Home
Random stuff I feel like talking about. [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
Chris Clark

[ website | My Website ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Writing yourself into a corner... [Jun. 11th, 2007|04:02 pm]
I think I kind of screwed up at the end of Exco.

I basically forced myself to write these long, heavy plotlines that were a little harder to make funny than what I would otherwise write. Part of me wishes I just had Sid get taken for some other reason so the only issue to be solved was rescuing Sid and not all this Kethera stuff.

Don't get me wrong, I like the plotline I wrote, I just wish I didn't have to wait a few months before I wrote any other plotline.

--

Today, I thought maybe I brushed up against some poison ivy. Twenty minutes later, it started to itch and a rash showed up.

...Twenty minutes?! Just how hypersensitive am I? Either I'm more sensitive to poison ivy than anybody else in the history of mankind, or I'm a big psychosomatic freak.

Luckily I've got that stuff from last time that actually dissolves the poison ivy oils and I got it on like an hour after exposure. So that should either stop the poison ivy from spreading, or have a nice placebo effect in the 'psychosomatic freak' scenario.
linkpost comment

Out of school finally... [May. 28th, 2007|05:31 pm]
You know, I can do school fine.  And I can do work fine.  Both at the same time, however, sucks total ass.

It's when I have to worry about both when I'm getting no sleep, not having any time to play video games, and falling behind on my comic.  So summer should be relaxing with only work.

Though, so far the only video game I've gotten this year that wasn't disappointing was really short.  (Super Paper Mario).  Mostly I've been playing through older games again.

The final exam from my course was kind of unfair.  In my favor.  There were all sorts of trick questions that were more about test-taking intuition than actual knowledge of the material.  I've always had great test-taking intuition, so I think I had an unfair advantage.

--

Other random thoughts on my mind.  China is looking to establish bilateral extradition treaties with America and other western countries.  I say, screw them until they do better on human rights.  We shouldn't be turning in their ideological prisoners and people whose only crime is leaving the country without permission.  Those are the kinds of people we should be giving political asylum too, not forking right back over to their oppressors.
linkpost comment

If earth met with aliens (In real life and in Backwater Planet) [May. 8th, 2007|09:12 pm]
I've been thinking lately about a future plotline where Earth finds out there is not only life throughout the galaxy, but most of it is under the command of a central empire.

There is so much to explore with that premise, I could spend months on it and never have to reach for material.  Besides the obvious comedic possibilities (There's a plotline I thought of back in the first year of Exco that I'm still waiting to do), there are the interesting political ramifications.

The most interesting to me is, how would America react if they suddenly found themselves on the other end of the relationship they have with the other countries in the world?  If there were some massive empire out there whose military outclasses their own by far.  One that, should they choose to, could just walk in and take over.

Would America just accept this role of the third world nation, or would they self-destructively try to assert themselves as a power?  Earth is already within the domain that the Panthosian Empire considers their territory, so to them they're within all rights to assume kingship over them.  They probably wouldn't just send a bunch of ships and invade, but they might adopt a Colonialist attitude and try to annex earth or something.  If so, they would come and offer help at first with new technologies, but they would make sure they retained control over that technology.  They'd treat Earth like a puppet state, and then if Earth started acting against their interests, they'd say Earth had violated galactic law and appoint a magistrate or something.  Or they'd see a war and send some kind of alien peacekeeping force.  In general, they'd adopt the same interventionist attitude America has toward the rest of the world.

Right now in the comic, the Empire wouldn't do that, because they don't have anything to gain from Earth, but the idea that they could is a plot worth exploring.  (It would also play a lot more to the title 'Backwater Planet'.  But I'd only do it if there were some way the main characters would be involved.)
linkpost comment

Comments about some newish albums [May. 4th, 2007|04:53 pm]
It's weird how good or bad albums can come in batches.

In the first week or two of the year, I picked up like six albums, and almost all of them were terrible.

The last week or two, I've picked up six, and like five of them were good.

Here are the bad ones.  (All referring to their main release this year).

Kings of Leon - I haven't heard such blatant gothbait since Evanescence.  Their self important muelling with that sort of whiny post-grunge voice inflection is almost impossible to listen to.

Bright Eyes - Not as bad as Kings of Leon.  But he's one of the many semi-known rock singers who've decided to take it upon themselves to justify every negative stereotype of liberals the conservatives have ever cooked up.  There are gut-wrenchingly embarassing lines like 'You know war, it has no heart'.  Even bad lyrics wouldn't matter if the music was great, but the music is only okay.

Grinderman - This is one of the better ones from this batch.  The only problem with it is indie-pretentiousness, which I'm pretty willing to forgive.  Not great, but good.

Fountains of Wayne - Fans accuse them of selling out.  But the fact is, they've been trying to sell out since well before they started succeeding.  This album, unlike Kings of Leon, is listenable, but they've lost their tongue in cheek lyrical flair they had back with Welcome Interstate Managers.

