And yes, this entry is public. Comments will be screened.
**************
I am not, at heart, a writer. In all honesty, I picked law school because I didn't think I had it in me to write a master's thesis (or, chas v'shalom, a dissertation!). The irony, of course, is that I spend most of my time at work - wait for it - WRITING. I think I'm getting better, because it's like 75% of what I do all day long, but really - I am not a writer by nature. I struggle like whoa when writing. I keep this journal because it helps my mental health, not to make any points about my writing skills.
Which is by way of saying, I don't know how much sense this entry is going to make. But you know, I only billed 3.6 hours today, because I spent most of the day with my mind wandering about banality, appropriation, and evil, and hey, why else do I have a journal if not to write about things like this?
***************
So - the banality of evil is a concept that, as far as I can tell, originated with Hannah Arendt's book
Eichmann in Jerusalem. The theory is that "great evils in history generally, and the Holocaust in particular, were not executed by fanatics or sociopaths but rather by ordinary people who accepted the premises of their state and therefore participated with the view that their actions were normal."
Cite. (Is there an earlier originator? Please tell me if there is.)
I have not read Eichmann in Jerusalem, and based on
deliriums_fish's reviews, I don't plan to. But I was thinking today about how fascinatingly horrifying a concept it is - that if you accept the premise of something (on my mind today: structural racism, appropriation, and the erasing of people of color), and what I mean by "accept" is that it's as common as the air you breathe - or part of the air you breathe even - such that you don't even notice it any more, you'll keep perpetuating those problems, because you see no reason to question whether it's normal.
****************
A confession: I read a lot of blogs. Less than I used to (really ma, I'm cutting back, I can stop any time I want to!), but still rather a great number of blogs.
Real blogs,
smart blogs,
blogs where people are thinking about important things,
in great depth, not just nattering on about their little lives like I do. One of these blogs is - was -
La Chola. That link doesn't work today.
The author of La Chola, who goes by brownfemipower, writes a lot about immigration as a feminist issue. I will freely admit that I had never considered that angle before, and that this is a function of my race and class privileges. (She also is one of a few feminist bloggers out there who really engage on disability rights, who listen to the voices of people with disabilities. You have to know how much I appreciate that.) What I wish I could do is link to her brilliant, thoughtful, and extremely engaging posts, but like I said - the link doesn't work today.
brownfemipower recently gave a talk at a conference about immigration as a feminist issue. About a week later, a major feminist blogger posted
this article on alternet. As outlined by Sylvia/M.
here, this article is nearly a line-for-line cribbing of brownfemipower's work over the past year (possibly more?). The major feminist blogger did not link to La Chola and did not mention La Chola in her article. Most disturbing for me, though, when this striking similarity was brought to her attention, the major feminist blogger responded by (1)
denying that brownfemipower was any influence on her, (2)
attacking those who were upset about the appropriation, and (3)
claiming that this was an attack on her career, not an attempt by an injured party trying to let her know that she had, you know, CAUSED AN INJURY.
And this made me think about the banality of evil.
*****************
Not because I believe this major feminist blogger is evil, no. Let me be clear that I do not think this woman is evil. I have my issues with her, but they do not even remotely involve evilness.
But because really - the entire interchange has been so very, very, banal.
ba·nal: adj. Drearily commonplace and often predictable; trite: "Blunt language cannot hide a banal conception" (James Wolcott).This happens again and again. People of color have the work, their art, their music, their words appropriated by white folks - who go on to profit from the ideas, the music, the art in ways that the actual creators simply cannot access. Because - and I probably don't have to say this but I will anyway - of structural racism. And it kills me, it absolutely kills me, to see another feminist doing this.
*****************
We are supposed to be a movement for all women. We are supposed to be good at listening to the individual voices of individual women. We are supposed to confront oppression and try to get rid of it.
Appropriating the work of women of color should not be acceptable behavior for a feminist. Lashing out defensively when someone calls you on it
should not be acceptable behavior for a feminist.
And we are losing ourselves as a movement for fighting oppression when we tolerate or support or give a free pass to this kind of behavior.
*****************
I really, really don't know what to say beyond this. I am so disappointed and saddened, and boy do I feel silly and histrionic for being this discombobulated by things going on in the internets. But I can't stop thinking about it.
*****************
I met
a friend through La Chola; I read her comments, and clicked on the link to her blog, and was just delighted to find a disability rights activist. I also read a fantastic post and set of comments about product suggestions for Latina women with tightly-curled dry hair - something our fabulous receptionist has talked to me about (she is also Latina and also has kinky, dry hair). I sent her the link, and she was thrilled. That link, too, is gone.
So in addition to losing the words and voice of brownfemipower, we have also lost a crossroads, a meeting place. I don't know what to do with that, either.
I need to go to bed.