Home
BillWetzel [entries|friends|calendar]
Bill Wetzel

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ calendar | livejournal calendar ]

Don't really use this journal anymore [25 Sep 2006|10:57pm]
I don't use this anymore. If you want to find more of my writings, both political and literary etc, I will paste the links here. -Bill

My URL
http://www.myspace.com/billwetzel

My Blog URL
http://blog.myspace.com/billwetzel


Here is the my author's page at opednews.com:

http://www.opednews.com/author/author1852.html

At Democraticunderground.com:

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Wetzelbill


I also write periodically at this site:

http://worldnewstrust.com/
post comment

Vote Crazy Horse for President in '08! [05 Jun 2006|03:08am]
Vote Crazy Horse for President in '08!



So, I get sick of voting for the elitist white guy who sucks less than the other elitist white guy, every four years. I have already been nauseated a million times over by the fawning over of Hillary Clinton (elitist white woman, there's a change) and John McCain by the corporate media. Ohhhhh the Democratic and Republican frontrunners! Yay! Look how Hillary is at odds with her husband on this issue! Oh and McCain is standing up against the President and other Republicans on this other issue! What strength! How refreshing! Oh glorious day! And, they appear to be good buddies too!

Then there are the other typical snooze-inducing spineless Dems these guys all cuddle up to. Yes, that young fiery brigand Evan Bayh! He could put the whole sleeping pill industry out of business just by himself. Or Joe Biden? Never seen that guy on a Sunday morning show before. The man clearly enjoys avoiding the spotlight so he can stand up and fight for the American people! Love that man! I just can't wait to see who else is going to join the ranks of the media anointed. You know, real Dems, men's men, who strangle ducks for cameras with their bare hands and make sweet love to mountains of sweet, glorious money. Yes, sweet, glorious money! Because if Joe Biden or some other Fighting Dem isn't looking out for Credit Card companies, well, then who will? And, if Evan Bayh isn't being an unrepentant asskisser, well, then who will take that righteous mantle?

However, any Dem is better than any Republican right? I mean truly, Dems are the good guys, aren't they/we/uh... us? Gotta vote for one of the good guys/girls....I mean, women. That is essential. Even if I don't agree with them. Even if they sell out on major issues. The Iraq War. Bankruptcy Bill. Medicare Prescription Drug Bill. Even if they care more about Multinationals and this sacred, holiest of holy Grails called: "Free-Trade" then say... oh, humanity. Even then, I should vote for the good guys, I suppose.....

Maybe I will. Maybe I won't. Not decided yet. But, what I have decided is this. When I go to the polls in November 2008. (something I am only talking about because the media members who have no life have been salivating over this next Presidential election, before the '04 ballots were even finished not being counted) When I go to the polls, if I look down and see another ticket in which I have to swallow my convictions like a bitter pill, with my dear Mary Poppins handing me a spoonful of sugar (where's the hard liquor at, Mare?) then I just may crawfish and shoot the proverbial devil in the ass. I may decide not to vote for either Sucks or Sucks Less. In that case, I'm going to revert back to my American Indian history.

I'm going to write in Crazy Horse.

Why Crazy Horse, you ask?

Well, conventional wisdom would say Sitting Bull, he may have been the greatest chief ever, and also, I am Blackfeet and Nez Perce, so how about White Calf or Chief Joseph? Not bad choices, but I like CH for various reasons.

Crazy Horse was quiet. And, lord knows, we need politicians to just shut the fuck up and listen. Instead of some bloviating blowhard who loves the sound of his own voice, well, Crazy Horse is a guy who just likes to kick ass and get things done.

Plus, the man was anti-establishment. In the words of WWE pro wrestler, Carlito, "Now that is cool!" Crazy Horse plays by his own rules, he doesn't care what the insulated DC establishment thinks or advises. He just wants to do his thing.

And, finally, I just want to see every interview with the Russerts, Carlsons, Matthews and various Stephanopouli of the world end in either an arrow to the heart or a vicious scalping. That would be fun. Put a few arrows into the opposition party or any in-house dissenters and they'd fall in line pretty quick.

This guy also knows a little bit about the separation of church and state. Nobody is going to try to force Christianity on Crazy Horse! No soup for you, fundies!!!!!!

Biological warfare? Hey, Crazy Horse was so tough, smallpox was even scared of him. You know if small pox is scared of the guy, not even Vladimir Putin would want to test him!

So yes, in the next presidential election, Crazy Horse just might get one vote. Mine. And, to tell you the truth, that's all he really needs.

Then maybe I can go to sleep that night with a little dignity left intact.
post comment

MY INFAMOUS NAKED HOMELESS MAN CHRISTMAS STORY [04 Jun 2006|11:33pm]
MY INFAMOUS NAKED HOMELESS MAN CHRISTMAS STORY
a bill wetzel joint


I will go to great lengths to tell a great story.

Case in point.

There was a naked homeless man reclined on my futon and all I thought about was what a good story this was going to be. I kept thinking about my friend Sara. If this couldn’t make her laugh, than nothing would. Meanwhile, I had some serious issues to deal with. Chiefly, was the naked homeless guy who looks like Carl from “Aqua Teen Hunger Force” camped out in front of me.

Hold on a second.

Stop.

Rewind.

I better do some background.

It’s Fall 2003 in Tucson, Arizona. My youngest brother Tim is living with me. He likes to make friends, talk to people, that sort of thing. One of his friends in our apartment complex is Carl from Aqua Teen…. I mean an older guy named Cliff. Cliff is brutish. Abrasive. Loud. A big Jewish guy from Jackson Heights, in Brooklyn, New York. His dream is to be a plumber. At fifty, I would think he may have decided to explore the turd wrangling option several decades earlier, but since I’m still hoping to become the starting Point Guard for the Seattle Supersonics, I have no room to judge. I don’t really know Cliff. Not enough to realize he’s a bit….well,…. fucked up. So I’m sitting in my apartment one night, Tim is sleeping in the back room and I hear a knock on the door. It’s Carl.. I mean Cliff. Cliff wants to know if he can come in and watch some baseball. It’s the playoffs, I’m bored, he doesn’t have a tv, so I let him in.

Not my smartest move, but everything is still working out.

The game ends after a while and Cliff asks if he can watch a film. Again, I say “Sure,” and he picks out A Perfect World, starring Kevin Costner and Clint Eastwood. About halfway through the dvd, Tim wakes up and as it’s getting a little late, tells Cliff he should leave and he can come over some other time. Well, I thought this was odd since Cliff was not hurting anyone or anything. It certainly was not because I was tired or bothered by his presence, however Tim objected, so Cliff left and that was that. Tim then tells me not to let him in, that he’ll come over and never want to leave, and he’s actually a pretty gross and rude person etc. No big deal to me, I’m not friends with the guy, so I don’t think much about it.

Well, for the next few months, every time I would see Cliff hanging out around the building he would try to come over and finish the movie. I would always say no. Once he knocked on the door at about midnight and asked to come in and watch the World Series. Well, the game had only been over a few hours, by that time and it was late. That Cliff could not comprehend such a simple rule of etiquette, struck me as odd. So, it was at this time when I began to think Cliff may have had a screw loose.

This notion was proven shortly thereafter.

One night Cliff was drunk, and apparently off his medication, and he scattered garbage all over in front of the apartment complex. Cliff had a custom. He looked through the garbage for pop cans, so he could crush and turn them in for money. This night he was acting completely nuts, and was trying to fight my next door neighbor, who was elderly, frail and just recovering from a stroke. Tim had to go down and physically restrain Cliff. His behavior and the whole situation was pretty bizarre.

Around this time, I had to go back to Montana to attend my grandfather’s funeral. I came back alone, this time, as my brother decided to stay home for a few months and visit. A few weeks after I got back, I ran into Cliff right as I was returning from getting the mail. I turned a corner and nearly ran into him. He didn’t even say hello, he just pulled a quart of ice cream out of a Fry’s Grocery Bag and said: “Want some ice cream….can I come over and finish the movie?” I swear, I didn’t have the heart to turn the poor bastard down again for the millionth time, so I let him come over.

This was the day before my birthday.

At the time, I was extremely busy.

My friend, Sara was coming over the next day. She was taking me to a movie for my birthday and my house was in need of some cleaning. That’s the thing. Guys are slobs. Most of the time we barely pick up a thing. However a woman changes all of that. No way can you let a woman walk in where you live and have it look like a pigsty. It’s male code. I’m sure it has to be written in stone somewhere. So, I’m telling Cliff he can watch the movie, but I’m going to be in and out, doing some laundry and cleaning up. I don’t think he particularly cared, after months of dreaming of finishing the film, my impression was he was glad that I even let him in the door.

However…..

As I’m sweeping up, an hour or so later, he asks me why I’m cleaning up. I tell him tomorrow is my birthday and I’m expecting a friend over and I haven’t seen her in a while. Cliff gets this puzzled look and after a few moments he says: “Oh you have a girl coming over tomorrow?” So I say, “Yes, she’s a friend from one of my classes. We’re going to do something for my birthday.” Again, Cliff is perplexed, as if the idea of a woman coming over to man’s apartment on her own accord is a foreign concept to him. He then asks” Is she good looking?” Ok, now I’m perplexed, however, I suppose it’s no big deal, he’s just curious and she is definitely a gorgeous woman, so I say: “Well, yeah, actually she’s really good looking.” So Cliff gets this big knowing smile, and says: “How much does she cost?” Ok, I nearly lose it. I swear, for some reason I about cracked up that he would think that. I suppose in Cliff’s world, the only way a guy can get any is by paying for it; maybe he is just confused at the whole idea in the first place. So I explain, “Oh no, Cliff, it’s not like that, she’s not a prostitute, she’s my friend, we aren’t a couple or anything.” I might as well have been talking to a brick wall, because Cliff says “Well, when you’re done with her, why don’t you send her over to my place too. “ Ok… that’s pretty sick, but pretty funny that he’d even think that, in the first place. I start to laugh, and am like “Oh no, no way, it’s not like that.” However, he still couldn’t grasp what I was getting at so I let it go, and eventually he left and went back to his apartment.

So the next day, I can barely contain myself. I have to tell Sara what he said. Now, I don’t know how she’s going to react, but she does think I’m about the funniest guy on earth - in all due respect, I’m at least in the top ten- so I decide to risk telling her. Well, when I got to the part about Cliff asking if I would send her over to his place when I was done, she about died laughing. Well, we about died laughing. Just the thought this guy would assume something like that was hilarious to us. Anyway, afterwards, I would randomly tease her about Cliff, saying I could hook them up etc. It was always good for a laugh, and we had some fun joking around about it. I figured that would be about as far as this Cliff stuff would go. Then one night a few weeks later…

I get a knock on the door.

