherwise insignificant Sunday morning is going to get you a front row seat in heaven!"
What was amazing to me then - and still to this day - was the fact that those who were already enmeshed in the belief system clearly could not see beyond it - but far more detrimental was the realization that they seemed to NEED others to believe as they believed. To NOT share the belief system, to DECLINE baptism, was blasphemy - the only unpardonable sin in the eyes of the Baptist faith. Bottom line: believe as WE believe, or else. And so history is cluttered with religious wars, the violence of the Crusades, and the burning of the witches - just to name a few of the atrocities that inevitably result when religion and common sense collide.
In the church I attended, there was a 1-week interval from the time one walked down the aisle until one was actually baptized. The thing I remember most from that week was seriously, deeply wondering what was wrong with the adults. Did they really BELIEVE this stuff? Could they possibly think that a man born of a virgin who was impregnated by a holy ghost could somehow have the power to save another's soul? And even if it were all true, how did this peculiar ritual of immersing someone in water play into the grand equation of religious salvation?
It didn't make sense.
It still doesn't.
Even IF God exists, I cannot imagine that s/he would grant or deny admittance to heaven based on whether one had been subjected to some ritual which is, ultimately, only a symbolic rite of passage rooted in a single belief system. Baptism is a ritual created by Man - nothing more, nothing less.
So is it necessary to be baptized in the name of Jesus? No more necessary than it would be to be slathered in vegetable oil in the name of Buddha, or smeared with mud in the name of Raxxmu of Mars. Rituals are the byproducts of belief systems - and belief systems are the byproducts of fear. They may hold great power & significance for those who are part of that system, but for anyone outside of it, the ritual is little more than a peculiarity - and may often be barbaric and frightening. To a Christian, for example, it is commonplace to hear the words, "Eat my body, drink my blood, and you will never die," yet to someone not indoctrinated into that faith, those same words may be interpreted as symbolic cannibalism and vampirism, altogether horrific. So, it's important to understand that the rituals of one religion will have no significance to someone of another religion, or someone with no religious belief at all.
For as long as man lives in fear of death, he will never know life.
"The destruction of faith is the beginning of evolution." (Quantum Shaman)
All material in this blog (essays, rants, images, poetry, et al) is copyright © by Della Van Hise, and may not be reprinted elsewhere without the prior written permission of the author. Quantum ShamanTM is a trademark of QuantumShaman.ComTM and reserves all rights
Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
The Role-Playing Game
Aug. 26th, 2008 | 11:46 am
The entire issue of "adopting a role" has to do with awareness. People who adopt roles WITHOUT awareness usually find themselves in a heap of misery at some point, because the role and reality usually don't go hand in hand. For example, I know a woman who plays the role of "the good wife". With that comes certain "responsibilities" (her word, not mine). She must cook the husband's meals, do his laundry, fold his socks, perform her wifely duties twice a week upon request. And all of this must be done with a smile, even though said husband has been cheating on her for years, abuses her verbally, and essentially married her to be a maid rather than a companion.
Now... the problem is that she has no awareness of any of this because the role has literally blinded her to what's going on all around her.
A stalker may adopt a role, but it is always done with awareness. For example, there have been times at one of our shows when I will quite happily play the role of the dumb blonde because most customers are less intimidated by a "dumb blonde" than by the real essence of who-i-am. Easiest way to explain it - when someone is looking at an expensive ring, and asks me, "So, how are you doing today?" my response is going to be what the person wants/needs to hear. "I'm great! You?" Chat them up, but never on anything too heavy. If I answered their questions truthfully, they would flee in terror. *LOL*
"How are you doing today?"
"Well, lemme see. We are all beings who are going to die, and short of taking responsibility for every moment we are alive, we will most likely die to the oblivion of our own awareness. Other than that, I'm having a great day. You?"
*heh* Obviously that's a very simplified version, but let me just say that a stalker chooses his/her role with awareness (as Mark Twain pointed out); whereas the "ordinary man" walks through life in a series of roles that are generally not really of his choosing. At work, he is the successful businessman (which comes with that "new set of clothes"). At home, he is "the loving husband" (a different set of clothes). With the kiddies, he is "the attentive father." Problem is... if none of those roles are talking to one another through a cohesive I-Am, there is a tendency to fragment and eventually one ends up on anti-depressants, because "the role" comes with a whole set of expectations as well as all those new clothes - i.e., the successful business man EXPECTS that promotion, which may instead be given to a junior partner who is, in fact, less deserving, but happens to be the boss's nephew. The loving husband EXPECTS a loving wife in return, but may, in fact, come to realize that because he was playing a role and not really operating from the assemblage point of his authentic self, his wife lost interest in him years ago and the entire marriage is nothing more than a pretty illusion. The attentive father EXPECTS his kids to do well in school, but will be shocked and dismayed to discover that they are selling meth to the first graders for reasons that may or may not ever be clear.
So, for the advanced warrior, there is always a keen awareness of whatever "role" we may be playing at any given time. I am well aware, for example, when I am playing the role of "the bitch" in order to stalk some aspect of myself. To others, I may appear "mad as a shithouse rat," but beneath the spinning, chruning Tasmanian devil is the cohesive self who is essentially the director/writer of ALL the roles. And that's the difference between the warrior & the ordinary man where "roles" are concerned. The warrior projects from the authentic self at all times, whereas the ordinary man (with his beliefs & expectations) has no real idea that there is an authentic self at all, because he becomes caught up in each and every role to such an extent that it becomes his sole reality.


All material in this blog (essays, rants, images, poetry, et al) is copyright © by Della Van Hise, and may not be reprinted elsewhere without the prior written permission of the author. Quantum ShamanTM is a trademark of QuantumShaman.ComTM and reserves all rights to this material. This includes all print and electronic media, including other blogs
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Swing Vote (Movie Review)
Aug. 2nd, 2008 | 09:27 am
mood:
cynical
I see a lot of movies, but very seldom do I feel sufficiently moved to write what amounts to a review of one. Yesterday, Wendy, myself and another friend went to see the new Kevin Costner film, SWING VOTE, and despite myself, I just can't seem to keep my mouth shut. Nothing new there, I suspect.
Overall, the movie was pretty damn funny.. Costner is an old drunk with a young daughter; he can't seem to keep a job or hold his life together in whatever fashion we would consider 'normal' in this country. He's a fuck-up, but he loves the kid and she loves him. The set-up of the movie is that the kid is bright and has an interest in civic affairs, at an age when she is beginnig to buy into the propaganda we feed our children. You know the stuff - voting is our civic responsibility; jury duty is our social contract; every vote counts... blah blah blah.
