Home
Most Boringest Journal Ever

> recent entries
> calendar
> friends
> NRGmusic Rocks!
> profile
> previous 20 entries

Wednesday, July 16th, 2008
7:03 pm - Thank you for your contribution
Dear Dustin,

Thank you for your contribution to Friends of Hillary.
We deeply appreciate your support. If you have any questions
about your contribution please contact us at
contributions@hillaryclinton.com.

=============================================================
YOUR CONTRIBUTION RECEIPT:

DATE: July 16, 2008 9:03 PM CDT
NAME: Dustin Nelson
ADDRESS: 2801 16th St
Everett, WA 98201
AMOUNT: $100.00

-------------------------------------------------------------

=============================================================

Contributions to Friends of Hillary are not
deductible for federal income tax purposes. Corporate
contributions are prohibited by law.

Paid for by Friends of Hillary

4420 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA 22203



If anyone out there truly supported her as much as I did, I hope you are still contributing, as you can, to pay down her campaign debt

(4 comments | comment on this)

Thursday, June 5th, 2008
4:57 pm - New Community


Some of the people who have followed my journal have friended me to see my posts about Politics. I'm probably just going to stop posting about Politics here and go back to posting stuff about life, and you can jump over to my new community: [info]nobama where I'll be talking about why I don't want Barack Obama president.

It's sort of shocking to me as a lifelong Democrat that I've started this community, but my party has just f'ing pissed me off this time.

(4 comments | comment on this)

4:30 pm - Two Tracks
Ugh, I've been pretty much hitting these videos on repeat on YouTube the past couple of days:

Lady GaGa - Just Dance






Boomkat - Runaway





On both of these - LOVE LOVE LOVE...

(comment on this)

Wednesday, June 4th, 2008
11:17 am - Seattle Times Article
Emphasis added (mine). By the way, she totally mis-quoted me, I never said that I would vote for him if she was on the ticket. Quite the opposite, I don't WANT her on the ticket because I think she'll be damaged by it. She should abstain and run in 2012 when he loses.

Anyway...

From: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2004456261_localobama04m.html

Locals cheer Obama's victory



A rowdy crowd of supporters of Sen. Barack Obama gathered at the World Sports Grille in downtown Seattle on Tuesday night. They laughed and cheered, and congratulated each other on their candidate claiming the Democratic nomination — and becoming the first African American to lead a major-party ticket.

"Obama's going to be president of the United States," said James Whiting, 33, of Seattle, who attended the informal celebration with his girlfriend, another Obama supporter. "We didn't think it was going to happen at first, but he's here. It's amazing. He's going to go all the way."

King County Executive Ron Sims, a superdelegate for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, switched his support to Obama on Tuesday. Clinton co-chair and U.S. Rep. Jay Inslee, D-Bainbridge Island, has not switched his support, but said he will speak with Clinton privately today. Former Gov. Gary Locke, also one of Clinton's co-chairs for Washington state, also endorsed Obama.

"We need to bring this to an end. We cannot wait. This cannot go to the convention," Locke said. "It's time for us all to rally around Sen. Obama."

Although Clinton did not formally concede, she and Obama gave speeches calling for a unified Democratic Party.

Some Washington state Democrats on both sides of the primary battle expect that the wounds left by the long, contentious Democratic primary will be slow to heal.

"It's been a hard-fought battle. And it hasn't been pretty some of the time," said Kate Karpf, an Obama supporter who works in government in Seattle. "But at the end of the day, we need a president who's strong on the issues that are important to us as Democrats. I hope people see that. I think it'll take time."

Clinton supporter Dustin Nelson, 31, a Web developer from White Center, said there's no way he'll vote for Obama.

"No-bama," he said simply. "I will vote for neither [Sen. John] McCain nor Obama. I will write in Hillary's name to show my disgust for the Democratic Party. If that means McCain wins, that's what the Democrats get for choosing the wrong candidate."

If Obama chooses Clinton as his running mate, Nelson might consider voting for him, he said.

Lucille Howitt, a longtime Democrat and "adamant" Clinton supporter, was more conciliatory. She's "disappointed and angry" that Clinton will not be the Democratic nominee, but she "can't imagine voting Republican."

Jethro Odom, 39, a Web project manager and an Obama delegate at his precinct caucus, said the divisions between Obama supporters and Clinton supporters have been overstated by the national media.