Ok, this is supposed to be the coldest night of the year. Granted, December in the desert isn’t exactly cold to a Montanan like myself, but it isn’t something you would want to be sleeping outside in. Well, as luck -bad fucking luck - would have it, I open the door to see a desperate looking Cliff standing with a sleeping bag and a friggin’ knapsack. It’s about 10 PM, cold and not too pleasant outside. Cars are rushing by. Exhaust fumes. I can only imagine what it would be like to be homeless. Before I say a word, Cliff immediately goes into a story about how he got kicked out of his apartment - it happens if you don’t pay rent for four months- and he had no place to stay and so on and so on and so on. Ok, I’m a pretty compassionate guy. Maybe to a fault. I in no way can turned down my fellow human being in a time of need. Even one as abhorrent as Cliff. So while he’s pleading his case, I say, “Come on in, I’m not going to let you sleep out at the bus stop in the cold or anything.” Here I am. The good Samaritan. I can just hear the “Aww… Bill, you’re so sweet” comments right now. Let me tell you this.

Sweetness is not all it’s cracked up to be.

Cliff is desperate, as I said. And, he cannot shut up about his damn story. He keeps telling me how the hell he got kicked out. I didn’t really care. I just wasn’t going to let him freeze to death in a sleeping bag right outside my door. And, to top it off, I was busy. Sara and I were going to another movie the next day and she was supposed to call me any second now. My dad was going to call any second now and my friend Mike was about to call any second now as well. I’m thinking about going over and getting a light bulb to replace one which just burned out, while Cliff is telling me about how he has a job interview as a plumber’s assistant all lined up tomorrow, but he doesn’t have a place to stay, and he can’t call to find out when he has to go in to the interview and so on. I would call this a shitty predicament. Literally.

I decide to go to the store.

I leave Cliff home so he can answer the phone.

Not good.

I quickly go to the store, grab some light bulbs, a cheap phone card for Cliff, and a few extra bucks so the poor fucker would have enough to get a few meals or something. I quickly jog home, and as I’m walking in the door, I see a horrific sight. No, he’s not naked. Yet. What I see is Cliff on the phone, talking to someone. Oh no, this is not good. If it’s my dad it’ll freak him out. Of all the luck, it ends up being Sara. Already, I know this is more fodder for me to tease her about. “So, did you and Cliff hit it off on the phone?” “Did you set up a date?” The jokes practically write themselves. As soon as I get on the line, I am brimming with the ecstasy that tomorrow I’m going to have a good story to tell her. “So Bill, are you all right…” she laughs. “Oh yeah, wow, tomorrow do I ever have a story to tell you.” The whole time I’m on the phone, which wasn’t long, Cliff was having a conversation with me. Or trying to anyway.

It turns out this guy never shuts up.

Later on, Mike calls. He’s a Customs investigator, a Blackfeet Indian from the same reservation I am from. I’m trying to have a conversation with him and Cliff is yammering on about how he got kicked out of his apartment, a story I have heard thirty times in the last hour. It’s about 11 pm, already I’m regretting letting him in the door. The philosopher Immanuel Kant believes that an action isn’t moral if somebody does it because of some kind of desire. Or emotion. For example, if you give a bum a quarter, simply because it makes you feel good, well that isn’t a truly moral action. If you give money to charity so you can impress people with your philanthropy then that isn’t a truly moral action. It may be, Kant eludes, that there has never been a truly moral action ever committed. I can tell you this though. I may have let Cliff in the door, originally, because of some humanist, touchy-feely, I-love-my-fellow-man bullshit, but I lost that warm, cuddly feeling inside, truly fuckin’ quick. Moral actions or not, I was beginning to think any elation I may get from being compassionate were not going to be worth it. Not at all.

So, then my dad calls.

Cliff is in the background, talking about how he might move to Montana with me. Ok, let me tell you this. Somewhere between Cliff getting booted out and him going and getting a turd wrangling job the next day, Cliff decided he and I were going to be roommates. I must have missed this because, A, half the time I was on the phone when he was trying to talk to me, and, B, I quit paying attention to what he was saying about 3 minutes after I let him in my apartment. I’m on the phone with my dad, and Cliff keeps yelling in the background about how he and I were going to rent a U-Haul and he’d drive me back home and we could move in with my parents. I’m thinking: “Oh lord, save me.” I think he got the idea when I turned him down a bit earlier when I was actually listening. He was practically acting like he was moving in with me already. He kept asking what time I got off and when I would be back so he could meet me back home. He even enticed me with….food stamps. Yes, Cliff wanted to buy some groceries with his “Stamps, “ meet me at home, cook dinner and spend the night again. In retrospect, I am not sure what he was thinking. Would he go out every day, wrangle turds and come home to me, his loving wife alternative? Would we be like a family or something? I’m pretty sure I don’t want to know. Seriously. I don’t want to know. When it was evident I wasn’t going to let him move in, he then tried to persuade me to move in with him in another apartment complex. That was a big “No fucking way!, “ however he then got it in his head we would then move to Montana with my parents. He would not give up!

Finally, my phone calls were done.

I told Cliff I was going to bed, good night, I’m waking you up at 6 AM so you can get the hell out of here, no you can’t live with me etc. So about 11:30, I crash out, and Cliff is in his sleeping bag on my futon about to fall asleep as well. I’m thinking the worst is over, all I have to do is sleep for a few hours, get up and boot him out. Simple, right? Wrong!
I am a lifelong insomniac. I can barely sleep, ever. I’m pretty weird about sleep. I toss and turn, toss and turn. Over and over and over. But, this night was different. I was out almost immediately. I doze off quickly, yet, it doesn’t last. I am asleep about an hour when I hear a terrible racket in the bathroom and also in the front room. I guess Cliff is maybe taking a shower or something I’m not sure. I try to ignore it, but he gets louder and louder and louder. I recall how he told me he was even kicked out of a few of the local homeless shelters. I couldn’t believe it, but now, I’m understanding. The guy is annoying as hell. Infuriatingly so. But, the night is almost over, I have a good story to tell my buddy, Sara, tomorrow and sleep should overcome me again soon. Finally, everything is quiet. Cliff must have finished whatever he was up to, and I could get some rest.

Too late.

I couldn’t sleep.

I lay around for a while, and just can’t sleep. It’s about 1:30, and I get up to use the bathroom. I made the mistake of not putting on my glasses. Not good. I am practically blind. Much like Milhouse from The Simpsons, I am basically worthless without them. So, I go into the bathroom, and as I am peeing, I look up in front of me and see a wet shirt draping off the towel hanger. Then I glance to my right and see a pair of wet, wrung socks soaking in a murky, dishwater-ish pool of water in my sink. It’s all so gross I have to laugh to myself. I’m shaking my head, thanking the lord it wasn’t his underwear when I turn to my left and see Cliff’s underwear hanging off of my shower curtain rod, inches away from my head! Oh sick… :: gag:: This stuff only could happen to me! See, I have always known I may be the most unlucky person in the world. I try not to go outside during a storm, because I know if lightning is going to hit somebody it would probably search me out. This one time, when I was very young, I was with my cousins in Great Falls, throwing bread crumbs at a park to geese and swan. Well, this big damn goose all of a sudden jumped on my head and pecked the holy hell out of me! It was traumatic. Funny, nowadays, but traumatic back then. That’s the kind of luck I have. Now, I can say with some confidence that I would rather be struck by lightning or attacked by another goose than to come into contact with Cliff’s underwear. No matter how brief that contact may be.

The underwear was not the worst part.

We are now at the beginning of this story.

I walk into the front room and see Cliff seated on my futon smoking a cigarette. Shirtless. Or so I think. Remember, I do not have my glasses on. With the confident stride of Mr. Magoo, I stroll into the kitchen, grab my Folger’s change can and pull out some quarters. “Cliff,” Mr. Magoo sa… I mean I say, “ here are some quarters so you can go dry your clothes in the morning.” Cliff takes a puff of his cigarette and nods. “You should have enough change to get them all dr…..” right then I notice Cliff is completely naked. Now, do any of you remember the Seinfeld episode, when Jerry is dating the woman who always walks around naked, then he tries to do the same, but with terrible results? Ok, there is such a thing as “good” naked and such a thing as “bad” naked. Cliff definitely falls into the category of “bad” naked. Even without my glasses, I may have been scarred for life, just in those few instances I’ve seen the guy naked. What’s more, he just sat around nonchalantly, not even trying to cover himself. Any rationale human being would have covered themselves up, or TRIED to. Not Cliff. Now, as a result, any sexual fantasy I may ever have will be forever ruined, because that image of Cliff may just happen to pop in there.

So…..

I calmly walked into my room, locked the door, and tried to pretend I didn’t just see something worse than the apocalypse. Again, I knew Sara - by this time anybody else, for that matter- would enjoy this story. My misfortune is good entertainment. Always has been. Always will be I’m sure. So the next morning, right at 5:30 AM, I wake up to roll Cliff out. I charge into the front room like a linebacker, ready to kick his ass out. Except, he’s gone! You might think this is good for me, but his stuff is still there. No fucking way am I letting this guy come back and stay just because he has to come in and get his stuff. I am incensed that he’d do this.

But…

Shortly thereafter, Cliff comes bounding up the steps. It turns out, he was just drying the last of his clothes. Already I’m trying to get him out. I say: “Cliff, you better get rolling, you have stuff to do and so do I, see you later…(don’t let the door hit you in the ass…)” But he wasn’t ready to leave. “So what time do you want to meet me back here?” …. I try to say something… “ I’ll go buy some food with my food stamps and we’ll have dinner…” Again with the food stamps. “No Cliff, you can’t come back, you can’t stay here, I might not even be around, it was just one time because it was cold and late… “ So finally, he was getting it. Now, I start making coffee, and figure I would bust out some of my gourmet flavored stuff. Crème Brulee. I’m a connoisseur. Figured that I’d bring a little class to Cliff’s day, you know? I recall how my brother told me Cliff had been homeless before. That he used to eat out of garbage cans. Well, my final insult was about to occur. When I asked Cliff if he wanted any of the flavored coffee I just made, you would have thought I asked him to drink a cup of rat piss. “Oh, God no! Yuk!” Gee thanks! The guy who thought I had to buy a prostitute, now thinks my coffee isn’t even palatable. Good times.

I really decide he has to go then. Insulting my coffee is like insulting somebody’s religion. I am an addict. I love the stuff. Finally Cliff went over the line! Coffee is the sweet nectar of life. However, Cliff still won’t leave. I’m thinking he can leave, and I can finally get a few hours of sleep before I go and do some things. I mention he better get going, that I need to get up in a few hours and be somewhere at about 9 or so. Cliff mentions how he could still sleep for a few hours, and that I can just wake him up then. That wasn’t going to happen. I decided the only way I could get this guy out is if I left and did my stuff at the school really early. So I boot him out and leave. He still wants to know what time I get back.

I ignore him.

It’s almost Christmas.

What I am thinking about doing could get me a lump of coal in my stocking.

Or the electric chair.

So I spend a few hours doing some work, come back home and sleep. Later on that afternoon, I finally get to tell Sara my story. Yes, I got many laughs with it. In fact, over the last few years, I have gotten quite a few laughs telling it. Was it worth it? Maybe, maybe not. In retrospect, it doesn’t seem all that bad. I can even laugh about it quite a bit. At the time, it sucked though. I like helping people, but sometimes enough is enough. Still, at least, I have a good story to tell, and I finally, decided to write it. Who knows, maybe I’ll have another similar one to tell again someday.

