Home
About this Journal
Current Month
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031
Jul. 21st, 2008 @ 06:17 pm Abortion and contraception
Hillary fights back against Bush's administration's sneaky tactic of labelling birth control pills, IUDs and other contraceptive means "abortion" thereby allowing healthcare providers to refuse providing contraceptives to women who need it. She's also posted at the Huffington Post, a site that has been to put it milly anti-Clinton this past primary.

NARAL's endorsee, Obama, meanwhile hasn't said a word. After his latest comments on abortion and mental health and his sentiment about the pastor's role in a woman's decision to have an abortion, his current silence on the issue really helps me see how he's interested in protecting women's rights And of course he advocates equal pay for women, so what if he doesn't walk the walk. I couldn't find a better candidate for women's issues. /sarcasm.
About this Entry
Jul. 19th, 2008 @ 05:49 pm I have a favourite YouTube duo
Tags:
Syncsta!

Like their version of Numa Numa!



Barbie Girl )

About this Entry
Jul. 19th, 2008 @ 12:43 pm Two concerts in two days.
Over the last couple of days I've fulflled my near-life-long dreams of watching two of my early heart-throbs live.

Him and Him. Both shows were extraordinary and worth the wait.

The former - his voice is just as beautiful as it was 20 years ago, and though he's a little pudgier than the man I swooned over at 12, he can still get to me with his ballads. The visuals were breathtaking, amply entertaining people in the nose-bleed seats (such as me). He did a mix of his older numbers which I loved and some of his relatively newer stuff which I'm not so familiar with, but the whole show was AMAZING.

The latter, well he's past his mid-60s and slowing down, but his songs are still fresh to his fans, and with a son and daughter-in-law to help him recreate his past magic, the show was a success. Of course, the real show-stealer was him - when the hell did he get so hot? and damn, the ballad he sang - wow! The crowd loved him, and though I'm not fangirl over him, I can see why. UNFORGETTABLE.
About this Entry
Jul. 15th, 2008 @ 10:44 am Animal law
Tags:
Animal law begins to gather steam in Canada

I love my cat almost as much as I would a child or maybe equally, everyone knows that. I like animals and hate animal cruelty (though that doesn't sit well with my non-vegetarianism, I know). But I'm kinda ambivalent here. There are still way too many people including children getting the raw end of the deal that in my mind I can't justify those legal resources being diverted to defending animal rights.
About this Entry
Jul. 15th, 2008 @ 10:29 am McCain clarifies his stance on adoption
You may or may not remember a previous post of mine lauding Sen. McCain for adopting Bridget from Bangladesh. I'm a huge fan of adoption and would ideally have a family of little adopted girls. And I believe in gay rights and equality. So when McCain says he doesn't believe in adoption by gay couples, it blows my mind.
"I think that we've proven that both parents are important in the success of a family so, no, I don't believe in gay adoption."

Uh-huh. Gay couples = two gay people = two potential parents. So where's the problem? (I'm sorry, I just had to point out that his statement itself is fallacious when he doesn't qualify the need for both genders.)

And besides what of all the single parent adoptions and single parent families (including McCain's own previous wife and kid(s)? I guess they're all huge failures out there. Terrible.
About this Entry
Jul. 14th, 2008 @ 11:59 pm "Dude" ain't a lady.
I don't know what it is exactly - but this post left a bad taste in my mouth.

Yes, Morgentaler is a "dude" and the Order of Canada was given to a "dude" for a woman's right to reproductive choice. The thrust of that post seems to be that awarding a man who fought for women's rights is patriarchal BS.

I don't see it that way. Morgentaler fought for a woman's right to choose, and he did so at personal risk. He faced bombings at his clinics and served time in jail. To say that Morgentaler does not deserve the award because he's a man and recognizing his actions is an example of lauding males for any behaviour that treats women as equals does no justice to the role Morgentaler played in ensuring that women have a right to an abortion in Canada.

