I'm starting to list books on eBay. Please help pay for my wedding!
Seller ID is eilatan1174.
Seller ID is eilatan1174.
I haven't really said much publicly about Nipplegate, mainly because I wasn't really sure what to say.
But I would like to say that I find it very sad that a number of my friends felt that it was necessary to delete their accounts in order to make LiveJournal/SixApart listen to their concerns.
I've been using SixApart products for years now, ever since the first version of Movable Type. I was a beta tester for TypePad a few years ago. I've never had any problems with them and my interaction with their tech support staff for both those products has been superb. Which is why their boneheadedness on this issue is so maddening to me.
Especially considering how quickly they moved on the licensing mess with Movable Type a few years ago. To recap that saga, they introduced a paid version of MT, but the restrictions on users & number of blogs was so restrictive that people were going to have to pay hundreds of dollars to upgrade to the new version. Within a handful of days--no more than a week--they announced that they were re-evaluating their licenses and within a month they'd made changes to the pricing scheme that pretty much everyone could live with. And that was without any sort of organized campaign on the part of outraged users, just on the strength of hundreds of trackbacks and emails from concerned users.
I was hoping for a similarly quick resolution of this issue.
I was hoping in vain, apparently.
I don't know where the line should be. But I do know that it bothers me immensely that, because my breasts are not lactating, that they are considered obscene by some women whose breasts are lactating. It also bothers me that male breasts are considered normative, while female breasts are deviant. They are not. I think I would rather see a "no naked male and female breasts at all" rule, where naked equals "visible nipple or areola" than a rule that implies that naked male breasts are acceptable but that female breasts are not. Because that's what we've got right now, and that's sexist. (Or, you know, make a rule that says that all breasts are acceptable; as a longtime fan of breasts, I could get behind that, too.)
I'm also very concerned with statements made, ex cathedra, by members of LiveJournal Abuse. Many of these comments have been documented at the Exposing LJ Abuse blog. Additionally, I am really bothered by a comment that Anil Dash made on this post over at the Whatever, in which he didn't disclose his financial interest in LJ/6A and basically said that people were blowing this out of proportion and that they should be worrying other, more worthy issues.
While I'm not convinced that having a default icon of a mother breastfeeding her child does much to further the cause (I know there are those who disagree with me on that point and I hope we can agree to disagree on that point), I think it is beyond ludicrous to claim that making an issue about default icons means that the person making the issue hasn't the desire to worry about other issues as well. In fact, it's downright insulting.
And yes, the behavior of some members of breastfeeding advocacy communities has been just as bad--and it has hurt the reputation of the community as a whole. I would hope that there are repercussions for those individuals. Comparing the banning of icons with visible nipple/areola to slavery is obscene and should not be tolerated. The lack of moderation of the
boob_nazis community is a major problem and I would hope that the more level-headed members of the community move to have a more active moderating team. (Also, personally, I'd look into changing the name of the community, but that's jsut me; I'm aware it's a joke, but I don't think it's very funny.)
What I would hope would come out of this would be a re-evaluation of the role of the Abuse Team. They perform a vital and important role in the smooth functioning of LiveJournal, but it's become pretty clear through this fiasco that there are problems. There should be a transparent appeal process. As of now, there is no appeal process in place. If there are unpublished guidelines surrounding any part of the FAQ or TOS, those guidelines should be published--and it should be indicated that it's not an exhaustive list (to cover the rules lawyers, because there are always rules lawyers). There should be a policy in place that prohibits retroactive editing of the FAQ to conform with a decision made by a member of the Abuse Team. There should be a clear rule prohibiting the Abuse Team from acting on reports filed as part of a vigilante action, if for no reason other than the fact that such actions on the part of users use up time and resources that the Abuse Team could be using to deal with real issues. The Abuse Team shouldn't be a weapon in inter-community warfare.
Anyhow. I'm looking forward to the return of my friends tomorrow. I've missed them.
Also, for fun: Tit Bits and The Nipple Project
But I would like to say that I find it very sad that a number of my friends felt that it was necessary to delete their accounts in order to make LiveJournal/SixApart listen to their concerns.
I've been using SixApart products for years now, ever since the first version of Movable Type. I was a beta tester for TypePad a few years ago. I've never had any problems with them and my interaction with their tech support staff for both those products has been superb. Which is why their boneheadedness on this issue is so maddening to me.
Especially considering how quickly they moved on the licensing mess with Movable Type a few years ago. To recap that saga, they introduced a paid version of MT, but the restrictions on users & number of blogs was so restrictive that people were going to have to pay hundreds of dollars to upgrade to the new version. Within a handful of days--no more than a week--they announced that they were re-evaluating their licenses and within a month they'd made changes to the pricing scheme that pretty much everyone could live with. And that was without any sort of organized campaign on the part of outraged users, just on the strength of hundreds of trackbacks and emails from concerned users.
I was hoping for a similarly quick resolution of this issue.
I was hoping in vain, apparently.
I don't know where the line should be. But I do know that it bothers me immensely that, because my breasts are not lactating, that they are considered obscene by some women whose breasts are lactating. It also bothers me that male breasts are considered normative, while female breasts are deviant. They are not. I think I would rather see a "no naked male and female breasts at all" rule, where naked equals "visible nipple or areola" than a rule that implies that naked male breasts are acceptable but that female breasts are not. Because that's what we've got right now, and that's sexist. (Or, you know, make a rule that says that all breasts are acceptable; as a longtime fan of breasts, I could get behind that, too.)