"In the end, there will be maybe 12 Clinton people who refuse to support Obama," he said. "We just need to go in there, shake their hands and say, 'Good game, good game,' because the real fight's just beginning."

(2 comments | comment on this)

5:42 am - I'll be in the Seattle Times again
I got a phone call last night from the same Seattle Times reporter who interviewed me for the earlier article. She tried to goad me into saying that I would vote for McCain in the fall, but I told her the truth, that I would vote for Hillary Clinton either as a write-in or our party's nominee.

She asked me if there was anything Obama could do to earn my vote, and I simply said "Nobama." She laughed, so I think that's going to be the quote she's going to use for me.

But then I went in to all the policy differences that I completely disagree with him on and how its a lot more than the "5%" that everyone keeps trying to shove down my throat. I said I'd have to change my "Hillary 08" shirt to a "Hillary 12" shirt and asked her if she knew of any good graphic designers to help me make it happen. She giggled at that again.

I'll post the article when I see it.

(29 comments | comment on this)

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008
7:11 pm - Hillary wants to know what we want her to do next...
I have three words for you Senator Clinton:

Denver. Denver. Denver.

(2 comments | comment on this)

Monday, June 2nd, 2008
9:34 am - Puerto Rico
Que Bueno Eres!

So yesterday, Clinton blew Obama out of the water in Puerto Rico, adding roughly 140,000 votes to her popular vote lead, and capturing all 8 senate districts. I've been giving Clinton $100 for each win she racks up in the primary, so I donated another $100 today, it isn't a ton of money, but it is what I can afford.

She needs 80% of the remaining Super delegates assuming that Montana and South Dakota go for Obama by a 60-40 split. A quitter would look at those odds and throw in the towel. It is why I support her so much, she just doesn't quit.

Over the weekend, when the Rules & Bylaws Committee unjustly awarded Obama not only more delegates than he was entitled too, but broke its own rules by awarding them away from Uncommitted (the legal entity they should have been awarded to)... just as food for thought: if the Clinton resolution had been adopted, this would stand at 1916.5 for Clinton, 2012 for Obama, 55 uncommitted, and 13.5 for Edwards. Obama would lack 105 delegates, or about 35 percent, and Clinton would lack 202.5 delegates, or about 65 percent, of the remaining delegates. That would have represented a wider open outcome, and not nearly the overwhelming odds that we are at today, at 80%.

I'm quickly becoming disillusioned with my party, and have registered a new website to talk about my feelings more as a centrist then a left leaning socialite and a right leaning fiscal. Understand that at the moment, McCain is speaking more to what I want to hear than Obama is, and while I will write-in Hillary for my vote in 2008 if she's not our nominee, I won't be lobbying any of my friends to vote Democrat this year if she isn't, and that includes the down ballot races, because I'm seriously pissed off at my (current) party.

This is HillaryOnDayOne.com - the new site will be announced soon.

(4 comments | comment on this)

Thursday, May 29th, 2008
10:26 am - *Sigh*


Sidenote, Obama vs McCain? Obama only gets 266, not enough to win :(

(3 comments | comment on this)

9:47 am - I have hate in my heart, but I won't go to Trinity to repent.


Obama's church now features the kinds of attacks that made the Rev. Wright infamous. If the congregation approves of these kinds of attacks on a Democrat, imagine the fodder they will feed to the RNC.

I've heard "this guy is white and Catholic so nobody will care." They have misunderstood how the Rev. Wright damaged Obama, particularly among independents, and how Obama's church continuing in that vein will compound the damage. Many Americans are repelled by the sort of rhetoric displayed in this video, no matter what church or preacher it comes from.

(1 comment | comment on this)

Sunday, May 25th, 2008
12:26 pm - Gambia promises homosexual genocide
Often, Africa is overlooked in the vast political spectrum, which is a shame because many spots are really becoming the 'new asia' as an up and coming place to invest and hopefully soon will have many first world nations.

Gambia's president, however, chimed in with this load of crap today:




Gambian President Yahya Jammeh says he will “cut off the head” of any homosexual caught in his country.

Addressing supporters at the end of his meet the farmers tour here Sunday, Jammeh also ordered any hotel or motel housing homosexuals to close down, adding that owners of such facilities would also be in trouble.

He said the Gambia was a country of believers, indicating that no sinful and immoral act as homosexual would be tolerated in the country.

He warned all homosexuals in the country to leave, noting that a legislation “stricter than those in Iran ” concerning the vice would be introduced soon.




