Home
Memento Mori - Omnia Mutantur, Nos et Mutamur in Illis [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
The Dreaded Kallah Cthulhu

[ Profile | Who Are You? ]
[ Bygone Eras | Yesterday is Dead and Gone ]

Links
[Links:| Alchemy Works ~ The Alchemyst's Garden ~ Nichols Garden Nursery ~ Bountiful Gardens ~ Heirloom Hulless Barleys & Wheats ~ Bonnie Plant Farm ~ Gothick Gardening ~ Cloud Hands T'ai Chi Chuan ~ Ireland and the Phallic Continuum ~ The Hermit ~ Graceful Presence ~ The Juggler ~ Via Negativa ~ Nine Lives, Many Masters ~ Memorabilia Antonina ~ Catenae Latinae ~ Trilokya Shambhala ~ Cheesaholics ~ Maledicens Contumeliae ~ In the Middle ~ Heartless Bitches ~ Sepulchritude ~ Iamblichus ~ Naked KnitGirl ~ Winterscapes ~ The Mango Grove ~ Spirit Winds School of Traditional Thai Massage/Yoga Therapy ~ Tao Mountain Resources for Thai Herbal Medicine, Ayurveda ~ Upledger Institute for Cranio-Sacral Therapy & Somato-Emotional Release ~ Cranio-Sacral Quackery ~ Mutuality & Waking Down ~ Textkit Greek & Latin Online Bulletin Board Learning Tools ~ Latin & Greek Study Groups ~ Vicipaedia Latina ~ Reading Latin Poetry ~ Metre & Scansion in Roman Poetry ~ Fee Verte ~ Oxygenee ~ Dharma Trading ]

The Bad Bishop's Book of Love Songs [Feb. 14th, 2010|05:01 pm]
[Tags|, , , ]



This illuminated songbook, made about 1470 for a worldly French cleric named Jean de Montchenu is now one of the treasures of the Bibliotheque Nationale. Although it is known that there was a vogue of heart-shaped illuminated manuscripts during the latter half of the fifteenth century, they are now rare, and this one is unique, the only known surviving manuscript that is in the shape of a single heart when closed and of two joined hearts when open. One of the greatest of Renaissance composers, Josquin des Prez, used his own and other composers' chansons as the basis for masses.
--Excerpted from Horizon, Winter 1964






Other links:
~ Dame Fortune and the capriciousness of love
~ Images of other pages of Le Chansonnier de Jean de Montchenu
~ Isorhythmic Motets and the Art of Memory
~ Ut Queant Laxis, a description of the hymn to St. John the Baptist, famous for the beginnings of our present do-re-mi scale system memorization in music
~ Fine Facsimile Illuminated Books of the 15th Century
~ Octavo's forthcoming high-resolution digital version of the Laborde Chansonnier from the Library of Congress
~ Book of the Heart
~ Essentials of Music
~ Philip Smith, Rare Books via Biblio
~ Philip Smith's Octavo Editions
~ Poison Pen Press, specializing in medieval cookery, costuming, and other books relating to the domestic aspects of the Middle Ages and Renaissance
Link4 Bel Cantos|Write a Sonata

[Feb. 13th, 2010|09:05 pm]
According to author Parker Ryan, "Cthulhu is very close to the Arabic word Khadhulu (also spelled Al Qhadhulu), translated as 'Forsaker' or 'Abandoner'. Many Sufi and Muqarribun writings make use of this term (Abandoner). In Sufi and Muqarribun writings 'abandoner' refers to the power that fuels the practices of Tajrid 'outward detachment' and Tafrid 'interior solitude'. These are exercises that are used to transcend (abandon) normal cultural programming. The idea is that by transcending (abandoning) dogma and fixed beliefs a person can see reality as it is. Khadhulu is stimulated by the Nafs (breath or soul). The stimulated 'abandoner' then causes the Hal [not IBM] or spiritual state."

Care to learn more? )
Link1 Grace Note|Write a Sonata

Palin's Little Starbursts [Oct. 3rd, 2008|08:09 pm]
[Tempo | amused]

Keith Olberman's Worst Person in the World!