Stars of the Lid - I bought this album without hearing it based on a lot of incredible reviews.   But what I had forgotten is that a lot of indie critics have decided that completely minimalist recordings of just a bunch of tones slowly fading in at out are the pinnacle of current art music.  I haven't read a single positive review of them that didn't basically say "If you don't like it, you're just not deep-listening".  And oh yeah.  It's a double album.

Blonde Redhead - This one is better than the other ones in the batch, but it's a little shoegazey and not nearly as good as the shoegaze albums from last year (Serena Maneesh, Asobe Seksu).

Now, the good batch.

Nine Inch Nails - This is the exception from the good batch.  It's just not good.  Would you buy a Nine Inch Nails theme album?  Trent Reznor has always had that 'Pretentiously unpretentious' thing going on, but he's never gone as far as to create characters and expound on current politics through those characters.  It would even be okay if there weren't so many jarring sudden loud noises that just didn't sound good.

Arctic Monkeys - Arctic Monkeys aren't nearly as good as UK critics make them out to be, but at least they can write some catchy tunes and deliver them with infectious energy.  A solid album, my only complaint about which is how much better critics say it is.

Patrick Wolf - He sounds kind of like early David Bowie.  Quirky, electronic sounding but driven by conventional instruments, glammy, catchy.  Very strong album.

Frog Eyes - They sound kind of like Wolf Parade, but with piano.  In a good way.  I think one of the guys from Wolf Parade is in the band, but I could be wrong.

Dinosaur Jr - The first album in almost 20 years with their original lineup.  And somehow, they still sound good.  They kind of explore a lot of different sounds, but all in that lo-fi indie style they helped pioneer back in the 80's.

Feist - Not nearly as good as her last album, Let It Die, but a lot of really catchy folk songs.  The thing that sets Feist apart the most is her willingness to be understated.  She doesn't beg for your attention, she just gets it.
linkpost comment

Venting about this Programming Web Applications class [Apr. 17th, 2007|08:56 pm]
This course sucks.

First, it's obvious the instructors have no idea how to communicate information and run the class.  At first they were like 'Oh, we're going to do Python/Django, Perl/Catalyst, Ruby/Rails, and maybe PHP!'  Then they realize, this is perhaps a bit ambitious for a 16 week course.  First they get rid of PHP.   Understandable.  Then, they decide, instead of getting rid of one of the other three applications (Which are way different in application but pretty identical in terms of what they can be used for), decide, hey, let's NOT give any sort of primer for the programming languages these web applications use!

Oh, you've never seen Perl before?  Okay, pick it up as you go along!

They also have no idea how to communicate with people who don't know as much about programming as they do.  They tend to throw a bunch of code on the screen and briefly describe it, then move on to the next major topic in less time than any reasonable person could possibly absorb it.

There were originally supposed to be five homeworks.  But, with the first homework, they randomly gave a two week extension.  The second homework, they kept saying they were going to put it up, but not doing it, for about a month.  Then for another week they didn't mention the due date at all.

Then, oh, the class server.  They say, the login name is your first initial, then first seven letters of your last name.  They forget to mention, oh, there's ANOTHER PERSON WITH THE SAME NAME AS ME!  I find out about two months into the class, I'm not (First initial)(Last Name), I'm (First initial)(Last Name)2!

They tell me this after important section meetings which we are required to log on, which I missed because I couldn't log in at the time.  So right now I have about ten days to develop a Catalyst application with a database.  I know absolutely nothing about Perl, and have very little idea how to get a Catalyst application up.

I know even less about Django because that was the homework they decided to cancel, and by the time I could actually log on, we had moved on.

This might be the most useless class I've ever taken.  They damn well better do a Ruby primer so I can actually learn Rails.  (I hear that's the most popular out of the three).

If this was a better class they would have had a tighter focus and went better into procedural detail, as well as had actual homeworks planned out.

Worst.  Class.  Ever.
linkpost comment

Best albums of the year so far/Final thoughts on Zelda: Twilight Princess [Apr. 8th, 2007|10:59 pm]
It's been a great first quarter for albums.  There weren't any albums so great you would immediately consider ranking them among the best albums of all time, but there were so many good albums it's extremely hard to narrow down a top five or six.

But first, the best two.

Of Montreal - Hissing Fauna, Are You The Destroyer?

I saw these guys in concert a few weeks ago.  They have a weird slideshow going on in the back of the stage that has nothing to do with the music, and a bunch of guys in weird costumes (Darth Vader, all white spandex, etc) show up on stage randomly.  They played music, too.  Their last album, 'The Sunlandic Twins', I never got into.  I enjoyed it a lot at first, but could never quite enjoy it all the way through, because it was all sameish and (Except for one song on it) lacked any sort of catchiness.

