big pond, little fish [entries|friends|calendar]
Hannah Wolf Bowen

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ calendar | livejournal calendar ]

(14 treading water | dive in?)

[20 Jul 2008|09:12am]
Sometimes you win, sometimes you, uh, win.

Right.  Back from Tamarack Hill.  We braved storms and stranding and a rather impressive meltdown to win our division (the Senior Elementary), finishing up on our dressage score of (wait for it) 30.0 and having a glorious, glorious long gallop out on the cross-country course along the war.

More later.  Short version: hurrah!

Also, my cell phone was sacrificed to the cause.  It died a sad death somewhere in between the lightning and the hail.  Don't call me, I'll call you.  Or won't, as the case may be.  I'll keep you posted once I figure out how I'm coping with this.  In the meantime, blissful silence!

Off to collapse.  Or go to Readercon.  One of the two.

(12 treading water | dive in?)

xc derby [16 Jul 2008|03:43pm]
Okay, that?  Where "that" was the cross-country derby at Scarlet Hill today?  Was entirely too awesome for words.  Not that that will slow me down!  But seriously: awesome.

We got underway a little bit late this morning, but planning to get there early means there's time built into the schedule for a little lateness here and there, and so: no worries at all, and the boys got along in the trailer really well, so that was nice.  Got to the farm, checked in, and scampered to join L. for a walk of the Beginner Novice course.

It, uh, turns out that 2'7" looks a whole lot bigger when you're about to jump it as a course of solid fences than in stadium, or even as solid fences on your home property.  Heh.

But we walked it, and then I walked it again, and went back to change and get Tucker ready with the help of A., who was today's hero of the revolution; she wasn't riding, but came along to assist pretty much everyone.  The beastie warmed up super: alert and relaxed, active and responsive, springy in his gaits and over his fences, as springy and stretchy as a thirteen-year-old gymnast.  So...off to the start box we go.  Count down. 

How'd we place?  Don't know.  Don't care.  They're going to pin at the end of the day and mail the ribbons.  I am curious to see what my time turned out to be.  I'm totally comfy with having a million time faults this year, but I wouldn't mind knowing what X meters per minute feels like.  But I had a blast, and Tucker ditto, and he handled the terrain like a star, and is, indeed, fit: barely even breathing hard at the end.  Got what we came for!  (And I confess, I'm a little sorry now to be doing Elementary at Tamarack on Saturday.  That was--did I mention?--awesome.)

Whee!

A. will get Tucker out to stretch his legs tomorrow, just a little w/t/c loosening session and maybe a light hack.  Then we're off to Vermont on Friday.  Wish me luck?

Onward.

(8 treading water | dive in?)

[15 Jul 2008|08:06am]
49. The God of Animals: A Novel (Aryn Kyle)

You know, if I'd wanted a depressing horse book, I could have just reread In the Presence of Horses and saved myself the trouble.  That one makes me want to slit my wrists, too, but at least it's well-written, unlike some books I could name.

#

L. was able to fit me in for a dressage lesson yesterday, so I trucked down after work and we spent our half-hour getting Tucker more up and open.  Good stuff.  Honestly, I could do with about three more of those in quick succession to get us back where we were six weeks ago.  But one is better than none!  And it was a private, which was nice; I love the work-with-instructor/work-on-own nature of the semiprivate lessons that I usually ride in, but there's something to be said, for sure, for intermittently having somebody help you ride. every. step.

The work itself was the usual: circles off the track, hands a little up and forward, pressing the horse up and under, quick-change transitions to encourage him to lift his shoulders and use his hind end.  Wasn't real pretty at first--Tucker had apparently warmed himself up for the lesson yesterday by staging a jailbreak from his paddock and a gallop around the property riling up the young mares and was feeling a little bit done-for-the-day and not entirely sure that he felt like being as hot off the leg as I'd like--but persistence and transitions saw us through and we had some quality work after that.  And hey, my ability to sit even that springy, powerful trot by letting go of my hips rather than getting floppy in my lower back made an appearance, so that was nice.

I am having a bit of cross-training anxiety.  I'm riding in a jump lesson tonight, the XC derby tomorrow, will most likely be off on Thursday for [info]pgtremblay's barbecue and so I can put in at least a brief appearance at Readercon, and then we leave for Tamarack Friday morning, and although I'll probably try to ride before we hit the road and hack in once we arrive, there won't be a whole lot of work in either of those: no need to stress myself or Tucker out ride before the Saturday show.  But all this working on jumping and field-riding means that our dressage schooling has been woefully limited and I'm feeling the lack.  There's just not enough time to do everything that I'd like to get done.

But y'know, in a couple of months I'll be stuck back in the indoor and pining for the stuff we're doing now.  And we can ease back a little for the next week or two and focus a bit on the dressage before ramping up the jumping again for Huntington (assuming I get in, but my entry's postmarked on the opening day and J. didn't think it would be oversubscribed) and maybe King Oak (assuming T. agrees with the rest of the world that that's not a bad starter event and assuming the fall course is comparable to the spring).  So I am not really stressing out.  Just wishing for an extra day or two in each week, is all.

In any case, jump school tonight, XC derby Wednesday morning, etc.  I pulled Tucker's mane last night--he'd gotten a little scraggly--and as usual, was stunned by how respectable he looks now.  Should probably start getting my stuff together for Tamarack, figuring out when I'm going to give my tack a thorough cleaning, and so on, and so forth.  Onward.

(11 treading water | dive in?)

[14 Jul 2008|07:29am]
The main problem with the Tamarack Hill horse trials being this weekend: I'm not sure if I'll get back to not!Boston in time to play in the Saturday night Mafia games at Readercon.  WOE.

(Though this may possibly for the best, given what happened last time I played in the same game as Jonathan Lethem.

(...except for the bit where "what happened last time I played in the same game as Jonathan Lethem" included the bit where I got utterly played, yes, but as the bit where Chip Delany consoled me as I sat there reeling.

(So I say again: WOE.

(But I'll come up if we get back from Vermont early enough, which I hope that we will, so don't entirely count me out yet, okay?  Okay.)

#

I was extolling the virtues of How to Stay Alive in the Woods to [info]tanaise last night and although I couldn't find the bit where the author is all, "So now that you've killed the bear..." and I'm all, "Wait, what?  I think we missed a step."

Instead, I found the section of cannibalism.

Oh, Bradford Angier.  So resolutely nuts, and yet so practical.  Call me!

#

48. Warrior Girls: Protecting Our Daughters Against the Injury Epidemic in Women's Sports (Michael Sokolove).

This really is the year of nonfiction.  Dodgy subtitle, of course, but Sokolove gets a partial pass because he actually does have a daughter (a swimmer) who's an athlete on at least the collegiate level.  I, of course, do not.  Possibly this means I shouldn't have read the book?

