Arbat ([info]arbat) wrote,
@ 2004-12-03 21:19:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: calm

New Policy II : Who Will Be Banned

I have noticed a new breed of visitors in my journal - Prolific Idiots. There are people who manage in a very short time to flood my journal with messages in many threads and branches that are totally devoid of any sense and value. I like... no, I LOVE to argue. However, the number of people who visit my journal grew and so did the number of those idiots. Things that are tolerable and even entertaining in small quantities - are not so amusing in bulk.

When I got hit by [info]geneus, I tried arguing. But it was too much. My life is too valuable to spend it repeating same things over and over again. Now, here is another attack of the brain-dead. When I complained the first time, [info]nalymov in not so many words suggested banning as a tool that best suits the problem. I regret to say, I have to run with this advice. I did promise banning those who argues with bumper-stickers, didn't I?

So, from now on Prolific Idiots will be banned. They will still be able to read, of course. Second, even Less Prolific Idiots may also be targeted for banning. I grew tired. I am of the opinion that an idiot must have some redeeming virtue. Posting only a few short messages is best. Politeness will do. "Personality goes a long way". People I like are most certainly exempt.

This is my journal - do not expect me to be fair. The only fairness I can promise is a warning. I may warn someone few times, but do not count on it. I promise just one. After that an offender will be banned quickly and painlessly.

* * *


One small thing, another pet peeve of mine: if you intend to argue about American politics, democracy, law, principles, elections - then please, with a sugar on top - read the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution beforehand. I mean - those documents are short and pretty simple. I am not asking too much.



(Post a new comment)


[info]_grisha
2004-12-04 08:46 am UTC (link)
Your patience impresses me beyond words. Mine would have run out much more rapidly.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]arbat
2004-12-04 02:18 pm UTC (link)
You have no idea.
Imagine that I have to go through exact same argument with each and every liberal! They are trained to repeat same arguments - all of them. It is soooo boring.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ohubelka
2004-12-04 10:06 am UTC (link)
personality. personality goes a long way

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]arbat
2004-12-04 02:19 pm UTC (link)
OOPS!!! Correction.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]belochka
2004-12-06 06:27 am UTC (link)
"I am of the opinion that an idiot must have some redeeming virtue. "

5 баллов!

(Reply to this)


[info]kelar
2005-09-05 06:02 pm UTC (link)
You should have provided links to those documents.
Дайте, дайте же ссылки на указанные документы !!! :-)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]arbat
2005-09-06 12:12 am UTC (link)
Говот дать в про0цессе спора :-)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kelar
2005-09-06 09:44 am UTC (link)
You've said "beforehand".
"Give her one more chance!!!"

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]arbat
2005-09-07 01:40 am UTC (link)
http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/declaration.html
http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/constitution.html

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kelar
2005-09-07 07:47 pm UTC (link)
Well, thank you soooo much :-)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…