Journal-like a blog, but better
Life, the universe and everything. Politics, geekery and adapting to life in Yorkshire. With occasional outbursts of intelligence.
To vote in polls and comment easily, either login using your OpenID or create an account.
To vote in polls and comment easily, either login using your OpenID or create an account.
My daily digest of texts, tweets and status updates.
Microblogging using LoudTwitter and Twitter.
matgb_twitter is there if you're mad enough.
- 12:33 is laughing at Jennie for ringing me and saying "hello, is that the council tax office" Chace'd be a fine thing--bloody bills. #
Microblogging using LoudTwitter and Twitter.
-
I wrote this 18 months ago, but I've linked to it increasingly recently to explain points, so I'm bringing it to the top. The electoral system encourages broad church coalitions and two main parties. Every vote is thus, in some way, tactical.
-
Charlie goes back over Fermi's classic 'if they exist, why aren't they here' paradox with a bunch of possible explanations.
-
Follow up from Fermi - Father Gabriel Funes, said intelligent beings created by God could exist in outer space - the Vatican is organising a conference next year to mark the 200th anniversary of the birth of the author of the Origin of Species, Charles Da
-
Very very cool. Link to part one of some production stills and mock ups of the CGI original design Cylons from the Razor TV movie. Part two, witht he gold cylon, is worth clicking through to.
-
For those that wanted them from last time, Jen's now posted the whole article.
-
Looking at various sources and I was reminded of this result - is it possible Labour's headed for a wipeout of these proportions unless they sort themselves out?
-
to be produced by Sam Raimi. That slurping noise? That's a thousand brains melting at the idea. If you haven't read the book? Don't. Really, don't.
-
Heh: staff and customers at a pub in Tunbridge Wells reported seeing a UFO with "red and green flashing lights" moving across the sky. When asked to describe the direction of movement their answer was "Gatwick".
Just received by email from the organisers of the 7th Fantastic Films Weekend (Friday 13 to Sunday 15 June):
Facebook event for those interested.
Hot off the press (or whatever the equivalent is on the interweb) here's the full FFW 2008 programme, almost all confirmed...I've bolded the stuff I'd like to see, but nothing specifc yet—some of the stuff I haven't highlighted (like Phibes) is cool but I've watched it recently as Jennie's got the DVD. It's in Bradford, 20 minutes by bus from us here in Brighouse, anyone wanting advice for accommodation give us a shout, sofa space may still be available.
( Cut for length )
Weekend Pass £40 (£35 concs)
Day Pass £20 (£15 concs)
Grindhouse/Dr. Phibes double-bills £10 (£7 concs)
BTW. Passes do NOT include IMAX titles
If you've got any questions let me know. Oh, and I hope to have at least some of the John Carpenter's exclusive intro to The Thing on YouTube for you all in the next week or so, as a nice little teaser.
Cheers,
Your friends at FFW HQ
Facebook event for those interested.
I've mentioned that shared brain thing, right? I finished reading something, got up to go check on the pizzas, stole a kiss from Jennie on the way past and said I had a poll to post when I got back up. She showed me her screen and asked if it would look a bit like this. To which the answer is yes, yes it would. Female voters 'fancy Cameron' apparently, but we're both convinced it's the old shag, marry or kill question, so here we go.
Poll #1187280 Bag, Shag, or Crag
Open to: All, results viewable to: None
(trying inserting her poll into my post, might not work, will likely take you to her post when you vote, never done this before)
Poll #1187280 Bag, Shag, or Crag
Open to: All, results viewable to: None
Bag, Shag or Crag?
Bag Brown, Shag Cameron, Crag Clegg![]()
![]()
2 (11.8%)
Bag Brown, Shag Clegg, Crag Cameron![]()
![]()
2 (11.8%)
Bag Cameron, Shag Brown, Crag Clegg![]()
![]()
0 (0.0%)
Bag Cameron, Shag Clegg, Crag Brown![]()
![]()
5 (29.4%)
Bag Clegg, Shag Brown, Crag Cameron![]()
![]()
1 (5.9%)
Bag Clegg, Shag Cameron, Crag Brown![]()
![]()
7 (41.2%)
Does this view have any bearing on how you are likely to vote?
Does it bollocks!![]()
![]()
18 (94.7%)
Yes, because I am *that* shallow.![]()
![]()
1 (5.3%)
(trying inserting her poll into my post, might not work, will likely take you to her post when you vote, never done this before)
Hah, Guru
rhodri's new book is available for pre-order at Amazon:
FWD This Link: A Rough Guide to Staying Amused Online When You Should Be Working
It's only £6 (and if you reserve it on pre-order then bookstores will stock more which helps him, right, no obligation to actually cough up later), although given most of my posts at the moment are already linkblogging...