Which brings me to last week.

I am on my computer, typing out some stuff, reading a few newspapers, when I hear somebody yelling outside. A loud, abrasive yell. “Bill!” “Tim!” A Jewish, Brooklyn accent. I use my old-school, Indian hiding tactics and slink over to my bedroom window. Slowly, carefully I sneak a glance. There is Cliff. I haven’t seen him in a few years. He’s standing outside in broad daylight, screaming the names of my brother and me. Why he doesn’t come up and knock on the door I don’t know. People are staring at him. Slightly afraid. I walk in the front room. Go up to the door. Grab the doorknob. Then I turn the latch and make sure it’s locked.

Sara moved a few years ago.

And, I already have plenty of stories to tell.
post comment

Metallic Persuasion -For Nick [15 Mar 2006|02:34pm]
This is about my friend's death. It does not do him justice. I don't think anything could ever do justice in a situation like this. We can only heal. I wrote something for the sake of writing it. Because I hurt. I felt bad. I missed him. He committed suicide.... what justice is that, you know? 26 years old? The tragedy not yet a year old. Fresh and painful. I feel selfish for writing this in some ways. Because it's truly about me. About how I mourn, about how I feel... About my tears....

So I can heal my own wounds. It does not do him justice. Not by any means. But, writing is the only way I know how to try. I never fully finished writing this... to me it's missing something.... And, I have never fully healed... I think this piece may be a bit of a metaphor for how I feel. That's the best way I can put it. Thank you all- Bill


METALLIC PERSUASION

In his hand. Cold and steely. Metallic persuasion. Shakespeare, The Prophet, wise more than us mere mortals could ever know. “To be or not to be?” That no longer seems the question. The answer is clenched, burning in his palm. Fire. Pain. Anger. Melancholy wisps floating in the air. Hovering in his car. Those final moments alone. When rhetoric no longer matters. Everything melts around him. The wisps die. City sounds drain away. The stars fall. In one move. Silence.
____
I’m not sure if I can imagine how it happened. My youngest brother’s friend. My friend. Nick. He committed suicide early last summer. I’m not sure if I even want to know how it happened. The act. Those last moments alone, when someone feels such pain, when they are in so much pain, that pulling a trigger seems like a rationale thing to do. The only thing to do. The right thing to do.

I cannot comprehend this.

I don’t want to comprehend this.

Nick was playful. At times child-like, cheerfully throwing punches; with a hint of apprehension. Self-consciousness. Tacitly, he looked for my approval. His friend’s older brother. Someone he could talk to about boxing - a love of his - politics, or current events. Unfailingly friendly. Genuine. Yet, underneath, you could sense the nervousness. In some way, you could tell there were demons. Inside this great guy - and he truly was one - an obvious battle was raging. It’s easy to relate. We all have our moments. Mood swings. Depression. Angst. Just not like this.

Not to the point of no return.

Not so bad that it gets the best of us.

My inclination is to always think of events in a political manner. That’s who I am; it’s my nature to think of solutions to problems. But how do you find a way to legislate against suicide? No law will stop somebody from pulling that trigger, tying that noose, swallowing those pills. No law can ease someone’s pain before it’s too late or their loved one’s anguish afterward. After the son of Oregon Senator, Gordon Smith committed suicide, the senate passed mental health legislation. Smith wept bitterly on the senate floor throughout the vote. I would imagine a new law was small solace for his overwhelming loss. I know the law gives me no relief. I think of my friend constantly. Miss him more than ever. No amount of critical thinking or creativity can change any of this.

For once I have no solution.

No grand idea to save the day.

I’m not really sure if I should.

A day or two after Nick’s death, his girlfriend came over to my apartment, and I was sitting next to her on my futon, trying to articulate my sympathy. I had no words. Nothing coherent. I mentioned the bible, how I had been reading for strength, yet I could not clearly explain what I was getting at. I didn’t know. I still don’t know. I don’t find any meaning to something like this. Just pain. Sometimes I still find myself thinking that he’ll come over. I constantly wonder what he is doing. I wonder if he’d like to come over and watch something on television. I wonder if he could maybe give me a ride to the store. Then I remember he is no longer alive. And, something breaks inside of me every time. Smashes hard in one blunting blow. It makes me ache deeply for several minutes afterward. I feel ashamed in these moments.

Because I forgot he was gone.

And, for what I didn’t do.

I knew for at least a month beforehand that something was wrong with him. I could tell he wasn’t right. He’d come over later than usual, be jumpy and apprehensive. He looked progressively thinner, sleep deprived and seemed more melancholy with each visit. Yet, I didn’t say anything. I never sat down and talked to him. My brother said he feared telling me that he had a drug problem. I suspect he feared telling anyone just what kind of mental pain he was in as well. I do not blame myself, I just wished I had tried something. I wish I went with my instincts. I have long since quit trying to make sense of death. I’ve witnessed people torture themselves to death with drugs and alcohol. Known others who have died from various diseases. Had several friends die in accidents, automobile and otherwise. Had a friend shot to death once. None ever made sense to me. But I do know that Nick could have been saved. That’s the only lesson I can think of in this. That there is help out there. Search for it. Seek it out. And, if you know someone who needs some then don’t hesitate to reach out. Go with your instincts. I wish I did. You just never know the place someone may be in.

For Nick, I will always remember.

And, never forget.
post comment

DISTANCE, TIME, BROTHERS AND LIMEADES [05 Mar 2006|07:03am]
DISTANCE, TIME, BROTHERS AND LIMEADES

In Jeremy Schaap’s book “Cinderella Man: James J. Braddock, Max Baer And The Greatest Upset In Boxing History,” there is an amusing tale about how Jim Braddock and his older brother get into a fight. It’s called The Battle Of Nurge’s Field, and came about when Jimmy had taken his brother Joe’s shirt without permission and wore it out on the town. Joe was a few years older than Jimmy and a professional fighter at the time. Jimmy was still in his mid-teens and a bit of a careless rambler, so his angry brother decided to teach him a lesson and some manners.

Joe huffed out and found Jimmy wearing his shirt while hanging at a place called Nurge’s Field. Joe immediately confronted Jimmy and started throwing punches, well, much to everybody’s surprise Jimmy not only started fighting back, but was holding his own. The two brothers fought for nearly an hour, going back and forth until it was eventually broken up. By this time the shirt in question was bloodied and worthless and the brothers each were claiming victory.

When I first read that story I couldn’t quit laughing because brothers all have a funny way of dealing with each other. I have three younger ones, all bigger and more athletic than me by now, but I remember those days when I was the headmaster around the household. I also remember when my brother Rex, ten months younger than me and always bigger, took one of my shirts. Well, he didn’t just take one, he had a habit of constantly wearing my shirts and leaving them at his friend’s houses and scattering them all over the country. One time, he took a shirt of mine without permission and I had enough. So I went and took his prized leather jacket and tossed it in a mud puddle. I challenged him to a fight and neither one of us were going to back down, but then again neither one of us really wanted to get into it either. At any rate, we jawed back and forth and we never came to blows. Which is a surprise, I guess, because we have before.

But the story of the Braddock boys reminded me of those times. And, as silly as it may seem, getting into a fistfight over an article of clothing seems like a pretty rationale thing to do.

However, I have to profess that despite any fights or arguments, my brother and I always grew up close. We were basically the same age. Raised together. Played together. Went to school together. We essentially had the same friends and the same experiences. Typically we played competitive sports in the same leagues as each other. All in all, you cannot break a bond like that in just a few moments with a few words or a few punches. Life typically doesn’t work that way.

Yet, in certain instances, I find that as people get older they tend to drift away from their families. It seems like time holds a greater distance than any argument or disagreeable action ever could. That does not sit well with me. Here I am, living across the country from most of my family, wondering if I am most haunted by the last time I saw them or simply the distance between us? I haven’t been home much for nearly seven years now. I do not call as regularly as I once did.

There is something both sad and enthralling to that.

Especially since I feel my family near my heart every day. I see them. In my thoughts. My prayers. I think about them constantly. Worry. Sometimes I burst with pride when I hear of successes. My shirt-stealing brother has given me a nephew and a niece. My second youngest brother, Justin, is a high school basketball coach and is about to get his Master’s degree. My youngest brother, Tim, lives with me right now. He’s 21, yet sometimes I feel more like his dad. As if I had a kid of my own when I was just 10 years old. In many ways, he’s the brother who is most like me. In some ways, he’s not. But we complement each other well. Have the same humor, the same interests, similar ambitions. He’s much as I was 10 years ago when I was his age. Maybe not quite as lost, I suppose. Now, it’s funny to see him, like an overgrown pup, wrestling around with me, child-like and not knowing his own strength. And, me, the old mutt who just likes to lie around, eat and sleep all the time. Half grouchy and war-torn. Scarred and ornery. Yet I still feel the need to protect him. Be close to him. Even though he probably protects me more than I ever could him.

I wonder how things will be ten years from now? Will he be like me? Will he be better? More successful? Less? I don’t even have a clue.

Around sixty years ago, my grandfather, Blackie, my dad’s dad, used to wake up before five in the morning in the middle of a harsh Montana winter. Impoverished and living with his young family 6 miles out of Cut Bank, MT on the Blackfeet Indian reservation. It would be well below zero, gosh he had to be younger than I am now, and my grandfather would walk out to fetch water for his family, then walk a few miles to the highway and hitchhike nearly 30 miles to work. Then when he got off he would hitchhike all the way back. Finally he received a decent paycheck and caught a ride to the bank in Browning, MT where he worked out a deal to get a car for his family. I think about that a lot. My grandmother, Doris had to be so young and pretty then. Working hard days, cooking and cleaning and watching her young son and daughter. With more soon on the way. My dad, Petesy, and aunt, Marlene, both had to be only a few years old. If that. Our country was at war in Europe. The Cold War was on the horizon. The country was still feeling the aftereffects of the Great Depression.

And, here was a young man living on a reservation, trudging in bone-chilling, to put it nicely, weather because he had no choice. His family had to survive.

Sometimes, people with mettle just do what they have to do. Yet, I can’t help but feel a great amount of love was put into these gestures. Maybe the greatest.

So here I am, about two months ago, trudging along at about 7 am, walking from a Sonic fast food restaurant, with one large limeade in one hand, and one large Diet Cherry limeade in the other. Chattering in the 50 degree weather. Chilled from my 5 minute walk each way. Dreaming about the moment when I’ll be handing my youngest brother, his limeade, cranking up the heat and sipping on my Diet Cherry one. Somewhere along the line, I think my generation has gotten soft. My grandfather’s generation whipped ass on fascism, communism and the Great Depression. Meanwhile, my greatest victory has been over Mike Tyson on Mike Tyson’s Punchout, many, many years ago when the old school Nintendos were en vogue. I am of the firm belief that we need to treat elders with respect. Not because I’m that nice of a guy, but because they’ve whipped tougher men than my generation before breakfast. And, their breakfast probably could have beaten up my breakfast too. Mind-exploding strong coffee vs. a Diet Cherry Limeade? Yeah, we have gotten soft alright. Too soft.