But I did, and found it interesting, if not quite as awesomely so as I'd hoped.  The book's primary concern is the high rate of ACL tears among girls and women playing high-level (for whatever age group) sports (soccer, mostly) and follows that focus through a couple of personal stories and through an investigation of the whats and whys of the injuries and the hows of reducing them.  It's much less alarmist than I'd feared; Sokolove's argument is not even remotely that these girls (most of his subjects are or were injured as teens) can't or shouldn't play at a high level.  Rather, he's interested in the biomechanics that may make (many of) them prone to this particular injury and in things that can be done to counteract that, both the expected stuff like cross-training and less crazy competitive schedules and the new-and-thus-more-interesting-to-me programs designed to retrain the ways in which they run and jump.

Major complaint: it's a repetitive book, and could have been much shorter than it is.

#

Lesson relearned during Sunday's ride: 90% of undesirable behavior in a horse can be fixed by giving said horse something to do.  Not a new piece of information, but one that impresses me every time I rediscover it.

(Works for riders, too.)

Undesirable, I say, rather than bad.  We did head out to the hayfields and frankly, I made a few bad choices early in the ride, trying out another field and some questions that, in retrospect, would have been better approached with a lead horse the first time through, with the end result that I wound up my horse (who'd been a little tense just walking down the road) a bit more than necessary.  He wasn't being bad, by any means: just a little hot and dubious about my sanity, for which I cannot blame him in the least.  But everyone basically kept their brains and manners in place even when we were disagreeing (very politely) about how the next few minutes were going to go, I stayed on the right side of the horse (except for a few minutes where I dismounted to try to work something through, but that was voluntary, and so a-okay), and I didn't get us into any real trouble before remembering that we were over in the hayfields for a good experience, not so much to challenge ourselves, and shifted gears to a better-part-of-valor approach.

Over in the usual field, we picked up our trot and Tucker was all, "Oh!  This is what we're doing?  Yes, ma'am!" and we had ourselves a ball.  A couple of little the-rest-of-the-world-exists! moments when we encountered some unexpected hikers (and one when we encountered what I can only assume--I didn't notice it, myself--was a rustly bush), but those are good, too: gives us something to work through that's a little bit different but manageable.  And the big field has a similar question to the one that was flummoxing us in the other--a sort of swale, but more inviting and with better footing and no water in the bottom--so we walked through that a million times: no big deal.  We trotted quite a few laps of the field and had ourselves some canters, forward and back within both gaits, working on keeping him balanced and straight and on keeping me open through my frontline, and he was feeling so good that I was a little braver this time: got up in gallop position and let him roll a few times.  No loss of brain function!  Awesome.  And he walked back through the trails and front feel all relaxed and purposeful-like, very calm down the road even with cars going by, and couldn't have been more cheerful and cuddly afterward.  So all in all, I was very pleased and am calling it a win.

(Also on Sunday, I discovered another reason to get  back to the weight-lifting.  It is a whole lot easier to randomly do a dozen stalls when you have more muscle than a wet noodle.  Oof.  My body feels trashed.  Glad I rode right after feeding instead of finishing up my chores first.)

Still working on the shape of this week.  But there will be more riding, that's for sure.  Onward!

(15 treading water | dive in?)

[12 Jul 2008|01:51pm]
Ah.  Good.  Except for the return of the horse fly from hell, who cut our grooming-while-grazing short as I had to hustle a very annoyed (with the fly, not me) Tucker into the barn for a dousing with fly spray.

I've been wanting to clean up our turn on the forehand for a while now, so I started our work today by tackling that in-hand.  Tucker's a very willing beastie, but tends to push his body away off, say, the right hind leg when moving his haunches around to the left rather than stepping the leg across and under his body in front of the left hind in the initial step or two.  He corrects himself after those first few steps and so we ultimately get the desired result of the exercise--but it's still sloppy, and ought not be, so we'll back up a bit and explain things to him more thoroughly.

(Of course, every single step today was super.  Guess who the sloppy one here probably is?  Hint: not Tucker.)

Climbed aboard, then, and flirted with the line between firmness and sympathy.  I've spent years pingponging between being ineffective and being too harsh.  One of these days I'll learn how to ride the line.  Today was good.  Expected a little more from him and from myself from our very first steps and he responded like a champ, no fussing, no fighting, just yes-ma'am and what-can-I-do-for-you-now?  (It helped, no doubt, that I was feeling much better balanced and in the middle of him with much less effort than recently.)

I was targeting those shoulders today.  Kept the focus there as we went through our paces, and also on keeping us both forward-thinking.  Played with our usual warm up a bit: added a little bend and counterbend on the circle into the walk work, got into the canter a little more quickly and put the leg-yielding afterwards.  Worked in the middle of the ride on the sitting trot (non-sucky! again!) and on transitions, looking for him to keep his withers and shoulders up and his hind legs coming through, inserting short stretchy walk breaks (and playing with the transition between the medium and free walks) and applying praise liberally; he was better to the left than the right, but really trying quite hard.  Did a little too much walking after this and had to convince him that no, we weren't done yet, but we got it back together and toyed a bit with smaller figures, shoulder-in, and canter lengthenings, where he at first was wanting to get a little down on that right shoulder but finished up really light and bounding along.  I do not look forward to the day when, no doubt, some dressage judge will inform me that probably our "lengthening" should be our working canter...!  But for now: so much fun.  Then a walk in the bigger XC field to cool out, and a long hand-graze while I read some more of my book.  No flies the size of my head, this time.

So.  I would still like to have myself a dressage lesson Real Soon Now, but certainly I'm feeling better about how we're muddling through in the meantime.  And hopefully we'll get that and a jump lesson both this week; I'm going to try to arrange something with L., scheduled around the XC derby on Wednesday and leaving for Tamarack on Friday (eek!).  Not tomorrow, though; tomorrow will hopefully be a run through the hayfield day, aka, "galloping."

Onward, then.

(22 treading water | dive in?)

[12 Jul 2008|07:57am]
...I interrupt this rant to bring you the news that apparently there are Young Riders DVDs out.  Have been since '06.  Why do you people not tell me these things?

I just...people!  My Pony Express tv show!  From when I was seven!  To nine!  I have no idea whether it was actually any good at all, but...Young Riders!  You didn't tell me!

I will never trust you people again.  I feel betrayed.  ::flounce!::

(28 treading water | dive in?)

hellboy II: actually worse than hellboy I [12 Jul 2008|07:37am]
Oh, Guillermo.  My friend, we need to talk.

