| | Subject: | LOLCATS | | Time: | 10:26 pm |
|
| 
David and I are obsessed with lolcats.
The funniest part is that Ellie thinks they are funny shit and she laughs HARD whenever she sees them. | comments: 2 comments or Leave a comment  |
| "[T]he first thing seen is a freshly detached human head being bounced down the long steps of a towering pyramid toward a frenzied crowd below. Only then does it dawn on the shackled prisoners what's in store for them. At the summit preside dissolute royals as well as a high priest who, time and again, plunges a knife into a man's belly and, while the victim is still alive, tears out his still-beating heart as an offering to placate the gods to end the drought." [Variety]
Mel Gibson's movies just keep getting bloodier. When will he finally get over his torture fetish?? Bleh. | comments: Leave a comment  |
| | Subject: | Sling things. | | Time: | 03:16 pm |
|
| Do you own a baby carrier (sling/backpack, whatever)? Got a favorite?
Bonus points if you'll tell me why you love it/hate it. | comments: 4 comments or Leave a comment  |
| | Subject: | Keith Olberman is my new boyfriend. | | Time: | 10:00 am |
|
| The documented truths of the last fifteen years are replaced by bald-faced lies; the talking points of the current regime parroted; the whole sorry story blurred, by spin, to make the party out of office seem vacillating and impotent, and the party in office, seem like the only option.
How dare you, Mr. President, after taking cynical advantage of the unanimity and love, and transmuting it into fraudulent war and needless death, after monstrously transforming it into fear and suspicion and turning that fear into the campaign slogan of three elections? How dare you -- or those around you -- ever "spin" 9/11?
Just as the terrorists have succeeded -- are still succeeding -- as long as there is no memorial and no construction here at Ground Zero.
So, too, have they succeeded, and are still succeeding as long as this government uses 9/11 as a wedge to pit Americans against Americans.
Wow. | comments: 3 comments or Leave a comment  |
| | Subject: | Update | | Time: | 01:59 pm |
|
| The carrot-apple muffins (code name: cupcakes) were a moderate success. All the kids at least tried them. Baldo gleefully devoured his, as did Dexter, but my little man was decidedly anti-cupcake-muffin. Ah well, ya win some, ya lose some.
Somehow I need to squeeze in a trip to the bank to open a bank account for Miles (to deposit his birthday money), a trip to Hobby Lobby to get last-minute supplies for a project Gabe has due tomorrow, bread and veggie soup for dinner, and a shower. Somehow I think the bank account and shower aren't going to make the cut. Hrmph.
That's all, for now, from The Land of Three Kids. | comments: 3 comments or Leave a comment  |
| | Subject: | Ellie's finally here! | | Time: | 10:14 pm |
|
| Eleanor Rose Erwin was born early this morning, Saturday June 17, at 4:27am after a fast and furious 2-hour labor. She weighed in at 8lbs, 4oz, her head measured 14.25in, and she is 20in long. The boys were there for the birth and are ecstatic to have a new baby in the house!
Pictures and story after much-needed rest & bonding... | comments: 21 comments or Leave a comment  |
| | Subject: | Feedback | | Time: | 05:08 pm |
|
| | You can send Six Apart your thoughts by opening a support request here. | comments: Leave a comment  |
| | Subject: | Twins, natch. | | Time: | 12:53 pm |
|
| Scientists have discovered that drinking milk and eating cheese stimulates a protein than prompts the release of eggs and makes women five times more likely to give birth to twins ... They found that the twinning rate in vegans is one fifth of that in vegetarians and meat-eaters ... Other scientists say vegan women may bear fewer twins because they are less well nourished. Dr Paul Haggarty of the Rowett Research Institute in Aberdeen says there may be other nutrients that vegan women lack.
From Dairy Diet the Natural Way for Mothers to Conceive Twins
Hm. Natural? | comments: 3 comments or Leave a comment  |
| | Subject: | Breastfeeding Photos are not obscene | | Time: | 10:07 pm |
|
| Denise,
Thank you for your response. However, I'm not sure that you or your Six Apart colleagues quite understand the nature of your decision-making. In order to be clear, I will directly reference your communication:
"We feel it's important to strike a balance between the ideal of free expression and the rights of, for instance, a parent to prevent their child from seeing unsolicited material that the parent feels is non-age-appropriate or the right of an individual to be able to browse public LiveJournal spaces without being exposed to nudity or violence."
Six Apart first indicates that this form of censorship "strikes a balance," indicating that those who feel that breasts and breastfeeding are offensive have a valid and worthwhile opinion.
Six Apart then equates breastfeeding with gratuitous nudity.
"There are not blanket restrictions on default userpics depicting the act of breastfeeding, and the restrictions have nothing to do with targetting or restricting breastfeeding activism or awareness campaigns."