National Review's Rich Lowry delivers upa masturbatory fantasy making him Keith Olberman's Worst Person in the World!

But, Daniel DeRito is even more cynical than moi! Is that possible?

"If affectations were authenticity, Sarah Palin’s debate performance would have been Oscar worthy. If flirtations were facts, Sarah Palin could transform ennui into an astute entry in the encyclopedia. If muddled mutterings were metrics, Sarah Palin could be a mathematician. If serendipity were substance, enlightenment would emerge from Palin’s equivocations. If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we’d all have a Merry Christmas. If audacity were hope, John McCain and Sarah Palin would be our saviors." Read more here.
Link2 Bel Cantos|Write a Sonata

Wrong Woman, Wrong Message! [Sep. 5th, 2008|08:14 am]
Gloria Steinem sums it up.


thanks to [info]enjoybeing - LJ icon LUV!
LinkWrite a Sonata

Plutocracy, Now [Sep. 3rd, 2008|08:58 pm]
"they were telling her to keep her face down to pull along the gravel. Sharif Abdel Kouddous is our other producer. He was there. They threw him up against the wall. They bloodied his arm. They bloodied her face." --referring to the producers of Democracy Now!

"I was on the convention floor interviewing the delegation from Minnesota and Alaska. I got a call, the producers are being arrested. I raced down here by foot. I went up to the riot police line. I said, “I would like to talk to a commanding officer.” This is all videotaped. And they took me, handcuffed me immediately, said, “You’re under arrest.” They pushed me to the ground. I said, “You can clearly see I have all the proper credentials.” I have my security clearance for the floor, for example, of the convention. So Secret Service came over, and they pulled it off. “Now you don’t,” they said." (for those who are unaware, when press is arrested, law enforcement is required to remove press credentials - routine, to avoid confusion)

"So, my question is, they have—they face PC riot, probable cause riot. I’ve already been charged with a misdemeanor. What is your policy with the press? How is the press to operate in this kind of environment? And a last question is, our producers were here, but the police only allow in two people from each press, but this is empty, and all the police are here. They far outnumber us in the press. Why our reporters can’t be here?" -- Amy Goodman, Democracy Now! to St. Paul Police Chief John Harrington
Link9 Bel Cantos|Write a Sonata

Abortion is a stand-in issue for Feminism [Sep. 2nd, 2008|06:05 am]
Why Anti-choicers own the Republican Party

thanks to [info]supergee
Link2 Bel Cantos|Write a Sonata

[Sep. 2nd, 2008|05:37 am]
If the functionally illiterate masses (who incidently, are still allowed to vote in this country) are watching their TV news channels, they received no word from either CNN or MSNBC of thousands protesting the Republican national convention. Interestingly, Reuters reported no violence from anarchists while Yahoo! News ran an AP wire that reported otherwise.
LinkWrite a Sonata

[Aug. 31st, 2008|06:40 pm]
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act," George Orwell.
Link4 Bel Cantos|Write a Sonata

[Aug. 24th, 2008|01:43 pm]
[Tempo | amused]

Last week, I managed to misplace my hands-free bluetooth cell phone ear piece. Not to worry, Top Gear showed the perfect solution. I wonder if it would actually meet the letter or spirit of the law, especially if one were to add one of these?
Link2 Bel Cantos|Write a Sonata

White Man Speak With Forked Tongue [Aug. 18th, 2008|03:49 pm]
Havasupai "Indian" Reservation wiped from map leaving 400 homeless (but who cares about that - boy scout troops and other tourists make the headlines) as yet another piece of our failing infrastructure collapses in this Third World country of ours where the middle class sits around with their thumbs up their arses as our troops serve five tours of duty (that's not volunteerism, that's enslavement, btw) and the oligarchical theocratic corporatocracy (aka rich bastards) spend our hard-earned tax dollars on empire expansionism.
Link3 Bel Cantos|Write a Sonata

[Aug. 18th, 2008|05:11 am]
Next, I'll bore y'all with excerpts from Rajiv Chandrasekaran's Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq's Green Zone, and excerpts from Vandana Shiva's Stolen Harvest: The Hijacking of the Global Food Supply.
Or not.
Eh, if interested, JFGI.
Link4 Bel Cantos|Write a Sonata

A Game As Old As Empire [Aug. 17th, 2008|07:08 pm]
The better I came to know those who made the decisions tht shape the world, the more skeptical I became about their abilities and their goals. Looking at the faces around the meeting room tables, I found myself struggling very hard to restrain my anger.

