Joseph A. Hayden ([info]bearlawnyc) wrote,
@ 2004-09-26 18:41:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Bear Codes are missing something
While I used to think that gay people automatically had what I coined a "GID" (Gay Intelligence Differential), I have been dumbfounded by the stupidity of many gay men in the ten years since I came out. I propose we add the "I" quotient (as in I-, I++! for Mensa members). I know like most of the codes it is subjective, but the brain is the biggest sex organ, is it not?


(Post a new comment)


[info]perlcub
2004-09-26 04:34 pm UTC (link)
If the "I" stands for "intelligent," I can only guess that as a skater I'm automatically no higher than a "I-"... ;D

(Reply to this)


[info]koalabr
2004-09-26 10:31 pm UTC (link)
I agree, and why stop at intelligence, what about a responsibility quotient or a self management and tidiness scale? Knowing these might help hedge the bets better!

(Reply to this)


[info]genxcub
2004-09-27 07:08 am UTC (link)
Yeah, but you could argue that people who would use it, really aren't. I mean, all it's going to mean is the cranial equivalent to AOL inches.

While I'm sure this isn't uncommon, there's something enticing about being with someone who's "big n stoopid," just not for the long haul :)

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…