It's attitudes that are exhibited in this post that prevents people who are not directly affected by discrimination from being overly involved in movements for equality, be they against racism, sexism or homophobia. I'm not saying that these people should be thanked or awarded for every effort they make.. But when they are recognized for their achievements in bringing about some equality, to say that they are not deserving because they are not the ones that suffer from the discrimination is discrimination in itself. Recognizing only the work of African Americans or women or gays and ignoring the contributions of white people, men or straight people in the respective fights for equality is a denial of history and a disservice to the memory of these movements.
About this Entry
Jul. 14th, 2008 @ 01:11 pm Impulse vs. patience
I'm an impulse shopper. If I want something, I have to get it within 48 hours, or I lose interest. Like the Wii. I waited so long because I couldn't find it that I lost interest and settled for the PS3 instead which I decided to buy and shopped for withing 24 hours. And I'm quite happy with it, thank you very much.

And the iPhone. I know it's finally come to Canada and apparently is worth the wait, but it took so long that I don't care anymore. We'll be getting a blackberry from work on Thursday or Monday and that will fulfill most of my mobile phone needs. So no iPhone for me. And I don't really care.

Though the iPod was a different story - that I waited for for three years and was still excited when I finally got one. Or the Kindle, I'm still waiting patiently to have it come to Canada.
About this Entry
Jul. 14th, 2008 @ 11:42 am Faux-outrage, or why we need more humour
Tags: , ,
People - This is a cover that should have garnered public outrage. It was clearly a misogynistic attack on the New York senator. There was no satire here - just a clear message - psycho, crazy lady has voices in her head - would you really want her to be president? But of course, it was only sexism, and it's Clinton, she deserves it. Why waste precious moments denouncing the cover.

This, on the other hand, is political satire. It may not be up to your standards of taste*, but its intent is clearly to underline the ridiculous right-wing characterizations of the Democratic presumptive nominee. Unfortunately, said presumptive nominee chose to be outraged and undercut what was actually quite an effective way to mock the right-wing nut jobs. Personally, I thought the cover was clever in showing the ridiculous image the Republicans were attempting to paint, but I'm just a low-informed, racist Clinton supporter - what do I know?

I get the "the New Yorker cover has the potential to go viral and have it taken out of context" argument. So did the TNR cover which was offensive when taken in context. Sorry, I'm not buying this argument. However, Jane in CA over on Talk Left makes a good point on what is really wrong with the cover:
...although it is clearly meant, and will be interpreted, as satire by the readers of the New Yorker, the potential for it to go viral in a negative way is significant.

And that's what concerns me. I don't like the cover. I do find it offensive but, more importantly, I believe it trivializes the more subtle but very real concerns that many of us have about Senator Obama. This cover perpetrates the notion that non-supporters are afraid because "Obama is muslim", "Michelle is a militant black supremacist," etc. In other words, it allows the Obama campaign to focus on non-issues, thus deflecting the narrative from more substantive issues such as, what does this guy really stand for? Is he going to support the issues that are important to me?

Obama has given so many conflicting statements that it is very difficult to be certain where he stands on a great many issues that are important to me. I would far rather that the media concentrate on forcing the senator to define his stance on these issues rather than giving him these kinds of easy outs. Who thinks we'll hear anything about his real position on Iraq as long as he has these ridiculous strawmen to denounce?

I'd also add that anyone swayed by this absurd cover was never going to vote for Obama anyway.


*I think it's a great cover for Mad Magazine, myself.
About this Entry
Jul. 13th, 2008 @ 06:58 pm Also read these books:
7. My Life - Bill Clinton
You all know what this is about. This was an audio book read by the President. I felt it could have gone into a little more detail. Also, I tend to not be able to pay as much attention to audio books so I may have missed a few things. I didn't pay much attention during his administration, so some stuff in there was new to me. (Not the Lewinsky affair, though)

8. The Conscience of a Liberal - Paul Krugman
Most of the book expounded Radical Right Wing conspiracy theories and universal health care. It was an interesting perspective on the rise of the right wing, and Krugman's theories on why the Republicans continue to win are interesting. If it is true that racism does play as big a role in the right-wing's victories (though as per Krugman, racism is on the decline so it won't be that much of an issue) - it will be interesting to see how it plays out with a black nominee in the light of Rev. Wright's statements.