Eventually, however, this perspective also changed. I came to understand that most of those men believed they were doing the right thing. They were convinced that communism and terrorism were evil forces--rather than the predictable reactions to decisions they and their predecessors had made--and that they had a duty to their country, to their offspring, and to God* to convert the world to capitalism. They also clung to the principle of survival of the fittest; if they happened to enjoy the good fortune to have been born into a privileged class instead of inside a cardboard shack, then they saw it as an obligation to pass this heritage on to their progeny.

I vacillated between viewing such people as an actual conspiracy and simply seeing them as a tight-knight fraternity bent on dominating the world. Nonetheless, over time I began to liken them to the plantation owners of the pre-Civil War South. They were men drawn together in a loose association by common beliefs and shared self-interest, rather than an exclusive group meeting in clandestine hideaways with focused and sinister intent. The plantation autocrats had grown up with servants and slaves, had been educated to believe that it was their right and even their duty to take care of the "heathens" and to convert them to the owner's religion and way of life. Even if slavery repulsed them philosophically, they could, like Thomas Jefferson, justify it as a necessity, the collapse of which would result in social and economic chaos. The leaders of the modern oligarchies, what I now thought of as the corporatocracy, seemed to fit the same mold.

I also began to wonder who benefits from war and the mass production of weapons, from the damming of rivers and the destruction of indigenous environments and cultures. I began to look at who benefits when hundreds of thousands of people die from insufficient food, polluted water, or curable diseases. Slowly, I came to realize that in the long run no one benefits, but in the short term those at the top of the pyramid--my bosses and me--appear to benefit, at least materially.

This raised several other questions: Why does this situation persist? Why has it endured for so long? Does the answer lie simply in the old adage that "might is right," that those with the power perpetuate the system?

It seemed insufficient to say that power alone allows this situation to persist. While the proposition that might makes right explained a great deal, I felt therre must be a more compelling force at work here. I recalled an economics professor from my business school days, a man from northern India, who lectured about limited resources about man's need to grow continually, and about the principle of slave labor. According to this professor, all successful capitalist systems involve hierarchies with rigid chains of command, including a handful at the very top who control descending orders of subordinates, and a massive army of workers at the bottom, who in relative economic terms truly can be classified as slaves. Ultimately, then, I became convinced that we encourage this sytem because the corporatocracy has convinced us that God has given us the right to place a few of our people at the very top of this capitalist pyramid and to export our system to the entire world.

Of course, we are not the first to do this. The list of practitioners stretches back to the ancient empires of North Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, and works its way up through Persia, Greece, Rome, the Christian Crusades, and all the European empire builders of the post-Columbian era. This imperialist drive has been and continues to be the cause of most wars, pollution, starvation, species extinctions, and genocides. --John Perkins, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man


* God Bless America (and no one else)? Battle Hymn of the Republic, anyone? Manifest Destiny paves the way for theocracy
LinkWrite a Sonata

[Aug. 17th, 2008|06:19 pm]
"Modesty requires giving up on the illusions of grandeur to which the end of the Cold War and then 9/11 gave rise. It also means reining in the imperial presidents who expect the army to make good on those illusions." [One cannot] expect either John McCain or Barack Obama to rein in the "imperial presidency"

people run for the presidency in order to become imperial presidents. The people who are advising these candidates, the people who aspire to be the next national security advisor, the next secretary of defense, these are people who yearn to exercise those kind of great powers.

They're not running to see if they can make the Pentagon smaller. They're not. So when I - as a distant observer of politics - one of the things that both puzzles me and I think troubles me is the 24/7 coverage of the campaign.