Hissing Fauna on the other hand has the same sort of psychadelic weirdness as Sunlandic Twins, but every song is catchy and interesting.  I have no idea what the lyrics mean.  For all I know they used a random word generator then fixed it for grammatical correctness.  But what few lyrics I can understand are weird and cool.  "We don't want these times to ever end -- we just want to emasculate them forever".  "Eva, I'm sorry, but you will never have me, for me you're just some faggy girl, and I need a lover with soul power -- and you ain't got no soul power."  I can't stop listening to this album.

Patty Griffin - Children Running Through

This is a bluesy folk album (The same way Lucinda Williams sings bluesy country).  Her singing is powerful and emotional and has a kind of 60's feel to it.  One song (Which I suspect may be some kind of cover of an old blues song I've never heard of) is about an old man on a bus, and an interchange like "You don't know where this train is going to?", to which he responds "It's going somewhere."

Other strong albums so far this year by:

!!! - Electronica with a bunch of synthesizers and loops.  At first it sounded kind of thin like most electronica, but it grows considerably on repeat listens because it's so catchy.

Vieux Farka Toure - Twangy guitar Afro-pop by the son of an Afro-pop legend who recently passed away.

Modest Mouse and the Shins - Indie critics are suddenly starting to say these bands are overrated, or somehow lost something form their earlier, superior works.  I wonder why they're saying that?  *Looks at album sales charts*  Oh yeah.

Amy Winehouse - Original bluesy rock by the critic dubbed free-spirit.  I think her song 'Rehab' is a hit or something.

Deerhoof - More wacky freak-folk from pretty much the only consistent freak-folk band.  Funny song:  "If I were man and you were dog...if I were man and you were dog...if I were man and you were dog...I would throw a stick for you!"  (In a Japanese accent with a bit of an off-key melody).

Andrew Bird - A tighter, but less unique album by a guy who plays like 20 instruments on any given album.

Arcade Fire - If you're still reading this post, you know who they are, and you probably have the album.  For some reason the indie critics haven't double-backed on them yet like they are Modest Mouse and the Shins.

Peter Bjorn and John - A variety of catchy tunes.  A lot of them are really good but the album doesn't really have it's own unique feel or identity.

So, Zelda.

I'm rounding the 45 hour mark, and heading to the final battle right now.  Overall, I give it a 7/10 that should have been a 9/10.  The developers are really good at game-building, but they have a lot of really bad ideas about what makes a good game.

I keep on getting to places and thinking 'If they did this more like Link To The Past, it would have been a lot better'.

I'll break it down to more specific areas for criticism.

First, dungeons.  The dungeons are totally linear.  At any given time, there's only one place in the dungeon you can make any sort of forward progress.  This creates the feeling of being led around by the nose from place to place, only given a few cool puzzles or something once in a while.  This is as opposed to Zelda:  Link To The Past where most dungeons have lots of different possible ways to get through.

Second, plot.  The plot is the same sort of plot as Zelda:  Link To The Past, and equally good.  In Link To The Past, you hardly saw anything of the plot.  Once in a while you saw a bunch of text that you could skip through if you wanted without making a huge difference.  In Twilight Princess on the other hand, they constantly shove the plot in your face, sometimes giving you long plot sequences and minigames.  They try to emotionally involve you in their shallow characters and fail miserably.

Third, pacing.  Until about the two-thirds mark they don't give you any reliable way to quickly jump around the world.  Everything involves long walks from place to place, and having to take the long way around to get half the places.  In Link To The Past you could pretty much always go straight to the next part of the game.  Then there are all these boring minigames which are forced on you, and have bad controls, and really throw you out of the pace of the game.  I've been playing the game for 45 hours.  I can beat Link To The Past in under 3.

Fourth, leading you around.  In Link To The Past, when there was some sort of trick to getting in somewhere, they only gave you vague hints at it, and let you figure out for yourself.  In Twilight Princess, Midna gives you really strong, obvious hints.

Fifth, easiness.  You hardly ever have to deal with more than one enemy at a time.  They all move super-slowly and when you do have to deal with more than one at a time, you can usually kill them all with a simple spin attack.  The developer said 'I don't like hard games'.  That's fine for you and other people who don't like hard games, but if you notice, most adventure games now have difficulty levels.  God of War, for instance.  People who don't like difficulty can play on Normal.  People who like a little challenge but nothing hair-pullingly frustrating play on Hard.  People who like hair-pulling frustration play on God.  It's their choice.  You get no such choice in Twilight Princess.  It's just easy for everybody.

There are some fun parts in Twilight Princess.  Some genuinely fun puzzles, some interesting dungeons.  But in general it seemed the game was made for people who were very much not me.  I kept running into parts where I thought 'If this game was made by the same philosophy as Zeldas 1-3, it might be one of the best games ever made'.  I don't regret spending the time and money to play it, it was a good game.  But I don't think I'll ever be playing it again once I finish it.
linkpost comment

Lost is being ruined by it's fans [Apr. 4th, 2007|05:28 am]
Back in the second season, Lost had such a strong devoted following it became the weirdest TV show ever to get good ratings.

