Home

Advertisement

Customize

Advertisement

Customize
About this Journal
Current Month
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031
Links:
Your recent comments. Update your LJ. Edit your entrails.
Oct. 8th, 2008 @ 07:03 am Hey Jeeves! Go sit naked on a standing champagne glass!
psicorp
I hope it breaks off up in your a--.
    The same goes for Cerulean Studios and Trillian IM
ASK.com, formerly Ask Jeeves, has partnered with various companies to get their search toolbar installed onto your computer without your direct consent.

While Trillian explicitly informs you that the ASK.com Toolbar is a pre-selected, but optional, install option, they make you un-check two check boxes on the same page to skip installation.

Here's what that agreement sort of looks like (without direct linking to someone else's screenshot):
    Better web browsing with blahblahblah

    Blah blah blah...

    [*] Enable address bar search feature.

    End User License Agreement

    Blah blah blah...

    [*] I accept the license agreement and want to install the free Ask toolbar.

Here's a link to a screen shot of that deceptive agreement: http://forum.securitycadets.com/index.php?showtopic=6854

I un-checked the second option, but I did not see the first. It was installed anyways. So if I didn't "accept the license" then the "address bar search feature" should not be installed.

http://blog.stopbadware.org/2007/06/18/bundled-products-where-the-heck-did-this-new-toolbar-come-from stops short of calling this deceptive mal-ware, but I think sneaking in an additional pre-selected check-box onto the agreement page qualifies as a bad practice. This is mal-ware as far as I am concerned.

Do not use Trillian.

Use Pidgin instead - http://www.pidgin.im/

It beats out Trillian in this LifeHacker poll, 13,368 to 5,353 votes - http://lifehacker.com/375391/five-best-instant-messengers

Results here - http://polls.gawker.com/?key==AzN2QTM&voted=1

Warning to companies - You may think your product (Trillian) is (was) King, but if you mess with my computer, I will let others know that you did it, I will find a better alternative, and I will inform them about it. Go sit on that champagne glass now; you've forever lost my trust.
Oct. 8th, 2008 @ 02:33 am Humans are efficiency-seeking creatures.
psicorp
I am forever optimistic about the heights to which people can aspire to if given the chance to not do something, myself included.
Oct. 7th, 2008 @ 07:51 am Old TV episodes
psicorp
What are the earliest television episode that you can remember well enough to be able to re-tell?

Try to select episodes that you haven't seen in the past 5 years or so.

Can you recall about how old you might have been when you first saw that episode?

Movies do not count.
Oct. 6th, 2008 @ 10:02 pm This VP is not for change.
psicorp
I came across this -

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/2314051/the_truth_about_sarah_pa
Oct. 6th, 2008 @ 09:49 pm I maimed my laptop.
psicorp
It started out innocently enough. I wanted a larger hard drive.

But I wanted to copy the original hard drive to the new hard drive, including the hidden system recovery partition.

That's an easy enough of a thing to do for free using a live Linux boot CD, but by the time I had hit enter I realized that I had just told the computer to copy the hidden recovery partition on top of my existing data partition on the same drive.
    Oops! Ctrl-C!
300,000 bytes written to the beginning of the data drive probably won't wipe away my data, but it will utterly destroy the Windows Operating System.
    Drat.
Alright, copy the drive anyways... ruined partition and all. Of course the laptop can't boot from it, but it can still reformat the data partition and re-install Windows.
    Done.
While that was going on, I connected the original drive to a 2nd computer and allowed Windows to re-index all of the files. I should now be able to get my data. (Some of it may have been over-written. We'll see.)

Spent the day re-installing all of the system updates, and I'm just getting around to re-installing all of the software. I got it to stop blue-screening with a hard drive failure any time I tried to update. (Which is really really scary when you're trying to update the hardware BIOS and you know that if you blue screen now you'll have a really expensive brick on your hands.)
    I upgraded the chipset (hard drive controlling hardware) drivers before doing that, and it looks like doing so had resolved the blue screening problem, but I was still a bit scared.
Update: I'm sorry to say that there wasn't enough data recovered to fill a thimble.
Oct. 3rd, 2008 @ 11:05 pm On being rebellious.
psicorp
He's a, "won't eat his broccoli" maverick.

A, "driving with his window open, elbow out the window like he's cool" maverick.

A, "knows of people that didn't go to Sunday school." maverick.

A "Didn't wash behind his ears.",
    "Doesn't listen to your opinion",

      "Eats desert first" maverick.
He. Is. A maverick -
    He's a friends with people who are in trouble with the law kind of maverick.
Not all who find themselves in trouble with the law are "bad",
    but these are the liars and thieves that would rather beat you up first kind of law-breakers.
I've hung out with some people who might call themselves mavericks, but the mavericks I admire the most?
    are the ones that peacefully gather outside of events in order to spread awareness of ill thought-out policies and unfair treatment, only to be forcibly corralled, beaten up, and arrested for "conspiracy to riot".
I admire them because they have to go to court to defend themselves against false arrest (quite possibly at their own expense), and then they get out there and do it all over again.

