Nick Mamatas ([info]nihilistic_kid) wrote,
@ 2004-09-28 01:13:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
How To Lose Your Money And Waste Your Time
The Washington Post this weekend published a ridiculous article in their little "How To" section. Yep, it was all about "How To Publish Your Own Book" and the piece couldn't have held more lies and half-truths had it been written by a con artist and published on the web. "How do you get your tome flying off the shelves at Borders?" the article asks. Not this way!

The hoary old roll call of dubious self-publishing successes are presented first. "James Redfield's 'The Celestine Prophecy' and John Grisham's 'A Time to Kill' started this way" author Rachel F. (the F stands for "Fire Me") Elson explains. Except that she's wrong. A Time To Kill was never self-published; it was released as a hardcover original by Wynwood Press in '89. The Celestine Prophecy was self-published, but its success is hardly easily replicable because the "novel" was actually an example of one of the few genres of work that can be legitimately and profitably self-published: New Age cultism associated with a seminar series where the book can be hand-sold to aging hippies by unpaid brainwashed volunteer table-minders.

Are you writing that kind of book? Probably not. Do you have a seminar series? Ditto. Brainwashed servants? Nuh-uh.

The article continues. "Publicizing your book shouldn't be the last thing you think about -- you should start even before the masterpiece is finished. Begin by lining up people to blurb it -- raid your Palm (and your friends' contacts) for former colleagues, teachers or other high-profile prospects." Blurbs don't sell very many books. They certainly don't sell very many self-published books, as those titles rarely if ever make it into bookstores where the blurbs can be read by eager browsers. And your "teachers" and "colleagues" probably ain't that high profile after all.

"Once you've typed those two gratifying words, 'the end,' call the local media, and submit excerpts to magazines and newsletters." Now this much is true, your local daily paper is likely to write you up...unless you live someplace actually worth living in. Excerpts are a hard sell, and even if you self-publish and can thus control the tempo of printing, you're not likely to get any nibbles until your book is out. Oh, and excerpts don't sell books either. Move Under Ground was excerpted in the June/July issue of Razor, which has a circulation of over 300,000. It didn't so much sell any extra books as it sold books a little faster -- amazon.com moved an extra 25 copies or so per week for the eight weeks the issue was on the stands. 300,000 readers equaled around 200 copies sold. That ratio of reader to buyer sounds about right. So, how many people read the South Bend Indiana Model Train Fancier Association Newsletter your excerpt will be appearing in? Ooh, that many, eh?

Here's another bit of almost good advice: "Hiring an editor isn't a bad idea; you can post ads on Craiglist.com, Copyeditor.com or local job boards (ask for references, and try out prospects with a few pages first)." Ah yes, you know what kind of editors hang out on craigslist? Me. The first thing I tell folks is that I charge a penny a word. The second thing is not to self-publish. I've found that there are very few people willing to pay $800-$1000 for a manuscript dripping with a red ink and an editorial letter that boils down to "Shred this and start over, but in English." (Thankfully, there are some.) Of course, most of the craigslist.org ads for editors I see say things like "I can't pay you now, but when I sell the book you'll get a share of the profits! I have a can't miss idea that'll be a great movie!!!" Hmm, maybe people should read this article, if it'll get them to look up the word "hire" in the dictionary...

I'll leave aside, for now, the massive difference between editing as it actually exists and editing as the average craigslister conceives of it, which involves "checking for typos." Or, to speak the native language of CL, "typo's." That ' isn't an apostrophe, it's a glottal click.

"Because consumers and reviewers do judge a book by its cover, be sure to find a good graphic designer." But the author forgot to explain, "And remember, the painting your fifth-grader did sucks, and no graphic designer can possibly transform it into a decent cover image so for the love of God don't use it. And don't think your cover art has to reflect a scene in the book because it doesn't and only mental patients insist on any such thing." Covers should not illustrate what happens in the book, but are in fact ads for the type of book being sold.

Then, the Post talks money, explaining that all this can run up a bill of over $7000 including printing. Yes. And it says "Prices typically start at $5 or $6 per book for 100 copies of a standard-size, 256-page paperback, but they drop as quantities rise." Also yes. But 100 copies of a book? Exactly how many of these are going to fly off the shelves of Borders? Well, none.