But I think the love is still there. That’s what matters most.

So, you know, that’s really the genesis of what I’m getting at. Your family is your family. Whether it is your grandparents, parents, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, cousins, nieces or nephews.. What you have in life are the people who are your own. Granted, some people don’t. Orphans. People who were abused. And, for that I am sorry, but the rest of us are lucky. We have blood. We have those people, those memories. That’s something that should not be taken lightly.

Among my people, I am a Blackfeet Indian, our society is highly familial. Often communal. Friends aren’t just friends, they are like brothers and sisters. Your aunts and uncles are almost like parents. Your immediate family are basically an extension of yourself. Turning your back on a parent or sibling is almost like killing a part of your own soul. It’s the highest form of treachery. Of treason. That is something we should all understand. That no matter how far away you are, no matter what the distance or time is, somewhere out there in this world there is an extension of yourself. Of your blood. Of your soul.

You are connected whether you like it or not.

There is this movie starring Patrick Swayze and Charlie Sheen called “Red Dawn.” It’s set in the mid-80’s during the Cold War. In it the Soviet Union attacks the United States and occupies a part of the country. Swayze and Sheen are two brothers who escape with some friends and attempt to survive up in the mountains. In the end, when these brothers are in a desperate situation, Swayze, the older one, looks over at his little brother and say’s “It’s hard being brothers, isn’t it?.” That reminds me of my family. Of my Uncles, my brothers, my cousins. On both sides of my family. Family is an odd thing. We can be so ambivalent towards each other. Fight. Argue. Rarely talk. But if somebody else messes with us, than you can be sure everybody will be there to fight back. That’s the way it is. Maybe the way it should be. But having family comes with a responsibility. The responsibility to stay in touch. To love. To forgive. To allow yourself to be both strong and vulnerable. So is it really that hard to be brothers?

Yes it is.

But I think that is a good thing.
post comment

Bosnia: An Exercise In Moral Authority [28 Feb 2006|05:05am]
This is a paper I wrote about the situation in Bosnia after the end of the Cold War. In the mid-90's we saw a nation, the former Yugoslavia, break apart and we had a region, Bosnia, nearly destroy itself. I address the situation from an international relations standpoint. I argue that humanitarian interventions are a valid aspect of American Foreign Policy. If you remember, George W. Bush disdained nation-building during the run up to the 2000 elections, yet now he embraces it in Iraq. American involvement in Bosnia was quite an unpopular action for the Clinton Administration domestically. There are a few different ways to categorize ideologies in foreign policy. I am both a realist, meaning that I believe in Realpolitik or power politics and the U.S. protecting it's own interests, and a social constructivist, meaning that I also believe in certain values such as human rights being incorporated in foreign policy decisions. I also probably fall into a liberal view of foreign policy as well, which I have to stress is not what you probably think it is. The term "liberal" as defined by the American Far-Right is not applicable to what I am talking about. Being a foreign policy liberal is a wide swath that consists of a belief in institutions. This means that I am a believer in multilateral actions, and diplomacy. For example, NATO was utilized in the Bosnian peacekeeping mission, now that is a liberal policy as defined by traditional foreign policy standards. So anyway, I want you all to consider the use of American interests, human rights and multilateral institutions and think about that as you read this. I go in depth and analyze the Bosnian situation here, yet I believe it is highly readable and isn't to heady even for people who are not well-versed in foreign policy or this particular situation. Finally, I would like you all to think about the United States and our moral role in the world. Consider the Darfur region of Sudan, Chechnya-Russia, the Arabic-Israel conflict, Pakistan-India-Kashmir and begin formulating your own opinions. I hope you all like this. Thanks. -Bill

BOSNIA: AN EXERCISE IN MORAL AUTHORITY

PREFACE: TWO JOURNEYS
June-July 1993
July 1995

The Woods To Tuzla

On the soccer field they lay
we imagine counting clouds
laughter smiling their sunny eyes

We are in the woods to Tuzla
our brothers and fathers left behind
to sleep where games are played

We are thousands all alone
silent cries in the Balkan wind
tinged scarlet by restless ghosts

- Bill Wetzel


Fear is exquisite. Sometimes it grips you inside. Compels you to ignore everything else. In June 1993, I was chosen to represent the state of Montana on an all-star cultural exchange wrestling team that would compete in Bulgaria. The anxiety of competition is exhilarating. I always thrived on it. However, traveling from Frankfurt, Germany to Sofia, Bulgaria, in what amounted to little more than a flying lawnmower holds a certain kind of trepidation that a farm kid from Montana is not used to dealing with. Rather than sit, white-knuckles clasped to my arm rests, I chose to relish my fear, to revel in it, because as any combat athlete can tell you, consternation is a tool. One that can be beneficial, as long as you do not let the demons overcome you.

You can even learn to relax in their midst.

So I was tranquil, mid-way through the flight when the pilot of one of Balkan Air’s finest soaring lawnmowers banked off into a different direction. Initially, I was curious at this. Why couldn’t we continue our trip in a straight line? However, the riddle escaped my mind when we landed in Sofia and began the whirlwind that accompanies a destination’s arrival. Money exchange. Hotel room check in. Unpacking. Dinner. Only later did I find out that our plane had to change course so we did not invade the airspace of the former Yugoslavia.

A country which had been destroying itself for the better part of two years.

While I was overseas, I never gave much thought to Bosnia, Serbia or Croatia. Nor did I hear much about it, even though at times my team was only a few hundred miles from some of the fighting. To us, the Balkan conflict still seemed as if it were on the other side of the world. Far away from sharp, snow-capped mountains and sprouting wheat fields. From dusty pick up trucks and musty, sweaty gyms. At the time, I only knew what existed in my life. I only knew about rodeos, wrestling tournaments, small towns and Indian reservations. My home, my dreams and my goals. And, in early July, as I escaped back to Montana, fresh full of stories and experiences from the other side of the world, I never gave the Balkan turmoil any more thought than I had while I was there. But I should have. Because the conflict there continued to escalate and a few years after I had left that part of the world, tragedy would strike.

The worst genocide the world had seen since World War Two.

On July 6th, 1995, the Bosnian Serb forces, under the direction of General Ratko Mladic, began shelling the Muslim enclave of Srebrenica. Within four days the Bosnian Serbs had taken the city and held around 400 Dutch peacekeepers hostage. Over the course of the next week, the world stood by as Mladic’s forces murdered thousands of Bosnian Muslims. Rounding the people up in buses, herding the men onto a soccer field and slaughtering them in massive numbers. The woods on the way to the city of Tuzla were filled with thousands of desperate men trying to reach safety.

Desperate to survive.

I am haunted by the thought of those men in those woods. Having lost everything. Family. Friends. Loved ones. Their ancestral homes. Running from a monolithic enemy bent on eradicating them from the face of the earth. I wonder what it was like for the people of Srebrenica as this was going on? What was their fear like? Hiding in those woods, frightened beyond words. Perhaps overcome with grief. Gripped by fear. Did it compel them to ignore everything else? To relish the thought of survival. Those times when consternation is a driving force, when they know they must go on, because there are demons marching behind them. Demons that will stop at nothing to overcome them.

And, they cannot relax while in their midst.
_____________
FAILURE TO ACT
1991-94

From 1992 to 1993, the former Yugoslavia destroyed itself. A country which proudly hosted the 1984 Winter Olympics in Sarejevo had been reduced to a shell of its former self. The death of Communist strongman, Josip Broz Tito, and the waning of the Cold War gave rise to several different leaders within Yugoslavia, however by 1989, the 600 year anniversary of the Battle of Kosovo Field, a Serbian Nationalist named Slobodan Milosevic had begun to garner power.

The Battle of Kosovo Field, in which the Serbs were defeated by the Turks in 1389, was shamelessly and maliciously exploited by Milosevic, who gathered several hundred thousand Serbs at the battlefield site for the anniversary. His nationalist rhetoric gave him unchallengeable standing in Serbia and this strength appeared ready to either break Yugoslavia apart or to make Serbs the dominant force in the country. Yet, in Croatia, a budding Croat nationalist and Yugoslav Army General, Franjo Tudjman was also on the rise, and his movement had aspirations of independence, which they eventually declared in 1991.

Facing the threats of both Serb and Croat nationalism, Bosnian Muslims, and their leader Alija Izetbegovic, fomented their own form of nationalism, which gave emphasis to the religious element. Eventually these actions devolved into full scale war, and by the time Bosnia was recognized as an independent state in April 1992, the new country had already been under attack for a month by Serbian forces. The siege of Bosnian towns by Serbian forces, including paramilitary, continued over the course of the next year, with little resistance and maladroit attempts at outside intervention by Western countries. By the end of 1993, Bosnia had been destroyed, as they also had fought against Croat forces who were looking to annex part of Bosnia for their own long-term interests.

During this timeframe, specifically at the beginning of 1992, former U.S. Secretary of State, Cyrus Vance, was able to get an agreement to stop the fighting in Croatia, and had secured the deployment of 12,500 peacekeepers, however the U.N. presence was passive in these territories and did little to prevent atrocities from being committed. Serbian forces often defied and intimidated peacekeepers, and it wasn’t until the massacre at Srebrenica before the world’s supreme superpower, the United States, which had been reluctant up until this point, could no longer avoid involvement.

So how did the situation in the Balkans become so desperate in the first place? What allowed the type of tensions to escalate and to level of destruction that occurred? In his diplomatic memoir, “To End A War” former U.N. Ambassador Richard Holbrooke, the chief architect of the Dayton Peace Agreement, outlines 5 reasons why the West allowed Yugoslavia to devolve into the level of chaos and destruction that it did. The factors he outlines are: a misinterpretation of Balkan history, inadequate American response to the conflict, the internal conflicts of the Yugoslav political leaders, end of the Cold War, and the mistaken notion that the Europeans could handle the challenge by themselves.

With the misinterpretation of Balkan history, the predominant Western view was the former Yugoslavia was destined to fall into chaos due to ancient hatreds between ethnic and religious groups. The deft exploitation of nationalism by especially Milosevic, but also Tudjman and Izetbegovic, only served to perpetuate this concept. In particular, U.S. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Colin Powell, was quite successful in convincing President Bill Clinton that it was pointless to become involved in the Balkan conflicts. However, this misreading of history, is an oversimplification of the many forces that tore the country apart. It wasn’t until President Clinton had concluded that other political factors, mainly the exploitation of nationalistic anger, were among the reasons for the violence that U.S. involvement became inevitable. No doubt some groups in the former Yugoslavia harbored deep seated anger and resentment toward each other, but not to the extent that was wrongly accepted as fact. Since 1389, the groups, who have no noticeable physical differences, had lived together and widely intermarried. Until the political leadership exploited nationalism and the republic was broken up, many did not even know the religion or ethnicity of their friends and neighbors.