However, much like the violence in Darfur, this too will probably be sent to the backburner by the U.S. and other big countries.

Source: Afrik.com

(1 comment | comment on this)

12:21 pm
Seriously:



Is there any stronger evidence that 2012 needs a massive overhaul vs the Democratic contests clusterfuck that is 2008?

Source: Jay Cost @ Real Clear Politics

(5 comments | comment on this)

Tuesday, May 20th, 2008
9:30 pm - 60% is now the *NEW* threshold
60% of people who voted for Clinton in the Kentucky primary would not vote for Obama in the general election. Kentucky isn't competitive with Obama on the ticket, it's within 2% if Clinton is at the top, so it's just a swing state with her, much like North Carolina is with him. But West Virginia is a true swing state however, it went Democrat in 92 and 96 and Republican in 2000 and 04, and the numbers are just as scary there.

To the tune of Rehab by Amy Winehouse:

"They try to make me vote Obama, I say no, no, no."

I've had a change of heart. While I still sincerely hope that Clinton is the top of the ticket, but if she isn't, that she doesn't take the VP spot. I at some point had said that if she didn't win but joined up with Obama, that I would still vote that ticket, I've decided against that recently, and if Clinton is not the nominee, I want to watch him go down in flames. I want to be able to say "you dumb fucks, I told you so."

I'm still working hard for her and at our most recent (congressional), Obama could not fill his entire slate of delegates because 34 of his delegates chose not to show up. 32 alternates showed, so he only lost 2 of his delegates at the congressional level, but Clinton had 100% of hers filled with 67 delegates and 3 alternates showing to make the 70 needed.

I was talking with some of the Obama people while we were awaiting the final counts and I noted that most of the people who were absent were delegates who fit the 'high school to college age' profile; notoriously the most unreliable voters ever. If 34 of his 'youth vote' didn't show when a major slip like giving Clinton pledged delegates on error (and yes, most of the alternates were either black or older or women, traditionally the strongest democratic voters) could help her towards the nomination, what the heck are they going to do if they think he's got it in the bag in November?

Anyway, John McCain is a republican I could live through without wanting to die like Bush. I contemplated voting for him in 2000 if he was going to get the nomination even though I liked Gore more.

Many, MANY (who knows, a majority?) in our Hillary Clinton democratic caucus have NO desire to vote for Obama in the fall. Count me in as part of that 60%.

(5 comments | comment on this)

7:37 am - YaY! I made the Seattle Times!
I was interviewed by the Seattle Times on Sunday night for an article that came out today, pasted below. (Emphasis mine)

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2004425727_hillary20m.html


For local fans of Clinton, campaign is personal and "extremely emotional"


When Shannon de Rubens, a stay-at-home mom, wears her Hillary Rodham Clinton button, she expects to be harassed. A woman in Bellevue even pretended to spit on her once. That's all part of the game, when you're a Clinton backer in a land of Obama bumper stickers.

"I hate to say it, but that sort of acrimony between strangers has been standard in this campaign, especially locally," said de Rubens, who lives in Issaquah and co-founded two grass-roots campaign groups, the Hillraisers, in the region with more than 100 members total.

"We feel undervalued, mistreated and bullied. It's been an emotional journey," she said.

In an impassioned race that's been shaped from the outset by personality and symbolism, it's no surprise the campaign has gotten personal.

But as the long primary season marches toward its conclusion — Oregon and Kentucky vote today — and Barack Obama tightens his grip on the Democratic nomination, will Clinton supporters be able to forget their squabbles and rally behind the man who was once their enemy?

De Rubens says no. She won't vote for Obama, even if that means not voting at all. She estimates that half the members of her grass-roots campaign teams won't either.

"His inexperience does more than irritate me, it frightens me," she said. "The job of the U.S. president is not an entry-level position."

In a recent Edison Media Group poll, roughly 60 percent of Clinton supporters who were interviewed after voting two weeks ago in Indiana and North Carolina said they wouldn't support Obama. About 30 percent said they'd rather vote for Republican John McCain than Obama, according to the poll.

But Matt Barreto, an assistant professor of political science at the University of Washington, says it's too early to take those numbers to heart.

"You can't ask a team as they're leaving the field what they think of the team that just beat them. When you get to the World Series, they'll all be rooting for the same league again," he said.

But Kimber McCreery, a Clinton organizer for the 34th legislative district in Southwest Seattle, says the relative calm of the national campaign — debates between Obama and Clinton were hardly rancorous — belie how tense relations between the camps have been on a local level.