Parsing every word, every phrase, that either Senator Obama or Senator McCain utters, as if what they say is going to reveal some profound and important change that was going to come about if they happened to be elected. It's not going to happen because the elements of continuity outweigh the elements of change. And it's not going to happen because, ultimately, we the American people, refuse to look in that mirror. And to see the extent to which the problems that we face really lie within.

We refuse to live within our means. We continue to think that the problems that beset the country are out there beyond our borders. And that if we deploy sufficient amount of American power we can fix those problems, and therefore things back here will continue as they have for decades.

--Andrew Bacevich, author of THE LIMITS OF POWER: THE END OF AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM, part of the American Empire Project. Bacevich's new essay on "The Long War," can be read there or at TomDispatch. Complete video interview with Bill Moyers, including transcript
LinkWrite a Sonata

An Empire of Consumption [Aug. 17th, 2008|06:12 pm]
More from Andrew Bacevich:

Ronald Reagan is the "modern prophet of profligacy. The politician who gave moral sanction to the empire of consumption."

to understand the truth about President Reagan, is to understand why so much of what we imagined to be our politics is misleading and false. He was the guy who came in and said we need to shrink the size of government. Government didn't shrink during the Reagan era, it grew.

He came in and he said we need to reduce the level of federal spending. He didn't reduce it, it went through the roof, and the budget deficits for his time were the greatest they had been since World War Two.

The big problem, it seems to me, with the current crisis in American foreign policy, is that unless we do change our ways, the likelihood that our children, our grandchildren, the next generation is going to enjoy the opportunities that we've had, is very slight, because we're squandering our power. We are squandering our wealth. In many respects, to the extent that we persist in our imperial delusions, we're also going to squander our freedom because imperial policies, which end up enhancing the authority of the imperial president, also end up providing imperial presidents with an opportunity to compromise freedom even here at home. And we've seen that since 9/11.

"The actual system of government conceived by the framers [of the Constitution] no longer pertains."

The Congress, especially with regard to matters related to national security policy, has thrust power and authority to the executive branch. We have created an imperial presidency. The congress no longer is able to articulate a vision of what is the common good. The Congress exists primarily to ensure the reelection of members of Congress.

As the imperial presidency has accrued power, surrounding the imperial presidency has come to be this group of institutions called the National Security State. The CIA, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the other intelligence agencies. Now, these have grown since the end of World War Two into this mammoth enterprise.

But the National Security State doesn't work. The National Security State was not able to identify the 9/11 conspiracy. Was not able to deflect the attackers on 9/11. The National Security State was not able to plan intelligently for the Iraq War. Even if you think that the Iraq War was necessary. They were not able to put together an intelligent workable plan for that war.

The National Security State has not been able to provide the resources necessary to fight this so called global war on terror. So, as the Congress has moved to the margins, as the President has moved to the center of our politics, the presidency itself has come to be, I think, less effective. The system is broken.

--Andrew Bacevich, author of THE LIMITS OF POWER: THE END OF AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM, part of the American Empire Project. Bacevich's new essay on "The Long War," can be read there or at TomDispatch. Complete video interview with Bill Moyers, including transcript
LinkWrite a Sonata

The Crisis of Profligacy [Aug. 17th, 2008|06:06 pm]
Another excerpt from Bill Moyers' interview with Andrew Bacevich:

We want to be able to pump gas into our cars regardless of how big they may happen to be, in order to be able to drive wherever we want to be able to drive. And we want to be able to do these things without having to think about whether or not the book's balanced at the end of the month, or the end of the fiscal year. And therefore, we want this unending line of credit.

"The fundamental problem facing the country will remain stubbornly in place no matter who is elected in November."
What neither of these candidates will be able to, I think, accomplish is to persuade us to look ourselves in the mirror, to see the direction in which we are headed. And from my point of view, it's a direction towards ever greater debt and dependency.

"What will not go away, is a yawning disparity between what Americans expect, and what they're willing or able to pay."
one of the ways we avoid confronting our refusal to balance the books is to rely increasingly on the projection of American military power around the world to try to maintain this dysfunctional system, or set of arrangements that have evolved over the last 30 or 40 years.