Krugman also is a passionate believer in universal health care, and says that mandatory insurace is the only way such a scheme would work. In the next breath he says that Obama's and Edwards' health plans have the necessary elements for universal health care. I think this book was written before the candidates' health plans were released in detail, but from what I remember, Obama was pretty proud that his plan did not require mandatory coverage. There was no mention of Hillary's health care plan - maybe hers wasn't released when the book went to press? It was also interesting to hear (this was an audio book too) Krugman plug Obama a couple of times in the book especially when he wasn't a supporter the next year. I guess he learned quick.

All in all a good book.

9. Show Business - Shashi Tharoor.
[info]co_techie sent me this one. It was an interesting read on the Indian Bollywood industry in the late 1970s to early 1980s. The protagonist seems to be based on Amitabh Bachchan - right down to his alleged affair after marrying the homely actress, his run in politics and his life-threatening accident on a movie set. Also the scripts of two of his famous movies - Silsila and Abhimaan. I enjoyed the way the author integrated the different movies into the story. The plots and the dialogues were true to form for the movies in that era.
About this Entry
Jul. 3rd, 2008 @ 08:40 pm Obama on abortion - again.
Obama never fails to disappoint. On the heels of his much appreciated view of the California constitutional amendment, he goes back to being the panderer that he is. In an effort to reach out to evangelicals (remember, the new Democrat base?), Obama states that mental distress is no reason to allow a late-term abortion.
In an interview this week with "Relevant," a Christian magazine, Obama said prohibitions on late-term abortions must contain "a strict, well defined exception for the health of the mother."

Obama then added: "Now, I don't think that 'mental distress' qualifies as the health of the mother. I think it has to be a serious physical issue that arises in pregnancy, where there are real, significant problems to the mother carrying that child to term."

Apparently, unless there is a serious physical issue, Obama is against late-term abortions, never mind the mental health of the mother.

Roe v. Wade's position on abortion -
medical judgments about the need for an abortion could include physical, emotional and psychological health factors.


Remember NARAL - the organization that endorsed Obama when Clinton was still in the running? Here's their position:
"A health exception must also account for the mental health problems that may occur in pregnancy. Severe fetal anomalies, for example, can exact a tremendous emotional toll on a pregnant woman and her family."

So what do they have to say about Obama's position now? They're still defending him -
In a statement, NARAL Pro-Choice said Obama's magazine interview is consistent with Roe v. Wade.

"Sen. Obama has consistently said he supports the tenets set forth by Roe, and has made strong statements against President Bush's Federal Abortion Ban, which does not have an exception to protect a woman's health," the organization's statement said.

Yes, only he's limiting health to physical health while Roe v. Wade includes psychological and emotional effects, or did they miss that?
David N. O'Steen, the executive director of National Right to Life, said Obama's remarks to the magazine "are either quite disingenuous or they reflect that Obama does not know what he is talking about."

"You cannot believe that abortion should not be allowed for mental health reasons and support Roe v Wade," O'Steen said.


So what was that about women having to vote for Obama because of Roe v. Wade? First women should consult with their pastors before deciding on an abortion and now this. Sure, he's for abortion, but it's such wishy-washy support that it's hard to believe he'd do much to actually protect the right.
About this Entry
Jul. 3rd, 2008 @ 04:30 pm But it's only a puppy.
Tags:
Police force apologise to Muslim community over "offensive" puppy ad

police force has apologised to the Muslim community after its ad campaign featuring a puppy sparked an outcry.

A picture of Rebel, a 29-week-old black alsation, featured on postcards promoting a new non-emergency telephone number.

But the choice of the image, which shows Rebel sitting in a police officer's hat, was questioned as Islamic tradition warns Muslims against contact with dogs because they are seen as impure.


Fortunately, the Islamic community has taken a more pragmatic view of the situation.
Last night Mahmud Sarwar, trustee of the Scottish Islamic and Cultural Centre and the Dura Street mosque, appealed for calm.