At the time that the Balkan conflicts were becoming serious, in the spring of 1991, the U.S. had just defeated Iraq in the first Gulf War and had been dealing with the collapse of the Soviet Union. The George H.W. Bush administration was also divided on this issue. Secretary of State, James Baker didn’t believe the U.S. could produce a serious dialogue between the Yugoslav parties at the time, and later he would famously take a realpolitik stance stating: “We don’t have a dog in this fight.” The Bush Administration, weary and possibly hurting from problems on the domestic front, refused to commit American power early on in the crisis. This would prove to be an egregious error which wasted an opportunity for peace and a chance to save lives. The Bush administration, as exemplified by Baker, saw no advantage in an American intervention, which, in turn, made the human rights aspect even more dangerous. From that point on, several more wars occurred in the Balkans, hundreds of thousands of lives were lost and two million more were displaced.

The Yugoslav leaders themselves were products of their time and place in history. In 1980, after the death of Tito, the autocratic leader, this country of 6 republics, 5 nations, 4 languages, and 3 religions, did not have a strong, designated successor. Instead, the central presidency was rotated every year within the 6 republics and, for a while, the region of Kosovo. Amidst a variety of domestic problems, deft leaders, most prominently Milosevic, were able to rally people with extreme nationalistic rhetoric. And, other leaders followed suit, at least to a certain degree. So as the U.S. and Europe remained disengaged, Milosevic was able to gather power and exploit the political situation. Those who wanted Yugoslavia to remain a multiethnic state or work out some other peaceful arrangement were run off or silenced. This situation escalated into a full blown crisis before any of the Western powers knew what was going on.

Further complicating the matter, was the end of the Cold War. As Yugoslavia faced serious crises, much of it was masked to rest of the world. Against this backdrop, the Berlin Wall was torn down and Germany became unified. The United States repelled Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, the Soviet Union split up into various republics and Communism was choking out it’s last gasps of air in Central Europe. As the world was preparing for a new post-Cold War order, the Balkan conflicts were largely neglected.
The last factor that Holbrooke outlined was the attempt of Europe to handle their first major post-Cold War problem on their own. The United States handed the security issue solely over to the Europeans. The Bush Sr. Administration, stellar in most post-Cold War foreign policy challenges, again made a major error in giving Europe so much responsibility. Without American leadership, Europe was rudderless and unable to act like a unified power. NATO, the most important Atlantic institution, should have handled the Balkan crisis, yet with it’s most important member disengaged, the post-Cold War purpose of the institution, which was to end the type of conflict that Yugoslavia had become, was severely undermined. Europe, believing they could resolve the situation on their own, was completely ineffective. Any attempts at diplomacy and subsequent agreements made the situation even more volatile. Eventually in December 1991, Germany recognized Croatia as an independent nation. This created a situation in which Bosnia would have to follow suit and declare independence as well. Which they, of course, did. This led to a chain of events that hastened the war in Bosnia. Soon after came the Vance agreement and the feeble U.N. peacekeeping mission that proved unable to stop some of the worst atrocities of the entire conflict.

NATO ACTION, DAYTON AND THE AFTERMATH
July 11, 1995 -Present

On the day that Srebrenica fell, NATO planes were finally given permission to strike, however after hitting two Serb tanks they were forced to pull back as Mladic’s forces threatened to kill the Dutch peacekeeping soldiers. Srebrenica was a dark day for the United Nations, one of the blackest moments in their history, as the institution failed to perform properly in a major crisis. 11 days after the massacre, the presidents of Bosnia and Croatia met and signed on agreement for military cooperation. Soon the Croatians mounted a well-planned and executed offensive, taking back the entire Croatian Krajina region from the Serbs. This devastated Serb morale in Bosnia; emboldened by the dramatic turn of events, Western governments began preparing for a new diplomatic initiative. Finally, after a Serb mortar attack on Sarejevo on August 28, the U.N. and NATO issued an ultimatum to Mladic; he was to remove his artillery from the Sarajevo “exclusion zone” or face the consequences. When he refused, NATO deployed a Reaction force equipped with artillery on Mt. Igman outside Sarejevo and conducted bombing raids for two weeks, with only one brief cessation. While this was going on Bosnian and Croatian forces combined to make dramatic military gains in northwestern Bosnia.

This possibility of a Serbian military defeat led to an American-led diplomatic initiative. This initiative concluded with a 3-week long session conducted at a U.S. Air Force base in Dayton, Ohio. Finally after intense negotiations, a general agreement was announced in Dayton on November, 21 1995. This was later formalized and signed as a treaty in December. The Dayton Accord amounted to what historian Noel Malcolm called a “de facto partition,” which led to the secession of the Serb Republic. The general agreement also consisted of a new constitution, various mechanisms to protect human rights, return of refugees, economic rebuilding, and a deployment of 60,000 troops, under NATO authority to ensure the quelling of hostilities.

For the United States, the implementation of the Dayton Accord, would prove to be unpopular domestically. While the public cheered the diplomatic effort, polls showed that 70 percent opposed deployment of American troops. In fact, this proved to be the most unpopular decision of President Bill Clinton’s first term. Congress itself, always ambivalent to action in Bosnia had mixed results after Dayton as well. While Clinton was committed to deploy 20,000 American troops, which he would do whether Congress approved or not, some members played both sides of the issue pledging to oppose the action, but support the troops. In this fashion, troop deployment received tacit approval from Congress.

Europe, on the other hand was mixed, too. Pleased that progress had been made and a cease to hostilities had occurred, Europe was still taken aback by the events. Europeans offered gratefulness for U.S. leadership, yet some officials were also embarrassed that they could not handle the challenge on their own. Moreover, lead negotiator Richard Holbrooke, dubbed the “Quentin Tarantino of diplomacy” rubbed some European colleagues the wrong way with his pushy image and bulldozer style. And, indeed, it appears in many ways that the United States, because of it’s hegemony and institutional power, is still more of a European power than Europe itself. Yet Bosnia, also gives credence to the argument that we do not live in a unilateral world, as NATO’s role in the effort was essential, especially in the deployment of two-thirds of the troops agreed upon under the Dayton Accord.

In the summer of 2005, ten years after the massacre at Srebrenica, 4,000 Muslims have returned to the city and over one-third of about 12,000 Serbs have left. Bosnia has not been carved up into two countries and economic and political ties between ethnic groups are strengthening. Bosnia appears to have become a place where peace has taken hold, not just an enforced cease fire. Although, it still is probably too early to tell for sure. Bosnia probably cannot become a multiethnic society as long as Ratko Mladic is on the loose, or Radovan Karadzic, another Serb War Criminal. The NATO mission is now predominantly a European Union one, with fewer than 200 American troops deployed. However, when American troops were initially deployed after Dayton, they were widely expected to take casualties, and, remarkably, in the ten years since not one American has been killed in Bosnia.

FINAL THOUGHTS
A foreign policy Realist, such as Henry Kissinger, might look at the Bosnian crisis and think that only an idealist would get involved. There is no obvious power play in doing so. At first glance, there are no security issues. But, I am of the notion that humanitarian interventions are valid aspects of foreign policy. For example, I believe that decisive action against the genocide currently being committed in the Darfur region of Sudan would save tens of thousands of lives. Human rights do have a place in foreign policy as the moral equivalent of pure unadulterated power. Nothing is more powerful than human life. And, if we had acted sooner in Bosnia we could have saved hundreds of thousands. On the positive side, if not for our actions, belated as they were, two million refugees would be wondering aimlessly, hundreds of thousands of more lives would have been lost, and Al-Qaeda, which our troop presence removed from Bosnia, would have set up roots in the Balkans.

The United States is still the most respected power in the Balkans, and with our continued involvement there we can ensure peace in the region. However, the job isn’t finished. What happens when peacekeepers leave? Will the tensions arise again? Will nationalism be exploited. Nobody truly knows the answer to these questions. Not until the time comes for troops to leave the Balkans to themselves. Only history will be the judge of that. In the meantime, the U.S. cannot shy away from it’s own moral authority. Early outside action will be needed to stop other challenges. More genocide will occur. More pain. More death. The world is an untidy place, one full of difficulties. Of course, there will be another Bosnia. There will also be another chance to stop it too.

And, for this, American leadership will always be required.
________________________________________________________________________


Sources: “To End A War” by Richard Holbrooke (Novel)

“Bosnia: A Short History” by Noel Malcolm (Novel)

“The Clinton Wars” by Sidney Blumenthal (Novel)

“Was Bosnia Worth It” by Richard Holbrooke (WA Post op-ed, July 19, 2005)

“Bill and Jim On Bosnia” an e-mail conversation between myself and military historian, Dr. James Dixon, a former Marine and member of Veterans For Peace
post comment

Stupid is as Stupid does [24 Dec 2005|12:05pm]
AS FORREST GUMP’S MOM WOULD SAY:”STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES”

LOL! IMHO, dis is dum!!!!

For those of you who don’t know what the hell, I just said, you are probably of a generation that actually wrote stuff out by hand, on paper and with a pen or pencil. How quaint is that? I admire your archaic sensibilities, it’s cute really. For I am of a generation, which routinely butchers the beautiful art we call the English language in e-mails, text messages, chat rooms and online message boards.

So what was that elfin gibberish I was typing anyway?

I was incredulously “laughing out loud” while saying, “In my humble opinion, this is dumb.” What exactly is so dumb, you ask? Good question, I’ll be sure to tell you.

I was reading a column by Miami Herald’s Pulitzer Prize winning columnist, Leonard Pitts, in which he talked about how a cell phone company in Great Britain has acquired the services of a former English professor to create text message synopses of great literature. This is to be used as a study aid for college students….

Huh?

The idea is to turn great English literature -Chaucer, Milton, Dickens… Shakespeare, no not Shakespeare!!!!!- into exactly the type of short hand that I was using at the beginning of this column. Pitts uses a stunning example, where “To be or not to be, that is the question” would conceivably become, “2b? Nt2b? = ???” To that I can only say: “WTF?”

Which to you laypeople out there translates to: “What the Fuck?”

Not exactly artful, but the eff word does seem appropriate.

You know what, I’m a time challenged college student. When I can’t read something in full, I just skim it. I skimmed Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” and Plato’s “Republic,” both in short order and managed to do well on tests afterward. Butchering the words of writers is not a study aid, it’s downright blasphemy, and doesn’t need to be done. There is no possible way to get the same appreciation of the work in that way, nor does it effectively make it a better study tool, than even say the Wetzelonian skim method.

That’s not even mentioning how foolishly easy Cliff’s notes are!!!!


The only effect this has is the continuation of the process of dumbing down Western societies. It’s a shortcut to stupidity. A stupidity that Westerners, and especially us Americans, seem to embrace quite a bit nowadays. It doesn’t matter whether it’s fast-food news, cultural and social ignorance, trite films or massacring language, we just seem to get dumber and dumber every day. And we like it to boot! I have heard people brag about effectively being incognizant. But the individual aspect isn’t even the problem.

The problem is that it’s an overall trend.

For years people have worried about the concept of the educated in our country. What will happen when the educated run into fields in which there is an influx of highly skilled, trained and educated people? The idea is that you’ll have people with Master’s degrees being forced to sweep floors and sell hot dogs for a living. The other side of that is that technology will become a massive Leviathan which will overcome manual labor and similar jobs. The concept is that a monkey can do it, so why can’t a machine?