FWD This Link: A Rough Guide to Staying Amused Online When You Should Be Working
It's only £6 (and if you reserve it on pre-order then bookstores will stock more which helps him, right, no obligation to actually cough up later), although given most of my posts at the moment are already linkblogging...
Chortle reports that Vegas is suing[2] over the allegations made by the Guardian[1] and hinted at in The Times. The original story sparked a (justifiable) series of complaints and posts, including boycott and letter writing as well as a good explanation from Jennie about why the audience and alleged victim may have kept quiet.
Vegas himself has not commented fully but has said
Of course, he does have a few witnesses on his side already, this commenter at the Evening Standard Comedy Blog for example:
[1] Guardian has removed the story as a result of the action, it was here.
[2] A few of the articles I link to have now been removed or locked down by the sites that published them due to liability concerns—no one wants to get sued for libel. Worth reiterating to commenters that under the T&Cs of Livejournal, each individual is responsible for their own comments—this is a public post and Schillings have a rep for searching blogs (see tag).
[3] From Tim at Bloggerheads in his post linking here. ( A note for non-LJ commenters )
Vegas himself has not commented fully but has said
I haven't done anything wrong(ETA: since I wrote this, the Press Gazette has covered the story and has comments from Vegas[3]). Given the nature of the UK libel laws this makes sense—his lawyers will've told him to stay quiet and not mention specifics, and they'll likely push for an out of court settlement. If it does go to court, unfortunately, the odds are in his favour to win the case. English libel law notoriously favours the plaintiff and all he he needs to demonstrate is that his reputation was hurt (uncontestable); the Guardian'll need to, they need to demonstrate that their version of events is a reasonable interpretation (and he'll only need a few audience witnesses to say otherwise unfortunately). Teh Graun pretty much needs the girl herself to come forward else they've lost. Have I mentioned English libel law is an arse? I think I might've.
Of course, he does have a few witnesses on his side already, this commenter at the Evening Standard Comedy Blog for example:
I too was at the show on Friday and from my vantage point in the second row, I can honestly say that the female audience member in question appeared to thoroughly enjoy the experience. Coming off stage she looked as if she had just won the lottery.and as Chortle observes:
Did his ‘victim’ feel uncomfortable, too? Undoubtedly. I certainly did. Did she feel abused? Only she can tell. It’s the million dollar question that Vegas’s reputation rests upon. Or maybe the damage has already been done.We'll be watching this one closely I suspect. Tim? I'll be in touch mate.
[1] Guardian has removed the story as a result of the action, it was here.
[2] A few of the articles I link to have now been removed or locked down by the sites that published them due to liability concerns—no one wants to get sued for libel. Worth reiterating to commenters that under the T&Cs of Livejournal, each individual is responsible for their own comments—this is a public post and Schillings have a rep for searching blogs (see tag).
[3] From Tim at Bloggerheads in his post linking here. ( A note for non-LJ commenters )
-
Spoilers, natch. SCENE: Many, many, many Testing the Suit scenes, ending with a pretty cool flight over Malibu, a crash through two levels of Tonyâ™s house, and an Oscar winning performance by Freddy the Fire Extinguishing Robot.
-
This are useful java bookmarklet-highlight some text, click the BM, get a pop up containing the text and the page URL, should work in any browser, nice way of emailing useful info or even just storing something.
-
Ryan geeks out over YouTube embed code. More useful than it sounds: Iâ™ve yet to work out why Youtube [have] the video at 425×355px, when the resolution is only 320px wide, creating a blocky video as it is badly upscaled. here is the âœeasyâ way to e
-
Actualy rahter amusing: If but one of thy uncouth, base number Stirs with unrest; then every mother's son Of you, I will put in the earth by this My very own long sword; Harken to'it.
-
Heh! Iain responds to the comments and feedback you lot left on the last post I made linking to him. See, comments are good ;-) Hadn't considered the domain spoofing thing, but at the same time it's supposed to be for blog commenting...
-
I still can't summon the energy and rage to assemble all the links for the Dorries attack - fortunately DK's done the job for me. If you only read one post on the odious lying disingenous anti-science zealot, this is a pretty good summary.
My daily digest of texts, tweets and status updates.
Microblogging using LoudTwitter and Twitter.
matgb_twitter is there if you're mad enough.
- 19:29 so the next Doctor Who spin off is... #
Microblogging using LoudTwitter and Twitter.