If you've seen the previews, you know that Costner becomes the one guy whose vote will matter. There's a long set-up as to why this is so, and if we can buy into that, it turns out that whoever he votes for will be the next president of the US. Of course, this leads to him being courted by both sides, and so the film consists of watching the machinations of politicians as they attempt to please this one sole voter, and actually go so far as to begin changing their entire political platforms in order to swing him to their side. There are some hysterical scenes in the movie - one in particular where the democratic candidate begins touting anti-abortion, and we see healthy children vanishing in a poof of smoke on some idyllic playground.
So there are some funny moments in the film. Maybe worth the price of admission. But... and it's a huge but...
SPOILER WARNING... (if you plan to see the film & don't want to know the outcome, read no further).
After all this build-up with how Costner is basically just a beer-guzzling ne'er-do-well, he decides virtually overnight to change his ways, mend his evil habits, and become socially responsible. Okay, maybe that's a good message. Maybe. But then comes the speech. {You knew there would be one, right?}
As Costner faces down the two presidential candidates in what is supposed to be "the final debate", he begins talking about how he feels ashamed for not voting, how he feels ashamed for losing sight of whatever minor dreams he had as a young man, how he feels ashamed of himself for being the fuck-up he is...
Hmm. At this point, I started to notice something about the audience. With the theater almost full, people were leaning toward the screen, some were mumbling "Amens!" of one sort or another, the lady two rows behind me was sniffling as if riveted to the final scene of TERMS OF ENDEARMENT, and for the most part, these sheeple were buying into the propaganda - cleverly delivered in the form of what amounts to neurolinguistic programming - and by the time the film ended, the audience cheered, while I was sitting there wide-eyed, feeling somewhat like I had just been slammed upside the head with a large 2 x 4.
"Don't they see the program?" I asked of Wendy. "Don't they realize they've just been spoon-fed a guilt-trip which is designed to do nothing more than drag them to the polls come November?" "Don't they GET that the movie is now shaking a finger at THEM, when perhaps it needs to be shaking a finger at 'the system'?"
They don't get it. That much was obvious. And, in fact, the other friend who was with us was quick to defend the film, attempting to say, "Well, it's just a fantasy film! No different than Batman!"
Er... I don't see it that way. The timing says otherwise. With the election only a few months away, it seemed far more rooted in agenda - and an agenda which relied upon essentially programming its audiences to feel guilty if they don't vote. Um... er... has everyone conveniently forgotten the fact that the LAST election wasn't decided by "the people" at all, but by a bunch of stuffy politicians referred to euphemistically as "the electoral college"? Nobody's vote counted! The guy who legitimately won the election isn't in the White House, because it would have been inconvenient to the powers that be, and so we were treated to a smoke & mirrors show, an elaborate presentation of the old shell-game trick, and if anyone cares to think otherwise, I suggest you check your programming guide and ask your doctor, 'cuz we all got a rather large suppository with THAT little charade, and as a result, I made the personal decision to never vote again. What's the point, after all? If the powers that be don't like the way the election turns out, there's always The Electoral College Card waiting to be yanked out of some spin-doctor's ass, and played like the ultimate trump in a bad game of Old Maid!
But I digress...
To MY perceptions, the entire purpose of the film had become an agenda - the humor turning into nothing more than a sugar-coating which would make us want to willingly swallow the big nasty pill. What seemed so ironic was that the Costner character had just read a letter from someone in Podunk, which essentially said, "My wife and I both work two jobs just to make ends meet, and some weeks we don't make it. I am afraid to think of what would happen if one of my children became ill. So my question is this: if we are the richest nation in the world, how come our own people can't afford to live here?"
Good question! How come most of us can't afford health insurance? Why is gay marriage even an issue, and why do we allow religious manipulation and the propaganda of the Catholic church to influence what would otherwise be a simple and clear-cut case of human rights? Why do we pour so much money into defense when cancer and AIDS still have not been properly addressed? And why should WE feel guilty when most of us are working our asses off just to pay our taxes so these guys who are "supposta" address these issues can go right on taking vacations to Tahiti on taxpayer money?
From a warrior perspective, the film left me with a bad taste in my mouth - largely because it demonstrated the fine art of neurolinguistic programming, and how that can be used to get people to think, say, feel or do just about anything. Feel guilty, we are told. Get out there and vote, we are told. Clean up our acts, we are told. And yet, our leaders have proven to be the most corrupt, inhuman, spiritually-debilitating bunch of nitwits to come down the pipes in centuries!
Does anybody out there believe voting is going to change anything? Maybe you do. And maybe you're right. Last election seems to say otherwise, but no mater. If you're going to do it, do it with awareness, and do it because it is what YOU want to do, and not just the result of some movie that attempts to shame and guilt you into buying into the existing paradigm; because the nasty secret is that while we are busy trying to be informed-about-the-issues, chances are we are doing little more than dancing on the surface of the mirror while the smoke creates an obscuring fog around our heads.
What to do?
Stay awake. I personally have come to believe that this country (and most others) have moved well beyond the point where our individual votes are going to matter one iota. When we couple the level of technology available with the degree of deception & manipulation that is possible, we begin to *see* that we are going through the motions of going through the motions... largely because we don't know what else to do. We want-to-believe it will make a difference, but is that really the reality of it? Seems unlikely, all things considered. Seems to me we would have better results if we each threw a gallon of gas in the bay like our ancestors threw all that tea in the harbor. Problem is - we don't have time for that, because we're too busy trying to keep our heads above water.
I'm a cynic, so if my words here annoy you, throw them over your shoulder and pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. Get drunk. Get laid. Or go to a movie. I would even recommend SWING VOTE for the humorous parts - some of which really are quite hysterical. Just be sure to wear your tin foil hat to keep the electronic propaganda from penetrating your skull, and set your bullshit detector on High.
***
copyright 2008, by Della Van Hise
All rights reserved

All material in this blog (essays, rants, images, poetry, et al) is copyright © by Della Van Hise, and may not be reprinted elsewhere without the prior written permission of the author. Quantum ShamanTM is a trademark of QuantumShaman.ComTM and reserves all rights to this material. This includes all print and electronic media, including other blogs
Link | Leave a comment {1} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Magic & Mysticism in the Real World
Jul. 31st, 2008 | 01:36 pm
or...
A Survival Guide for Sorcerers in the 21st Century
***
PART ONE:
Magic is a Burden to Others
Most people don't really want magic in their lives.
What else can we call it? Supernatural phenomenon. Hauntings. Prophetic dreams. Visionary experiences. Intuitive knowing. Or simply: any inexplicable encounters with the nagual.