I'm also very concerned with statements made, ex cathedra, by members of LiveJournal Abuse. Many of these comments have been documented at the Exposing LJ Abuse blog. Additionally, I am really bothered by a comment that Anil Dash made on this post over at the Whatever, in which he didn't disclose his financial interest in LJ/6A and basically said that people were blowing this out of proportion and that they should be worrying other, more worthy issues.
While I'm not convinced that having a default icon of a mother breastfeeding her child does much to further the cause (I know there are those who disagree with me on that point and I hope we can agree to disagree on that point), I think it is beyond ludicrous to claim that making an issue about default icons means that the person making the issue hasn't the desire to worry about other issues as well. In fact, it's downright insulting.
And yes, the behavior of some members of breastfeeding advocacy communities has been just as bad--and it has hurt the reputation of the community as a whole. I would hope that there are repercussions for those individuals. Comparing the banning of icons with visible nipple/areola to slavery is obscene and should not be tolerated. The lack of moderation of the
What I would hope would come out of this would be a re-evaluation of the role of the Abuse Team. They perform a vital and important role in the smooth functioning of LiveJournal, but it's become pretty clear through this fiasco that there are problems. There should be a transparent appeal process. As of now, there is no appeal process in place. If there are unpublished guidelines surrounding any part of the FAQ or TOS, those guidelines should be published--and it should be indicated that it's not an exhaustive list (to cover the rules lawyers, because there are always rules lawyers). There should be a policy in place that prohibits retroactive editing of the FAQ to conform with a decision made by a member of the Abuse Team. There should be a clear rule prohibiting the Abuse Team from acting on reports filed as part of a vigilante action, if for no reason other than the fact that such actions on the part of users use up time and resources that the Abuse Team could be using to deal with real issues. The Abuse Team shouldn't be a weapon in inter-community warfare.
Anyhow. I'm looking forward to the return of my friends tomorrow. I've missed them.
Also, for fun: Tit Bits and The Nipple Project
- Mood:
thoughtful
For those of you involved in the breastfeeding icon brouhaha, I provide the following links for your use in icon-making (I went looking for one particular painting that I'd seen at the Met, but found a bunch more):
Virgin and Child, attributed to Simon Bening
Virgin Suckling the Child, Netherlandish (Antwerp) Painter
Virgin and Child, workshop of Dieric Bouts
Virgin and Child, Anthony Van Dyck
Virgin and Child, Hans Memling
Madonna and Child with Two Angels and a Donor, Giovanni di Paolo
The Holy Family, Joos van Cleve
Virgin and Child, attributed to Simon Bening
Virgin Suckling the Child, Netherlandish (Antwerp) Painter
Virgin and Child, workshop of Dieric Bouts
Virgin and Child, Anthony Van Dyck
Virgin and Child, Hans Memling
Madonna and Child with Two Angels and a Donor, Giovanni di Paolo
The Holy Family, Joos van Cleve
Text of a comment I posted to this post over at Feministing (archived here for my own reference, no one needs to read what's below the cut unless they really want to read me wank on about romance novels and stuff).
( wank wank wank )
( wank wank wank )
- Mood:
thoughtful
As most of you know, my sister has a daughter who was born on February 10th.
She's been trying to breastfeed, with mixed success. It seems that she's susceptible to mastitis, which isn't a lot of fun, and the baby's having some latch issues as well. She's been persevering (and working with a LC), but now disaster has struck:
Her breastpump--which she's been using to help buid up her supply (and to put a bit of extra breastmilk on ice) has broken.
Her husband is not working. She does not work. She cannot afford to replace the part of the pump that's broken. So I'm posting this here in the hopes that someone will be able to help her.
She has an Avent Isis pump, an older model. She can't find the model number anywhere on it--she bought it off eBay. The piece that has broken is the funnel piece.
If anyone happens to have this piece or know where it can be obtained, please let me know at natalieann @ livejournal.com. You will be compensated.
Edit: It's been taken care of. Thank you, everyone.
She's been trying to breastfeed, with mixed success. It seems that she's susceptible to mastitis, which isn't a lot of fun, and the baby's having some latch issues as well. She's been persevering (and working with a LC), but now disaster has struck:
Her breastpump--which she's been using to help buid up her supply (and to put a bit of extra breastmilk on ice) has broken.
Her husband is not working. She does not work. She cannot afford to replace the part of the pump that's broken. So I'm posting this here in the hopes that someone will be able to help her.
She has an Avent Isis pump, an older model. She can't find the model number anywhere on it--she bought it off eBay. The piece that has broken is the funnel piece.
If anyone happens to have this piece or know where it can be obtained, please let me know at natalieann @ livejournal.com. You will be compensated.
Edit: It's been taken care of. Thank you, everyone.
Posting this in the hopes that someone will be able to help--
Does anyone know any publicists at Baen? I'm trying to get a review copy of the new Wen Spencer and RT isn't having much luck finding anyone.
Does anyone know any publicists at Baen? I'm trying to get a review copy of the new Wen Spencer and RT isn't having much luck finding anyone.
Also, because I suck, I meant to post this yesterday--

What I wrote in 2001: Manibus date lilia plenis
What I wrote in 2001: Manibus date lilia plenis