Damn, you better get educated in that case!

So we are in a crux in which we feel damned either way. If you don’t get an education, then your job will be obsolete and at sometime you will be replaced by technology and out of luck. Yet, if we as a society get too educated, people with degrees will be jobless anyway. In these views, everything is a total mess.

However, neither is all that valid of a problem.

Sure, in some cases both do occur, but that’s the beauty of America, we can adapt. If a person loses their job because of technology they can often get trained for something else. If somebody has a degree or degrees and can’t get a job in a certain field, they are often skilled enough to do many things. It isn’t ideal but it works. But, where the stupidization of America fits into all of this, is what highlights the big problem.

We are making everything so easy, that it’s creating a socioeconomic chasm.

It’s why Chinese and Indian software engineers are able to design programs that teach an illiterate American hick to push buttons with French Fry symbols on them at McDonald’s, so reading and arithmetic isn’t an actual skill they need to hold down a job. We are slowly devolving into absolute idiocy while the rest of the world, specifically India and China, are challenging themselves to be smarter and better.

Lagging behind the curve is bad enough, but actually trying to stay there is lunacy.

We should be challenging ourselves to use our immense intellectual capacities. For leadership. For innovation. At the very least, for enrichment. Instead we decide to lower the bar, lower and lower and lower. Placing great literature into text shorthand is just one part of it. As we begin our trip into the 21st century, we should be going into a different direction, instead stupidity has become en vogue.

And, that is dumb, dumb, dumb!

LOL, I ment dum, dum, dum!!!!

Now, I’m going to spend my day reading a book the old fashioned way.
With regular, dull, old words! Call me quaint, cute and archaic now! I might even start using, honest to goodness pens and paper someday soon. Wouldn’t that be something?

TTYL! (talk to you later)
post comment

MT Senator Conrad Burns Caught Up In Abramoff Probe [27 Nov 2005|07:42am]
Montana Republican Senator Conrad Burns Is Part of Casino Jack Abramoff Scandal

Ok everybody,
It appears that good ol' Conrad "Con Job" Burns, quite possibly the most corrupt member of the Senate, has been caught up in the Jack Abramoff probe, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Abramoff is the uber-lobbyist and Republican culture of corruption poster boy, who was caught bilking Indian tribes out of millions of dollars with his partner Michael Scanlon. This is far reaching. Some Dem senators are even on the outer edges of this thing. The big problem for Republicans is that Abramoff is a good friend of Texas Congressman Tom DeLay and, Scanlon is a former DeLay aide. From there, because of DeLay's narrowing of focus and insistence on Republican power, even using his power to force lobbying firms to hire Republicans rather than Dems, this Scandal largely encompasses the Conservative rank and file. So it's really a disease far-reaching within the Republican party and that is a major concern for them.

The problem for Democrats is that the Indian Affairs Committee is chaired by Arizona Republican John McCain, who has shown little interest in fully investigating and prosecuting his own Republican colleagues. He's shown how benign his supposed "independence" was with his performance as a member of the Robb-Silberman WMD commission. There McCain nearly single-handedly had the focus taken off of the misuse of WMD raw data by the Bush Administration and white washed this into the status quo view that it was purely an intelligence data. So, McCain may be in the process of rigging the game enough or at least slowing the process to the point, so that his Republican colleagues will not go down en masse in scandal. This would hurt both McCain politically with his own party and take the Republican party down for a great many years. So, be wary of any great expectations on this. One thing you can almost always ensure is that when big-time politics and big money is involved the truth has a way of not being found. How much will be turned up this time?

That's anybody's guess as of right now.


Montana Senator Conrad Burns is part of Abramoff probe.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/112605A.shtml
post comment

Republicans Pull A Shameless Stunt [20 Nov 2005|03:30am]
House Republicans Pull Shameless Stunt


Friday on the floor of the House of Representatives, House Republicans pulled a stunt of unmitigated gall. And for these shameless bastards, that is saying something!

Ok, so here is the deal. On November 18, Pennslyvania Democratic Congressman Jack Murtha, a former Marine and veteran of both the Korean War and Vietnam, called Bush's war in Iraq a "flawed policy wrapped in illusion." He then advocated pulling all of our troops out of Iraq, among other suggestions. (for his actual speech I will attach video and also paste a link to the text of his remarks.)

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/pa12_murtha/pr051117iraq.html

What makes this significant is that Congressman Murtha voted for the Iraq war and is one of the leading and most respected foreign policy voices in Washington. So immediately he was attacked by Vice President Dick Cheney, who Murtha promptly said this about: "I like guys who've never been there that criticize us who've been there. I like that. I like guys who got five deferments and never been there and send people to war, and then don't like to hear suggestions about what needs to be done."

Then yesterday on the House floor, Ohio Republican Congresswoman, Jean Schmidt, the junior member of Congress, was forced to withdraw comments that she made by implying that Jack Murtha was a "coward." Schmidt had earlier shamed herself by passing on a message she received for Ohio State Senator and Marine Reservist, Danny Bubp, who is a known Republican stooge who helped Schmidt smear her previous Democratic opponent Paul Hackett, who is a veteran of the most recent war in Iraq. Schmidt's statement consisted of this message from Bubp: "He also asked me to send Congressman Murtha a message, that cowards cut and run, Marines never do." She was immediately shouted down, and in a rare occurence forced to withdraw those comments, as I said earlier.

Then California Republican Duncan Hunter forced a vote on an amendment to withdraw all the troops from Iraq immediately, with no plan or any thought whatsoever. Hunter and the House Republicans then tried to equate this amendment with Congressman Murtha, who has a more detailed plan for redeployment, and use this as a wedge to get House Democrats on the record as voting for a simple "cut and run" amendment. It was pure theater. A shameless ploy from a shameless band of cowards, who make it a priority to play politics with the lives of Americans in uniform, while refusing to hold the White House accountable for any type of plan to win the Iraq war or a viable exit strategy.

But, there is more to this than the political theater that occured in the House this past Friday. Because, for those of us who thought invading Iraq was a bad idea and have since criticized the poor execution of the war, Jack Murtha has touched on and lent his expertize to some issues that we have always been concerned with. For more on my opinion on this nearly two and a half years ago, read this column that I wrote questioning this administration's ability to deal with the aftermath of the Iraq War. http://wildcat.arizona.edu/papers/96/136/03_3.html

Going into Iraq was Mission Impossible at best. The country consists of 25 million people split into three groups, Shi'a Arabs, Sunni Arabs and Kurds. An elementary fact that President Bush apparently didn't even know 6 weeks before going to war in Iraq. (A prominent Iraqi-American had to tell this to President Dumbass at a WH Super Bowl Party in 2003) The minority Sunnis historically repressed both the minority Kurds and the majority Shi'a. Thousands of years of authoritarian rule also make democracy a foreign idea to Iragis and, in fact, in the Middle East, often tough authoritarian leadership is much more respected than any other. As in the case of Saddam, you had a brutal dictator who was able to impose a relatively secure society in one which now is full of tumult and chaos. Often in history, such as during the Cold War, authoritarian leaders such as a Saddam in Iraq or a Tito in the former Yugoslavia, are the only thing that holds a society together and keeps ethnic, religious and racial tensions from exploding. Witness the events of a decade ago in in Bosnia, Serbia and Croatia. Now, my former professor, David Dunford worked in Iraq on the reconstruction after the initial war phase, and he told me a few years ago that Iraqis took to liberal democratic issues very quickly. So yes, many there do want democracy. And, it is capable of being done in some form. But, the point is, you cannot account for security in an environment where everything in the society has been imploded. And, you cannot account for security when you are not willing to commit the resources or the troop levels to do so. Even at that the outcome would be in doubt.

This administration steadfastly refused to look at planning from the State Department, the Army War College and other sources. They choose to see their own reality in which troops would be welcomed with open arms and everything would fall in place nice and easy. The refused to listen to military experts such as General Eric Shinseki, who advised using an overwhelming invasion force with hundreds of thousands of troops. The refused the advice of former National Security advisors such as General Brent Scowcroft (Bush, Sr) and Zbigniew Brzezinski (Jimmy Carter) who have consistently advocated more troops and warned against the possibility of a civil war. When Coalition Provisional Authority head, General Jay Garner balked at privatizing the Iraqi economy, he was replaced with L. Paul "Jerry" Bremer, who felt it was more important to write intellectual property into Iraqi law and ensure that American companies would be involved in divvying up energy assets, than to say, oh, rebuild the country and finish winning the war.

This whole situation has been a fiasco from the beginning, whether this administration was ginning up reasons to go to war, alienating our friends and allies, or completely blowing the execution of the war. Anybody who has a remote, miniscule knowledge of the Middle East could have told this administration this war and the democratization of Iraq would be difficult. They didn't want to listen. Now we are faced with an unlimited occupation in a hostile country, a situation that cannot be won militarily, over 15,000 American casualties, 200 billion dollars already down a rathole and still no viable plan to get troops out or win the situation. They refuse to understand that Iraq has fell into a lower grade civil war and that worldwide terrorism has increased exponentially since they executed this ill-fated idea.

Jack Murtha sees this reality. He has questions. I do to. So do millions of Americans, most who do not support this war anymore. Congressman Murtha said in his speech the other day that the American people are way ahead of the curve on this issue, that it's the politicians in Washington that don't get it. So will this reality fall upon deaf ears as usual? Will they do something about it?

Or will we continue to piss billions away and see thousands more of our finest citizens maimed and killed before the powers that be in all their infinite petty wisdom see the light?

I say expect Americans to be in Iraq for at least another decade, and probably for the rest of my life in some, way, shape or form. I say that our soldiers dying and leaders lying will continue as long as this President is in the White House. By then he'd have fucked it up so badly that we'll have to leave in shame or continue on his same disastrous "What, me worry?" Alfred E. Newman inspired path.

But, I am a cynical bastard, but who could blame me for that anymore.
________________________________________________________________________

Here are clips of Murtha's speech and also the shameless Republican stunt from this past friday. They are taken from a post one Democratic Underground, by Nothing Without Hope, the clips are courtesy of liveoaktx.
John Murtha (D-PA) House Floor Speech Nov 18 (C-SPAN)]

Windows media, in FIVE PARTS:

Part 1: http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/murthanov1805floorsp...

Part 2: http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/murthanov1805part2.w...

Part 3; http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/murthanov1805part3.w...

Part 4: http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/murthanov1805partfou...

Part 5: http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/murthapart5nov1805.w...

Also see:

Outrageous attempt to GOP attempt to call the fake resolution "The Murtha Resolution" - the Speaker says it's a matter of debate! Shouts ensue and finally the Speaker is forced to admit that the resolution being discussed is NOT the Murtha Resolution but the Hunter Resolution:
http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/buyernov1805wrongres...

And to keep them together,

Dennis Kucinich's magnificent, impassioned speech on the GOP stunt/ fake resolution:
http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/kucinichnov18republi...

And Henry Waxman's:
http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/waxmanrepublicanstun...

And Jim McGovern's:
http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/mcgovernmurthanotafr...