Whatever we call it, let's face it: magic is inconvenient to most folks, disrupts their daily routine, takes away from the enjoyment of a "happy" day (whatever that might be), and generally disturbs and confounds their belief systems upon which has been built the immovable foundation for A Normal Life. Anything that does not align with the traditional status quo is therefore a pain in the ass, a thorn in the side, a discrepancy in the matrix, and something to be avoided at all costs.
As a child, I had many magical experiences - I've written about many of them here on this forum and on my website. Not sure why the nagual seemed to single me out, except perhaps because I slipped through the cracks of traditional upbringing - or, put another way, I was spared the dubious benefits of a lot of the programming which most children endure just by virtue of being alive. Living in an isolated rural environment, with a mother who was at work from 6 a.m. until 6 p.m., and a father who was less than attentive, I more or less ran wild in the neighborhood in a time before fences or pit bulls. The swamp, the lake, and the orange groves were my milieu, and as an only child, my so-called 'invisible friends' were my only friends.
It was idyllic.
No fences. No pit bulls. No rules. No expectations.
Thing is... in hindsight, I can also clearly see that the lack of traditional programming allowed my mind/spirit to develop in what I would consider to be a more natural fashion than most kids growing up today. With no television in the house, no telephone, no video games, no VCR, no DVD or computer, and very little adult supervision, I was essentially forced into a bond with the natural world and, ultimately, the 'supernatural' world.
So the tales I'm going to tell here may sound like fanciful imaginings of an isolated little girl, remembered by an elder witch through the eyes of poetic license. If that's what makes you sleep better, then you are free to inject that belief into your own programming in the same way a doctor might inject morphine into the IV line of a patient experiencing a great deal of pain.
The morphine doesn't really make the pain go away, of course. It only masks the symptoms, but for the most part, that's what patients are looking for. And it's what "most folks" are looking for in their day to day lives.
I'm reminded of Arnold Mindell's comments in his excellent book, THE SHAMAN'S BODY:
| Arnold Mindell wrote: |
| Is it your fault if you remind others of dreams they do not want? And who can blame the group, either for resistance to you or for the life-and-death struggle that ensues? These people are fighting for their lives, equilibrium, homeostasis - indeed, for the perpetuation of history. "Do not disturb us more than we can take," they say. From a global viewpoint, you disturb your organizational system, and history must fight for continuity. In this universal and fated interaction, the warrior's friends become the voices of the web. Their warmth turns to ice. They accuse you of unjustifiable behavior, egotism, and criminality as they become possessed by their lawmaker role in this eternal drama of human history. The collective you live in must pursue you for what it experiences as criminal acts and bring you to trial, just as you have challenged other rule breakers in the past. Now it is you who enters into a life-and-death struggle with the universe..." |
For those who have been engaging in the world of 'magic' for any length of time, it is almost a certainty that you, too, have been labeled as a pain in the collective ass of society, or even your own family & friends. If you have been on the path as long as I have, it is even a strong possibility that you are a lone practitioner now - for the ugly truth is that this path does not really make us many friends. Oh, we might connect from time to time with other warriors on a parallel path, but when we commit to this journey with the totality of mind/body/spirit, we quickly discover that in order to be true to ourselves, we can no longer uphold the expectations of others in the manner to which they have become accustomed.
What does that mean? "Surely you jest, Della!" someone is sure to say. "I have dozens of friends and a loving and supportive family, and I am still a warrior!"
Maybe.
My mantra is simple: IT. HAS. TO. BE. REAL.
And it is when we begin to be absolutely true to the Self that we find ourselves out of step with the status quo.
1971
What is the status quo? Greatly simplified, it is the consensual reality, in which there are rules and agreements we are all expected to live by. Which brings us to expectations, of course. What is expected of us by our friends? Our family? Other warriors? And if we find ourselves leaning toward wanting or needing to somehow satisfy those expectations, are we then attempting to mold ourselves into the consensual programs as a means to seek acceptance and that sense of well-being we are "supposta" experience when surrounded by family and friends?
Personally, I have come to see the expectations of others rather like individual bars on a cage. How are you doing? Fine, thank you (the expected response, when in reality you have a painful hemorrhoid and your dog won't stop pooping on the rug). And how is your lovely wife today? She's doing well, thanks for asking (even though she's on anti-depressants as a result of catching you in bed with the pool boy twice last week). Would you like fries with that? No, I'd prefer a dinner salad, thank you. (But you're lying and you know it. You want the fries. Fries good. Salad bad. But you say the right thing because you're having lunch with your skinny friends who have been duly assimilated by the tao of lettuce.)
But I digress... Your painful hemorrhoid and your crapping dog and your inability to keep your pecker in your pants are still foibles which polite society will agree to overlook in order to maintain their illusion of normalcy. After all, the priest may tell you - we are only human with human shortcomings. Say a few Hail Marys, kick the dog out the back door, get some Preparation H, slap your errant prick into submission; and all will be right with the world. And who knows... in the world of matter & men, in the world of polite society, perhaps the preacher is right to the extent of his understanding of the agreement. You may be an asshole, but you're a normal asshole - a card-carrying member of The Human Agreement.
Ah, but what if you were to be sitting there at lunch with all those malnourished, well-to-do, normal friends of yours, and you just happen to casually mention during the appetizers that you were abducted by aliens last night. Everyone laughs it off, of course, because you are obviously joking around as you are wont to do, you little minx, but by the time that nasty-tasting dinner salad arrives, you've made a reference to a prophetic dream you had last week, and now the laughter is getting somewhat more nervous and your best friend's wife has dropped her fork with a loud clattering sound more than once.
When the main course is served, you turn the conversation toward the fact that your house seems to be haunted by the spirit of the former occupant, who appears in the mirror over your sink every other Thursday and whispers, "Cats really do go to heaven," in a melodic but androgynous voice. Now you're keeping in mind that these are your closest friends - maybe even people you grew up with, went to high school or college with, friends with whom you have discused all manner of philosophy at one time or another. Is there life on other planets? Is religion a comfort or a crutch? Did don Juan really exist, or was Castaneda just stoned on mushrooms and made the whole thing up? Was Nietzsche onto something with nihilism or is nihilism just much ado about nothing?
To you, these things are just a part of your inventory now, maybe even the fuel that drives your imagination. So by the time dessert arrives, you're talking openly about the projection of the shaman's double as a quantum vessel of energetic awareness, replete with free will and the ability to transcend the space/time continuum.
But what you have perhaps failed to notice is that your friends left Neverland long, long ago. They went away and grew up and got married and had lots of babies, so by this time, their amusement has turned to outright discomfort, and the males at the table have turned to talk of Nascar and beer, while the females have retreated to The Ladies Powder Room to do whatever it is females do in the restroom that seems to require at least 30 minutes and the assistance of their 12 closest friends.
You are alone.
In the middle of friends, surrounded by those closest to you...
