The 32nd International Committee of the History of Art is currently being held in Melbourne. There are around 700 attendees, including museum directors, curators, academics, and art historians from all over the world.
The Herald Sun asked 15 of them for their opinions on Melbourne. The response seems to be fairly mixed. The fact that quite a few make comparisons to Berlin, Paris, and London implies that the
Herald Sun asked them that as a direct question - "How would you compare Melbourne's culture with that of Berlin, Paris, or London?". Of course, Melbourne doesn't compare favourably with those cities - it's too small - it's not a fair comparison to make in the first place. The article is then given the headline "Critics blast city as art wasteland" which prompts the usual angry comments from readers.
- Melbourne is an awesome city to live. I dont care about the art s@#$.
- What would those fake-stuck-up snobs know about life, seriously look at how stuck up and UGLY they are and there cloths are circa 2005 how lame
- WHAT A LOAD OF ELITIST CLAP TRAP. PROBABLY NEVER WORKED A DAY IN THEIR LIVES ANY ONE OF THEM. WHO CARES? I'M HAPPY.
- to all you art critics....if you dont like our beloved city then get out!!!
- What can you say to these so-called Art Academics, other than "Get a real job"?
- Thankfully such tossers live overseas, they can stay there too in their cultural elitist society.
- What a bunch of up-themselves twats! Here is my artistic advice to you - B****r off and go home. We do not want or need a bunch of supposed-intellectual tossers telling us anything about our city.
The
Herald Sun sets it up, and the readers knock it down.