"It's been like being in gunfight, with only a knife," she said.

In Washington state, Obama beat Clinton 2-to-1 in the February precinct caucuses, and Clinton supporters complained they weren't treated fairly by the large pro-Obama turnout.

Such deep divisions between fellow Democrats who live in the same neighborhoods has to do with the fact that both campaigns were about more than just values and issues, McCreery said.

"It's a man of color versus a woman. It's an entire identity being marketed," she said. "You can't separate that out. It's extremely emotional stuff."

Cindy Samuel-Zulch, 55, a Clinton supporter from Clyde Hill, gave money to a presidential campaign for the first time in her life, partly because she wanted to help a female candidate.

She said many middle-aged and older women who grew up during the feminist movement, and have struggled with issues of equality in the classroom and in the work force their entire lives, look to Clinton as a role model and hero.

"Hillary is my peer. She's experienced a lot of the same things I have," said Samuel-Zulch, who said she may hold her nose and vote for Obama if he gets the nod.

"Some of us grew up at a time when there wasn't Title IX, where women did not get the same benefits as men in school," Samuel-Zulch said.

"When you see a strong, intelligent woman who has succeeded despite of all that, it's a powerful thing. I don't know if the younger generation of women really ever appreciated the historical significance of that."

Nobu Sanusi, 28, a high-school teacher in Kirkland and a staunch Clinton advocate, says she and fellow Clinton supporters have felt disheartened and betrayed by women who did not back Clinton.

"What's really sad is she's not really getting the female vote. I don't understand why women don't support women. I think that's really upsetting," she said.

De Rubens, 35, who worked at Microsoft for a decade, said she's found that many members of her Hillraisers groups have "related to [Clinton] on a deeply personal level, as mothers, and as women who have worked in a male-dominated fields."

She compares Obama's quick ascendancy in the national Democratic Party with some young men's quick ascendancy in the corporate world, while "women are not getting promoted, but doing all the work."

"Somewhere along the way, her [Clinton's] success became our success. I have adopted her in my gut. Before this campaign started, I wouldn't have seen that as a woman's issue, but now I do," she said. "When something happens to her that seems unfair, I feel it like it happened to me."

Dustin Nelson, 31, of West Seattle, who traveled to Oregon several times to volunteer for Clinton there, said the men he's met on the campaign trail tend to react to Clinton's campaign with "knee-jerk, hateful reactions."

"They'll call her a bitch. Or say she's evil incarnate. They come up with these horrible names that you just don't hear men getting called," he said. "With Hillary, everything's personal."

Shaun Shaffer, 29, a Web developer from White Center, said Seattle Democrats have accused him of being a racist for not supporting Obama. "In this campaign, you couldn't just be for or against a candidate," he said.

As a result, this primary has "left a bad taste," Shaffer said.

Shaffer said the only way he'll vote for Obama is if the candidate chooses Clinton as his running mate.

Linda Mitchell, president of the National Women's Political Caucus of Washington, said many local Hillary supporters "feel like they've been treated as second-class citizens."

"There are hard feelings, definitely. There is a lot of anger — a lot of anger — about some of the late endorsements, McDermott's [endorsement of Obama], and all that," she said.

The results of such highly personal intraparty combat will be tricky for Democrats, said Paul Berendt, former chairman of the Washington State Democratic Party.

"Regardless of who the nominee is, a significant effort will need to be made by the other camp to reach out," said Berendt, who will be a Clinton delegate at the Democratic National Convention in Denver this summer.

"If that doesn't happen, there could be a hemorrhaging of votes. One shouldn't underestimate it."

That said, this race has not been nearly as divisive as some primary campaigns in the past, he said. Negative ads have been limited and the debates generally have stayed on the issues.

"If people think this is acrimonious, they haven't been paying attention," he said.

In the meantime, neither Clinton, nor her supporters, are talking about quitting.

"She shouldn't give up the fight just because that's what the boys tell her to do," said Nancyhelen Fischer, retired chairwoman of the National Women's Political Caucus of Washington.

"She's a fighter, and so long as she's in, we're fighting with her."

In other words, it's not over 'til the lady in the pantsuit sings.

(3 comments | comment on this)

Tuesday, May 13th, 2008
10:11 pm - Ah, the Obama fan boys try and spin
This was the start of a posting over at Daily Kos today about Hillary's landslide win...