But, it's not the American people who are deploying around the world. It is a very specific subset of our people, this professional army. We like to call it an all-volunteer force--but the truth is, it's a professional army, and when we think about where we send that army, it's really an imperial army.

President Roosevelt told us World War II was essential to U.S. national security, and it was. And President Roosevelt said at the time, because this is an important enterprise, you, the American people, will be called upon to make sacrifices. And indeed, the people of the United States went off to fight that war in large numbers. It was a national effort. None of that's been true with regard to Iraq. I mean, one of the most striking things about the way the Bush Administration has managed the Global War on Terror, which President Bush has compared to World War Two.

One of the most striking things about it is that there was no effort made to mobilize the country, there was actually no effort even made to expand the size of the armed forces, as a matter of fact. The President said just two weeks or so after 9/11, "Go to Disney World. Go shopping." Well, there's something out of whack here, if indeed the Global War on Terror, and Iraq as a subset of the Global War on Terror is said to be so critically important, on the one hand. And on the other hand, when the country basically goes about its business, as if, really, there were no War on Terror, and no war in Iraq ongoing at all.

"seven years into its confrontation with radical Islam, the United States finds itself with too much war for too few warriors and with no prospect of producing the additional soldiers needed to close the gap."

--Andrew Bacevich, author of THE LIMITS OF POWER: THE END OF AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM, part of the American Empire Project. Bacevich's new essay on "The Long War," can be read there or at TomDispatch. Complete video interview with Bill Moyers, including transcript
LinkWrite a Sonata

Andrew Bacevich [Aug. 17th, 2008|05:51 pm]
Another excerpt from Bill Moyers' interview with Andrew Bacevich:

"Anyone with a conscience sending soldiers back to Iraq or Afghanistan
for multiple combat tours, while the rest of the country chills out, can
hardly be seen as an acceptable arrangement. It is unfair. Unjust. And
morally corrosive." And, yet, that's what we're doing.

It has long stuck in my craw, this posturing of supporting the troops. I
don't want to insult people.

There are many people who say they support the troops, and they really
mean it. But when it comes, really, down to understanding what does it
mean to support the troops? It needs to mean more than putting a sticker
on the back of your car.

I don't think we actually support the troops. We the people. What we the
people do is we contract out the business of national security to
approximately 0.5 percent of the population. About a million and a half
people that are on active duty.

And then we really turn away. We don't want to look when they go back
for two or three or four or five combat tours. That's not supporting the
troops. That's an abdication of civic responsibility. And I do think it
- there's something fundamentally immoral about that.

Again, as I tried to say, I think the global war on terror, as a
framework of thinking about policy, is deeply defective. But if one
believes in the global war on terror, then why isn't the country
actually supporting it? In a meaningful substantive sense?

Where is the country?

I'm not calling for a reinstatement of the draft because I understand
that, politically, that's an impossibility. And, to tell you the truth,
we don't need to have an army of six or eight or ten million people. But
we do need to have the country engaged in what its soldiers are doing.
In some way that has meaning. And that simply doesn't exist today.

--Andrew Bacevich, author of THE LIMITS OF POWER: THE END OF AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM, part of the American Empire Project. Bacevich's new essay on "The Long War," can be read there or at TomDispatch. Complete video interview with Bill Moyers, including transcript
LinkWrite a Sonata

Andrew Bacevich with Bill Moyers [Aug. 17th, 2008|05:34 pm]
the troubling part is, because of this preoccupation with, fascination with, the presidency, the President has become what we have instead of genuine politics. Instead of genuine democracy.

We look to the President, to the next President. You know, we know that the current President's a failure and a disappointment - we look to the next President to fix things. And, of course, as long as we have this expectation that the next President is going to fix things then, of course, that lifts all responsibility from me to fix things.

One of the real problems with the imperial presidency, I think, is that it has hollowed out our politics. And, in many respects, has made our democracy a false one. We're going through the motions of a democratic political system. But the fabric of democracy, I think, really has worn very thin.