Now, in the third season, all the same people who loved it before are suddenly saying how crappy it is.  They have various complaints, most of which boil down to variations of 'Nothing happens!' or 'The mysteries don't get solved fast enough!'  But, nothing they say about the third season doesn't also apply to the first and second season when they loved it, so something else must be going on.  It's almost like they all spontaneously realized liking Lost was no longer fashionable and jumped bandwagon against it.

It's almost like they're so used to getting instant gratification from television that they are no longer willing to consider having the patience for the kind of clever storytelling and divergent character development of many different characters that the show thrives on.  Like they are no longer willing to treat all the weird mysterious of the island as the setting and will be satisfied with nothing less than solving them all instantly.

Like last week's episode, with Nicki and Paolo.  I watched it and saw a great episode with very good storytelling.  I tell other people I love it they complain that 'Nothing happened' because Nicki and Paolo were 'Disposable characters'.  As if expounding at all about the 20+ people on the island not in the main cast is total white noise.

Thankfully the show has already been renewed for a fourth season, but at this rate, the show won't go much father than that, and the same thing will happen to it as happened to Twin Peaks:  It'll end before it gets a proper ending.  And if that happens, either the questions are left forever unanswered, or the writers are forced to rush to an ending in a few episodes, that will be what ruins the show.

All because the fans for some strange reason have lost all patience for the things that made the show good in the first place.
linkpost comment

A view on the Iraqi conflict I haven't heard [Mar. 20th, 2007|05:27 pm]
Between the Shiites and Sunni, people tend to focus on the religious difference, as if their religious affiliation is the sole thing that defines the different groups.

But the fact is, in most places in the Middle East, Shiites and Sunnis coexist a lot more peacefully.  It can't be just the religious difference.

Let's remember Rwanda for a second.  For years, the British ruled and installed the Tutsie in power.  Then the British left, leaving the power to the Hutu majority, who were angry about all the things the Tutsie did while in power.  The proceeded to kill Tutsie indescriminantly.

Now in Iraq, for years Sadam ruled by force and installed the Sunni in power.  He goes away, leaving the power to the Shiite majority.  Sound familiar?  And now the Shiites there hate the Sunni there and target them with violence.

This isn't about religion.  Sure, the division happens to be along religious lines, but this is the same situation as Rwanda.  One minority group installed in power, suddenly at the mercy of the majority they used to have political power over.  Why isn't anybody making this comparison?  And why isn't anybody worried about a full out genocide against the Sunnis for just this reason?
linkpost comment

Rock and Roll Hall of Fame's 'Definitive 200 albums' [Mar. 14th, 2007|09:05 pm]
This week, the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and some retails compiled a list of their '200 definitive albums'.
Electric Ladyland isn't on it.  Neither is Blonde on Blonde. 

Link:  http://blogs.usatoday.com/listenup/2007/03/definitive_albu.html

What is on it?

Linkin Park - Hybrid Theory
Alanis Morisette - Jagged Little Pill (According to them, the 26th most important album of all time).
Norah Jones - Come Away With Me
Santana - Supernatural (#13)
Kid Rock - Devil Without A Cause
Christina Aguilera - Self Titled
Shania Twain - Come On Over (#21)

So, to recap.  Jimi Hendrix ignites practically an entire genre of music with Electric Ladyland, and it is not definitive. 

Linkin Park, rap-metal's version of a boy band, is assembled by the record company to exploit misanthropic depressed teens, and they are definitive.

Bob Dylan inspires an entire generation of folkies, not definitive.  Christina Aguilera dances half naked in front of a camera and reads lines the record company wrote for her, and that audio is fed through a voice modifier to somebody else's generic dance beats -- definitive.

Stevie Wonder, Innervisions and Talking Book -- not definitive.  Santana has contemporary pop stars sing songs for him in a desperate attempt to revive his career by clinging to American mainstream -- VERY definitive.

The worst thing about this list is the word 'definitive'.  If you want to pander to consumers who actually think they'll remember all these generic pop albums even ten years from now, at least qualify your list and sell it for what it really is.  I never really cared much for the rock and roll hall of fame, but at least I used to have respect for their mission statement.  Now it's completely lost my respect forever.  The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame is to rock history what FYE is to record stores.
linkpost comment

On the evil of repair men. [Mar. 5th, 2007|09:23 am]
Okay, so a repair guy was supposed to come here this morning to repair my washing machine.

The time they offered us, that we accepted, was 8-12.  So, I wake up early and make arrangements expecting for them to come between 8-12.

I get a call at 8:45 "We're not going to be there till 1".  1 pm, the time of my 90 day/100 hour review for work.  So I have to block out another morning a week from now to be here 8-12.  This is a morning in which I have a very late night job, and could really use to sleep in.