And here comes the kicker. "If you want a tiny printing, you might try a print-on-demand operation, such as Xlibris (www2.xlibris.com), CafePress.com or AuthorHouse (www.authorhouse.com). These companies can simplify the publishing process by providing layout and design services, the ISBN number, and a distribution network -- but they tend to have higher costs and lower returns." And they're not printers but vanity publishers. If you self-publish, you own the books that the printer prints. If you publish via a vanity, the publisher owns the books you paid for. You still have to do all the work of selling the title; buying copies, dragging them around to events and conferences, trying to get publicity, hand-selling, etc. And in return you get the privilege of giving the vanity 90% of the money...on top of their initial fees. Sweet!

The real pitfall of self-publication is distribution, but the article has suggestions here too! "Wholesalers, such as Baker & Taylor (www.btol.com) or Amazon Advantage (www.amazon.com/advantage), handle only warehousing and shipment, while "master distributors" like Biblio Distribution (www.bibliodistribution.com), a small-press distributor, have a sales force to present books to retailers. Again, the more marketing you've done ahead of time, the easier it will be to persuade a distributor to pick up your book." The author conveniently forgets to mention that B&T has massive issues with paying even its larger customers within six months of order fulfillment, and doesn't normally take self-published one-offs. The other major fulfillment company, Ingram, raised the drawbridges on small publishers a few years ago in order to compel them to go POD with Lightning Source, the print-on-demand company that is...wait for it...owned by Ingram! If you want in Ingram, you pay them to print and distribute, or you publish ten titles, sell them via magic, and then apply for a slot in the warehouse for your eleventh book.

Biblio, National Book Network, SCB, Consortium, my homies at PGW, and the other independent distributors that field sales reps and have their own warehouses (which feed into Ingram and B&T) aren't looking for self-published one-offs. This article, were it about becoming a rich doctor, would at this point simply say "To be a rich doctor, go to a good medical school, like Harvard's." Gee, thanks for the tip lady.

Amazon Advantage means a slot on amazon.com and nothing else, and a 55% commission on books sold on the site. Well, let's say you take that deal mentioned above and get a trade paperback at a unit cost of $6. It should sell, given 256 pages, for around $15. Okay, that's $9 as your margin. But you paid for editing ($1000), a cover ($400), and ISBN ($250), and copyright protection, shipping, marketing and other costs including $30 to be enrolled in the program ($200). That's $1850, and we'll spread that out over a print run of 500 instead of 100 because I'm feeling extra nice. That's $3.70 a book. Take that from $9 and your margin is now $5.30 a book. But what about that 55% commission? You're selling amazon.com your books for $6.75. Books that cost you $6 to print and $3.70 to create, for a total of $9.70 per unit, sell for $6.75 to your distro. That means that for every copy you sell via Amazon.com advantage...you lose $2.95.

You can, of course, name your price, and sell your trade paperback for $20, but given the choice between a $15 trade paperback (or a $25 hardcover, or a $7 mass market paperback) from a familiar author that's widely available for browsing and flipping through in bookstores and your expensive book with your son's painting on the cover and with you, Jimmy Joe Nobody as the author, how many people are going to spend an extra $5 on you that they wouldn't spend on their favorite authors? That's right, none.

And that, my friends, is how you publish your own book. Tune in next week when we'll discuss how to perform an appendectomy on yourself. Here's a helpful hint to whet your appetite: "Try not to die when you cut yourself open."


(Post a new comment)


[info]fetishpunk
2004-09-28 01:45 am UTC (link)
All good stuff, mister, thanks for laying it out so plainly. the easier and more widespread these technologies get, alas, the more common the sorts of operations you mention will become and the more muddied the whole field of publishing becomes. What is is interesting is that even with many small press "publishers" what we're really looking at are small press printers. If all you do is print up a book (and maybe typeset it) then that's nothing more than a printer. A publisher invests, markets, supports, etc etc.

Personally, i don't know how i'd feel about self-publishing a book. I think i'd feel like a cheat. Obviously *I* think that what I write deserves to be published otherwise i wouldn't have put all the effort into writing it, that goes without saying, but unless at least one person feels strongly enough to put in their own time, money and effort then I almost feel like the work doesn't deserve to be printed. i've been trying to find a home/agent for the n*vel and haven't had a single bite so far, I'll keep trying for a few months then if nothing happens I might have to consider that it's just not what anyone is interested in.

There is value in small/indy presses and the DIY nature of them but there is no value that i can see in vanity publishing if you want to be a serious author.