The other consequence of the imperial presidency, is that, for members of the political class, that would include the media that covers the political class, serving, gaining access to, reporting on, second guessing, or gossiping about the imperial president are about those aspiring to succeed him, as in this campaign, has become an abiding preoccupation.

you cannot help but be impressed by the amount of ink spilled on Obama and McCain compared to how little attention is given, for example, to the races in the Senate and the House. Now, one could say perhaps that makes sense, because the Congress has become such a dysfunctional body. But it really does describe a disproportion, I think of attention that is a problem.

I think that the imperial presidency would not exist but for the Congress. Because the Congress, since World War II, has thrust power and authority onto the presidency.

"The United States has become a de facto one party state. With the legislative branch permanently controlled by an incumbent's party. And every President exploiting his role as Commander in Chief to expand on the imperial prerogatives of his office."

One of the great lies about American politics is that Democrats genuinely subscribe to a set of core convictions that make Democrats different from Republicans. And the same thing, of course, applies to the other party. It's not true. I happen to define myself as a conservative.

Well, what do conservatives say they stand for? Well, conservatives say they stand for balanced budgets. Small government. The so called traditional values.

Well, when you look back over the past 30 or so years, since the rise of Ronald Reagan, which we, in many respects, has been a conservative era in American politics, well, did we get small government?

Do we get balanced budgets? Do we get serious as opposed to simply rhetorical attention to traditional social values? The answer's no. Because all of that really has simply been part of a package of tactics that Republicans have employed to get elected and to - and then to stay in office.

the prime example of political dysfunction today is the Democratic Party in relation to Iraq.

Well, I may be a conservative, but I can assure you that, in November of 2006, I voted for every Democrat I could possibly come close to. And I did because the Democratic Party, speaking with one voice, at that time, said that, "Elect us. Give us power in the Congress, and we will end the Iraq War."

And the American people, at that point, adamantly tired of this war, gave power to the Democrats in Congress. And they absolutely, totally, completely failed to follow through on their commitment. Now, there was a lot of posturing. But, really, the record of the Democratic Congress over the past two years has been - one in which, substantively, all they have done is to appropriate the additional money that enables President Bush to continue that war.

the promises of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi prove to be empty. Reid and Pelosi's commitment to forcing a change in policy took a backseat to their concern to protect the Democratic majority.

--Andrew Bacevich, author of THE LIMITS OF POWER: THE END OF AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM, part of the American Empire Project. Bacevich's new essay on "The Long War," can be read there or at TomDispatch. Complete video interview with Bill Moyers, including transcript
LinkWrite a Sonata

Andrew Bacevich with Bill Moyers [Aug. 17th, 2008|12:18 am]
[Tags|]

Andrew Bacevich on the crisis of profligacy. Videos I and II plus transcript. Read or watch to the end. It's worthwhile.
LinkWrite a Sonata

Weapons of Mass Deception [Aug. 15th, 2008|09:57 pm]
Pursuant to this discussion...

In December 2003, Democracy Now! and Free Speech TV aired The PR Industry Unspun: an interview with Lauri Fitz-Pegado, the woman who ran the PR campaign for Hill and Knowlton coaching the Kuwaiti girl called "Nayirah” in her shocking but phony testimony on Congressional hill that she’d seen Iraqi soldiers murdering Kuwaiti babies. That unprecedented stunt helped propel the U.S. to war against Iraq in 1991. Included in the transcript of that segment are excerpts from Toxic Sludge is Good for You with John Stauber, co-author of Weapons Of Mass Deception.
LinkWrite a Sonata

We, Come September [Aug. 15th, 2008|06:00 pm]


"There are other worlds. Other kinds of dreams. Dreams in which failure is feasible. Honorable. Sometimes even worth striving for. Worlds in which recognition is not the only barometer of brilliance or human worth. There are plenty of warriors that I know and love, people far more valuable than myself, who go to war each day, knowing in advance that they will fail. True, they're less successful in the most vulgar sense of the word, but by no means less fulfilled."

