Pervez Musharraf quits as Pakistan's President, rather than face impeachment proceedings.
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/08/18/musharraf.address/index.htmlMusharraf overplayed his hand in the last year or so. He was increasingly seen as too cozy with the United States, and a person who increasingly put his own political survival ahead of the development of Pakistan's political institutions. As
I posted about a year ago, the crisis with Pakistan's judiciary wound up being a key turning point leading to the events of this morning (the assault on the Red Mosque may have been another). He lost the elites, and the support of the Army (THE key institution in the country), and now his job. I suspect that people will mention Pakistan's nuclear capability about a billion times today - insinuating that Pakistan's instability combined with their nuclear arsenal means big trouble.
There are three primary questions in the back of my mind this morning:
1. Who becomes the new ruler of Pakistan?
2. Does that person have the ability to reverse the horrible economic situation in the country?
3. Does that person have the willpower to confront the jihadis and build a secular state?
EDIT: Consider this - in Pakistan, they impeach the President for violating the Constitution. And we're critical of
their political institutions?
EDIT2: According to the Pakistani Constitution, in the case of the resignation or impeachment of the President, the Chairman of the Senate becomes President. That's
Mian Soomro, appointed by Musharraf to office and apportioned with awesome facial hair (like a Bollywood movie elder - like Amitabh Bachchan). The Constitution says they need to find a permanent President within the next 30 days.
EDIT3:
The Beeb has a good article on his legacy. No more Daily Show appearances, I guess! Jon can save his tea for the next guy.