You are alone.
Magic is a burden to others.
At some point, this becomes obvious. If you are extremely fortunate, you find yourself merely alone and not hanging from some makeshift cross or secured to a handsome pile of very dry kindling while the stuffy magistrate recites the charges against you.
This is where the journey takes a sharp and dangerous turn, and you have some decisions to make that are going to be painful.
Do you really want to be a sorcerer at all if this is where it leads?
But... far worse... do you have a choice anymore, or have you already wandered past the point of know return?
(to be continued...}
All material in this blog (essays, rants, images, poetry, et al) is copyright © by Della Van Hise, and may not be reprinted elsewhere without the prior written permission of the author. Quantum ShamanTM is a trademark of QuantumShaman.ComTM and reserves all rights
Link | Leave a comment {3} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
The Tao of Lettuce
Jul. 25th, 2008 | 11:26 am
Well, if you ask me, it's something that should probably be eaten BY grasshoppers, rabbits and other marauding rodents & insects, because to the human palate, lettuce is rather like congealed water rendered into some manner of crunchy leaf through the mysteries of nature and the marvels of modern horticultural techniques. Iceberg letttuce, we call it. And it may be found in all manner of salads, heaped upon sandwiches, and shredded liberally over an otherwise delightful taco.
We consume it in mass quantities because we are told it is good for us, yet upon doing an admittedly small amount of research, I discover that lettuce has very little nutritional value for humans. Guinea pigs seem to like it and can actually live on the stuff, but how bright are guinea pigs when all is said and done? Glorified lab rats, unfortunately, which is neither here nor there, but it does cause one to take a more critical look at this being whose primary diet is lettuce. Hmmmmmmmm.
It is said that the tao which can be spoken of is not the true tao.
Therefore, it could be speculated that lettuce which has any real flavor is not really lettuce. Any flavor attributed to lettuce must be examined for its true nature, and is usually found to be some manner of "dressing." Funnny word, that. Dressing. Like we must dress up this peculiar weed in some attempt to make it more acceptable to the eye, more palatable to the tongue - to disguise the fact that we are eating what amounts to crunchy water with a bit of chlorophyll thrown in just to keep it interesting.
In the course of dealing with this diagnosis of diabetes that has been handed to me, I have been examining the benefits of a better diet. This leads me to salads. I sat at a restaurant yesterday, observing these painfully-thin women munching on a variety of salads. Asiasn chicken salad. Cobb salad. Dinner salad. Casear salad. They appeared on the surface to be content, yet one could clearly see that keen look of hunger and animalistic resentment in their gaze as they eyed the dessert menu, while verbally reciting (unconvincingly) what a delightful salad they were having, and how they would prepare yet another salad for dinner (though one did admit that her husband would demand something of greater 'substance'.)
Lettuce is passively evil.

Leafus-Insidius
Note the evil green eye at the center of the head
It has hijacked the minds of otherwise sane beings. It is the foreign installation hiding in plain sight at the dinner table, screaming, "Eat me! Eat me!" like some out of control carrot monster in a sleazy juice bar in Santa Monica. It has convinced us it is good for us, when it is really nothing more than the carrier mechanism for the ranch dressing, the croutons, and bits of chicken and cheese. I mean - really - when you get down to it, does anybody really LIKE lettuce? ANY kind of lettuce? Red leaf, curly. Romaine. Chinese. Endive. Crisp-head. Summer-crisp. Loose-leaf. Iceberg. It may LOOK different, but the taste is the same. Crunchy water, right?
C'mon, guys. 'Fess up. Tell the truth. 'Cuz otherwise, I have to conclude that the joke is on us, and we have merely convinced ourselves that we like this stuff that would make a better xmas wreath than a "healthy" meal.
When I was a kid, I used to eat grass. Yeah, laugh it up. You did it, too. We all had to eat a few bites of grass to see what all the fuss was about with the cows. But when all was said and done, we quit eating grass 'cuz it tasted like lettuce - actually, it had MORE flavor than lettuce, and probably more nutritional value. But it doesn't grow in cute little heads that can be cultivated commercially, so grass makes a lousy salad unless you're a grasshopper on a macrobiotic diet.
So I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the funny thing about lettuce is that we consume it as if it were going out of style (no such luck), and in social settings, we pretend to enjoy it, when the reality of it is that it's like the emperor's new clothes. The emperor was nekkid as a jaybird, and lettuce is something a lot of folks pretend to enjoy just because it is considered bad form to badmouth the leafy green alien that has taken over control of our common sense.
We eat lettuce because we see other humans eating lettuce. (Mother's voice: "If everybody else jumped off a bridge, would you jump, too?") We eat lettuce because the lettuce growers tell us it is good for us. (TV Commercial: "Eat more lettuce because it's the only goddamn thing we can grow here in El Centro and we need the money!") We eat lettuce because we have accepted our programming. (Borg says, "You cannot resist the water-leaf. You will be assiimlated.")
Admit it.
Lettuce sucks.
The lettuce which does not suck is not really lettuce.
***
All material in this blog (essays, rants, images, poetry, et al) is copyright © by Della Van Hise, and may not be reprinted elsewhere without the prior written permission of the author. Quantum ShamanTM is a trademark of QuantumShaman.ComTM and reserves all rights
Link | Leave a comment {1} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Rants & Ramblings of an Elder Witch
Jul. 24th, 2008 | 10:52 am
It's not that I don't have anything to say these days - just that the majority of what I have been observing has either been said before, or there seems to be litle point in tossing words up on a screen just to see them appear like magickal talismans on the cyber-fabric of some internet chat room or forum. I hear myself asking... "What's the point?" Obviously, there is none, and so I return to the silence and simply observe the flow of life and death and all that falls in between those two sticky-labels, and the real truth is that it is all too damn big to talk about except to grab at litle bits and pieces which might move the heart or stir the soul at some point in an otherwise insignificant day.
Over the course of the last few months, there have been dialogues here and on other forums that may have caught my attention briefly, but even when I have felt motivated to respond to them, it all comes down to that same question: "What is the point?" I have concluded that forums and chat rooms are not really places where we learn much, if anything at all. Most often, they are cyberlounges for folks on a similar path, and that can have a certain appeal and perhaps even some minor value, but I have also come to realize that any real learning that is going to happen will most likely happen in a one-on-one environment, person to person, face to face. Doesn't mater. Just my observation. Something I am choosing to talk to myself about here in this blog folder where there is no attempt to justify anything, and no need to apologize for any feathers that may choose to become ruffled by my mumblings. These are simply my thoughts. You are free to disagree.