That was atrocious.  Like, truly awful.  Like, possibly even worse than Pulse, which was both stupid and incomprehensible, but at least had Ian Somerhalder for me to admire and was not smug.  Hellboy II?  Is smug.  On top of being terrible.  It is not a good combination.

Which is not to say that there weren't moments in which you could tell that this was from the same guy who did Pan's Labyrinth*.  The bit with the tree and the dying and the grass and flowers was especially lovely, especially graceful.  But that almost made it worse, because he could so clearly have done better and yet chose not to.

So many problems.  I cannot choose!  But I must.  Biggest problem with the movie: the bit where the prince--the bad guy--was not the bad guy.  Not only was he the only one in the flick with any intelligence whatsoever, he was, as [info]nihilistic_kid puts it, resisting genocide.  I'm not sure I'd go as far as calling him the good guy, given that he did do some not-so-nice things, but frankly, I'm willing to give him a pass on that, as he clearly didn't mean it.  Not that anyone in this movie meant anything.  Possibly they'd all been kidnapped and drugged, or replaced with robots shortly before filming began.

Happily for me, I must have fallen asleep twenty minutes in.  There's this fight scene fairly early on, with Hellboy & Co. facing down about six million little tooth fairies--think piranhas with wings--and basically all that they do for the first five minutes of said fight is attempt to shoot these things with their guns.  Obviously, this would never work, and so, just as obviously, that entire group was slaughtered during this fight,and then I fell asleep, and the rest of what I thought I saw was (obviously) an awful dream.

Honestly, people.  Even the previews before it were bad.

* Granted, the bit I most recall from Pan's Labyrinth was how they got the ad reel out of sync at the beginning and fixed it, but not properly, so that when the fascists showed up at the end of the movie and gunned our heroine down, said ads popped up again, beginning with one that was all, "Happy holidays from the National Guard!"...

(11 treading water | dive in?)

[10 Jul 2008|08:34pm]

[info]tanaise to the yellowdog: Stop licking my toes!  I'm sorry if yelling at you hurt your feelings.
Me, from down the hall: Some people like that kind of thing!

#

Got Tucker's new funny hat from Smartpak today.  It is, ah, less subtle than expected.  I went for the black with beads, expecting the beads to also be black: so just a little bling, but low-key, right?  And no tassels at all.

There are tassels.  And the beads are many-colored.  Not bright, exactly, but shiny metallic.  Oh, my.  Everyone I showed it to cracked up.  Including me.

But it doesn't look too ridiculous when you're on the horse, and I think it makes his ears look smaller (I swear, this is the first time I've ever seen a horse's ears fill up all the allotted space in one of these things), and it seemed to help him tolerate the bugs (and the Endure spray is a win, too, [info]wldhrsjen3!).  So I will not bury it in the darkest corner of my tack trunk.  I can always get another if T. refuses to be seen with me in public with this one on my horse, right?

So.  We went out and worked on our dressage in the cross-country warm up area, and ended up sticking with that for the duration of the ride; we had some submission and precision issues in need of working out.  I have, I suspect, been getting sloppy with my geometry and straightness, what with all this riding around out of doors.  Which, of course, is no excuse at all and I need to pay better attention.  (And I have been paying attention.  Just--to other things.  Need more accessible brainpower!)  But a little slide through the outside shoulder or a little failure to finish a turn here and there can add up, and today that became clear.  So I actually, y'know, rode a little, and raised my standards, and we had some rather spiffy work through the middle of the ride.

I do suspect that I'm being a little self-indulgent with the canter-to-trot work ratio; we had a couple of moments when I half-halted and pressed, looking for more oomph and carry in the trot, and Tucker offered up instead a (gorgeous) transition to canter.  This is something we've go through whenever we work on improving the quality of the trot, and usually I angst for a couple of rides about encouraging the effort vs. looking for the right answer before settling on a combo of both.  I do think we managed to get from point A to point B in one ride this time--rode the canter the first few times (including a super 10m canter circle, just seeing how he'd handle it, and he handled it well) and then steadily turned up the dial on getting us promptly in the proper trot--so hey, that's progress, anyway.  It'll go away as we build our strength and understanding again.

Speaking of strength...  My leg was much better today and I dropped my stirrup length back to where it belongs with good results.  But I am still having a terrible time keeping my torso upright, and the reason why dawned on me in our last set, when I decided to work on my sitting trot for, uh, the first time in about six weeks, what with Tucker's foot and everything.  T. says that when you're working on sitting the trot, you have to commit to it--that you can't be going along thinking, "Gosh, I wish I were rising now!"  So I did; if I felt like I needed a break, I was allowed to canter, but not to rise.  And it mostly did not suck, but my abs?  More entire core?  Ohmygod.  Ow.

And it dawned on me that when I started to get my upper body sorted out this spring, it was no doubt the result of a leap in riding skill, but there was also that other pesky little detail: I was going to the gym a couple of times a week.  And what have I not done in about those same six weeks, what with moving and horse stuff and all?  Right-o.  I didn't even reup my membership when the school year ended, to cover the summer.  And why did I start going to the gym in the first place?  Because I realized that I needed to be fitter in order to ride the way that I wanted to ride.

Oh.  Right.

The thing is, my core strength naturally doesn't suck, so it's relatively easy for me to forget that knocking off three digits worth of sit-ups (not that I need the gym for that, but it's not like that was all that I did there, so) can actually make a difference; I tend to take those results for granted.  And so I think of going to the gym as this thing that I do because I enjoy being mighty (because I totally do!) rather than this thing that I do because it has an actual practical application in my real sport.  It's not that I need brute strength to ride, but body control?  Oh, yes.

I suspect I'll have to start from scratch; humans don't hold their fitness as well as horses do.  Drat.  I'm giving myself one more week's grace, because this coming week is likely to be a little nuts, but then?  Back to work.  (Nice to know that it actually did make a difference, though!)

Tucker did start to get a little tired in the sitting trot set (which really, I shouldn't have left for last, but I didn't expect to get there today, so) and I thought, "Gee, if the heat is getting to the Energizer Bunner here, what does that mean for me...oh, crap."  So we finished up what we were doing and cooled out and then I chugged enough Gatorade to keep me from falling over while I put Tucker away, and we had ourselves a happy ending after all.  Maybe I really am tolerating the heat better this year?  Probably not wise to push it, though.  Stupid air conditioning; hot weather never bothered me (well, it bothered me, but it didn't make me fall over) until I started working in the a/c all day.  Just wrecked my tolerance utterly.

Anyway.  Friday off.  I'd like to do some dressage on Saturday and then go out and run in the hayfields on Sunday, but we'll see how things shape up.  Onward.

(21 treading water | dive in?)