And Mel Watt's (speaking on behalf of the Congressional Black Caucus):
http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/wattnov1805stunt.wmv

And Nancy Pelosi's - ABSOLUTELY DO NOT MISS THIS ONE!!!:
http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/pelosinov1805stunt.w...

(There are many more at the Can-o-fun site)

And let's not leave out some of the slimy Republicans from this compilation:

Duncan Hunter (the author of the fake resolution the GOP attempted to attribute to Rep. Murtha):
http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/duncanhunternov1805....

The ineffable Jean Schmidt:
http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/schmidtrepublicanstu...

And to top it off, a brief but very nasty smear job from Rep. Kingston:
http://www.canofun.com/blog/videos/kingstonnov1805.wmv

The Can-o-Fun home page is here: http://www.canofun.com/blog/default.asp
(Click on "more" at the bottom of the few video clips on the right side to go into the pages of archives. Those above and more are currently on the first page.)
post comment

Indian Series: Is Political Change Inevitable? [05 Oct 2005|07:34pm]
Indian Series: Part Three

I should mention before the article starts that I do not believe political change is inevitable, but in this column, it suggests that I do. I have been criticized for that apparent contradiction, so I'll clear it up here and now. What I mean is that changes come and go. Often progress is made and then somebody else comes along and changes it back to the status quo. Or worse. Inevitability means that not only will change happen, but it implies a permanence to it. Permanent, positive, political change for American Indians is not inevitable, however it is possible. It's just not easy. In Plato's Republic, Thrasymachus argues that justice is whatever the people in power want it to be. That power is the most important thing. People tend to do what we do out of self-concern. A shepherd protects his sheep not because he cares for them, but because they are his livelihood and it benefits him. In Thomas Hobbe's Leviathan, Hobbes argues that man's nature is perpetual war and self-preservation. That man will do whatever we can do out of greed and survival. Plato, however, would tell them that knowledge and wisdom are more important than power. That there are forms, ones that stand for something better, more beautiful and more spectacular than can be imagined. Happiness. Beauty. Everything that is good. But, it takes great knowledge and wisdom to reach this level. There is something great out there. Something better. It isn't easy to accomplish, for nearly everyone it is impossible, yet we can catch glimpses of it. So, no, political change is not inevitable, it is difficult, nearly impossible. Power elites and selfishness are tough to overcome. But, with hard work it can be done. That is what I am getting at. Hope you all enjoy this. -Bill

IS POLITICAL CHANGE INEVITABLE?

Political change is not inevitable. Not from the standpoint of progress, anyway. But there are a couple different phases to this question. First, in terms of the structure of tribal government and then next in terms of civil action, whether progressive or regressive. I will focus on progressiveness when I get to that part.

I do not think that tribal government structure will be changing anytime soon. Since the 1970s Congress has been much more willing to accept tribal autonomy, with the passage of the “Indian Self-Determination and Educational Assistance Act,” which allowed tribes to take control in managing their own housing, law-enforcement, education, health, social service, and community development programs. Later on, the “Indian Child Welfare Act” and the “American Indian Religious Freedom Act” furthered strengthened the governments position on tribal cultural rights.

There is an entrenched bureaucracy in place, on the federal, state, tribal and community levels. A major change in this system will not happen anytime soon. Nor am I sure there should be a change in this system. Other than efficiency and service improvement. One possible change in tribal governments could eventually come with the dilution of the tribal members blood. Then you would have to see about opening membership to descendants or other alternatives. That would effect the political landscape I’m sure.

One other possible change you may see is the ideology of deregulation and privatization. Politically, would tribes allow this to happen to their resources and services? Some might. I know the Bush administration has been interested in privatizing BIA schools for a few years now, as well as the utilities - electricity and water - of tribal members. Were tribal leaders to become free-market ideologues you would see a massive shift in political power on reservations. Reservations would lose autonomy to private interests in this case.

In terms of civil action, however, a lot of political change is on the horizon. It may not be inevitable but it is coming along. In the 60s and 70s, such acts as the “Indian Civil Rights Act” and the “Economic Opportunity Act” were passed, giving tribes funds for judicial systems, Head Start, Upward Bound and other development programs. With the monetary power that casinos provide, politicians are forced to take notice of tribes more now than ever. Yet, the activist movements of the 60s and 70s are still providing inspiration.

In Montana, for example, “Indian Education For All” is finally being funded after being past around 25 years ago. Much of this was driven by political change. A new governor, with close ties to Indians, a few prominent Indian State Legislators and the support of state’s tribes. Without political will this change would never have occurred.

I am an activist at heart. I believe in using electoral office and politics as activism. To take that mentality and not just protest, but to make policy. It’s why I am running for office when I go back to Montana. So is political change inevitable? I hope so.
post comment

Indian Series: What Shaped Native American Leadership? [05 Oct 2005|07:08pm]
Indian Series: Part Two

What Shaped Native American Leadership?

I must confess to being a cynic.

My first thought as I sat down to write about the shaping of American Indian leadership was: “We have leaders?” However unfair that may be, I can recall less than two years ago listening to the tribal chairman at the time, a relative of mine, ramble on in an embarrassingly incoherent speech at my grandfather’s funeral. An extremely personable man, he is easy to like, but quite clueless as a public persona and leader. Like too many leaders, both in and out of tribal culture, he has a million dollar personality and a ten cent mind. At least when it comes to leadership and policy. I know that must seem harsh.

Yet, my next thought conjured up the word “necessity.” I would submit that tribal leadership, especially the good leadership, is formed from necessity. Moreover, awareness and years of cultural observation would fit into shaping this individual leader or overall group of leaders. But, I will get to all that a little later.

What truly shaped tribal leadership, in a less introspective definition, is Manifest Destiny. Which was the drive of the U.S. government to conquer and occupy all of what we call the United States, from coast to coast. Because this created an occupied people. People who were subject to physical genocide, and through assimilation, the attempted genocide of their culture. In many ways, because of this colonialism, leaders who are elected to office, do not really know anything or have never done all that much. Reservations are stricken by poverty and other socioeconomic ills. My home county has an aggregate income of 12,000 per year, and a high unemployment rate. It is lucrative to make over 40 grand a year as a tribal councilman(woman), even though you may know little about actual policy, if anything. Leadership becomes a popularity contest.

This is not effective. As many tribal leaders are more influenced by the Bureau of Indian Affairs and state leaders than they are by their own people and socioeconomic situation. American Indian leadership has never fully devolved down to the individual nations, but is still heavily influenced by the original colonial power, which is the U.S. government. Which, of course, doesn’t always have bad intentions, but in this system Indians have never fully developed their own autonomy. They simply do not know how to run themselves properly, at least, many of the individuals in power positions do not. So this brings me back to necessity.

A true leader evolves from the need for change. They are altruistic, progressive and activist minded. Through hard work, education - auto-didactical or higher education-
and on merit they develop the skills to work for their people. Often against criticism. An Indian leader should above all be willing to sacrifice mightily for even the smallest amount of progress. That the situation is bleak should not be a factor for a true leader.

They do what they do because it is necessary.
Somebody has to.
post comment

What is a Nation? Part One of American Indian Series [07 Sep 2005|10:29pm]
Ok, I'm kicking off a 14 part series of columns that I am writing all of which will correlate to American Indians and Indian policy in some manner. -Bill

Part One of American Indian Series

WHAT IS A NATION?

Growing up in the United States, I, by nature, took the concept of a nation for granted. We are spoiled on that idea. The national myth. We are the greatest country on earth. In America, you can come from anywhere and be anything. We are all entitled to, as the Declaration of Independence states, “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.” Americans are taught to take pride in ourselves, our country and what we stand for. We take these concepts as unquestioned truisms. It’s our form of nationalism, except we call it “patriotism.”

This common patriotism is the bedrock concept of what defines our nation.

This myth is our identity.

And, above all, my notion is that a Nation is an identity. At least, in it’s simplest form. At that point, a nation can simply be an idea. But, with that identity, comes the dream of something larger. Think Palestine. Think Israel. These are both people with an identity. Both are Semitic, both have history on the lands they occupy - often religious history- and both have an idea of what an Israeli or Palestinian state can become. In Israel’s case, it is called Zionism, which is essentially their word for nationalism. Palestine adheres to that same identity, whether you call it nationalism, patriotism or Zionism it all amounts to one thing.

An identity.

What happens next are the actions that make history.

That is what makes an identity such an essential element. From that point, a nation can take on many forms. A politically organized nationality, with nationality meaning a national character or, again, an identity. It can become a community of people of the same identity who are defined and bound by territory. Now this is where a nation can get a little sketchy. A nation can also be a large community of various nationalities all put together in one boundary, as is the case in the United States. Often this results in great tumult. As we have seen, during our Civil War, Indian Wars and even, in a way, during our election and legislative processes. Certain demographics often have a great dislike and/or mistrust of each other. It’s often that commonality of nationalism that keeps these disparate parts together. However, loosely that may be.

It’s why blacks can work at the same job next to whites.

Why people from Arizona do not wage war on people from Montana.

So what is nationalism? If patriotism is our nationalism then we must understand the definition of the parent theme. Webster’s defines nationalism as:
“loyalty and devotion to a nation; especially : a sense of national consciousness exalting one nation above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations or supranational groups”
Again, remember that subsets of nationalism include race, ethnic and religious affiliation. Often subsets are linked through a common culture and language. In the same manner that various U.S. immigrant groups and our indigenous people are. However, the overriding theme of our national identity keeps the peace. We also celebrate freedoms and often embrace our myriad cultures. As a result, we have cultural pluralism. Which means that in our nation, you can be an American, and something else. In my case, I am an American, but also a Blackfeet Indian. I can embrace both sides of myself. Be proud of that.

I do not have to be only one or the other.

Our identity allows for both.

Now, look at Iraq, for example. Here you have a tacit constitution, a Shiite majority, historically repressed, and two minority groups, the repressed Kurds and the historically powerful Sunnis. They also break into various sects. None of which can agree. Mainly, you have two groups that would like control, the theocratic Shi’a and the historically dictatorial Sunni, and another, the Kurds, which would like to be autonomous. This is the result of historical disagreements and man-made borders drawn after World War One, which were made with no regard for history, race, ethnic and religious affiliation. So you have a nation that doesn’t have an overriding identity which they all can subscribe to.

You have a conglomeration of tribes and sects.

Which would love to repress each other given the chance.

Indian tribes, such as the Blackfeet, which have a people with a common culture, languages, race and historical homeland, could be considered more of a nation than Iraq. Toss in the relative autonomy a tribe has and you are getting somewhere. Sovereignty, in and of itself, is an idea. So you couple a people with an identity and an idea and that becomes a powerful force. But then again, I am focusing on heritage and ethnic issues. I am also dwelling on boundaries. Maybe in the end a nation’s identity ends up being less a focus of religion, skin color or other cultural concepts? The people of Iraq, Israel, Palestine and even the United States, may be best served in looking past those issues. Because, as an online message board poster informed me a nation may simply be a “people” who have a “mutual interest in a cooperative future.“

And, we all have that same interest in mind.