He said he had no problems with the postcard and called on homeowners and local businesses to display them as it is in the public interest.

“I’ve not heard anything about that from members of the community,” Mr Sarwar said.

“I was round some shops today and at the mosque and nobody has said anything about it.”

Mr Sarwar said that religious sensitivities would prevent him from displaying the postcard on a building of religious significance but there was nothing to stop them being displayed in shops.
About this Entry
Jul. 3rd, 2008 @ 03:50 pm Whatever happened to eggs and bags of flour?
I don't know much about attachment parenting, so I'm ambivalent about this.

Apart from the psychological issues around separation of the infant from the primary care-giver, I find it interesting that there is concern that teenagers with no experience in child-care have to look after these infants for a 72 hour period under supervision.* In the mean-time I see little outrage that scores of incompetent parents out there look after thier kids unsupervised for 18 years and manage to royally screw them up.

*They teens are accompanied by trained nannys, on-set psychologist, and the parents are close by monitoring every move and have full rights to intervene at any point. At least that's what the article says.
About this Entry
Jul. 3rd, 2008 @ 02:22 pm Order of Canada returned over Morgentaler's appointment.
Of course, some people can't stomach that a pro-choice activist should get the Order of Canada - a B.C. priest who was given the Order for his work with troubled teens has returned his Order over Morgentaler's appointment
Rev. Lucien Larré said he means no disrespect to the Governor General, but said he must return the Order of Canada because Morgentaler's appointment degrades the award for those who believe in the sanctity of life.


uh-huh. I know this is not a separation of church and state issue, but it illustrates why I am a strong supporter of church and state and an opposer of the faith-based initiative. I agree, many faith-based organizations do good work. But all too many times thier religious views prevent them from extending their charitable work to situations that do not meet their moral convictions, or they're influenced by their religious ideals to oppose changes that should be made on the basis of individual choices and rights. Of course, Rev. Lucien Larre's protest here is not going to change much but a faith-based organization that refuses to help a pregnant girl get an abortion or worse, refuse to hand out birth-control pills as a matter of principle is another matter. Of course we can move on to arguing that other organizations are available for this situation, but my beef is that I'd rather see tax dollars going to funding more inclusive programs than funding those that are limited by the morality of their religion.

Anywho, I wouldn't want to share the Order of Canada with a convicted child abuser. But to each their own, I guess.
But in 1992, a Saskatchewan jury convicted [Rev. Lucien Larre] on two counts of physically abusing children in his care at Bosco, according to Canwest News Service. Canwest said one of his convictions revolved around the accusation that Larré forced pills down the throat of a teenager to teach her a lesson about drug abuse.
About this Entry
Jul. 3rd, 2008 @ 11:44 am Obama on California's constitutional amendment - This is actually pro-Obama
(I feel I have to put in a disclaimer because given the general tone of my Obama entries, it's reasonable that most people will expect another rant :))

After skirting around the issue, and issuing politically safe statements after the recent California decision on same-sex marriage, Obama comes out and explicitly opposes a ban on same-sex marriage

In a letter to San Francisco's Alice B. Toklas Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Democratic Club, the presumptive presidential nominee said he opposed "the divisive and discriminatory efforts to amend the California Constitution" and similar efforts in other states.

...
For both campaigns, the decision to get involved in the same-sex marriage debate carries political risks.

...
Still, the Obama campaign didn't go out of its way to announce the senator's position on a controversial California ballot measure that will have repercussions across the nation. Instead of a splashy public endorsement ceremony, complete with beaming supporters of same-sex marriage, Obama announced his support midway in his letter, which was read at the club's annual breakfast.

Good on him! While I'm not too happy that his position wasn't made too public, at least he's on the right track. I appreciate there are political risks to publicly support gay marriage no matter how subtle that support and I think this move in the right direction for progressive values.
But Prop. 8 supporters accused Obama of trying to have it both ways by coming out publicly against same-sex marriage, but opposing any efforts to ban those unions.

"His position makes very little sense," said Brian Brown, executive director of the National Organization for Marriage, California. "If he's opposed (to same-sex marriage), he should just say so. Instead, he's trying to appease the wealthy elite who support gay marriage."