Disagree. An interesting word, and one often heard on forums. Sometimes it has started to seem to me that people choose to disagree not necessarily because they really do disagree, but because in disagreeing with someone, a platform of dualism is created, wherein a debate may ensue - you say black, I say white, and the debate is on, wherein each of us attempts to define our position and - just perhaps - there is some underlying attempt to define the self through the debate.
But... is that really the self at all? If you convince me that black is white or I convince you that the sky is not really blue at all, what has really been accomplished? Perhaps some belief systems shift slightly, but ultimately they are still beliefs. Life goes on. Kingdoms come and go. Cemeteries fill up. And what we believe about it all is little more than what amount to a critical review one might write after seeing a particularly silly play in some high school drama production.
Heh. People don't want to hear that. They want to go right on with the comfort of their belief systems, and who am I or you to tell them otherwise? I've put what amounts to an inventory of my own "belief systems" on my website, Quantum Shaman. Anyone can read them. Agree or disagree. Makes very little difference to me in the big picture. Your agreement will not strengthen my reality - though for some truly bizarre reason, we seemed to be programed as a species to believe otherwise. Thus, we are always seeking some sort of agreement - some sort of consensus, some sort of resonance. And yet... does it ever really happen? And if it does... what does it actually accomplish? Just questions I ask myself from time to time when I read something on one of these forums that either pleases me or rankles me. So what if I agree, disagree, or have no opinion whatsoever? Nothing changes in Pismo either way, and so the question becomes one of what might be called "confidence" in our own unique reality.
In some ways, I've spent the past 8 years testing my personal "foundation" (my own unique reality) in these forums. Putting my experiences out there in the form of my website, my book, and my forums has been a means of assimilation for me - rocky and treacherous at times, loving and supportive at others. And still... what really matters is what's inside myself. Does the foundation hold? Has the assimilation brought me any closer to a personal synthesis of The Meaning of Life? Difficult question to answer in a yes/no fashion. Ultimately, I have no regrets, but at the same time, we come to a point in our journeys where we realize that we have used a certain tool until it has become dull and ineffective. So, after these past 8 years, what I have discovered is that my foundation is firm, my experiences (and not my beliefs) are the basis for my reality, and that the core of my beliefs determines the realities we see, and obliterates those we choose to ignore.
A contradiction? Perhaps. Who cares, eh?
Two nights ago, a visitor came into my office late at night. At first I believed she was a bat because she flew like a bat and looked like a bat. I am not afraid of bats, so I made no effort to harm her, and when I finally got a good look at her, I realized she was actually some manner of large gypsy moth - probably attracted to the light streaming out through the open door leading into the courtyard. She flew around the ceiling light for awhile, but then came and landed on my head. Just because of her size (about as large as my hand), I could feel the weight of her. Kinda funny, as she crawled around in my hair. She would fly away at times, but always kept returning to land on me. I took it as an honor and tried to listen in case she might have something to teach. But my hearing wasn't so good for moth-speak, and so I simply sank into the experience of the moth herself. Took a few pics...

At one point, I took her back outside and released her to the night, even left the porch light on to attract some bugs for her to eat, but she came back in and once again perched on my arm. Hmm. Impossible to describe, but we communed at some level beyond humanform. She said she was looking for sanctuary, and so I left her in my office when I went to bed. And yet, I realized I couldn't sleep because I was thinking about this strange moth (not even indigenous to this area, or so I'm told, not sure about that). Got up out of my comfy bed and returned to my office to find her sitting in my chair. So we regarded one another for awhile, until she flew back up to the ceiling and I returned to bed. Next morning, she was gazing out the window, and so I gathered her up on a piece of paper and took her back outside. She flew up under the eaves where she blended exquisitely with the natural wood, stayed there for several hours, then apparently flew away. Haven't seen her since, yet the experience remains with me and causes me to smile whenever I think of it.
Strange encounter. An encounter with the nagual. Perhaps. Yet entirely mundane if viewed only from the perspective of the tonal.
Funny thing... I woke the next morning (yesterday) feeling as if I were 18 again. My body felt lighter. My eyes seemed brighter. Tested my blood sugar only to find it was higher than normal. Just numbers, I heard my mind say. Agreements. A consensus to which one either agrees or disagrees. I choose to disagree, with the awareness that there are consequences to any choice we make. I felt better than I had felt in years, so it seemed to me that the numbers could be just an attempt to pull me back into the agreement. I chose not to play. Fuck the numbers.
In the other room, Wendy is watching the tube, and I hear the chattering drone like a bee buzzing around some particularly tasty flower. Ask your doctor. You are sick. Be afraid. Global warming. Can't sleep, try this pill, even though the side effects may include jumping off a tall building in your stupor or gunning down innocent children on a playground in your delusional state. This drug. That treatment. This ailment. That cure.
Programming of the mind. First we make you believe you are sick, and then we offer you the cure, but it's not really a cure, because it if were, you would no longer be sick and that would not be profitable, so back to square one, and remember to ask your doctor about the treatment plans available to deal with the side effects of the cure, so now you're even sicker than before, but you agreed to agree, so now we have you by the balls.
We take pills for our ills and put gas in our tank (at $4.50+/gallon) just to get to work, so we can afford to buy the gas to put in our tank to get to work, and all I can do is marvel at the fact that the world keeps turning and humans keep upholding the very programs which hold them as slaves. For surely we must all realize somewhere deep in the heart of ourselves that this is not real. I mean... if I see it, surely others must see it as well, right?
What to do? Nothing, perhaps. I could start a revolution and suggest that we each throw a gallon of gas in the bay like our forefathers threw all that tea in the harbor, but that would only add to the pollution, and so we just keep on keeping on even though the system is clearly broken and the hounds of hell who professs to be "in charge" are really only sitting back laughing at the complacency of a population that seems to willingly bend over every time some new tax is imposed or some new war is contrived.
Ever see WAG THE DOG? Great little movie. Hoffman. DeNiro. Basically the story of how everything we think is real is just manufactured in some Hollywood studio and sold to us on the 6 o'clock evening news, like so much toilet paper and deodorant. What's amazing to me is that so many buy into it so easily. Suddenly we are fighting a war on terrorism, when the greatest terrorists of all are those selling us the lies in a plain brown wrapper labeled "truth", when to anyone who *sees*, there is no doubt whatsoever that every bloody shred of it is illusion re-dressed in such a maner as to make it palatable so that we will swallow it right along with all those pills, and keep on smiling when we bend over to take it up the ass yet one more time from the latest tyrant with an agenda to peddle.
And yet...