[10 Jul 2008|07:43am]
The yellowdog has defected.  He wants to be [info]tanaise's dog.  She has a sheepskin on the floor of her room, unlike some people he knows.

#

Look!  Paleface is for sale.

One assumes that possibly his rider had something to do with it...but this horse's cross-country run at Rolex was a thing of beauty.  Clocked around that big old course like it was a walk in the park.  And he's cute, too.  See?  (The horse, not the rider.  [Well.  Maybe the rider, too.  Too bad he's like twelve.])  He could be my next event horse, since [info]coneycat is probably not going to give me Mitzi any time soon and [info]melodiousaphony is being all stubborn about letting me kidnap her girl.  I have a couple of nickels.  Do you think that would be enough?

(13 treading water | dive in?)

[09 Jul 2008|08:26pm]
Remind me, people.  How often do I have to reapply sunblock?  The new stuff (I adore Blue Lizard Sport, but it is expensive, so I am test-driving Coppertone Sport) is SPF 50 and supposedly "ultra sweat-proof."

#

Tonight's ride started off a little rough in the warm up, and it was hot, and I felt I was doing altogether too much work (no doubt Tucker was having the same thought about himself), and so I shrugged and stepped right into the meat of the ride, big canter and then rubberband work in that gait, taking a page from the reiners' book: big fast circle/slow small circle/big fast circle.  Though in our case, more like: big circle, canter lengthening/small circle, package the gait/big circle, lengthen again, changing the length of stride rather than the tempo.  Back and forth between leads a bit until I felt like I had him quicker off the leg and solidly out to the bridle both in the canter work and in the trot between leads, then patted and let him have a break while I pulled my stirrups up a hole.

I noticed the other day and then again tonight that I seem to be having an instability-of-leg problem at my usual dressage stirrup length.  I suspect that it's not so much that my leg has suddenly gotten worse as that it's just starting to seem that way by comparison the all the work we've been doing to get it rock-solid for jumping and galloping.  But it is not a pleasant feeling and I would like it to go away now, kthnxbye.  I need to think lots and hard about lowering my knee, I suspect, but going back up a hole will help while I get sorted back out again.

It's funny.  One of you ([info]kerlin?) said something a while back about how you'd always have one phase of the event that you felt really good about, and one that was fine, and one that needs work, and they wouldn't always be the same ones in each spot.  But somehow I figured, even so, that I'd always be flip-flopping dressage and stadium between the top two places, and trying to play catch-up cross-country.  No, it turns out.  I somehow find myself feeling much better about both jumping phases than I do about the dressage, which is a truly weird place for me to be.  I suspect it means that I'm due for either a breakthrough or a humbling.  I know which one I'm hoping for!

Picked him back up after the break and did some more transitions within the canter and some working trot work.  Which was not our very best--the trot needed more half-halt and more inside leg to really get his balance shifted back, not to mention a more upright rider--but was pleasant and loose and over his back in a level balance and certainly a vast improvement over what we'd started with, and at the end of that set he was quite hot (temperature, not temperment) though not blowing hard or otherwise stressed.  We wandered out back while I considered whether or not to do anything more with him.

I opted, ultimately, to go for it a little more.  We ducked into the small XC field (empty since T.'s taken one of its usual evening inhabitants up to Vermont for the week; her turnout buddy has been hanging out in a different paddock for the duration) and did our rubberband work at the trot, up and down the little rolly hills.  Lengthen up, shorten down, working in between, and: needs some work.  Nothing comes as naturally to us as the trot as at the canter.  But--it was the first time we've played with lengthenings in far too long (seriously, I have no excuse) and even if they weren't perfect, we got some air.

Walked out then, a couple of times around the field, and gave Tuck a little hand-graze after his shower before putting him up and heading for home.  We need to keep this in-gait transition stuff in the work, I do believe.  It's one of those things that I know is important, but tend to lose among everything else that we need to work on, and I forget that it can make all that other stuff so very much better.  Plus: fun.

So.  I was going to try to gallop ("gallop") tomorrow, and I'd still like to.  But we could use a little work on lateral suppleness and responsiveness, too, so I'll try to stick some of that on one end of the conditioning work.  Easily done, since it's not like we need to get too carried away with conditioning for the level we're at.  Then Friday off, and ride Saturday, and ride plus morning feed and back stalls Sunday, and onward.

(21 treading water | dive in?)

gratitude: an irregular series [08 Jul 2008|08:04pm]
A cascade of soap bubbles blown by the hundreds from somebody's balcony in the street.

#

Thanks, folks, for all the chewy comments on the initiative post!  I haven't had a chance to respond to them (and to some on earlier posts) yet, but I'll do that, and I'm enjoying reading them as they come in.

#

Jump set today with L. as part of the mad rearrangement of lessons happening this week and next.  The fold over the fence begins to feel less alien and less like it demands all my focus.  I begin to grok the feel of letting the horse jump out in front of me.

Or not.  It's returned to brutally-hot territory (yes, just mid-80s, but I am a temperate wimp) and the horses were feeling a wee bit sluggish, so we spent a lot of time today on quality-of-canter stuff, which has an additional component for Tucker and I, the flip side of the ICP XC lesson from last week: he is both greener and more broke than I tend to remember.  Today, I was tending to be too conservative with my canter: to throttle him back too quickly after jumps and not ride the corners forwardly enough, not trusting that he'll take the half-halt and come back out of the corner if I rev the motor a bit between the jumps.

I said to L., after finally getting it during a round and enjoying the payoff, "I can gallop that much in the corners?" and she looked up at one of the other riders and asked, "Did you see any galloping?"  Heh.  Point taken.  It's not that I can't feel the difference between the big, balanced, adjustable canter and the undesirable variations on either side.  It's just that I don't trust the big canter, yet, or more precisely, don't trust Tucker in it.  And I have to learn.  He's more than ready.

So we had some super fences, and some that were less so, and got to play with some fun turns (rollback from skinny to in-and-out!).  And when I was test-driving that rollback--jumping the skinny and turning and going past the in-and-out so L. could see whether it would ride okay--and I turned through the in-and-out to get back to the center of the ring, Tucker's ears went up and his canter bounced and he locked right onto the oxer all, "Hey, I could jump that.  You wanna jump that?  Let's!"  And that time I had to decline the offer, but--that's my jumping horse.  Gives a good feeling, that's for sure.

No lesson tomorrow, after all.  We'll do some dressage on our own and work on some rubberband stuff--transitions within the gaits--and hopefully get out and gallop some on Thursday.  Onward.

#

47. The Green Glass Sea (Ellen Klages).

As an audiobook.

Set in Los Alamos during WWII, with all that that entails.