I'm not that brave.

Where was the maverick when these good people were being beaten up and arrested? Sure, he was busy at that moment, just a few blocks away, but where was he the next day?
    This happened on your watch.
I can just hear someone's mom, now: "Well, gosh darn it, those protesters shouldn't have been out so late, doncha know. A person that stays out that late is just askin' for all kinds of trouble."
Sep. 30th, 2008 @ 08:03 pm Do this.
psicorp
Go here.

http://www.youtube.com/experiencewii

Then go to the comments afterwards.
Sep. 28th, 2008 @ 01:23 pm This also looks like fun.
psicorp
Stressful, a huge time sink, but fun.

A Shadowy, Wet World of Squirt-Gun Assassins - NY Times.

Gives new meaning to "wet work", doesn't it?

Info:

Assassin (game) - Wikipedia

Links:

SJ Games: Killer

Tag: The Assassination Game - IMDB

Gotcha! - IMDB
Sep. 28th, 2008 @ 12:49 pm This looks like this was fun.
psicorp
Sep. 19th, 2008 @ 07:09 pm That weirdo with a lame duck on his shoulder.
psicorp
A fast you land lumbers are.

Eye need me wrench eye.
Sep. 18th, 2008 @ 10:52 pm A clarification
psicorp
Apparently, the commercials have not been canceled. I've seen phase 2, they're not much better.

The only reason I'm posting that at this point is for accuracy. The last post was inaccurate.

I also apologize for posting this at all. This is the conversation I've been having. It's kind of difficult not to respond at all to stimulus or to a perceived response. I'll have to try harder to ignore these things in the future. (I mean that jokingly.)

A: This sucks!

B: This is good because it got a response out of you!

A: Just because it sucks loudly doesn't make it suck any less.

B: See!? See!? That's why you'll remember it!

A: I remember it because it sucks, and the message I will remember is that it sucks.

B: But you will still remember it.

A: But not to their advantage.

[Days pass...]

B: See!? People are still talking about it! See how great this is? The whole point they're trying to make is that they know that they're out of touch! Techies just don't get that point. ( This coming from a techie. )

A: That's not a good message to convey, and the non-techies don't get it either.

B: They post to LJ, so they're not non-techie enough.

A: I just read an article that confirms the suckage. MS is pulling the ads.

B: But you're still talking about it!

A: I'm only talking about it because you brought it back up! I moved on. (I just wanted to prove how much this thing sucks every time you say how great it is.)

B: But you're still talking about it!

Ok - I fucking give up. There's nothing to talk about here.

So I apologize for creating yet another post on the same subject. I promise that there will be a permanent change of subject moving forward.
Sep. 18th, 2008 @ 05:26 pm Epic fail
psicorp
Kill confirmed - for the win!
Sep. 17th, 2008 @ 06:18 pm Calling all non-technical people!
psicorp
A friend of mine has a theory that only you can prove or disprove!

Have you seen the new Bill Gates / Seinfeld commercials for Microsoft?

If you have, leave your thoughts about it in the comments.

Thanks.
Sep. 17th, 2008 @ 06:15 pm Why I really don't want a dog?
psicorp
Because the National Geographic Channel doesn't have a series entitled The Cat Whisperer.
Sep. 11th, 2008 @ 07:41 pm Cause and effect.
psicorp
I've heard it said that Orwell's 1984 influenced McGoohan's The Prisoner.

I've also heard it said that The Prisoner was an influence to JMS's Babylon 5.

This can supposedly be seen whenever Bester grins that fake grin of his and says, "Be seeing you." Even the hand gesture is the same.

Let's rewind a bit to the opening sequence of The Prisoner:
    "Where am I?"
    "In the Village."
    "What do you want?"
    "Information."
    "Whose side are you on?"
    "That would be telling…. We want information. Information! INFORMATION!"
    "You won't get it."
    "By hook or by crook, we will."
    "Who are you?"
    "The new Number Two."
    "Who is Number One?"
    "You are Number Six."
    "I am not a number — I am a free man!"
    (Laughter from Number Two.)


Now in B5:
    What do you want? is the Shadows' question.

    Who are you? is the Vorlon question.

    Whose side are you on? = 4 seasons of a secret war of ideology between Vorlons and Shadows lasting well over three thousand years.


If you're a fan of both shows... Think about it... Cause and effect?

    Hey, wasn't the leader of the Mars resistance referred to as a Number for a while?


Hmm....
Sep. 9th, 2008 @ 07:40 am John Cleese on Extremism
psicorp
As seen in other LJ postings:

Sep. 9th, 2008 @ 06:58 am Dark Shadows, Indeed
psicorp
Had a nightmare disturbing dream, last night.

I dreamed that I (and a few others) had just survived a vampire attack. We grab the nearest weapons we could find (a collection of Number Two pencils) and head off to their lair to finish them off.