(Reply to this)


[info]jenlight
2004-09-28 02:09 am UTC (link)
*whining* but I wanna publish a boooooooook

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]antonstrout
2004-09-28 04:22 am UTC (link)
Ok, fine fine... send it in and we'll publish it!

See? That's how you do it. Whine and the world is yours...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]jenlight
2004-09-28 12:30 pm UTC (link)
Yay!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]chaizzilla
2004-09-28 03:23 am UTC (link)
had it been written by a con artist and published on the web

had it only!

(Reply to this)


[info]autopope
2004-09-28 04:05 am UTC (link)
I'm trying to remember where I saw it, but a statistic that stuck in my mind was that a survey had discovered that roughly 79% of the US population "thought they had a novel in them". And the functional literacy level was at least ten percent south of that.

I'd say the first thing to impress on people who "want to publish a book" is that it's a buyer's market. Everyone wants to publish a book -- at least 1% of the population are writing the blessed things and finishing them, the first step on the road, and to all intents and purposes 1% of $BIGNUM is still $BIGNUM. You want to write a book, I got no problem with that -- but you should only begin thinking about publishing if you think what you want to write is something that other people will also want to read.

It took me, personally, about a decade to internalize that idea, and another decade to get a handle on (a) what other people like reading and (b) what I like writing and (c) the set-theoretic intersection between the two. And I'm sorry, but I think this is going to descend into a rant if I don't stop myself quick, so I'm probably going to take it to my blog (when I get through sorting out my annual accounts and tax return -- bleargh, one of the side-effects of writing for a living that nobody warns you about).

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]marlowe1
2004-09-28 07:27 am UTC (link)
Then again doesn't everyone think that their book is a masterpiece that everyone wants to read? Especially since they took the time to finish the stupid thing. Makes you think that Xlibris came up with that stupid NaNoWriMo idea in the first place.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

comment and a question
(Anonymous)
2004-09-28 05:31 am UTC (link)
Nick, one comment -- I think Cafe Press is actually a printer, no? They don't buy any rights when you do a book through them. V. high per unit cost, though, as with all their items.

Here's my question. I did a little Sri Lankan cookbook last winter as a Xmas present, right? It was a great way to do Xmas presents -- it cost me something like $5/book, including paying $500 for cover art, plus my time and labor (but it's for presents, so labor of love). I gave maybe 50 of them to friends and family, and the rest are available on Amazon and the like -- occasionally, I get a hundred dollars or so off there. Now, people keep asking me how they can do something like that. And I point them to the SLF layout guide (http://www.speculativeliterature.org/Editing/slf_guide_(print).html), and tell them that I got it printed through a friend's small POD press. They have no friend with a POD press.

So here's my question. If they don't care about having an ISBN or selling the books (so don't need to set up as a micro-press themselves), but want them solely as charming gifts, and would like to get a lower per unit cost than Cafe Press will give them, do you know of any easy way to get the books printed POD?

thanks,
Mary Anne

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: comment and a question
[info]bryant
2004-09-28 06:01 am UTC (link)
I hear good things about lulu.com.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: comment and a question
(Anonymous)
2004-09-28 07:48 am UTC (link)
Lulu's website looks friendly and generally clear, but I can't seem to find the piece of information I actually want, which is, how much would it cost to buy your own books? They say they take 20% commission of books sold (although on another page, it says 25%) -- does that include books sold to yourself?

This is all I find on discounts: "Discounts are calculated on a sliding scale beginning with orders over 25 copies. For an order of 100 or more copies of a 100-page book, we offer discounts from 20%. For an order of of 500 or more copies of a 100-page book, we offer discounts from 35%."

Their base charges are also unclear -- I'm having trouble figuring it out enough to be able to compare it elsewhere.

Also, they charge $35 for an ISBN, which seems a bit insane to me. I need to go see if Cafe Press offers an ISBN service, and if so, how much they charge.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: comment and a question
[info]bryant
2004-09-28 08:36 am UTC (link)
Welp, it costs $225.00 to get a block of 10 ISBNs, so it's not a horrendous markup over what you'd pay if you got your own. Mind you, a block of 1000 costs only $1,200.00, so Lulu is probably making some money there.

Special book pricing for authors: http://www.lulu.com/help/node/view/14

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: comment and a question
(Anonymous)
2004-09-28 09:42 am UTC (link)
Ah, that pricing chart is exactly what I needed -- thank you!!! And their author prices look sane, and your explanation of the ISBN thing seems reasonable, so all in all, I think Lulu.com is a service I can comfortable recommend, at least based on this. Great to know.