Does it matter to me? Not in the least. I quit voting for good when the guy I voted for actually WON the election, but never took office. That's one of those times when the illusion-masters slipped up and we got a peek at the man behind the curtain; but instead of staging a revolt, most just went to work the next day (and the day after that and the day after that), pretending the wizard was really the wizard even though they had clearly seen him for precisely what he was: a fraud, a cheat, a lie. The funny thing is that we fraud ourselves, we cheat ourselves, and we lie to ourselves, because it is far, far, FAR easier than looking the illusion in the face and seeing it for what it is. So, we choose to go on believing it's real because that "feels" better, and we are indulgent little bastards who crave our comforts like a baby craving mama's teat.
But no matter... All a warrior can do is laugh or cry, maybe a bit of both, knowing full well that neither will make one iota of difference in the big picture of The Meaning of Life. All of these plays and illusions are altogether irrelevant when all is said and done, for these "interesting times" in which we live are but a drop in the bucket of the All, just little dramas to amuse ourselves while we wait in the darkness for the touch of Death on our left shoulder, having long-ago accepted that "all things die", when we have absolutely NO personal experience in that regard, only the belief system coupled with the "evidence" that has been shoved down our throats by well-meanig parents & peers since before we first crawled out of the womb to begin the trek toward the grave. Why do we accept the programming we are given? Ah, that's the question, isn't it? We believe we will die, and so we live accordingly. We believe the sun will rise tomorrow and there will be enough oil in our tanks and water in our piles, and so we live accordingly. We believe... but what do we really Know?
Not much. Maybe nothing.
If there is any meaning, it is in what we decide as individuals. If I choose to find meanig in my meeting with the moth, it is no more or less significant than the bombing of the World Trade Center or the war in Iraq. If I choose to disagree with all of the consensual agreements, nothing will change in Pismo anymore than if I should choose to agree with the consensus.
Out there beyond my window, the world is simply what I experience of it. In here, within myself, the world is what I experience of it. Everything begins with a thought. From that thought, we choose to act with intent, or to remain passive observers. Which is right? Which is wrong? Where is the consensus? What would don Juan say? What would Jesus do? What would Buddha think?
Who cares.
Believe what empowers you. Manifest what serves you. Throw the map away. Burn the paradigms that enslave you even and especially if you love them. Get rid of the toxic elements in your life. And, most of all, remember to breathe.
All material in this blog (essays, rants, images, poetry, et al) is copyright © by Della Van Hise, and may not be reprinted elsewhere without the prior written permission of the author. Quantum ShamanTM is a trademark of QuantumShaman.ComTM and reserves all rights
Link | Leave a comment {1} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Assembling Otherworlds
Jun. 11th, 2008 | 08:13 pm
What I've observed with regard to the AP is that it is like an "aperture" of perception - not unlike the images thrown onto the screen by a movie projector. I know it to be "real" but whether it is "quantifiable" or not, who's to say? Our instruments can only register what they are made to register, so we cannot yet record our dreams onto CD ROM even though the dreams are "real".
Point being - the AP itself is basically the "lens" through which we assemble our world. It can "move" or "shift" as a matter of our intent, or through assistance from someone who has the skill to assist the movement.
As to how it correlates to assembling otherworlds... If we view the AP as the lens through which we view/assemble our world, we begin to realize that a lot of that "assembly" process is comprised of belief systems, ideas, fears, prejudices, conclusions, experiences, imaginations, and so on. You and I may live in the same world, but we do not assemble is in the same maner.
The ability to assemble otherworlds is largely a matter of seeing and wholly internalizing that what we actually see/experience in THIS world is only what we have been taught to see & assemble. We canot see viruses, for example, with the naked eye, but they are nonetheless all around us. By the same token, we cannot see other dimensional realities or parallel timelines, but from a quantum perspective, they are all around us. Working with the assemblage point (moving it to different locations on the energy body - or double) enables the sorcerer to "assemble otherworlds."
What's important is to really take a look at what that means. "To assemble otherworlds." Too many people make the mistake (in my opinion, it's a mistake!) of thinking that this means alien landscapes or far-flung planets, and while that is certainly a possibility & an option, I have personally found that "assembling otherworlds" is more about stepping outside of our "static" existence, in the form of the double, or Dreaming. Some would say, "What's the purpose of that?" To me, one thing and one thing only: the experience of doing it, i.e., learning what we are capable of, moving beyond the boundaries of our limited humanform perceptions.
Early on in this journey, I would talk to Orlando about "assembling otherworlds." Something he said has really stuck with me: "There is only one world, divided infinitely by perception." In other words, there is only the Now, yet our perception determines what "now" we may assemble. From what I call ordinary awareness, I am simply "Della". From another assemblage point on the energy body, I may be a little boy in Greece or a beggar in Spain, though "Della" would have no direct awareness of it, as don Juan said when he made the comment, "While he's acting he has no notion of his duality." So it is when we assemble our totality that we have full access to the infinite nature of the assemblage point. Can this occur in our normal lifetime? Who's to say? But one thing seems fairly certain: we are far more complex energetically than we have been taught to believe, and it is through exploring that complexity that we flex our awareness & expand it.
The AP moves not only in our ordinary awarenes, but it may also move outside of time, and beyond what we think of as space. And because the double is infinite, it becomes possible to understand how a movement of the AP in Dreaming might take the sorcerer to any number of "otherworlds" - i.e., what we think of as past lives, parallel lives, alternate dimensional planes.
This is what is really meant by "the superposition of the assemblage point" as it relates to assembling otherworlds. The hardest part of the battle is coming to truly see/realize that we are not limited to our humanform perceptions alone, nor are we limited to a single position of the assemblage point.
As Gonz is certain to comment, "Yebbbut, we always end up HERE again." The question becomes, "Why can't we STAY in the new position of the assemblage point?"
Though I suspect this might only muddy the waters, I would simply say, "We can. We do." It can be argued that we perceive from this ordinary position of the AP, and so that is all there is, yet for the sorcerer who has taken don Juan's words to heart and turned them into direct personal experience, we are in more than one place at a time, but the arrogance of our own self-importance causes us to (mistakenly) BELIEVE that it is only the perception of our humanform self that has relevance.
| Don Juan wrote: |
| "A sorcerer may certainly notice afterwards that he has been in two places at once. But this is only bookkeeping and has no bearing on the fact that while he's acting he has no notion of his duality." (Don Juan to Carlos Castaneda) |
Through the double, through the superposition of the assemblage point, I am experiencing a thousand lifetimes or more right now. Each of those "otherworld" selves has perception, feeling, awareness. It is the function of the infinite self to evolve in this manner - it is the magic of being alive. We are alive INFINITELY (not just in our humanform bodies). It is only our ego that tells us there is only "here". The folly would be if we were to believe that and, in doing so, fix our assemblage point in the grocery line.
