 |
|
 |

 |
firecat | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I originally posted this on a mailing list. I've edited it a tiny bit.
I find how people draw lines between "individual responsibility" and
"cultural/societal responsibility" fascinating.
Some examples, involving race, alcohol, and weight
We almost all agree that racism is a cultural phenomenon and a societal
responsibility. Therefore we understand a black person's negative
reaction to black-face as a rational response to a society that's doing
something wrong. Most of us call for stopping the practice of performing in
black-face as a solution to this problem, and a way of decreasing racism
and increasing equality in society. Most of us would never say out loud "Well,
black people irrationally fear black-face; black-face is merely an
individual decision, and they should just get over it."
However, most people think that alcoholism is a person's individual
responsibility -- even though alcohol use is prevalent in our society to
the point where avoiding situations where alcohol is served, and
avoiding people who are drunk, takes a great deal of effort and limits
one's activities. We expect an alcoholic to take all the responsibility
of avoiding temptations to drink on his or her shoulders. OK, he or she
can go to a support group to help with this responsibility, but he or
she is certainly not allowed to ask for accommodations such as not
serving drinks or talking about drinking from anyone but his or her
closest friends. We think of an alcoholic as having a disease, not as
reacting to something wrong with society. Even though we know that
drinking alcohol makes the alcoholic very sick, some/most of us still
believe that if the alcoholic has a negative reaction to a discussion of
drinking, that reaction is not rational, and he or she should take care
of it privately rather than asking for accommodations from others.
Where do we draw the line with regard to weight and food issues, and
why? Does discrimination against fat people and the prevalence of
weight-loss dieting, anorexia, bulemia, and weight-loss surgery indicate
something wrong with society? Or is an inability to deal with society's
stuff around food a disease that's the responsibility of the individual
and her/his support group and close friends?
I think that fat discrimination and society's weirdness about food are
problems with society. Many/most efforts around weight change, and the
health problems that result when they are taken to extremes, are
reactions to these problems. I think society should be changed to
accommodate people of all sizes. I don't think hatred and fear of
society's stuff around weight are irrational; I don't think one's
choices about weight and eating are simple individual decisions with no
social ramifications, and I don't think those of us who are sensitive to
this stuff should just get over it.
Others think that while society might have a few issues around
weight and food that they'd prefer were different, weight and food are
primarily an individual responsibility; that their decisions and others'
decisions about weight and food are irrelevant to society at large; and
that people who are sensitive about this stuff have personal issues that
they should be dealing with in private, not asking for accommodations for.
Sadly (because I'm so darned sick of it), I think it's going to be a
very long struggle before there's any kind of consensus about this.
feeling: theoretical
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
From: cjsmith |
Date: May 6th, 2004 06:05 pm (UTC) |
| (link) |
|
...a black person's negative reaction to black-face as a rational response to... [...] ...if the alcoholic has a negative reaction to a discussion of drinking, that reaction is not rational, and he or she should take care of it privately...
Hmm, interesting. I parse those responses, the one by the black person and the one by the alcoholic, as emotional: anger, perhaps, or fear, or hurt. I don't think I usually tend to label emotions "rational".
I might label an emotion "sane", as in, "I'd have to be insane not to feel angry about this." But then I think both the black person and the alcoholic are being sane. They're not having the reaction I would have, but hey, they're not me.
So what do I think is the difference between the two? Or, more precisely, why the difference in the ways those two cases are treated?
Maybe because occasional drinking is more fun than occasional smearing of gunk on one's face? Giving up one is easier than giving up the other?
I dunno.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|

 |
|
|  |
 |

|