Without a doubt.
post comment

All Governors should criticize this administration on NG deployment.... [03 Sep 2005|12:41am]
All Governors should criticize this administration on NG deployment....


The state of Louisiana has 35 percent of its National Guard units fighting in an unnecessary, optional war, with no end in sight. It has help perpetuate the slow response to the disaster in NO.

This policy of extending NG units in this manner is damaging to Homeland Security, and disastrous in the case of NOLA.

Now, in order to make up for the depletion of the LA NG, the state has to get commitments from other state's guard forces. What if those other states, already depleted by Iraq and Katrina, have a security problem? They're screwed.

Now, in Montana, for example, nearly 50 percent of the NG are in Iraq and they have a relatively troublesome fire season. Fires in MT this summer were a nagging problem, more so than usual, because of this foolish deployment policy. Bush and the Pentagon have steadfastly refused to rotate MT NG so that they could be in MT during fire season. They also refuse to allow Governor Brian Schweitzer to go over to Iraq and visit his own NG troops. That's off topic, however.

The issue here is, besides Iraq being a dumb and even evil action, the deployment policy of NG troops make states vulnerable to disasters. And, in the event of one, it makes other states even weaker because they have to further deplete their Troops in order to make up for the disaster stricken state not being able to handle the effort on its own. It's stupid. Dumb. And, detrimental to national security. Only a few governors, starting with Schweitzer, have criticized the administration on this. Now, you'll see some more of it, you probably already have. But, every governor - party shouldn't matter because safety goes beyond politics - should be concerned about and vocal on this issue. It is important.

And, essential to national security.
post comment

RATHER, BROKAW AND JENNINGS DIDN’T COME SUPERSIZED WITH FRIES [27 Aug 2005|09:46am]
I put off writing this for a little while while I gathered some thoughts on the topic. I found a lot of the "of an era" talk a little trite. I think Rather, Brokaw and Jennings were flawed just like all of us are, but still men of integrity. It's tough to be in a system that doesn't allow you to take on a giant corporation or revolts against you if you get a little too close to the truth. But, these three men deserve tribute and all did a wonderful job as network anchors and throughout there careers. -Bill

RATHER, BROKAW AND JENNINGS DIDN’T COME SUPERSIZED WITH FRIES

One of my first television memories was watching President Jimmy Carter address the nation one night when I couldn’t have been more than 4 or 5 years old. I recall sitting there, eating spaghetti with parmesan cheese and listening to words I really never understood anything about. Was it about the Iran hostage crisis? It very well could have been. But, I don’t know. I was so young.

I’m not sure.

What I am sure about is that television has had a tremendous impact on the people of my generation. In my three decades on this planet, I have watched cable TV morph into an all-information-all-the-time monolith, in which you have, literally, hundreds of options at any given moment. All one remote click away. Sports. Music. Movies. Comedy. All at your fingertips.

And, then there is news.

The advent of pure news channels going round the clock, every day of every year, has ushered in a new era of information. You can watch news at any time. You can get the weather. Watch Congress on C-Span. Observe trials, such as the O.J. Simpson case, or most recently, Michael Jackson. The news channels make such diverse people as Scott Peterson, Natalee Holloway, and Gary Condit household names. At least for fifteen minutes anyway.

But this isn’t necessarily a good thing.

News has become a form of puffed up entertainment. You can no more trust CNN, MSNBC or, especially, Fox News to give you reality any more than you would expect WWE Smackdown to do so. News as entertainment. Channel after channel after channel. Watered down. Tilted to ideology. Shifting to the winds of polls or ratings. The truth isn’t nearly as important as the bottom line. A fast food version of reporting crammed down your throat quickly, cheaply with as much fattening filler as possible. Bloated. Overweight. With little nutritional value at all.

Salty, greasy, useless infotainment meant for little more than satiety.

Now, in the old days you only had network anchors to bring you your nightly dose of news and information. Giants like Walter Cronkite. John Chancellor. Chet Huntley and David Brinkley. They all helmed positions at the big three networks, ABC, CBS and NBC. Cronkite, in particular, practically invented the whole concept of evening news along with his crew at CBS. He ended his career known as “the most trusted man in America.”

There is something to be said about that.

I grew up in the network era when Dan Rather at CBS, Peter Jennings at ABC and Tom Brokaw at NBC all took over anchor positions and became media giants in their own right. In truth those are the only three network news anchors that I can recall with any accuracy. I would not say that I ever had a preference out of the three either. I loved Rather’s folksiness, his penchant to speak bluntly and his knack for getting into the trenches, whether it was reporting from Vietnam or his interviews with Saddam Hussein. Brokaw, to me, was the quintessential network anchor. Good looks - I heard women call him eye candy - a deep voice us mere mortals could only dream of having, and a charismatic ease with which he did everything, whether is was straight broadcast reporting or a newsmaker interview. Peter Jennings, on the other hand, was the epitome of smooth. Sophisticated. Urbane. He seemed intense, trustworthy and laid back all at once. All three men seemed like family to me.

Like family to millions of homes around the country.

Now, mainstream media has its faults. For example, they all jumped on the Iraq bandwagon. All made erroneous WMD conclusions, when lots of viable information pointed to the right answers. I, personally, know an inside story in which CNN purposely kept vital WMD information off the air, as the Bush Administration was beating the drums of war. Ratings were more important than disproving misinformation or, at worst, a flat-out lie. Network news often suffers from the same status quo driven problems that cable and other Mainstream Media outlets fall victim to or ride shotgun with. They also suffer from Inside-The-Beltway mind rot. A condition that happens when insulated news professionals stay on the inside too long and lose touch with the majority of the American people. When Washington mythology becomes truism.

But, the big three network news anchors always were a little better than that.

Rather, Brokaw and Jennings each put together a formidable body of work. And, in recent years, kept a certain integrity to the newer fast food news process. Most people still get their news from the nightly network broadcasts. Now, understand, that in one half hour a day, in a corporate, status-quo driven system, network anchors cannot give the American public all the right information it deserves, but these three men always did a solid job of it. All should be considered great journalists.

Because they all are.

Since Rather’s retirement last year spurred on by a mistake in verifying documents regarding George W. Bush’s National Guard actions during Vietnam, Brokaw’s retirement, and the recent sad and unfortunate death of Jennings, much waxing has been done over “the end of an era.” However I don’t buy that. The era hasn’t been the same for quite a while. Ideology and opinion is passed off as valid information nowadays. Money and power are greater influences than ever. Integrity in politics and in news coverage has become a lost art in most circles. I do think that soon enough the American people will recognize this and it will get better. Hard work, for sure. But, campaign finance and other common-sense populist issues will have their time with the American people.

Those days will come.

Through it all, network news will still be around. Maybe we won’t have the same icons that we had in the past. No more Cronkites or Brinkleys. Maybe our several hundred channel options are just too much to give us those same trusted household names that feel like part of our family. I do hope that integrity wins out and we get anchors who will do the legacies of all the great ones proud. Maybe we’ll get a woman or a minority news anchor soon, who knows? But we will never get another Dan Rather, another Tom Brokaw and another Peter Jennings again. Not all at the same time, not with the same integrity, star power and voluminous bodies of work that they all built. (personally, you can toss PBS’s Jim Lehrer in there too) So, it isn’t truly the end of an era.

But, something will definitely be missing.

For sure.
post comment

Article by Christopher Green [24 Aug 2005|12:34pm]
This is an op-ed article from the Cleveland Plain Dealer, by a friend of mine named Christopher Green. Chris is an accountant, who has worked on numerous political campaigns in Ohio and even was a Congressional Candidate at one time himself. In recent years he has developed an illness that has forced him to redefine the way he lives his life. This is a touching, well done and written article, but a truly great guy. I'll attach a few paragraphs and the link for you all, as I can't paste the whole thing for you because of copyright purposes. This link is courtesy of my good friend Rev Recluse, DJ extraordinaire, his radio station website is http://www.radioenigma.com/.


Illness begins a mid-life redefinition
Tuesday, August 23, 2005
Christopher Green
In the last months of 2001, a new doctor was examining me, trying to discover why I wasn't responding to asthma treatments, why I kept getting pneumonia and why I always seemed to be exhausted. When a 5-foot-10-inch, 210-pound forty-something man has the lung capacity of a gerbil, something is terribly wrong.

For years I just sloughed off shortness of breath and chronic infections as part of being asthmatic. Pretty annoying but not life threatening. Or so I thought.

That fall and early winter, I faced a fast and furious battery of tests that culminated in a new diagnosis, one that proved my illness was far more serious than asthma. I have bronchiectasis. Within a matter of days of getting the news, I qualified for disability.

http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/othercolumns/index.ssf?/base/opinion/1124789614156910.xml&coll=2
post comment

Kicking the AP's ass, plus Keith Olbermann [22 Aug 2005|10:53pm]
This is what I wrote to the Associated Press about their use of jingoistic terms and warmongering rhetoric with regards to the protests in Crawford, TX, where our fearless Recreationist-In-Chief has promptly set the record for laziest president ever besting the formidably lazy Ronald Reagan by over three years. Well, everybody has to be good at something right?

Here is my e-mail to the AP, plus the attached article, I am referring to. Now, I should say this, the bottom line here is that spouting slogans and jingoistic talking points isn't being patriotic, it's being a sheep. Sheep are trained to follow and do what they are told. No questions asked. That isn't patriotic, that's being stupid. I will also attach an opinion piece written by Keith Olbermann of MSNBC for more info on lies and jingoism. Limbaugh runs away from Limbaugh (Keith Olbermann) http://www.bloggermann.com/

What matters here is that being "pro-war" doesn't mean you have the market cornered on patriotism. It just means like everybody else you are entitled to your opinion. Speaking up and out, in and of itself is pretty patriotic, be it support or dissent. But, blindly going forward in support of a folly is dangerous territory my friends. This isn't a George Orwell novel or 1930's Germany that we're living in. It's the United States of America. And, we have some serious issues going on, that require serious questions to be answered in a pretty serious fashion. So you can be a sheep or you can be a patriot. Which one are you? I don't know, I just report.

You decide.

Subject: About the words "anti-war" and "patriotic"

I object to the AP calling the pro-war group the showed up in Crawford "patriotic" and the Cindy Sheehan affiliated group simply "anti-war." It's a slap in the face of veterans and the parent's who have lost children in a war to make this dismissive, condescending correlation. The people who blindly support this President's folly, which according to polls are not the majority of this country, are not "patriotic." They're foolish, if anything.

So would you call Chuck Hagel "anti-war" because he has serious critiques of the Iraq war? Or Paul Hackett? For that matter would you suggest that Russ Feingold isn't patriotic because he voted his conscience in the run up to the Iraq War and speaks that conscience to this very day? I doubt it.

Would you call that lunatic who mowed down the crosses at Camp Casey a "patriot" because he is avidly pro-war and pro-Bush? I hope not.

If you're going to call that camp anything, just call them "pro-war" or "warmongers" because the term "patriotic" should be reserved for the people demonstrating on the other side of the issue in Crawford. Camp Casey is all about pat