| March 18, 2004 |
[18 Mar 2004|08:15pm] |
March 18, 2004
I have been discussing with a colleague on a music list, the importance and relevance of gender to music and how being a Lesbian can have a profound effect on one's performance, i.e. to identify with the text one is singing.
People have been writing me with sentences something like this: "As a long-time singer, composer and conductor of a variety of choral ensembles, I fail to see any relevance whatsoever as to sexual orientation" shows me that I see things very differently from the straight world.
The most important point he made was that in singing a song, we are all disenfrachised from our subject to a certain extent, in that we cannot be in the shoes of the person completely and utterly, and thus must find a way to express the content and emotion of the song no matter what our personal reference point is. He related that his daughter was told to think of a cat she loved while singing a song about a woman in love with her newly wed husband, since the daughter had had problems with men in the past, and could not use this image to connect. You can always find a way to connect even if disenfranchised, was his point. I replied:
"Your points are interesting and cogent. Obviously, each of us cannot ever be in the exact same shoes of the poet or the songwriter, and must find some way to connect to the person or situation one is singing about. For example, as a person who scarcely ever goes digging in the garden, let alone uses a shovel, I cannot be even close to a Gravedigger in "Gravedigger's Lament" although I can connect with his pain. (In my desperation to avoid love songs to a man I picked such songs for my voice lessons, and my teacher couldn't understand why I wanted to sing such dark strange material. At the time I wasn't able to talk about my sexual origin.)"
"But the cat as a reference point to one's beloved when one is singing about a wedding ring? Mon Dieu. As a voice teacher, I find that a bit of a stretch, but I guess to each her own. But here is where the analogy ends."
"In a psychology experiment, two groups were given a test to take, in adjoining soundproof rooms. Both were presented with heavy distracting and jarring music accompanying their test taking. Group A however, was given the option to press a button and turn off the music. Who had the best scores? Group A of course. Ah but here is the rub. Group A did NOT turn off the jarring music. The perception that they COULD, in the conclusion of the psychologists, constituted the leading edge for them."
"Perceiving one's self as having options whether actual or imagined is the point here. Given options, I can step into any role that I desire. Now suppose your daughter was told: you can choose a cat but remember it is wrong to love cats, you will sin if you do, you will be considered a freak, you could lose your job, get an F in class, or be ridiculed. How well would your daughter connect by picking a beloved cat as her reference point? It would invalidate her participation, to use your words."
So then, in the land of cat discrimination, I would tell her, okay, you can pick the cat as long as you imagine that the cat is a woman (because that would be acceptable in this mythical kingdom). Ah but I don't want to be singing to a woman! Besides, who wants to go through such machinations?
Dawn Upshaw held a master class in voice, which I recently attended. A young singer picked a Strauss song in which a woman clearly sings to a woman. The Soprano expressed difficulty with this, so Upshaw said, "just replace her with a man. Not "Just imagine a woman you love and sing to her." That clearly was not an option for Upshaw.
I so wanted to sing Schumann's Dichterliebe in my student days in Germany, but as my accompanist cautioned, "Well, you know what kind of women would want to do THAT." At the time it didn't take much to squelch me and my feelings. Again, it invalidated my participation. This is what countless gay and lesbian musicians have suffered through the years, some surviving better than others. Most of us have unconsciously internalized the negation of our very beings.
Now I know it is okay to sing Dichterliebe and I have done so for years. But that hasn't yet translated itself into the general audience acceptance.
My last thought: even Charlize Theron could find her way to portray a prostitute who killed a number of men. But you will note that in almost all cases where a Lesbian (which I believe she was not even if so designated) is the character, she is played by straights? ("The Children's Hour", "Boys Don't Cry," "Monster" and of late "The L Word" on Cable). Lesbian characters hit the big screen only when they have a defect, are deranged, die, kill or are sex crazed. No goodness, no greatness of character, no redemption. I find it highly ironic, incidentally, that Lesbians are not selected to portray Lesbians. But this is a digression.
Kind regards,
Naomi
|
|