While breastfeeding as an act is not prohibited per se, breastfeeding is sub-categorized under gratuitous nudity.
It is misleading to say that the restrictions do not restrict breastfeeding activism or awareness campaigns without elucidating exactly how Six Apart's definition is non-restrictive.
The restriction is by definition restrictive and censoring; it is also passes a value judgment against those who are unable to depict the act of breastfeeding without revealing an aereola or nipple (which vary in size, shape and color from person to person). It disallows breastfeeding photos that reveal nipples or areolas even though these body parts fundamental to the breastfeeding process.
"Any usericon in which unclothed breasts or genitalia are visible is therefore inappropriate for use as a default icon..."
Again, going back to the statement that Six Apart is not trying to restrict breastfeeding activism or awareness, this censorship restricts photos which depict proper latch-on techniques which are vital to the education and awareness-building of women and men everywhere who have or may have children at some point.
Six Apart also, by this claim, equates breasts with sexuality, viewing them primarily and most importantly as sexual objects, seeing breastfeeding only as a subsidiary use of the breast, areola or nipple. Six Apart validates the concerns of those individuals that feel that images of breasts are vulgar by imposing the restriction, taking sides even while claiming not to.
"The application of this policy to icons depicting breastfeeding is not in any way intended to be a statement that breastfeeding is dirty, shameful, or obscene.
Unfortunately, Six Apart's intentions are clear. By restricting pictures which depict an infant nursing, latching on or off to nurse, or participating in breastfeeding or bonding functions with a bare-breasted parent, Six Apart has placed an emphasis on the sexual function of the breast, a subsidiary function which serves a biological purpose that in no way compares to the care and feeding of a newborn child.
"We fully support our users' right to make their own decisions regarding parenting choices and styles, and we appreciate the dedication of parents who have chosen to participate in breastfeeding activism and education."
You can imagine why parents who have endured discrimination due to their breastfeeding choices find this statement an empty sentiment devoid of sincerity.
"We ask only that you are willing to extend the same support and appreciation to, for instance, parents who choose to believe that it is inappropriate for their children to view unsolicited nudity in public."
As a parent of three, I absolutely do not extend support or appreciation to individuals who find breastfeeding or breasts to be offensive or vulgar. I have both breast and bottle-fed my children. There is no need for individuals on either side of the issue to feel animosity towards the other--both are perfectly valid ways to feed a child, privately and in public.
"We feel that the restrictions we have always placed on default usericons strike the best balance between individual expression and individual courtesy."
Gratuitous sexual imagery exists everywhere, and as a parent, I would prefer to have the ability to monitor and make decisions regarding what my children are exposed to. I do not need Six Apart to make decisions such as this for me.
"We do agree that in a perfect world, the issue would not arise, but unfortunately, this is not a perfect world, and we believe that our solution to the issue is a reasonable compromise between two wildly divergent points of view regarding what is and is not appropriate for LiveJournal -- not simply regarding icons depicting breastfeeding, but all material which a parent or other individual might feel is inappropriate for public."
Agreed, this is not a perfect world. But, according to Six Apart, LiveJournal is YOUR world which you and your colleagues rule with unmonitored control. And, according to Six Apart, imagery which includes any form of nudity, regardless of whether it pertains specifically to breastfeeding and in fact even when it pertains specifically to breastfeeding, is offensive.
Six Apart has chosen to communicate to users that there are situations in which breastfeeding is offensive.
"... the issue is not at all a political one. We welcome and value our pro-breastfeeding users and communities, and appreciate their dedication to and passion for their cause."
The issue is political.
The primary biological function of a breast is for feeding an human child, sustaining the life of a newborn infant.
Sex is a subsidiary function of the breast.
Banning pictures which depict breastfeeding because they may or may not be interpreted as having a gratuitous sexual aspect is validating the interpretation that the breast is primarily sexual, breastfeeding is sexual, and breastfeeding as vulgar or offensive.
Breasts and breastfeeding are not offensive, they are natural and necessary.
If Six Apart agrees that images that depict breastfeeding are sexual, you will continue the restriction.
If Six Apart agrees that breastfeeding is natural, non-offensive, and indeed necessary to sustain new life, you will apologize to those you have unnecessarily shamed and offer to all users the same breastfeeding support that most states in the US currently extend to mothers and children today.
Sincerely, | comments: 8 comments or Leave a comment  |
| | Subject: | Listen up, Breeders. | | Time: | 05:42 pm |
|
| That's right, ladies, I'm talking to you. If you haven't forgotten (and your government hasn't), you are really just a baby-making vessel. I mean, really, first and foremost, you are a reproductive machine. That's your, um, God- or whatever-given mission. And you're failing at it miserably, ya hear?
According to the WaPo:
The U.S. infant mortality rate is higher than those of most other industrialized nations -- it's three times that of Japan and 2.5 times those of Norway, Finland and Iceland, according to a report released last week by Save the Children, an advocacy group.