The back cover of this book makes it sound like it's all about Dewey, girl mechanic.  That isn't so.  At its heart (or half of it, anyway), the book is about the relationship between Dewey and Suze, whose family takes Dewey in when her father is called to Washington (much to Suze's dismay).  There's no getting around the familiarity of that part of the story: the growing understanding between two very different girls, not initially inclined to get along.  But Klages's hand is light and her characters convincing, and her weave of that story into the grander-scale story--that of the atom bomb--helps it to stand out from the crowd.

And yes.  There is the atom bomb.  Or the gadget, as its called in this secret, secretive place.  This part of the book is told mostly in white space; the girls (and the reader) are acutely aware of all that they don't know about what their parents do all day.  Klages's detail work is impeccable when it comes to the implications of living in Los Alamos--the graduating high school seniors who can't get into college because the high school they're graduating from doesn't officially exist, and so on--and as someone ([info]mrissa?) said, I'm not sure how much of it is research and how much is made up, but it's utterly convincing, and in the end that's what matters.

And--in the end.  I don't usually do spoiler warnings, but I'm going to quote the last sentences of the book here, so this is a special case.  Look alive.

First things first.  I'm not at all sure that the death of Dewey's father (well before the end) is necessary.  I suppose he was in the way of what Klages wanted to do, and I suppose that's legitimate, but--meh.  I was not impressed.

But.  About that end.  The trip to the see the green glass sea left at the Trinity test site, and somehow I wasn't as moved as I thought that I was supposed to be.  It's an impressive moment, and impressively (and, again, delicately) written, and yet, I felt something was still missing.  That this was the moment that was meant to open up the scope of the book and drive home how awesome and how terrible was this thing that had been created.  I didn't need, "Now I am become Death...", exactly.  But I felt like I needed something more than I was getting, and I was all set to be a little let down (not unusual for me at the end of a novel) as they climbed into the car and drove away.

Then.  Oh, then.  They're driving, and Suze turns on the radio, and catches a fragment of news...

Suze nodded.  "Any music would be good."  The radio popped and crackled with muted static.  She was almost to the end of the dial when a man's voice came through, soft but clear: "...onto the Japenese city of Hiroshima this morning..."  She turned past it to more static and shook her head.  "Nothing but war news," she said, clicking the radio off.  "We can always get that later."

And somehow I could barely see the road for the blurring in my eyes.

The book ends there, on that opening-up, and on that rejection of same.  Leaves the characters poised on a knife edge and you know that it's going to cut, and deep--but it hasn't yet, and somehow that moment of--privilege? or grace? cuts the reader (maybe just me?) all the more.

It is one that feels to me more like a novel meant for adults that happens to have child characters than it does like the childrens' book that it was published as, and I can't quite put a finger on why that might be.  (And I'm happy to accept that it's wrong-headed of me.)  It also feels a like a book, though, that would work well in a WW2 unit in school, paired up with something like, maybe, Sadako and the Thousand Paper Cranes.  (Something like, hopefully, rather than exactly that, but maybe my grade school memories of that book are less charitable than it deserves.)

In any case, this went in the space of a paragraph from being a book that I'd deeply enjoyed reading to being a book that I loved.

(5 treading water | dive in?)

[08 Jul 2008|09:15am]
46. Magic Thief (Sarah Prineas, aka [info]sarah_prineas).

It's always funny to me which books-by-people-I-know that I'm afraid to read and which ones I look forward to.  It's got nothing to do with how much I like the person in question, or how well I know them, or with how well I think they write.  But sometimes it's terrifying for me and sometimes it's kind of fun.  This one falls into the latter category.  Lucky me!

It's a nice little object, a digest-size hardcover with some nifty design flourishes and games on the inside pages.  Always a pleasure to handle a book that the publisher clearly wants to succeed.

So!  Conn is a streetkid, a pickpocket, in a city that's powered by magic, and one day he happens to pick the pocket of a wizard, and grabs said wizard's locus magicalicus (that is, the stone used to channel the magic for use).  The stone should have killed Conn dead, but it doesn't, and so the wizard takes him home to be his apprentice servant.  But Conn's not all that interested in being just-a-servant and has some mad skillz that convince wizard Nevery to give him a chance,  But he has to find a locus magicalicus of his own in thirty days or the other wizards in the city won't confirm him as Nevery's apprentice, and then there's the minor detail of the city's magic a showing steady and inexplicable decay.

It's a fun book, a quick and breezy read.  The inevitable Harry Potter comparison?  This isn't as gleeful, but it does have better bones (and better, more playful prose).  I didn't find Conn and the other characters to be as vivid as some other readers seem to, but he's a clever, resourceful kid and the foundation laid here--Conn's theory of magic as a living creature, in particular--promises some Really Cool Stuff to come in future books as things continue to unfold.

(Sorry, Sarah; the book-thought part of my brain still seems to be broken, so this seems to be all that I've got.  I may have to try the biscuit recipe, though!)

(73 treading water | dive in?)

initiative [08 Jul 2008|08:13am]
So.  I have been thinking about initiative, and about horses, since reading a comment the other day in a helmet-or-no-helmet? thread.  A commenter quoted someone he's worked with, like so (emphasis mine):

Dare I risk getting boring (again) by suggesting that this whole debate is really about the mess we have got into over the last 20/30 years because we abandoned, or got talked out of the idea, of the 'broken' horse. It's just a word ok, but when you ride a safe horse without ideas of its own, it's just such a nice experience.

And fair do's, if you want to sit on horses that have a say in their own movements (spooks, going without being asked, stopping without being asked, sideways stuff, avoiding things they don't like etc etc) then definitely wear a hat. That is a dangerous sport - I'm not interested in it myself. I would bet that far more injuries are due to poor training than due to not wearing hats.


The thread is here, for folks who like to see these things in context.  (And yes, I overreacted a bit; I was stunned.  I stand by my comment, but the "positively horrific" bit was probably not necessary.)

It made me think a little more on a topic that I've been thinking on for a while now.  This is, in its way, the flip side of that post I made a while back about generosity.  I want my horse to trust me.  To believe in my leadership.  To try for me.  To be a well-trained and well-educated and cooperative partner.  And I also want him to think for himself.

A story.  A few months ago I rode down to the rolltop in our front ring and Tucker stopped.  Automatically, without thinking about it--kick-on ethic, yes?--I popped him on the shoulder with my bat.  And T. brought me right up short.  "Hannah," he said.  "Stop.  If you get the horse to a good spot and he quits on you, then you can get after him.  But if you ride him on a bad line with no impulsion to a bad spot and he stops, then you pat that horse for saving your life."

Ah.  Yes.  Lesson learned.  I have not done that again.