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
The Syntax of Sorcery
Jun. 5th, 2008 | 10:24 am
As a result of some ongoing discussion on another forum, I'd like to talk a bit about what I have come to call "the super-position of the assemblage point." A few of you whom I've spoken to privately about this seem to "get it" without too much difficulty, but it has been brought to my attention that others see it as "just words, meaning nothing." Perhaps true - as these are my words and so they are meaningful to me even if incomprehensible to anyone else. So it goes.
Before getting to the discussion itself, I would also like to comment just briefly on the notion of bringing new syntax and new terminology to "old concepts". Again, this arises from a discussion on another forum, yet I feel it has relevance to anyone who is on this path not just to "follow" the works of someone else, but to actively create one's owsn path toward freedom.
Over the years, I have found that the works of Carlos Castaneda have provided something of a background to my own work, but I must say that I do not really "follow" Castaneda to the letter. What worked for CC worked for CC. That was his path. This is mine. And as my own double, Orlando, pointed out to me about a year ago, there comes a time when even the most enlightening and uplifting material can become "stale" if we don't bring new life to it through our own individual efforts. We start to hear only the words and may forget the actual energy the words are attempting to describe. For example, I've heard the term "recapitulation" so many times, it runs the risk of becoming just a series of grunts and clicks. Ditto for "dreaming body" or "higher self" or "stalking" or "the double". After awhile, particularly after many years on a path, some sense of "renewal" is required, or we run the risk of falling into the trap of hearing the words alone.
When I was working toward become a professional writer, one thing that was oft-repeated was simply this: "Find your own voice." While you might be influenced by Ray Bradbury or Stephen King or Anne Rice, attempting to emulate those writers will only result in a cheap imitation. And though this may invoke the ire of some, I have come to the conclusion after many years on this path, that attempting to recreate the journey of Castaneda (or Buddha or Christ or anyone else) will only result in the same cheap imitation. We can learn from their journey, but attempting to duplicate it would be like trying to step in the same river twice. Simply not possible.
Sorry - no offense intended to anyone - but the real joy of the journey is that it is personal and it is unique to each of us. And at some point along the way, it becomes our responsibility (yes, our responsibility!) to take the instruction manual beyond where we found it, make it unique unto ourselves as individuals. It is then that we begin to expand and create our own "voice" - not to change the original song, but to enhance it and make it our personal muse, in the same way a maestro might play Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata, but with new inflection, fresh energy, and - hopefully - inspired passion. Any competent student can play Beethoven. And, yes, much may be learned from doing so. But at some point - if we have learned what is most important of all from our instruction manuals - we become a new musician with our own special voice, and our own unique song.
So, with that said, I think it stands to reason that, as my own journey has progressed, I have actively sought new ways of looking at old material. CC's words still inspire me, but can be limiting of taken at face value alone. As our understanding of our world has increased over the last 40 years, so has our use of language. At the time CC was writing his most important works, quantum physics was in its infancy. CC couldn't talk about "the superposition of the assemblage point" because the language itself didn't exist at that time - or, if it did, it existed in such a tiny group of scientists that it was not readily available for a layman to research. There was no internet back then - no Google! - and so CC wrote in the language of his time, and did a phenomenal job of putting together a new synatx which many of us still use to this day.
However... my feeling here is that as new language becomes available to describe some of these things CC spoke about, we would be negligent not to consider that maybe - just maybe! - science is finally catching up to what shamanism has always known & seen, and by looking at things with a quantum eye as well as a shamanic eye, we might just run the high risk of empowering ourselves through a deeper understanding of our own "magical" nature.
So, when I use terms like "the superposition of the assemblage point" or "a singularity of consciousness" or "bilocation of awareness as a quantum duality", it is because this is how I have personally come to *see* some of the things CC was talking about. The new syntax isn't really for anyone other than myself - my own voice. If it gives someone else some expanded understanding of something, so much the better. If not, then the old syntax works just fine, I suppose, but for me, as I said without any intent to offend anyone, it can grow stale if we hear it so often that it becomes background noise.
As a result of my website, Quantum Shaman, I receive a lot of emails asking how one might gain a deeper understanding of "how these things work". How do these things really work? A common question.
| Don Juan wrote: |
| The self dreams the double. Once it has learned to dream the double, the self arrives at this weird crossroad and a moment comes when one realizes that it is the double who dreams the self. Your double is dreaming you. No one knows how it happens. We only know that it does happen. That's the mystery of us as luminous beings. You can awaken in either one. |
At the time those words were written, perhaps it was true to say "No one knows how it happens." But as our understanding of energy has increased, so has our potential to truly understand the nature of the double. And is it not through a better understanding that we might begin to be better able to use the tools with which we (literally) create our own reality? In other words, through a quantum comprehension of the nature of energy, we empower ourselves to Intend a movement of energy in a quantum universe - a movement of energy which could only be seen as "magic" at a time before the language existed with which to further our own personal comprehension. We empower ourselves through information, and transform that information into Knowledge through the path of experience.
There are a couple of very good books written in layman's terms, which I have found extremely helpful in developing a better understanding of our quantum universe. THE DANCING WU LI MASTERS (Gary Zukav) is perhaps the most easily understandable of the two books. The second book which I would highly recommend is THE TAO OF PHYSICS. Either of these will provide a delightful foundational background which doesn't destroy the world of shamanism & mysticism, but actually enhances it and validates it in ways that are, ultimately, amazing.
My advice to anyone on this path, though, is the same advice that was given to me many times over the years. Find your own voice. Find your own unique frequency of understanding. When you do, you may write your own language and wander well off the map, but isn't that where the journey really begins?
PART TWO: A Quantum Look at Sorcery
What I'm going to do here is basically toss out some of the terms I have come to use over the years, and provide a brief explanation of what it means to me. There is also a fairly decent GLOSSARY on my website, if anyone wants to explore this further. None of this is carved in stone, of course. It's just an expression of my own voice, my personal attempt to take the instruction manuals beyond where I found them.
Let's start with a premise...
"All things exist within the realm of possibility, but only some things will be forced to go through the motions of actually occurring." (Quantum theory)
That being the case, we must ask ourselves, what is the force which causes something to go through the motion of actually occurring? Many times, that force is us - whether we call it intent or will or magic.
Everything begins with a thought.
SINGULARITY OF CONSCIOUSNESS – The self made Whole, the evolution of consciousness which results in a cohesive field of awareness existing ubiquitously and non-locally, infinitely and eternally. The cohesive, fully integrated I-Am consisting of all components of the mortal self and the eternal double, brought together under a single assemblage point.