I don't see a contradiction here. Obama personally may not support gay marriage, but he believes states have the right to make the decision, and I'm hoping that his statement against the ban is recognition that his personal beliefs aren't shared by everyone and individuals should have the choice open to them. I'm willing to believe that - I don't see pandering here. (and you all know how willing I am to believe that the man will pander to anybody :) )
About this Entry
Jul. 2nd, 2008 @ 03:59 pm Don't be ridicolo
Tags: ,
As much as I dislike the presumptive democrat nominee this story is just ridiculous

OMG! Obama had good credit and got a slightly lower rate of interest!! OMGZ!

/eyeroll

Maybe I should stop shopping around for cheaper mortgages just in case I ever decide to run for public office.
About this Entry
Jul. 2nd, 2008 @ 09:17 am Of anthems and god
Tags:
Debating on whether the reference to "god" should be removed from O Canada

I haven't had the time to read through all of this, but you already know what my answer is.
About this Entry
Jul. 2nd, 2008 @ 08:47 am More people disappointed
Tags: ,
Aw - even Markos is disappointed.

First, he reversed course and capitulated on FISA, not just turning back on the Constitution, but on the whole concept of "leadership". Personally, I like to see presidents who 1) lead, and 2) uphold their promises to protect the Constitution.

Then, he took his not-so-veiled swipe at MoveOn in his "patriotism" speech.

Finally, he reinforced right-wing and media talking points that Wes Clark had somehow impugned McCain's military service when, in reality, Clark had done no such thing.


Funny, he wasn't half as pissed when Obama clearly snubbed the gays with McClurkin - or maybe that was "leadership"? Or when he took his not-so-veiled swipe at his own grandmother - poor typical racist white woman? Or when he reinforced right-wing and media talking points that Clinton would do anything, ANYTHING to win, or that the Clintons were racist?

Of course, now that Clinton is no longer in the picture, it's easier to see the presumptive nominee for what he is. Not exactly what you hoped for, eh?
About this Entry
Jul. 2nd, 2008 @ 01:34 am Can I say "I told you so"?
Tags: ,
Ah Dissappointment - such a bitter pill to swallow.

The Obama brand has always been about inspiration, a new kind of politics, the audacity of hope, and "change we can believe in." I like that brand. More importantly, voters -- especially unlikely voters -- like that brand.

Pulling it off the shelf and replacing it with a political product geared to pleasing America's vacillating swing voters -- the ones who will be most susceptible to the fear-mongering avalanche that has already begun -- would be a fatal blunder.


News for you Arianna - that brand was just that - a "brand." Like Apple and the Wii - just because they're cool doesn't mean they're better or that they'll even live up to the expectations created by their ad campaigns. (Watching the commercial for Wii is so different from watching the Wii in action - it's actually quite silly and very juvenile. As for Apple - besides the iPod, not really for me.)

In the meantime, I'll watch the other supporters contort their political ideals to match Obama's increasingly conservative stance.
About this Entry
Jul. 1st, 2008 @ 09:23 pm Morgentaler
Morgentaler named to Order of Canada

Of course, some people just had to rain on the parade...

"If Morgentaler had any integrity, he would refuse the medal," Mary Ellen Douglas of the coalition said in a news release. "This presentation should be given to people who have made Canada a better place to live and the elimination of thousands of human beings who would have contributed to the future of Canada is a disgrace, not an honour."


Yes, because potential human beings who don't exist currently are way more important than the woman who is in existence and who's life will be altered, most likely for the worse, by an unwanted pregnancy. Some fictitious person's right to life is way more important. I get it.

Of course, Mary Ellen Douglas fails to even contemplate that those potential human beings could be worse off, and could have been a burden to Canadian society. I'm sure the burden on the Canadian welfare system has been alleviated, if even slightly, after abortions were made legal.

For those not in the know, this is Morgentaler
About this Entry
Jul. 1st, 2008 @ 12:01 pm For all the Canucks out there...


From Wikipedia...
About this Entry