"The only dream worth having is to dream that you will live while you're alive and die only when you're dead. To love. To be loved. To never forget your own insignificance. To never get used to the unspeakable violence and the vulgar disparity of life around you. To seek joy in the saddest places. To pursue beauty to its lair. To never simplify what is complicated or complicate what is simple. To respect strength, never power. Above all, to watch. To try and understand. To never look away. And never, never, to forget."
- Arundhati Roy

A fast-paced 64 minute documentary that covers the world politics of power, war, corporations, deception and exploitation, this musical video visualizes the words of Ms. Roy's famous Come September speech, where she spoke on such things as the so-called war on terror, corporate globalization, and justice.

We, closing credits links
Link1 Grace Note|Write a Sonata

[Aug. 13th, 2008|10:11 am]
[Tags|]

"Mmmm, you smell like french toast" -- to z, Hidden Springs, summer 2008
Link2 Bel Cantos|Write a Sonata

[Aug. 7th, 2008|11:59 am]
Bayer's commercial crop field spray insecticide for killing spider mites is called... Oberon.
Link3 Bel Cantos|Write a Sonata

Mnemonics for Anatomy, Biology, Micro and Physiology [Aug. 7th, 2008|10:10 am]
[Tags|, , , , , ]

Can Intelligent Karen Solve Some Foreign Mafia Operations?
Mnemonic for the Krebs cycle: Citrate, Isocitrate, Ketoglutarate, Succinyl, Succinate, Fumarate, Malate, Oxaloacetate.

1) Use white board
2) Draw pathways out
3) Know important regulatory steps
4) Know glycolysis, Krebs, electron transport, photosynthesis like the back of my hand (names/enzymes/structures)

Animated Krebs cycle.

CoA to CO2 in the Krebs cycle.

The metabolic model of the electron transport chain


Among other useful mnemonics, completely hilarious mnemoncs for the 12 cranial nerves and the anatomy of the wrist.
Link2 Bel Cantos|Write a Sonata

A Critical Eye [Aug. 6th, 2008|08:57 pm]
Probably not of interest to most of you, but, I recently viewed a video of a 2003 Bioneers conference featuring Takao Furuno's symbiotic method of rice farming with aigamo ducks and loaches. Impressive as it is to those who want to be able to feed a village, I'm not certain this method, intended for six acres, would work for 100 acre commercial rice farms. Not certain California rice farmers would be willing to diversify into duck meat and egg production since we don't enjoy protective tariffs as they do in Japan. Also, in California, there is no "off season" in which to grow diverse veggies in the same patch of ground. Not addressed: How do Asian rice farmers keep wild adult ducks, geese, and swans out of their fields?

Also on the video:

An intro to the landmark Canadian Supreme Court decision of Monsanto v. Schmeiser, the rest of the story available on the website. Synopsis: Own a commercial farm anywhere within 10 miles of a GMO farm? Prepare to be bent over and be forced to use your life savings and then some to make your way through the appelate court system with years of hardship and stress only to get a somewhat satisfactory supreme court decision and receive an out-of-court, undisclosed sum from the GMO creeps. It's really a shame that Schmeiser's website lacks visual impact.

Fred Kirschenmann also gave a completely unconvincing speech full of the usual platitudes on sustainable ag with nothing whatever to backup his assertions. Worthless rhetoric. Who is his target market for his books? Perhaps if he'd been given more time to speak? But my guess is the lack of substantive data means he's seeking another government appointment.

I wonder what the future holds for the commercial farmers of California's bread basket?
Link4 Bel Cantos|Write a Sonata

Rice Paddy Art in Yamagata [Jul. 29th, 2008|11:36 am]


In the Yamagata prefecture town of Yonezawa, an image of 16th-17th century samurai Naoe Kanetsugu has appeared in a field near the Onogawa hot spring. The samurai is based on a portrait housed at the nearby Uesugi Museum. This year marks the third time that crop art has been grown in Yonezawa, created by planting various colors of rice in the field. Here are a few photos of works from the past two years.
Link1 Grace Note|Write a Sonata

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]