- Mary Anne

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: comment and a question
[info]bedfull_o_books
2004-09-28 10:58 am UTC (link)
Call the Library of Congress and ask them about applying for an ISBN yourself. Or try http://www.loc.gov/. That's their official Web site.

I work for a publisher and I don't think we pay for ISBNs, but it might be one of those "operations costs" they tell me nothing about. Then again, it might be the "processing fee" for Lulu.com to get you the ISBN, which is crazy, because it takes all of 15 minutes to fill out the form and pull the stuff together....

Just my 2 cents.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: comment and a question
[info]polycat
2004-09-28 05:08 pm UTC (link)
i have a friend who's done iuniverse (a long time ago, for the ISBN) and now uses lulu and is much happier. they're a lot less expensive, and the machinery is the same. also, if you can furnish finished files and don't care about the isbn, can't all the kinkos do stuff like this now? i'm pretty sure most of the peeps selling their books of poetry on 125 in harlem are getting them done at kinkos or someplace similar.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: comment and a question
[info]gnostalgia
2004-09-28 06:01 am UTC (link)
iUniverse.com -- if you aren't actually trying to market the book and just want it to look nice, this place works well.

For the low few hundreds, pretty much as you did with the POD, you get an Amazon-listed product with a color cover and good production values. And you just do it all through their website.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: comment and a question
(Anonymous)
2004-09-28 07:54 am UTC (link)
iUniverse looks insanely expensive to me. $460 for their basic service, and you only get 5 books?!!!

If I hadn't paid a cover artist to create a new illustration for me (which I'd be doing if I went through iUniverse too, so that $500 should be counted separately), I would have paid essentially $250 for 50 books. That's something like 20 times as good a deal as what iUniverse offers. Am I missing something???

- Mary Anne

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: comment and a question
(Anonymous)
2004-09-28 07:57 am UTC (link)
Okay, I found the iUniverse volume discounts, which make it slightly less horrible -- if you buy at least 100 copies, you get 45% off something (the base price, hopefully, and not the cover price?). But I still suspect that's only going to drop it down to being 10 times as bad a deal as what I got. There must be a better way.

- Mary Anne

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: comment and a question
[info]mroctober
2004-09-28 02:26 pm UTC (link)
I'd be surprised if their bulk discount for authors was off of anything but the retail price. That's pretty standard. I would be shocked too if they offer royalties that match Lethe.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: comment and a question
[info]gnostalgia
2004-09-28 08:13 am UTC (link)
Nothing except that it's listed on Amazon and POD as well -- the production values, as I said before, are pretty nice; the full-color cover came out looking exactly as we'd wanted it, and the black and white photographic reproductions inside also came off well.

The staff was very professional and easy to work with; you got 50 edits/corrections as part of the price.

For being able to upload a Word doc, a PDF and a TIFF and have it turned around, edited, in production and listed on Amazon inside of a month without any major conflicts or screwups, it seemed like a good dea.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: comment and a question
(Anonymous)
2004-09-28 09:03 am UTC (link)
I'm not trying to make you dissatisfied with your experience -- I'm glad you're happy with your book. But I do want to note that the cover and interior are exactly the same no matter which POD publisher you go with -- that's all handled through LightningSource, so they all come out the same, to whatever level LightningSource's current level of technology can manage.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: comment and a question
[info]nihilistic_kid
2004-09-28 09:51 am UTC (link)
Hi Mary Anne. I would contract with either OPM or Fidlar-Doubleday. They have the cheapest rates I've seen for digital short runs. Word Riot uses OPM and many publishers use F-D for galleys.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: comment and a question
[info]mroctober
2004-09-28 02:23 pm UTC (link)
Heh, I was happy to help out with the book. I hope you were happy with the end result.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jonhansen
2004-09-28 06:51 am UTC (link)
Never mind the publishing stuff. How do we get brainwashed servants?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


watermelonsugar
2004-09-28 07:11 am UTC (link)
Exactly what I was going to ask!

(Reply to this)(Parent)

t. rev
(Anonymous)
2004-09-28 08:10 am UTC (link)
Oddly enough, it's a seller's market for brainwashed servants. At least 52% of the population view themselves as potential criminal masterminds, and very few of these people are willing to 'pay their dues', even as middle management.