No 60% Point Win Tonight...
by LtdEdishn
Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:24:05 PM PDT

Yes, Hillary will win West Virginia big tonight, and kudos to her campaign for doing so; but there was no 60 point win blowout. There will be a 40 point blowout win for Clinton tonight, with 92% of the vote in, but what this means is that Obama did 20 points better than expected by all of the pre-election polls that the Clinton Campaign was claiming early on.




lol, who the hell expected Hillary to blow Obama out of the water by 60 points? Anyone want to chime in as the culpable party?

(12 comments | comment on this)

4:20 pm - West Virginia Thread
Update: CNN already calling it for Clinton 'by a wide margin'.


Repeat after me: Just because the media says Obama is the nominee, does not mean the voters agree.

Polls are closing soon, so why not pull some numbers straight outta you know where.

Predicition:

Clinton: 75%
Obama: 23%
Edwards: 2%

Why not.

(1 comment | comment on this)

7:52 am - Birthday Wish
For my birthday today, I'm hoping that by the time I head to bed tonight, I see the following headline on CNN, MSNBC, or ABCNews:

"HUGE BLOWOUT: Clinton picks up West Virginia by over 80%"

Someone give me a candle to blow out so I can make it come true.

(6 comments | comment on this)

Sunday, May 11th, 2008
9:00 pm - Listen up folks
You're going to hear a lot in the coming days about Clinton's arguments to the Super Delegates that she is the most electable candidate, and the only candidate who will be able to beat John McCain. It takes 270 electoral votes, state by state, to win the general election.

Below is evidence that proves Clinton IS the candidate who can beat John McCain. These are state by state polls from national polling firms that basically poll the respondants and say "In a Presidential General Election between McCain and Obama, who would you vote for?" and "In a Presidential General Election between McCain and Clinton, who would you vote for?"

I give you Exhibit A, the May 11th Pollwatcher from My Direct Democracy ( www.MyDD.com ):








and Exhibit B, the May 11th Electoral Map from Electoral Vote ( www.Electoral-Vote.com ):





Total: Clinton: 280 McCain: 258




Total: Obama: 254 McCain: 273 Ties: 11


The Key to Exhibit B





So are you interested in electing a Democrat with Hillary Clinton, or handing the election to John McCain by giving the nomination to Barack Obama? While posted for everyone, I really hope my Oregon friends are reading this.

(8 comments | comment on this)

Wednesday, May 7th, 2008
8:50 pm - 50% is the new threshold
A full 50% in North Carolina of people that voted for Hillary Clinton and another 50% in Indiana that voted for Hillary Clinton say they will not back Barack Obama in the General Election.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/06/primaries.change/index.html

Yes, you can call it a consequence of the heated primary battle and some will settle down and cross over. However, there's a lot of people out there like me who will not cross over.

More damning, 33% said they would vote for McCain over Obama in Indiana, and 38% in North Carolina.

Obama voters appear to be more willing to support Clinton in November. In Indiana, 59 percent of Obama backers said they'd vote for Clinton, and 70 percent of Obama backers in North Carolina said vote for her against McCain.

If he does become the Democratic nominee... why do the words "Republican Circle Jerk" keep coming to my lips?

(8 comments | comment on this)

9:50 am - The Plan Continues
A few weeks back, I had posted about how I thought the game was going to run for the remaining races. Pennsylvania for Hillary, North Carolina for Obama, and Indiana would be tight, but if Hillary won, she's going to pick up a good chunk of pledged delegates in the remaining races through June 3rd.

I know many Obama supporters are celebrating the win in North Carolina and keeping it close in Indiana and declaring it over. I wouldn't count my chickens before they hatch.

Kentucky and West Virginia are shaping up to be HUGE wins for Clinton - we will possibly see 70% in either or both of these two states. The size of her wins in the appalachia portion of North Carolina and Virginia are making me more and more happy as I look at the breakdowns. Clinton is *still* on track to pick up 30-50 delegates in these last contests through June 3rd.

And then, there is Michigan and Florida. Call it "Moving the Goal Posts" all you want, I call it "Throwing the Challenge Flag" onto the field and having the referee review. May 31st is the first test of whether we will see Florida and Michigan seated and how they will allocate. The latest indications from everyone, including Dean, is that they WILL be seated. And any allocation for either state that isn't 50/50 is a big win for Clinton, especially because she has the backing of the Super's in both states. Don't use the Kos countdown clock, since the referees will be adding time to the official game clock on May 31st.