This proves that repair men are evil, and should be shunned by society.  And when they all get to purgatory, St Peter will tell them "Yeah, I'm busy right now.  I'll get to you sometime from 4000-8000 AD."

--

Now, the Thermals show.

First, I was a little annoyed by the scheduling habits of small venues.  You see, they tell Ticketmaster their doors open time.  Which is often 3-4 hours before the headlining act goes on.  So though my ticket said 8:30, the Thermals didn't go on till Midnight.  I'm lucky I checked the venue's website before I went or I would have been stuck standing up for three hours before the band even went on while crappy local bands played.

When the Thermals actually went on, it was awesome.  I was never in a crowd like that before.  It was almost as densely packed as the Radiohead crowd at Bonnaroo.  By the time it started, people were packed right up against each other from all sides.  I've been to club shows before where it was packed but never like this, never to the point where I felt seriously in danger of asphyxiating.  When the band started playing, people started jumping around like it was a mosh-pit, except with no actual space to jump up against each other, so everybody was just kind of pushed back and forth like it was Dante's 5th layer of hell.

It was awesome for about the first twenty minutes.  Then the novelty wore off and I kind of made it off to the side.  The first three songs they played were Here's Your Future, I Might Need You To Kill, and The Blood, The Body, the Machine.  After that, I really have no idea.  First they played a couple songs not on the album I'd heard, then I could hardly tell what they were playing because of the crowd noise combined with the volume induced temporary hearing impairment.  I left at like 12:45 when I realized I just couldn't hear the band enough to enjoy it anymore.

I miss going to shows.  Now that I have money again I can actually do it sometimes.  Hopefully in future shows I go to I'll be able to move, like was the case all the club shows I'd been to in the past.

People really, really like the Thermals.
linkpost comment

More Dan Gross jokes [Mar. 2nd, 2007|07:49 pm]
What did Dan Gross say to the five year old kid?

"There is no Santa Claus, tooth fairy, or easter bunny."


What did Dan Gross say to the depressed teenager?

"Your parents hate you and you'll be sad and lonely forever."


Dan Gross, a telemarketer, and a vampire walk into a boar.  The telemarketer says "You disgust me.  Come on Vampire, let's go drink somewhere else."
linkpost comment

Anna Nicole Smith - A name I'm DONE HEARING ABOUT FOREVER. [Mar. 1st, 2007|11:39 pm]
The time has pretty much come that the TV 'newstertainment' channels should really stop pretending to be news.

They're treating Anna Nicole Smith like she's freaking Princess Di.  Why was she even famous in the first place?  Because she fucked a bunch of rich guys?  It's bad enough that people are obsessed with Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt.  But at least they somewhat earned their fame with charismatic performances in movies.  There are celebrities who all they did was fuck a bunch of people and get on the news about it.

This woman was a human being, and for that reason only I'm sorry to see her dead.  Other than that she was pretty much the most offensive person in existence who's never killed someone.  And is her death really that surprising?  She practiced pretty much every dangerous lifestyle decision in the book.  Drugs, anorexia, sex, sex, and more sex.  The only reason to be reporting on this for weeks and weeks would be as an example of why her lifestyle is dangerous, but she's being treated like some modern royalty.  For fucking a bunch of rich men and then dying.

If I could correct just one of the inanities of modern popular culture, I'd make it so to be famous, a person actually has to do produce anything that is of some use or some artistic value to society.  It pisses me off enough to constantly hear about Brad Pitt's sex life, I really can't take having to hear about people like Paris Hilton.
linkpost comment

Dan Gross, the asshole. [Feb. 27th, 2007|06:49 pm]
I was reminded last night of somebody I went to high school with, a guy named Dan Gross. He was basically an obnoxious ass, and last I heard of him he was the guy on campus at his college who showed people around, and he smoked cigars, and he got bad grades.

For those of you familiar with Exco, the character Stan Cross was based on him.

So, I've decided to invent a new kind of joke, kind of like the lawyer joke. The 'Dan Gross' joke.

What's the difference between Dan Gross and a banana?

A banana is a tasty fruit, and Dan Gross is an asshole.

What's the difference between Dan Gross and Grand Theft Auto 3?

Grand Theft Auto 3 is a video game, and Dan Gross is an asshole.

What's the difference between Dan Gross and Hitler?

Hitler is a genocidal dictator responsible for some of the most reprehensible acts in human history, and Dan Gross is an asshole.

How many Dan Grosses does it take to change a light bulb?

One. He's not an idiot, he's an asshole!

What's the difference between Dan Gross and an asshole?

An asshole is an orifice you poop through, and Dan Gross is an asshole!
linkpost comment

Thoughts on Zelda: Twilight Princess [Feb. 24th, 2007|01:26 pm]
I know I'm really into a video game when I start picking the game up when I didn't plan to.  Basically, when I start playing it 3-5 hours a day.