Their lair is a large upper-crust private boy's school, straight out of Bully, from what I've seen of that game. Most everyone in the school is a vampire. Anyone at the school who is not a vampire seems distant and detached from their environment. There is no joy to be found here. Their minds are not their own.

As we venture further into the heart of the school, we learn a terrifying fact about our prey. These are Lasombra, from White Wolf Gaming Studio's earlier incarnation of their World of Darkness setting. These are vampires who can control shadows and wield them as weapons. Worse still, they can become shadows.

So here we are, all sitting on a couch in the dark in the middle of a large room, watching the shadows for any sign of movement, knowing full well that our Number Two pencils will do little to save us.
Sep. 7th, 2008 @ 05:01 pm New use for an old USB 1.1 hub
psicorp
AC Adapter to USB port to charge USB devices.

USB port to USB hub to charge several USB-powered devices at once.
Sep. 6th, 2008 @ 06:54 pm Mathematically debunking liberal bias in the media.
psicorp


n ( n-1 )
-----------
2


The result is the number of communication paths where n is the number of things being coordinated.

Scientists like to collect as much data as possible when conducting research. Large population sizes (of data) help to ensure the accuracy of the conclusions based on that data. A smaller population size may not tell the whole story.

Always consider the formula I just gave you when considering the plausibility of conspiracy theories. Who's in the conspiracy? Every component of a conspiracy that needs coordinating increases the value of n by one. The higher the result, the less likely the conspiracy.

"Liberal bias in the media" is a conspiracy theory.

There are ten major media conglomerates that own the vast majority of all commercial media. They are: AOL/Time Warner, AT&T, Bertelsmann, GE, News Corporation, Liberty Media Corporation, Sony, Viacom, Vivendi, and Walt Disney. One of those ten is well known for telling people that the others are biased. That means there are nine conspiring groups. Let's do the math:

9 * 8 = 72 / 2 = 36 lines of communication between major groups to keep up the conspiracy.

Now let's analyze the accuser:

1 * 0 = 0 / 2 = 0 lines of communication between major groups to keep up the conspiracy.

The math suggests that the opposite is true. It is far more likely that the accusing group is the conspirator and is lying to us.

Again, the best way to verify this is through the population size of your data. Try watching the other networks. They may have their editorial shows, but I've never seen any of them wield those editorials with such frequency and such ferocity as that one network. I've never heard of defecting ex-employees from any of the other networks claim that their network had team meetings in which the political talking points and spin of the day were being discussed. I've also never heard any of the other networks ever say that you could not trust anyone else but them. I've also never heard any of the other networks wield the phrase "fair and balanced" as though it were an indisputable certificate of trust.

All of us are opinionated. Anyone who says they're not...
Sep. 5th, 2008 @ 05:02 pm Jerry Seinfeld takes M$ Window$ for a ride.
psicorp
A somewhat bemused and slightly bewildered Bill Gates humors Jerry Seinfeld as he blathers on in a series of random tangents and you've-got-to-be-kidding-me moments of what-seems-to-be utterly stupid pieces of advice. I can imagine a much younger Gates just not having the time for such nonsense.


I feel sorry for Bill in this one. It's as if he's putting up with this annoyance because it's the right thing to do (or it's expected of him), and it doesn't look like he "gets" whatever Jerry is doing. I don't. Numerous other postings to the Internet don't, either.

I'm not sure how this is supposed to counter the Apple ads at all. Apple has this air of youth and newness about it. It's like they've got that sleek new car that everyone wants to test drive just once. Bill, on the other hand, is looking old in this one. He pulls out a frequent buyer photo ID membership card with a picture of him from his arrested DUI days. He's a far cry now from the same young man shown in the photo, and the years are showing. It's almost as if he's walking off into the pastures...

I can just imagine the conversation that happened when the ad agency approached Seinfeld to do this:

Jerry: "Hey. What's up?"

Ad: "We want you to do a series of advertisements for Microsoft to counter the Apple ads. We need a fresh new approach that shows we're cool, young, and with it."

Jerry: "Woah, woah, woah - You know I did an entire television series about nothing, right?"

Ad: "Uh. Yeah?"

Jerry: "Okay, well, before we get into details - I mean how much we're talking about, here?"

Ad: -muffled-.

Jerry: "Really? That much? I'll do it, but only if I get to call the shots."

Ad: "Sure-"

Jerry: "- and I mean all the shots."

Ad: "... Sure, Jerry. What did you have in mind?"

Jerry: " Me. Bill Gates, and a shoe store."

Ad: "Huh?"

Jerry: "That's just it. It'll be about nothing. It'll be so cool. Get it?"

Ad: "Yeah... I get it. A commercial about- nothing."

Jerry: "Right. How soon can I expect that first installment?"

Ad: "We can get you the papers you'll need by tomorrow."

Jerry: "Great. We'll talk then, okay?"

Ad: "Ok. Looking forward to it."

Jerry: "Yeah, me too. See ya" -click- "Oh man, I'm so going to take Microsoft for a ride..."