Lastly, the item that I've been hammering on for eons is all about electability.




Uncommitted Democratic superdelegates in Congress overwhelmingly say they won’t necessarily back the presidential candidate who wins the most primary delegates. Instead, electability will be very important in their decision.

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/superdelegates-say-we-will-decide-2008-05-06.html




Apparently the undecided Super Delegates agree. And look, Clinton still wins over McCain, and earns more electoral votes than Obama. I just gave Clinton money to congratulate her on her Indiana win, because she's moving on, not just in this primary, but in the General Election.

(1 comment | comment on this)

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008
4:47 pm - Go Hillary Go

First, let me tell you a bit about me. I like to think I'm in the center of a lot of issues. I identify as a democrat, and a fiscally responsible one at that. I don't like programs on any level (city, state, federal) that don't have a means to pay for it; I certainly am not the 'never met a tax increase that he didn't like' democrat; yet I certainly believe that many things society should chip in and pay for - to help common good. I have issues where I find myself in lock-step with many in the Democratic party: I support single-payer health care, a high minimum wage, strong environmental protections, and full civil rights for everyone. I stand on the outside of where some of my other self-identified Democrats are at: I think the death penalty is just fine. I think government assistance should have a cap. I think taxes are too high for many small businesses. I identify as a DLC Democrat more than I do a Progressive Democrat; what I like to call a Centrist Democrat. The economy is my number 1 issue in this election, and in every election.

I grew up and came of voting age in 1995 - so my first vote was for Bill Clinton (an easy call vs Perot and Dole). But still, I didn't vote for Bill Clinton just because he was the Democrat on the ticket, I voted for Bill Clinton because he made a difference in my life. I grew up in an area of Seattle called White Center, a place where low income housing projects dominated the region and depressed the housing values. The longer people sat in these projects, the longer they grew accustomed to the government doing for them what many of them should be doing for themselves. Many took no pride in themselves or their efforts to improve their conditions - as long as the government kept paying, they kept on with their own personal status quo. Bill Clinton helped our area with the 1996 Welfare Reform Act that motivated our neighbors to do what they needed to do when they could: Go to work. The first President Clinton's committment to the American working family made me have so much pride in . My dad was a welder, and my mom was a secretary. Without things like the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Family and Medical Leave Act, my growing up would have been quite a bit different. I won't go into why, since this isn't about Bill Clinton, but I wanted some back story there to show that I trust Hillary Clinton when she says she's out there looking out for American families. While it was Bill in the Whitehouse with the executive pen, their last name has earned my respect and trust to accomplish goals of the middle and working class families, much to the same degree 'Kennedy' has it's reputation in Democratic circles and elicits respect.

When I found out that Hillary Clinton had jumped in the race for 2008, I immediately went to do research to look at her stance on issues.

I already knew Clinton had the tenacity in a candidate that I wanted. I can't imagine getting up day in and day out to be attacked on a personal level. To be called a bitch. To be told to drop out of the race and iron my shirt. To be called a monster. To be told that you're unlikable. The determination of any person under that sort of bombardment, both from the Republicans on the other side, but also from people that bring the phrase to mind: "With friends like these, who need enemies?" makes me particularly enthusiastic in supporting her. I can see that sort of grit as being an asset when negotiating with foreign leaders. Yet I can also see the side of Senator Clinton that a lot of people say she lacks - her April Fools day speech made me laugh, her New Hampshire tears were genuine and showed me that she's just like you and me and I could empathize when in a similar situation. If you really want to look at something that gets lost on a lot of people in this age of quickie divorce and las vegas weddings, she had all the reason to leave, and yet she chose to honor her vows: "For better or for worse, in sickness or in health, to love and to cherish 'till death do us part." She's someone who will do what they say and demonstrates it in how she lives her life.

I love that she's a policy wonk. I want a President who is very knowledgeable on a wide array of issues. I think that's a strong asset. I particularly liked her ideas and policy in four key areas. So much so that I gave money to a political candidate for the first time in my life.

