here's a situation:
10 years ago, you made a phone call to the police based on educated evidence that a person you know may be a potential suspect in the rape of a 15 year old girl.
after a week or two, the person you reported is arrested. a few months later, found guilty by a trial and sentenced to 4 years.
several years later, you do some googling on this person and discover the following:
* at the time they were arrested for this crime, they were on probation for a previous sexual assault against a teenager.
* they have appealed the conviction (and lost).
* they have appealed the DNA that was taken from them and added to the dangerous sexual offenders database, based on a technicality (but they lost that appeal too).
* they served the entire four year sentence before being released.
skip ahead another few years. another google is done and the above information is still easily located (court documents are publicly archived and easily searchable) but you find the following:
* this person is now married to the girlfriend he had at the time he was arrested/convicted, who believes that the charge was false.
* he is self-employed as a musician, playing for old-age homes and other organizations.
* his wife is a devout christian.
* he himself advertises himself as a devout pentecostal, even posting poems and prayers to god on websites.
you're also aware that the community of people you were part of at the time he was picked up by the police believe in his innocence at the time.
now, i'm aware that this person *did* fulfill their punishment by serving the entire four years and all appeals failed, so the criminal record has stuck. but at the same time, i kind of feel the way the advocates do in the various criminal tv shows. i feel like loudly proclaiming to everyone around him that he's a rapist, a sexual offender. i want his neighbourhood to know what kind of person he is... a man that will grab a 15 year old off the street, drag her into the bushes, and rape her. and that he hasn't done it only once.
yet there's the niggling little thought in my head that people deserve a second chance. that people can actually reform and change and ask forgiveness. maybe his attempts at being self-employed and being a christian are part of that reformation. and while a person who admits their guilt and asks forgiveness doesn't attempt to appeal a rightful conviction, it's entirely possible he changed after he tried the appeal process.
but there's still a strong part of me that wants to scream out warnings. he was a creepy old man who couldn't keep his hands to himself around any semi-decent looking female... even if they were young enough to be his daughters (but old enough to be legal). i would avoid him at meetings because he was always trying to cop a feel. it's a shame that others laughed at it and encourage him to be a dirty old man.
if he gets nailed again, i won't feel bad for thinking the worst of him. but i hope hope hope, for the sake of others' safety, he really has changed.
(hrm... this kind of changed from a hypothetical situation to something pretty obvious. anyway... if you knew all these facts and were the person that did the initial phone call back up at the top, how would you feel? what would you do?)
Current Mood: contemplative