Here's how I played the last few hours of Twilight Princess.  After I finished the second dungeon,  I played maybe once every few days, for 45 minutes to an hour to session.  It took me two weeks to get to next dungeon.

Then I got to the third dungeon, and I played 3 hours non-stop.  I got there yesterday and I'll probably finish it today.

Zelda:  Twilight Princess is an amazing, addictive, fun game when you're actually in the dungeons.  When you're not it's annoying and frustrating.  It's like, it's a really great 30 hour game that lasts 60 hours.  (Just my estimation, my current game clock is 21 hours.)  The dungeons are the only part of the game that have the same feel as Zelda:  Link To The Past has through the whole game.

Between dungeons they have these twilight sequences when you're a wolf, you can't use any of your items, this demon thingy called Midna is talking to you constantly.  There are none of the clever setups and puzzles you find in the dungeons -- you're just kind of walking around the world looking for things marked on a map.  Occasionally there's a lateral thinking puzzle where you have to warp somewhere else and bring some item you've seen elsewhere to where you are.  These wolf parts aren't bad, but they lack the 'Zelda' feel that the dungeons have.

But in addition to these wolf parts there are a lot of random errands and minigames you have to do.  When the game first starts you have to play for 2-3 hours before you even fight anything.  You're basically stuck in your village...herding goats, fishing, getting a cradle back from a monkey, and so on.  Later on you have to sumo-wrestle, you have to escort a caravan through being attacked by monsters (Which is extremely annoying because you're on the horse which has iffy controls, and have to hit small moving targets with projectiles while the horse is moving and you're being attacked by monsters on the ground, and if you stay back at all, the caravan won't wait up for you.)

I don't know if Nintendo added these parts to make the game longer, or because they felt they needed to be more like Squaresoft RPGs.  But I would probably rank Twilight Princess in at least my top 20 games of all time if they just cut all these parts out and focus on dungeons and exploration like the very early Zelda games did.

--

Let's see...other game stuff...

Most of the RPGs coming out this year that interest me are for XBox 360, so I'll probably try to get one right after my birthday.  Zelda and Rogue Galaxy (The other game I'm playing now) both seem like really long games, and since I'm working now it's a good thing the next game I want isn't really coming out until May.  (Odin Sphere, an Atlus game.)

Well, other than God of War II, which is probably real short compared to RPGs, and Okami which I have on hold until after Zelda, which is also real short.

Anyone who happens to read this post and is into RPGs but isn't that into Squaresoft?  Try getting Shin Megami Tensei:  Nocturne and Valkyrie Profile:  Silmeria.  (Yeah, Silmeria was published by Square, but not developed by Square.  They pretty much just bought the publishing rights and slapped their name on, they didn't have any part in the actual making of the game.)
linkpost comment

UK Critics: This is an intervention [Feb. 20th, 2007|02:04 pm]
Okay, we've had enough, British music critics.

We've figured out the pattern.  Every time a British pop band comes out that's pretty good and released a few real good singles that anybody takes notice of anywhere else in the world, you come along and declare them the new Messiah, here to lead popular rock music into the new millenium.

First you did it with Oasis in the 90s.  That lasted a couple years, and then they fizzled out.  Then you started doing it more and more frequently.  The Strokes, Franz Ferdinand, Bloc Party, Arctic Monkeys, Lilly Allen.  You talked about just about all of them like they were the new Beatles for like a year, then what happened to all of them?  They released a mediocre follow up album.

And you know what, it's your own fault.  Maybe Noel and Liam Galagher from Oasis would have never started believing they were the new John Lennon and Paul McCartney if you didn't keep telling them they were.  When you bolster a pop-star's ego like that, it only raises their expectations to a point where they'll either try way too hard to replicate their good album, or go in the other direction and adopt a weird tone of pretentious grandeur.  If you didn't keep listing What's the Story Morning Glory in your top ten lists for all time, maybe the album after that wouldn't have sucked so much.  Instead of trying to write a great album, they would have kept just trying to write good catchy pop tunes.

If you stop overrating your own bands and just give them the credit they deserve, maybe they'll naturally develop into great rock stars.  You're sabotaging your own sensations by putting too much pressure on them to deliver the next Revolver.

Come on UK critics.  We all know you miss the glory days of the British invasion.  But it's not going to come back just by crying wolf about it every year.  The Strokes released one real good album they couldn't follow up.  The Arctic Monkeys are a pretty good pop/rock band.  Lilly Allen has a lot of potential.  If you want them to become really great bands, shut up about them and let them explore their own sound naturally, without all that extraneous pressure.  That's the only way the UK will even have a chance of producing another Beatles.
linkpost comment

Various random things that cross my mind [Feb. 19th, 2007|12:55 pm]
First, through my Programming Web Applications course, I'm learning one major thing.

Python is a much better programming language than Java.

Simplified syntax, fewer annoying brackets and semicolons to worry about, and without all the weird arbitrary restrictions Java uses to make you program in the kind of style they like.