And if you'd asked me before it happened, I would have told you that I wouldn't have done it then, either.  Even with all the discussion swirling around the event world, even with my conviction that it's fair to expect a horse to try, I would have told you that I understood that I'm human, and that I'll make mistakes, and that when I do and when the mistake is a big one, the horse is well within his rights to say, "I'm sorry, Mom, but you're nuts."  But some things get under the skin more than we realize.  I'm sorry I didn't do it right the first time, but I'm glad to have had the chance to learn that about myself in a situation where my ego and my faith in my judgment were the only things bruised.

Because y'know, this idea that it's a good thing to take a horse--a living, thinking, feeling being--and teach him that he doesn't get to have ideas of his own or a say in his own movements...that's stunning to me, and not in a good way.  I can get my head around, sure, the idea that someone might prefer to ride a horse like that.  But like I say in my comment, I value my horse for who he is, and I value the time I spend with him for, in large part, the chance to develop an understanding with that creature that goes so very much deeper than "You will do as I say."  If my horse has no ideas of his own, then there's no point in this endeavor, to me.  Then it becomes mere button-pushing, and well, if I wanted to push buttons, I'd be building robots instead.  I could go on and on about this, but I'll stop here, because I suspect that I'm preaching to the choir, and that if somebody doesn't understand in their bones why this upsets me so much, there's just a disconnect between us that no amount of talking will bridge.  Which doesn't mean I won't try, if someone who'd like me to, but for now, we will move on--

--to the part of the equation where taking away the horse's initiative in the name of safety seems to me just utterly bizarre.  Yes, I understand this part:
spooks, going without being asked, stopping without being asked, sideways stuff, avoiding things they don't like.  And yes, if you teach a horse not to spook, you can eliminate one source of potential danger.  This is, of course, a big part of the reason that I'm pleased to be able to describe Tucker, now, as a recovering spook.  Life is much better when the horse knows how to handle his fear in ways that don't involve teleporting across the ring or field.  But you can teach that without interfering with (by bolstering, even) the beastie's ability to think for himself.

If you don't--if your solution is to instead attempt to create
a safe horse without ideas of its own--well.  Maybe I'm just not a good enough horseman to make the first half of that phrase compatible with the second half.  And maybe there are situations in which a horse without ideas of its own is safe.  But that isn't my world.  I am human.  I make mistakes.  And when I do, I want my horse--the same horse that respects my leadership and is generous with his try--to tell me, "Sorry, Mom.  You're nuts."  I want him to stop at the fence that he can't jump without flipping.  To refuse to cross the rotted-out bridge.  To decline the invitation to walk under the tree with the mountain lion in.  I want, when I merrily, stupidly ride him into the bog and we find ourselves reenacting the Swamps of Sadness sequence, to be able to kick the reins at him and say, "Okay, dude, you get us out."

And this is why, all else aside, on a deeply practical level, it's deeply, viscerally important to me to have a horse with initiative.  Yeah, it makes things a little more exciting and a little more frustrating, sometimes, than maybe they would otherwise be.  's okay.  I can work with that.  Because yes, the horse without his own ideas may not dump you on your helmetless head.  (On the other hand, he may just do that no matter how thoroughly broke he is, because there are rocks and gopher holes and aneurysms and all sorts of other things in the world that can cause the most trustworthy horse to trip and fall or otherwise drop his rider on the ground.)

But some day, somewhere, you may make a mistake, or maybe just be a little unlucky, and those pesky ideas of his may be the thing that saves your life.

(13 treading water | dive in?)

[06 Jul 2008|06:14pm]
Had a very nice day of scribing with the best judge yet to scribe for (or maybe I'm just getting better at writing quickly and legibly both at once).  Somehow, this did not translate into copious quantities of take-home message; perhaps that part of my brain was fried while I was "helping" man the cross-country in-gate (for values of helping that include drinking my friend P.'s water while she did the actual job) and then grabbing (politely, after asking, to avoid spooking or upsetting anyone) ear tags as horses came out of stadium.  All I've got left is this:

People.  When you're doing a free walk, you have to let go of your reins.  Horsie is extremely unlikely to offer a stretch when he is given no space to into which he can do so.

Thank you.  I feel better now.

Tucker had gotten to go out during the day despite the show, so we skipped the longe and I just climbed aboard.  I'd decided that if I had to err (and of course I was going to err), it would be on the side of relaxation and looseness rather than, as yesterday, on the side of precision and firmness: both good things, and at some point necessary, but all too easy to turn into rigidity and tension when things don't go quite as planned.  So I breathed, and sang a little under my breath, and did the stretch T. showed me the other day to loosen up hip and groin: just a standing quad stretch while in the saddle, same as I did when I ran and have done many times since, but it never occured to me that it could be useful on the horse, to help sink leg and seat into the right position.  Turns out it is!  Good thing to know.  And Tucker came out a little bit electric, and I felt plugged in from word one, and y'know, neither of those things hurt, at all.

So we did our walk work, and we did our trot, and our canter, and we took our break, and I kept an eye on all the things I'd been struggling with yesterday--the forward lean in my torso and drop of my chin, the high-and-tight position of my right shoulder, my tendency to let the reins get long and to end up with my hands in my lap, Tucker's desire to offload his left hind onto his right shoulder and to be a little fussy in the contact--but without letting myself get caught up in them, or angry about them.  Instead, I noticed, and I went about my business, and I made an effort to correct, but refused to force anything, and my leg was solidly down and around the horse, and I was keeping my hands soft and thinking forward with them again, so as to avoid jamming him up crooked behind the contact...and there were a few moments that were almost a little dicey, but I stayed soft, and so did he.

And somewhere in the second set, a miracle occured.

I'm not sure if it was during the canter work, or during a sequence of canter/trot/etc. transitions, or what, exactly, happened.  (In any case, I have relearned yet again that when you have a horse with a just-nice-enough trot but a genuinely-good canter, you use the canter to improve the work in the trot rather than muddling along in the gait that comes less naturally.  Not that I have ever muddled.  Ahem.)  But suddenly--or maybe I just noticed it suddenly--we were right where I wanted to be: harmonious and balanced and light, able to set his feet wherever I wanted them, all swinging back and flexing hocks and solid connection.  Ah, bliss!  It wasn't that there weren't still things to work on, of course.  Tucker was a little stiff in his hind legs in the trot/canter, especially tracking left, pushing off his hind legs in the transition instead of stepping them genuinely through, and conversely, he was offering so much carry behind and lift of the forehand--honest-to-goodness sit--in the canter/trot that I was a little flummoxed how to keep all that power flowing forward.  But it all became minor, minor, minor, because the horse's body was available to me, and I was aware of what he needed, and so we could work it through and explain things to each other in a way that made sense to us both.