Middle Class Economics

Senator Clinton has called for extending the middle class tax cuts including the EITC child tax credit. I love that she recognizes the inequity that someone making $50,000 a year pays a 25% tax bracket, yet a Wall Street investment managers making $50 million a year could pay just 15%. She supports a 90 day moratorium on Housing Foreclosures to keep Americans in their home. Ben Bernanke just yesterday said that unless we take immediate steps to do exactly this - keep Americans in their homes now, we are going to face a financial crisis. Further, she supports a 5 year freeze on Adjustable Rate Mortgages from adjusting higher to keep Americans in their homes. She voted to cap credit card interest rates. I have one credit card where my payment arrived 3 days late and they adjusted it to the default 37.99% APR from my 12% I had. They said I had to keep it for 6 months with on-time payments before it would be reduced. Her plan to fix Social Security involves rolling back the tax cuts (both income and capital gains) for the rich, and to use that money to keep Social Security solvent. There are all things I rabidly support.

Health Care

I love Hillary's Health Care plan because it's the plan that would cover me and everyone else. A 30 year old white guy who is working but doesn't get health insurance through his employer, I've been without health care for about 7 months now. Getting coverage for everyone saves everyone in the long haul against paying for the massive amounts of uninsured and underinsured people who can't pay at the hospital. It's a progressive plan, and is estimated (by a range of people who have analyzed her plan) to save Americans $662.5 billion dollars per year, the most of any plan put forward. I look at companies like the one I have now, and by lowering costs to all, I could possibly afford the health care plan here, or opt-in to a public plan option. I love that her plan guarantees that I will remain covered even if I lose my job.

Energy

Hillary took a courageous stand by voting against the Cheney Energy Bill that provided billions of tax breaks to oil companies. I think her plan to create an Energy Strategic Fund is a great idea. In it, she details that Big Oil would have the choice of either investing in alternative energy or contributing a portion of their earnings into the fund. Coupled with an immediate break on the federal gas tax this summer to people ($30 is something I'd rather have in my pocket) by putting the responsibility on the backs of the oil company's largess windfall profits, she shows both a committment now to do what she can to help lower prices, and also invest so that we'll be easing off middle east reliance and the OPEC cartel in the near future. Analysts expect oil to get to $200 per barrel this summer. She was right to oppose the tax breaks to Ethanol companies when the largest - Archer Daniels Midland, just reported a $517 million dollar profit. They are on target to earn $2 billion dollars this year. Hillary says no to tax breaks to big oil, and no to tax breaks to big ethanol. She does say yes to tax credits to those who least can afford it - the American consumer and the average gas station, by providing gas station owner a tax credit for installing E85 (ethanol) pumps. She does say yes to tax credits for promising alternate renewable sources that aren't raking in the dough, like tax credits for wind power and solar power. A Home Run for Hillary in my scorecard.

Iraq War

I was one of the 80% of Americans who though the Iraq War was a good idea back in 2003. I have no regrets about my initial support. However, I agreed with the action that Hillary Clinton outlined in her speech on the floor that day.

She outlined in her speech that she absolutely wanted the President to use this resolution as a last resort.


A vote for it is not a vote to rush to war; it is a vote that puts awesome responsibility in the hands of our President and we say to him - use these powers wisely and as a last resort. And it is a vote that says clearly to Saddam Hussein - this is your last chance - disarm or be disarmed.


She called on the president to go through the U.N.


If we were to attack Iraq now, alone or with few allies, it would set a precedent that could come back to haunt us. In recent days, Russia has talked of an invasion of Georgia to attack Chechen rebels. India has mentioned the possibility of a pre-emptive strike on Pakistan. And what if China were to perceive a threat from Taiwan?

So Mr. President, for all its appeal, a unilateral attack, while it cannot be ruled out, on the present facts is not a good option.




I do not blame Hillary Clinton for voting for her bottom line last-to-use imploring vote, quite the opposite, I think it was the right thing to do. Putting teeth behind your resolution to get action was something that was needed. I blame George Bush for being anxious in wanting to rush to war and his absolute disaster of managing it. I think Hillary can do best in applying her experience in getting us a true plan and action to bring needed stability and getting us out of Iraq in a secure manner.

Saddam Hussein had already proved he was a madman. The U.N. had proved he previously had weapons of mass destruction. The man had murdered upwards of 300,000 of his own people according to Human Rights Watch, and was continuing on a daily basis. I challenge that a vote against clear and convincing action to reign in this dictator this man was a vote to endorse his continued murder of his people.

I could continue on into other areas on why I support Hillary, including her bi-partisan accolades from her work in the Senate and what she's accomplished, National Security, and on and on, but for the sake of expediency and readability, I've chopped it off at the points above.

(2 comments | comment on this)


> previous 20 entries
> top of page
LiveJournal.com