I'm thinking of putting a game on the web programmed using Python.  I've even got a lot of really good ideas of it.  It's sort of based in the Java game I made for my term project last semester (Got an A in the course by the way), except more fleshed out and with a pvp mode.

I'm thinking the game would have an overhead view and a feel kind of like Zelda:  Link To The Past, except there would be these generators all over the place that send area of effect beams that you can redirect and mirror.  These areas of effect would have effects on everybody inside them, like increasing or decreasing stats, hurting you, healing you, teleporting you, etc.  (A little like the geopanels from Disgaea).  You would also be able to make walls, set bombs, and maybe other traps.

I was also thinking the rooms of the layout would generate themselves as you moved around and explored the area, and then would close off when you got to some kind of maximum threshold.  In the 'adventure' mode there'd be monsters and treasures and such, maybe a few puzzles (Even though most of the rooms would be randomly generated, maybe a few wouldn't.  Like, maybe there'd be a keyed door in some room, and the key in a random place in the previous floors.)

The pvp mode would work like a battle royale.  People would enter it and you'd kill as many other players as you can before you get killed.

The main thing that I like about this idea so far is that you have to be careful about position, and use clever strategy instead of just hack and slashing your way to victory.  If I manage to balance it the way I want, a low level person would have a fighting chance against a high level person if he were very, very clever.

--

I heard Battlestar Galactica was only renewed for 13 episodes next season instead of 20.  You'd think I'd be bothered by this, but I think it's a good idea.  If you look at the second half of both seasons two and three of Battlestar Galactica, you see a lot of costcutting filler.  Nothing really happens between about episode 12 and about episode 18. 

It was really apparent in last night's episode.  They did a trapped in a small space episode for the gods' sake!  13 episodes in a season is fine.

--

I decided I really like Wii Virtual Console.  I hadn't played Mario 64 in 10 years since I used to stay at my father's house on weekends.  Now I'm totally re-addicted to it.  And there's still Contra III and Super Castlevania, two games I've never played in my life.  Not to mention anything that might get added later.

I had eight jobs last week, I only have one so far this week.  I'll probably get one or two more, but still, I finally have time to play these games.  I played for like 4-5 hours last night.

Zelda:  Twilight Princess is ticking me off.  It's like, I'm having fun, enjoying it, then suddenly I run into a plot sequence where I have to run another bloody errand.  I want to go to the next dungeon and it's making me protect a caravan or sumo wrestle or something.  I have 17 hours logged and there's only been two dungeons.  This would be a really great game, if they would just trim down the boring parts and let you get right to the meat.

Rogue Galaxy on the other hand I'm really enjoying.  It's got a fun battle system that isn't that hard, but hard enough that if you're not careful you could actually lose.  And it's got a stupid plot, but not one that takes itself too seriously, so it's not that bothersome.  It's also cute out it blatantly rips off Star Wars and Dune.

Other games I'm looking forward to soon...

There's Odin Sphere, Persona 3, and Dawn of Mana which are really the last PS2 RPGs.  Odin Sphere I've heard March and I've heard May, so May is more likely.  Persona 3 is July and Dawn of Mana I have no idea.

Then there are a few XBox 360 RPGs that are making it so I can no longer ignore the system.  Blue Dragon in June, Infinite Undiscovery probably some time in summer or fall, and then Eternal Sonata I have no idea.

Then of course, God of War 2 and Super Mario Galaxy coming out around that time.

I just hope PS3 keeps sucking for a while so I don't have to get one until I can get it much cheaper.  (Though, I saw it in some displays at game stores.  Incredible graphics.)
linkpost comment

Embiggening the terrorists with cromulent boldness [Feb. 8th, 2007|01:39 am]
Is anybody else SICK of hearing the 'republican' Nationalists chestthumping about how any criticism or backtalk about our current plans in Iraq will embiggen...err...embolden the terrorists?

Yeah, that's right, the terrorists are a bunch of five year olds desperately in need of validation, and they're so super-impressed by America's sheer manliness that if we keep trodding forward doubtless, they'll lose their will to explode things and keel over like little affeminate children.

Do these Neo-Federalists listen to themselves when they talk? They've practically declared 'Know thy enemy' as a sign of weakness. For all their prophecies about the tragic weakening of our national libido, they have no idea how the enemy even thinks. Or apparently, what country they're in. They seem to have just declared them the school bully who's really a coward deep down and applied the same tactics to fighting them that they would some pissed off small country interested foremost in it's own survival.

They also seem to feel their position is so weak they have to use blanket rebuttals to any attack against their position.

The most depressing thing of all is that in a democratic system, people this weak, stupid, and cowardly ascended to a position of power.
linkpost comment

Music and job stuff [Feb. 5th, 2007|01:32 pm]
First music stuff.

Already some good albums out this year. In general I'm casting a wider net to buy albums than I did last year because I have...well...money.