I didn't want to push it.  We worked on those transitions, got them consistently more where I wanted them, played a few minutes more just to enjoy ourselves, and knocked off for a walk in the woods (after which, while I was putting him away, Tucker was hilarious: oh so very, very polite while simultaneously making it clear that he knew it was bran mash night and would I please hurry and finish setting his meal up like yesterday?).  But I am still walking on air, two hours later.  It's not that we did anything particularly fancy.  It's just that--this is the best dressage school-type ride I've had on him in ages.  There may have been rides in which we achieved better work, but the level of communication there tonight, once that miracle occured, was miles above our usual standard.  Clarity.  Grace.  The work at hand was still work--don't get me wrong--but at the same time it was easy, because we understood each other, Tucker and I, and went at it together.

I've been talking with a few of you, lately, about how I've come to think that riding and training (and teaching to ride, and teaching to train) are different skills.  Related, yes.  Overlapping, one hopes!  But not identical.  Easy to mistake, though; you can, it turns out, get pretty far with only the former, faking the latter.  Part of me is sorry about all the time I wasted not understanding that.  Part of me (most, to be honest) is daunted by realizing that I'm only just taking those very first steps down the road to knowing how to train as well as to ride.  But the rest of me thinks that here I am, and if all that fumbling in the dark is what it took to get me here, then it wasn't wasted time at all, and worth every last stubbed toe.  (It has to be, I suppose, given how many more I'm sure to get along the way.)  Breath-taking!

Tomorrow off, and probably just as well.  I have no idea where we'd go from here, and any ride would inevitably be a disappointment.  Isolated thunderstorms for the next few days, but I think I'd like to do a conditioning ride on Tuesday if the weather cooperates and we can get out back.  Maybe a little galloping, or maybe some bombing around the trails, finding a better balance between initiative and attentiveness.  Lesson on Wednesday, then, and I think I'll try to ride Thursday as well, and set up a jump lesson with L. for Saturday if she can fit me in.

Onward.

(2 treading water | dive in?)

[05 Jul 2008|02:04pm]
...and then other days I love my horse and it's a damn good thing, because otherwise I'd have to quit riding and take up some other athletic pursuit.  Like tennis.  Or macrame.

Things that I do not recommend: nearly having a panic attack on the horse.  Good grief.  Just one of those days when I couldn't seem to do anything right.  I was well aware (oh, so well aware!) of what needed addressing, but when I tried to convince my body to cooperate, it laughed at me and was all, "No, sorry, out to lunch!"

Our canter didn't suck, and we were eventually able to salvage some non-disgraceful walk/trot/walk transitions after learning a nifty new stretch from T., after which I decided to call it a day since I was not breathing and not relaxing and didn't really want to tax poor Tucker's goodwill more than I already had.  But I think we'll throw that one out and forget about it, thanks.

To the barn tomorrow morning for five hours of scribing, and longe after the show.  Maybe I'll climb on; we'll see how tired I am.  Monday off, Tuesday ride, Wednesday lesson, and it does occur to me that it's been over a month, what with one thing and another, since I've had a dressage lesson on my own horse at 100%, so I'll, uh, look forward to that.

Onward.

(dive in?)

gratitude: an irregular series [05 Jul 2008|09:33am]
Sunset sky, striated, glowing red and twilight navy blue, and Tom Waits singing "Downtown Town."

(12 treading water | dive in?)

[04 Jul 2008|02:31pm]
My horse is never getting a day off again.

Well.  No.  His days off are important, for his body and his mind, not to mention, y'know, mine.  But man, it's easy to forget, when we're only going two or three days in a row, how good and happy he gets when I can string together five.  Or six.  Or more.  Of varied work; I wouldn't try it in the winter, say, when we're stuck in the indoor.  But a jump set on a conditioning day on an XC school on a dressage school on a hack on a dressage school--he's just about as cheerful as can be, and feels downright awesome.  I should maybe make a point of doing this a little more regularly.

Perhaps needless to say, our jump lesson with L. today went smashingly.  We seem to be settling, at least for now, on the stirrup length from the ICP workshop and also kept one of their tricks: setting the stirrup farther back on my foot, actually behind the ball.  Which may inspire me to see about getting some safety irons (I dislike peacock stirrups, but I've had my eye on the kind with the all-metal curved outside bar) on the saddle if we end up sticking with it, but in a controlled schooling situation (and in, of course, heeled boots), it makes a useful antidote to my habit of getting my heel excessively far down and in the process, pushing my leg out in front of me (and taking the shock absorption out of my ankle, in the process).

Worked on the gallop position, first standing and then in motion, to which my main response was, "Ow."  This is definitely going to require some dig-the-weirdness time.  Or, as L. put it, "When it feels right, move your leg farther back."  But I begin to understand, I think, the particular sort of weirdness that I'm meant to be digging, here, so that will help me find it on my own.

Then: we jump!  Gymnastic line, just crossrails, trying to dig the weirdness (and the other folks in the lesson, of course, working on their own stuff) and in the process discovering that we have some work to do on that pesky rightward tendancy that I usually camoflague effectively when I'm not focused on something else but that, of course, shouldn't be there to need camoflaguing.  (And doesn't, I think, show up as much in the turn/jump/turn/jump courses that T. normally sets as it does in a straightahead gymnastic.)  One part not quite finishing my turn to the jump, one part not quite getting the horse channeled straight from seat and leg rather than trying to fix it with that little opening left rein over the fence.  So!  We shall be seeing more of this work, I think, over the next few lessons-with-L.

And then onto some little courses, not big fences--2'3" or 2'6"?--but making a point to include wider ones--oxers, the rolltop, etc.--to give me a little airtime over the fence to get the feel of my fold.  And hey, it worked.  Not perfect or automatic by any means in just the one session, but I was definitely starting to grok it as almost a two-step process: the close of the hip angle and then the slide back of the hips to keep the upper body balanced, comfy and secure, over the hell.  Tucker seemed to enjoy it, too, which makes sense: done properly, it keeps me more out of his way and invites/allows him to stretch out over the fence.  Not that he has to stretch much over this height, but the other way was going to get us into trouble down the line, and nice to start good habits early on...!  He was just super, happy and attentive and keen, offering his good canter right up with little-to-no fuss.  We disagreed on one distance--our first trip to the rolltop; he was right--but that was it all day; otherwise, he was taking the half-halt out of the corner and my eye was right on and he moved up or eased back or stayed just the same as requested, every time.

And y'know, I love my horse.  I wouldn't trade him for anything else in the barn.  But even so, there's something a little extra-special to those days when he's just an utter joy--an honor--to spend time around and on.  This was one of those.