The conclusion is clear: if you want to get published, become one of NK's brainwashed servants.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


sclerotic_rings
2004-09-28 10:28 am UTC (link)
The same place that provides hot groupies for science fiction writers: it's a little venue smack between the Emerald Palace and Miskatonic University, and right down the street from the Roy Orbison Celebrity Rehab Clinic and Retreat, where Elvis Presley spends his time on the small-arms range with John Lennon and Selena, ultralight flying with Buddy Holly and Stevie Ray Vaughan, and taking charm and tact classes with Sid Vicious and G.G. Allin.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]yanatonage
2004-09-28 06:59 am UTC (link)
The author also forgot to mention "once the book is on Amazon.com, invent 8 pseudonyms and have them all write you excessively glowing reviews. Don't be afraid to go overboard, either."

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]marlowe1
2004-09-28 07:29 am UTC (link)
Or make your friends read the thing and make them write glowing reviews, else cut them off.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lunablack
2004-09-28 07:11 am UTC (link)
Just freakin' hilarious.

I have some friends that do their own small press, so you could probably add that it's easier if one of you is a good artist, one of you has worked for a publisher before, both of you are very computer savvy, at least one of you is a good writer and editor....etc. Oh! And don't forget the Photoshop genius friend. Hehe.

(Reply to this)


[info]marlowe1
2004-09-28 07:32 am UTC (link)
Oh the horrors of editing bad writers that think they are geniuses. And the stupidity of the phrase "well I'm publishing this anthology and you're a writer. I like this story and I'll publish it but please do a rewrite." which is later followed up by - "well let me do some editing and tell me what you think." which then turns into "Did I mention that I'm an editor. It's my job to get rid of hairball choking phrases like the ones that you're trying to push on me and no, I don't buy your arguments about these sentences being necessary or genius." and of course that's followed by "well fuck you too, you pathetic talentless shit. And by the way - vampires are fucking boring."

Of course that might be only my experience.

(Reply to this)


spimby
2004-09-28 08:06 am UTC (link)
"The Celestine Prophecy was self-published, but its success is hardly easily replicable because the "novel" was actually an example of one of the few genres of work that can be legitimately and profitably self-published: New Age cultism associated with a seminar series where the book can be hand-sold to aging hippies by unpaid brainwashed volunteer table-minders."

The other, related category of "self-publishing successes" being motivational or inspirational books written or compiled by speakers or preachers who already have an established circuit of speaking engagements, with books and tapes and whatnot sold at said engagments. Chicken Soup, anyone?

I always love these articles for failing to mention that shit.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]nihilistic_kid
2004-09-28 10:06 am UTC (link)
Ah yes, OLD Age cultism too!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


sclerotic_rings
2004-09-28 10:20 am UTC (link)
Lawzy: are you sure that the author of that piece of swill didn't write for Writer's Digest? (I've still hung onto WD's guide to writing for online venues that appeared back in 1999: it's the funniest humor magazine I've ever read.)

(Reply to this)

(Deleted post)
Re: Idea for a novel: utter stranger adds comment to NK's LJ
[info]nihilistic_kid
2004-09-28 10:49 am UTC (link)
It's not copyright that is at issue, but publication rights.

Copyright is essentially ownership -- you get to decide who makes copies of your work.

Rights are licensed that the copyright owner gives to a publisher in exchange for money. For example, I own the copyright to Move Under Ground. For an advance of $3000 against 10% royalties, Night Shade Books licensed the right to generate the text in a hardcover and sell it in the US. For an advance of €1000 against 5% royalties, Edition Phantasia bought the right to translate the text into German and produce that translation as a paperback they can sel in Germany and German-speaking Switzerland.

Now if I walked down to the local printer and had them print my book, the printer wouldn't have the right to sell them at all. They'd be mine.

Places like XLibris can say all they like that the rights stay with you, but if they're putting copies of the book up at amazon.com, collecting money from sales, and paying you royalties off books that belong to them, then guess what, they are consuming rights no matter what.

In the long run it matters little; books get reprinted all the time, but it's a sneaky claim by the POD vanities. "Oh no, we don't want your rights. We'll just use them."

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Smile! You're on Bookslut!
[info]oblomova
2004-09-28 02:23 pm UTC (link)
This is linked at the Bookslut blog, as you probably already know.

Good work.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…