Ultimately, the singularity exists within the realm of possibility for every human being. However, from a Toltec perspective, it is generally accepted that not every human being will choose a path which would lead to the formation of a singularity of consciousness. It is stated in terms such as to say one who is not cohesively aware will be consumed by the eagle. In other words, the elements of one's consciousness would simply be rendered back into their natural state - energy-in-waiting. From a quantum perspective, it is known that energy fields may become cohesive through a variety of means. It is also seen (both quantumly and shamanically) that consciousness is an energetic field.
From that perspective, it is also possible to *see* (to use Toltec terminology) that for those who do choose a path toward freedom, the goal (term loosely applied) would be to take one's awareness with them when departing this earthly plane. To do so, in essence, would invoke what the Toltecs refer to as "inhabiting the totality of oneself". And yet, I've been asked so many times, "What does that mean? What does it mean to inhabit the totality of oneself?" Simply put - it is to become the singularity of consciousness... the intersect point where the experiences of the mortal self and the experiences of the double combine totally - an assemblage point where one would have full access to the All of one's combined awareness.
In cases of Dreaming, OBE (out of body experience) and NDE (near-death experience), just to name a few, it has been observed that the mortal human self is capable of projecting an "energy body" beyond the confines of the physical form. In the world of the shaman and the sorcerer, this dreaming body or energy body may be consciously cultivated (we create the double through dreaming, to use Toltec terminology), so that it has what amounts to energetic autonomy. If viewed from a perspective entirely ubiquitous, however, it would be seen that the double is not "autonomous" at all - the double is the self, but it is our definition of "self" that bears some consideration. Through our ability to project the double beyond our physical form (and beyond our mental comprehension), we become "greater than the sum of our parts", at least from a humanform perspective.
The purpose of this is to utilize our quantum ability to essentially project our awareness into otherworlds and othertimes (or other dimensions, if one prefers that term). Some of these otherworlds may be experienced as what we (mistakenly) refer to as "past lives" - but in a quantum universe might be seen as movements of our energetic awareness in other realms.
These other states of being are not isolated from us, as we have been taught to believe. Instead, as the warrior/sorcerer develops the ability to access her own personal gnosis (silent knowing), s/he begins to be able to draw upon the vast experience of the double even while in mortal form (the double begins dreaming you). Put simply, we are beings with a dual nature - the mortal self and the immortal/eternal "other". And, in my opinion, based on many years on this path, it appears to me that this is simply our nature as human beings. It may even be the manner in which we evolve, grow and develop - much like a chick inside an egg or a caterpillar in the process of metamorphosis. I have said at times that "life" is the egg in which we gestate. If that is the case, then the singularity of consciousness is the fully-developed being which emerges when the egg itself "hatches".
From a Toltec perspective, it could be said that we "slip past the eagle to be free". From a quantum perspective, it may be viewed as "becoming a singularity of conscoiusness." Same thing...
SUPER-POSITION OF THE ASSEMBLAGE POINT Here is where it would help to have a small amount of background understanding of the quantum universe. You can find a somewhat comprehensible explanation on WikiPedia with regard to "Superposition Principle" although a simpler way of looking at it is to realize that "all things exist as probability until they are called forth into manifestation."
Also, a more admittedly fanciful exploration of "the superposition of the assemblage point" may be found on this forum in the thread: Questions for Orlando, Assemblage Point Question
To me, understanding the superposition of the assemblage point was the key to my own journey in so many ways, because it enabled me to finally realize that we are truly infinite beings, and we don't need to wait until we die to experience our infinite selves. It's right here, right now, all around us. It is the double who is the self, who is a duality by nature.
In essence, the superposition of the assemblage point may also be seen as "the realm of all possibility." From our humanform awareness, we perceive (mistakenly) that we are finite beings with a limited scope of awareness. Yet, from the assemblage point of the double, we have an entire universe open to us for our exploration. Orlando has said he has worn a thousand faces, lived a thousand lives, died a thousand deaths. This is not some progression through linear time, but instead a movement of the awareness of the double in the now. And through gnosis, the mortal self may gain insights, information and even direct knowledge. This is what is meant when it is said that "the double is dreaming you." The (so-called) "past lives" or "parallel lives" we experience are not some accidental bumbling of a spirit through time and space, but instead the cohesive and instructional lessons we set for ourselves through the course of our day to day living.
For example, if you are currently having issues with a petty tyrant, chances are that your double is off in a parallel Now living an entire "lifetime" devoted to the idea of learning to deal with petty tyrants. The mortal self, of course, has a limited time on earth - for we are beings who are going to die - but the sorcerer's double is neither mortal nor limited, and so we have at our fingertips an entire multiverse of possibility. The trick, of course, is learning how to open ourselves to it in spirit, even if we never gain direct access to those "memories" (though even that is possible, through gnosis).
What does this have to do with the superposition of the assemblage point? Simply this: Once the sorcerer has dreamed his/her double, the double becomes essentially ubituitous - existing simultaneously everywhere and nowhere - no longer a prisoner of time and space. And it is at that point that it may be said the double has become "the superposition of the assemblage point" - i.e., a non-local points of awareness which can manifest wherever it is needed in order to further the knowledge/education of the mortal self (i.e., "the double is dreaming you", to use Toltec terminology).
Perhaps this is irrelevant to most warriors. I've heard many say, "I just let it happen." That's certainly grand if it works for you! More power to you! Carry on and continue! Throw these words over your shoulder and rejoice.
Clearly, this is a work in progress for me, and for all of us, I suspect. Don't follow me, because I may not be going where you want to go. Find your own voice, walk your own path, and always be willing to take the instruction manuals beyond where they left off. The whole purpose of this path for me is an evolution of consciousness - and that is naturally going to include an expansion of awareness to include the lessons we learn along the way. If we followed the Bible to the letter, we'd all be burning witches and running around the desert with long beards, wearing togas. If we followed Castaneda to the letter, we'd all be swinging from trees and sewing the eyes of lizards shut.
These things are all fine and good if they work for you. But I hear from folks all the time who tell me, "I've done everything in the CC books, and I still feel like something's missing." What's missing is often the ingredient of personal spice, personal passion, one's own unique and altogether powerful muse. What's missing may be the You in unique!
Find your own voice and let it sing. And remember: there really is no path at all. The path is always ahead of us and in the power of our own creation. That is where the singularity of freedom is found.
*****
copyright © 2008
by Della Van Hise & Quantum Shaman (tm)
All Rights Reserved
Link | Leave a comment {4} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend
Dialogue With a Warrior
May. 7th, 2008 | 10:55 am
December 14, 2002
Transcript of a channeled gnosis session - Orlando's dialogue with a warrior
***
JACK: Julian and Juan were very different. Juan was under the impression that Julian was waylaid in his search for freedom. Della and I feel you to be considerably closer to Julian than you might be to Juan or Elias. Is this true? And, if it is true, does it matter