So he had many pats and a nice hand-graze after, moseying about the front of the property to find the very best grass, before heading back out into his paddock.  We'll do some dressage tomorrow and he'll get a longe after the show on Sunday, and then Monday off.  Onward.

(25 treading water | dive in?)

[30 Jun 2008|07:21am]
45. Lolita (Vladimir Nabokov).

Too much pedophile, not enough roller derby.


I've been meaning to give this a whirl for a while, but I was worried I wouldn't like it, and for some reason, it feels important to me to basically like this book.  But there's been the whole lightness-and-ease issue, as of late, and I did enjoy the Kubrick version when I saw that a few years ago, so I bit the bullet in the hopes that Nabokov's prose + any semblance of the movie's sense of humor would = a win.

Half right!

But the writing is, indeed, sublime, and that was enough--more than enough--for me through part 1.  Part 2 and I got on less well: the story drags its heels like whoa and chases its tail in circles, and I mostly wasn't in the mood.  So we'll call it half a win, or maybe three-quarters: I did, much to my relief, basically like the book, and oh, the writing is, indeed, sublime.

(24 treading water | dive in?)

[29 Jun 2008|08:24pm]
You know what New England needs?

A Steak n Shake.

#

Right, then.  Time to raise the standard a bit.

Our ride today started off just a bit sloppy.  A little weak behind, a little inconsistent and brace-y in the contact, a little disinclined to bend.  Tucker was having, "Hey, the world exists!" moments re: the open arena doors (and yes, one has spent the last few weeks stuck closed, but still: no excuse) and I was getting reactive and hand-riding.  And, in response, trying to be ultra-soft and loose, and getting not exactly nowhere, but not where I wanted to be.

Until I gave myself a shake and said to Tucker, "Hey, listen up," and let it be ugly for a couple of strides to get my point across, and then stayed rigorous with myself: no flopping and slopping around.  And hey, the more sharply I rode, the more sharply Tucker went.  Funny how that works, eh?

We didn't get quite where I'd wanted to be: he was leaning on his right shoulder and my right leg, so our project for the day was a bunch of leg yields and spirals to help him carry his own weight.  In retrospect, I should've gone ahead and played with the shoulder-in, at least in walk.  But we did the spirals and we worked on our trot/canter transitions, on keeping them powerful and round, and not incidentally on staying down in my right heel and seatbone.  We ended better than we began.  Even if it wasn't quite what I had in mind (but of course, it did have elements of what I'd hoped to work on), that's a good ride in my book.

It's interesting.  I don't know how much of this is knocking the rust off of him and how much is knocking it off of myself and how much is it a simple loss of familiarity: take a week off of any riding and a week on either side of not doing much, and the same old issues that you get used to band-aiding start to feel strange again.  Which is good: maybe we should do this more often.  There's plenty to be said for going back to shore things up.

And Tucker was pretty thoughtful and pleased, after those moments in the middle when we weren't real happy with one another.  We finished up with a nice walk around one of the cross-country fields and a series of leg yields from one side to the other of the path on the way back to the barn.  Could have used a little more power there (the path goes uphill and we went a bit more sideways than forwards sometimes), but I was basically okay with that, given that it was the response to the lateral aid that I was after, and he was offering that in spades.

So, new plan for tomorrow.  I'll be riding during the day rather than at night, and I'd like a little more polish and responsiveness going into the ICP ride on Tuesday (before which I must decide whether I'm brave enough to ride in front of Phyllis Dawson with electric tape on my horse's foot).  So instead of just hacking out, we'll have ourselves a short dressage school, lots of leg yield and spirals and transitions, preferably out back in the XC warm up if the footing's not too wet, and then we'll go for a walk on the trails.  Then up at o'dark thirty to ship to Scarlet Hill on Tuesday, and hand him over to A. for the rest of the week, with a day off in there somewhere for Tucker, and a longe on Sunday after the mix-and-match schooling show (sounds like I'll be scribing again).

Onward!

(4 treading water | dive in?)

[28 Jun 2008|01:39pm]
Ah.  Nice day.

We had our plan and we stuck to it: short school and then hack out.  Coming off two days off and heading into a busy week and after the initial ouchiness on Wednesday, I figured we'd err today on the side of taking it easy.  Started off in the outdoor, stirrups dropped to help me find a long and relaxed leg (with some "legs away" intervals to find my seatbones and also to demonstrate how tight my hip flexors are: ow) and we just rode a bunch of walk/halt/walk transitions, looking for me to stay straight and relaxed and keeping my chin up and for Tucker to stay soft and light to the aids and in a good balance.  Then some circles each way, searching for same, and for a calm rebalance and change of direction through the halt.  Walk/trot/walk, a little uninspired at first into the up transition but very quickly--with no special effort on my part--gathering energy and push.  Trot/canter/trot, adding in steps of walk as desirable.

I was leaning again, a bit.  Why is it so easy to build the bad muscle memories and so hard to build the good ones?  So I worked on that.  And payed special attention to the bit of bottling-up and crookedness in walk/trot transitions that's resurfaced after Tucker's holiday.  It's an old frustration for us, one that tends to rear its ugly head after he's had some time off or when the weather gets cold: every winter, it freaks me the heck out until I remember that oh, yeah, we go through this to some extent every year.  Just Tucker's way of saying that his body doesn't feel quite as ready as he'd like.  And really, it's a nice opportunity to help him learn to work through it when his muscles aren't all stiffened up from the cold.  Stayed quiet when he threatened to go there, pushed my hands forward a hair and sent him out to the bit, aborting the transition if need be to get him happy and balanced before trying again.  Just the same basic, basic foundation stuff.  Yes, Tucker, freely forward is always the right answer.  Yes, so is stretching to the bit.  There, doesn't that feel better?  Good boy.

And then we headed out back to bomb around on the trails.  I hiked my stirrups up and practiced my gallop position; I've been thinking a lot lately about the rider's half of the whole fitness thing.  And oh, do I need to get looser and stronger in my hamstrings!  But it's feeling less bizarre, now, so that's something, anyway.

Tucker had himself a grand old time: bold and a little aggressive, interested ears and clever feet.  We did another minute or so of trot/canter/trot in the XC warm up when we came back out of the woods to reconfirm his softness and suppleness and called it a day: nice rinse and a hand-graze and back out with his pal.

Very sound.  Very nice.

We'll step up the dressage a notch tomorrow, see if I can remember how to get him a little more engaged and carrying behind.  Hack out Monday, and call the farrier to check in; he did a little work on the pesky foot the other day, so I want to find out how everything looks in there.  ICP on Tuesday, and onward from there.

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]