| Right now - some thoughts |
[Jul. 15th, 2008|10:20 pm] |
I must know this exactly. I must understand this exactly. I must do this exactly.
- Herr Klesmer, the three musts of the artist; George Eliot, Daniel Deronda
----- ----- -----
My must: I must know what is relevant.
Insight is relevant; knowledge is relevant. But I must know why I think so. This is more difficult than it seems.
Is beauty relevant? First inclination is to say no. Because ugliness can be just as relevant and because something may be beautiful but not relevant. Or something may be relevant, but not by simple reason of its beauty. But perhaps ugliness is a quality of beauty by its absence? Can the absence of something be a quality of it? I think so, the same way I think that nothingness is a quality of existence. Could we have one without the other?
Why is history relevant? Because it is knowledge, because it is real and it is human. Because each human is a small segment of a greater whole, an heir to the legacy of a magnificent species. Because no one can ever be a first who was not a first, and because difference is more challenging to find in sameness. (George Washington and I are the same. I and Adolf Hitler are the same. Lafayette, Ghandi, Bette Davis, Pol Pot, Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Buddha, Stalin, Jesus, Allen Ginsberg, Picasso, Winston Churchill, Bat Ye'or, Caesar, Shakespeare, Thomas Hardy, Susan B. Anthony, George S. Custer, Tecumseh, Hilary Clinton, Muhammad, Lord Carnivan, John Lennon, Teddy Roosevelt, Madonna, Ramses, Louis Armstrong, Virginia Woolf, JFK, Mandela, Sitting Bull, Elizabeth, Charlemagne, Edgar Allen Poe, Le Brun, Wagner, Gertrude Stein, Machiavelli, Leonardo, Abraham Lincoln, Twiggy, Mao, Andy Warhol... we're all the same.) To know our past is to know ourselves. And that is relevant.
I value myself.
----- ----- -----
A death ought to be mourned. It is the final end, the absolute, the all-end, of a set of possibilities and potentials. That's why it is, for me, so tragic.
|
|
|