Tangentially related to this fact is the need for all women in the US to start treating their bodies like the unprepared wombs that they are:
New federal guidelines ask all females capable of conceiving a baby to treat themselves -- and to be treated by the health care system -- as pre-pregnant, regardless of whether they plan to get pregnant anytime soon ... Among other things, this means all women between first menstrual period and menopause should take folic acid supplements, refrain from smoking, maintain a healthy weight and keep chronic conditions such as asthma and diabetes under control.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong here, but I don't remember the CHILD and Newborn Act of 2006 suggesting that the feds pass the buck on infant mortality rates to the mothers.
And it isn't like the WaPo article fairly whistleblows--it also includes the tidbit that mortality rates are higher among African-American babies, but does not discuss discriminatory health care or welfare practices that are inevitably linked to these rates. And it gives no information on how to find out more about the new "guidelines," whatever they may actually say (the CDC.gov site is silent on the issue).
Now, I love popping out the babies as much as the next woman, but not all of us WANT to have babies, not all of us INTEND to have babies, and women that are sexually active are not necessarily in need of a good "reminder" as to how to treat their bodies. I certainly don't hear men being given guidelines as to what to do with their giz.
*UGH*
Good thing shit like this happens so that my pregnancy hormones have something to play with. | comments: 4 comments or Leave a comment  |
| I've been slowly catching up on most of the tech blogs I had subscribed to in the last 2 years. Lots of good posts about information design, interaction design and usability. Lots of good abstract nuggets about "findability" and meta-blogging. Lots and lots of intellectual gourmet.
Unfortunately, I find myself leaving this field. I'm good at what I do, and I never fail to find a job, and it pays reeeeelly well, which is what keeps me coming back. But I can't help but think the same thing over and over: I am good at a lot of things. I want to do something that *means* something.
The thing about being a techie is that there is a crazy amount of data out there. Crazy crazy. I could spend all day and night reading, posting, subscribing, bookmarking, tagging, re-organizing, deleting, posting some more... I don't really have that kind of time.
And most people don't have the time. My mom doesn't use Bloglines because she doesn't go to more than one or two blogs every day, and even that would be saying a lot for her. With her work/travel schedule, she maybe surfs once a week.
ID techies love to talk about information and how to get it out there, make it digestible, and give it meaning (from a design/visual pov). They love to create new things and see how users react.
But you have to have an audience. And there is this HUGE group of people out there that isn't watching/reading because they don't have access. Even if they did, they wouldn't have time. Even if they did, they might not care.
I believe in the internet revolution. The internet is why I had two home births and cloth diapered and breast-fed, things that were 100% foreign to me (if not repulsive) before I read the accounts of a bunch of women who were doing it. The internet helped me learn to appreciate homeschooling and organic gardening and acupuncture. The internet showed me (in great detail) how W was a fraud and how most things people are afraid of are urban legends and how natural disasters can elicit amazing amounts of individual charity.
I think it is really important to not get into a headspace that forgets the outside world. Being a specialist in something sometimes elicits tunnel-vision. If I kept on going in the design-usability-interaction direction, I think I would forget all this other stuff, like how not everyone is online. MOST people are not online.
And I want to reach those people. | comments: 3 comments or Leave a comment  |
| | Subject: | You get what you pay for. | | Time: | 11:19 pm |
|
| AlterNet is hosting a truly phenomenal article on working women's wages, a.k.a "paid maternity leave."
Pretty much every aspect of women's reproductive work is punished economically in the American workplace. And that affects all two-earner, nuclear households -- the ideal to which we're all supposed to aspire (the wage gap is estimated to cost working families $200 billion dollars per year).
But it doesn't need to be that way. We're so far behind the rest of the world in commonsense, pro-women and pro-family policies that we don't need to reinvent the wheel to figure out what works.
In a globally competitive environment, we need expanded parental leave, universal pre- and after-school programs, more flexible work hours and time off to take care of sick kids and elderly parents.
You go, boy. | comments: 2 comments or Leave a comment  |
| | Subject: | No means no. No is always no. Even if its yes, it means a thousand times no. | | Time: | 10:44 am |
|
| No, you can't come in the kitchen yet. Lissi barfed on the floor and I need to clean it up.
No, you can't have a hot dog for breakfast.
No, the stick has to stay outside. So does the soccer ball. So does the mud.
No, we don't watch the same movie over and over again. Because it isn't good for your imagination.
No, it isn't okay to scream at each other. Everybody hug. In a family, we treat each other with respect.
No, Lissi, you can't come back inside yet.
No, you can't have company in the bathroom while you pee.
No, it isn't okay to talk about farting while we're all eating at the table.
No, Jimmy Neutron is not real. But if he were real, I agree that he would beat everyone at chess. | comments: 2 comments or Leave a comment  |
|
|