Brian Martinez ([info]cluebyfour) wrote,
@ 2005-09-01 14:24:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:disaster, politics

House Speaker to NO: too bad, so sad
Well, somebody had to say it:

House Speaker: Rebuilding N.O. doesn't make sense
Thursday, 2:55 p.m.

By Bill Walsh
Washington bureau

WASHINGTON - House Speaker Dennis Hastert dropped a bombshell on flood-ravaged New Orleans on Thursday by suggesting that it isn’t sensible to rebuild the city.

"It doesn't make sense to me," Hastert told the Daily Herald in suburban Chicago in editions published today. "And it's a question that certainly we should ask."

Hastert's comments came as Congress cut short its summer recess and raced back to Washington to take up an emergency aid package expected to be $10 billion or more. Details of the legislation are still emerging, but it is expected to target critical items such as buses to evacuate the city, reinforcing existing flood protection and providing food and shelter for a growing population of refugees.

The Illinois Republican’s comments drew an immediate rebuke from Louisiana officials.

“That’s like saying we should shut down Los Angeles because it’s built in an earthquake zone,” former Sen. John Breaux, D-La., said. “Or like saying that after the Great Chicago fire of 1871, the U.S. government should have just abandoned the city.”

Hastert said that he supports an emergency bailout, but raised questions about a long-term rebuilding effort. As the most powerful voice in the Republican-controlled House, Hastert is in a position to block any legislation that he opposes.

"We help replace, we help relieve disaster," Hastert said. "But I think federal insurance and everything that goes along with it... we ought to take a second look at that."

The speaker’s comments were in stark contrast to those delivered by President Bush during an appearance this morning on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

“I want the people of New Orleans to know that after rescuing them and stabilizing the situation, there will be plans in place to help this great city get back on its feet,” Bush said. “There is no doubt in my mind that New Orleans is going to rise up again as a great city.”

Insurance industry executives estimated that claims from the storm could range up to $19 billion. Rebuilding the city, which is more than 80 percent submerged, could cost tens of billions of dollars more, experts projected.

Hastert questioned the wisdom of rebuilding a city below sea level that will continue to be in the path of powerful hurricanes.

"You know we build Los Angeles and San Francisco on top of earthquake issures and they rebuild, too. Stubbornness," he said.

Hastert wasn't the only one questioning the rebuilding of New Orleans. The Waterbury, Conn., Republican-American newspaper wrote an editorial Wednesday entitled, "Is New Orleans worth reclaiming?"

"Americans' hearts go out to the people in Katrina's path," it said. "But if the people of New Orleans and other low-lying areas insist on living in harm's way, they ought to accept responsibility for what happens to them and their property."


OK, so he makes a very good point.  Rebuilding New Orleans, at an enormous cost to taxpayers, may not make sense if the same nightmarish scenario can happen in the future, even with improved flooding protection and wetlands management.  The Dutch may have pulled off the trick of living on below-sea-level lands, but they also don't deal with hurricanes.  And it shouldn't be the taxpayers' responsibility to deal with the consequences of the residents' choices.

But to choose this time to make such a cold analysis, when the bodies haven't even been counted or recovered, when a dying city writhes in agony with no food, water, power or sanitation, and when people are risking their lives to save others: to make such a statement now tells you a lot about the priorities of politicians and bureaucrats.  Human compassion doesn't seem to be among them.

Hey, Dennis: shut the fuck up and let people get to work.  You can whine about the cost during your appropriations hearings.  But for now you're simply cementing the reputation that liberals have accused Republicans of having all along: you don't really give a shit about the less fortunate, at least until the next election season.



(Post a new comment)


[info]ilcylic
2005-09-01 08:05 pm UTC (link)
It has nothing to do with not caring about the less fortunate.

Wouldn't it make more sense to rebuild the city elsewhere, to give the poor a safer place to live, that isn't likely to get smashed and drowned again? Wouldn't that be real compassion?

-Ogre

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]cluebyfour
2005-09-01 08:40 pm UTC (link)
Well, imagine how much more it will cost taxpayers to completely move the city. No matter how trashed NOLA is, it still has infrastructure that can repaired and built upon.

But that's entirely beside the point. The point is Hastert's galactically stupid and insensitive timing. How ironic for a Republican to suddenly regain a sense of fiscal responsibility when he fellow citizens are facing death in a hellhole that makes Mogadishu look like Disneyland.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]deadpansev
2005-09-01 08:38 pm UTC (link)
Good timing or not, he has a point. It is just not smart to live below sea level as much of NOLA is. I think it is good to get the conversation started now before it is too late about rebuilding the city should be something the federal government should involve itself in or not.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]cluebyfour
2005-09-01 08:43 pm UTC (link)
Yes, yes, he has a point and a good one. Fine. Wonderful.

Tell me, Sev, is this really what you'd want to hear when you've gone without food and very little water for three days and facing looters and dead bodies floating in the water at every corner? Put yourself in their shoes and tell me that Hastert "has a good point."

He could have a waited a fucking month to open his piehole without costing the Feds another dime.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]deadpansev
2005-09-02 06:24 am UTC (link)
Frankly if I were in that situation I don't think I would even know about Haserts comments as I would have otther things to worry about. In fact the only reason I even know about them now is because of you. Even so, I would not be looking to the government to save me, no matter what, so why would I care one way or the other if the government is coming to my rescue?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…