Out of the eight albums I've picked up so far, the ones that stand out are The Shins, Deerhoof, and Of Montreal. I haven't listened to them enough times to make any kind of cogent critique of them, but sufficed to say, they're all awesome.

The Shins' new album by the way debuted at #2 on the billboard chart, despite being indie. Never would have happened before the mp3 age.

The disappointment so far would have to be Clap Your Hands Say Yeah. The vocals are mixed way too low, and there's a big clash of styles between the Wolf Parade-esque vocals and the music. Again, I've only listened to it two or three times so I can't really make a good critique yet.

--

Job stuff. I keep getting these night jobs in places like Dorchester where I'm not sure I should be at night. When you get the schedule you have the opportunity to say 'I can't make it to that job', but that's only going to work so many times before somebody makes the connection. And to make it worse, I think my team leader who would be the one I have to tell not to put me in Dorchester or Roxbury, lives in Dorchester. So I'm not sure how to bring up the topic without sounding condescension.

But hanging around at bus stops around midnight in high crime racially un-mixed areas is...bad.
linkpost comment

My favorite albums of 2006 [Jan. 25th, 2007|10:13 pm]
Being an indie hipster, I'm contractually required to make a bunch of ordered lists of my favorite music. So, here's my favorite albums of 2006.

1. Joanna Newsom - Ys. Kind of a copout choice, but honestly my favorite. For once an album hyped legitimately. Really weird meandering stream of consciousness stringy folk. Listening to this album is joy, distilled.

2. TV On The Radio - Return To Cookie Mountain. Also kind of a copout choice. On one level it just sounds like your run of the mill weird indie melodies, but there are these resonant guitar noises in the background that are executed so perfectly it doesn't matter.

3. Bob Dylan - Modern Times. There is no other person in the world who has released one of the best few albums of the year in two years 41 years apart from each other. And you know the only reason he manages it is because he stopped giving a crap about being commercial like 41 years ago. He's also gotten past his experimentation phase from the 70s and decided he's just going to crank out bluesy stuff like he should have been doing in the first place.

4. Destroyer - Destroyer's Rubies. Better known from New Pornographers, Dan Bejar is one of the most distinctive musical personalities out there. His songs are completely structureless and random, and manage to sound great and like nobody else, partly due to Bejar's quirky voice and partly just due to his incredible songwriting acumen.

5. The Knife - Silent Shout. Scandanavian electronica. It's like trip-hop, but weirder, and good.

6. Herbert - Scale. I can't really describe this album. It's one of those sample driven electronica albums, but executed seamlessly enough that you don't really notice it. The songs have a distinct dark clubby feel without having that trademark pulsating drumnbass, and every song sounds different.

7. Decemberists - The Crane Wife. If you are still reading my list to this point, you probably know exactly who the Decemberists are, so I won't bother.

9. Howe Gelb - Sno Angel Like You - Indie rock with great guitar riffs and help from a gospel choir. An interesting experiment, which is successful.

9. The Thermals - The Blood, The Body, The Machine. Kind of post punky in that it's mostly basic power chords, but with weird biblical lyrics and sung better than all the rest of the post-punky stuff.

10. Scott Walker - The Drift. Pitchfork bait, pretty much. Lots of weird noises and inexplicable lyrics with that sort of creepy John Cale/Nick Cave approach to song building, and Captain Beefheart-esque lyrics.

Now, I'm listening to the new Of Montreal album, to purge my brain from having to hear Run Around by Blues Traveller about 5452 times last week in grocery stores and retail stores. (Perfectly good song, but not perfectly good to hear 5452 times in a week.)
link1 comment|post comment

Random reflections [Jan. 24th, 2007|12:03 pm]
Ugh. I finally remember to tape House on a night when I have a Tuesday night job, and Shrub pre-empts it with his 'State of our current fictionalization of the union' speech.

Why do they have to air presidential speeches during prime time? Prime time TV shows are way more entertaining, and they ADMIT they're fiction.

Now that the January rush is over I'm finally having a reasonable amount of jobs. I only wish there was some way to know in advance how long I'll be there. Like, I have several three hour jobs in a row, then I get to a store just as small as those ones and I'm there seven hours. And my team leader seems receptive to how much or how little I want to work during the semester, so it seems like this job will work out with the school.

The next semester starts next week. This semester I'm taking Intro to Java II and Programming Web Applications. I'm a little worried I don't have all the prequisite knowledge of HTML for the latter one, but I should be able to pick it up quickly if I don't. (HTML is easy as hell).

If I don't get an A in Intro to Java I after losing like a total of 7 points the whole semester I'll be royally pissed.

Since I started working, I've found that I'm only enjoying video games where the gameplay is actually fun. So, I'm going to be selling FFXII on ebay. It's a great looking game with a very good plot. But the actual gameplay is dull as hell. I'm not sure I'll ever enjoy a non-Shin Megami Tensei turn based RPG again.
linkpost comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]