Previous | Next

This could be heaven for everyone.

  • Mar. 23rd, 2004 at 2:15 PM
I tend not to get involved in the assorted debates on LJ about religion or beliefs because my own are rather contradictory. But the recent selections have made me sit down and think long-hand about my own and so I'm going to present them. I hope no-one is offended by them, I suspect some will be surprised.

I feel long comments in ongoing debates often get lost once the threading starts and a short précis of my beliefs could confuse. Observe:

I am an atheist/apatheist who believes in heaven and hell.

So I need to start defining some terms, eh?

First off, let me apologise for the fact that I'm going to use the word 'we' when talking about what happens after we die. I know it means that I'm saying that I don't subscribe to the view of the afterlife some of you have. Take it as a philosophical standpoint and not an attack on yourselves personally. I'm perfectly happy for you to believe I'm wrong. Furthermore, is my view of the afterlife actually incompatible with yours? (c;

I am an atheist, not an agnostic. I don't believe god exists. I'm a soft atheist - I don't really mind if other people believe in god(s) provided their belief doesn't negatively impact my life. People can believe in Jesus as Messiah, the Earth Goddess, or that they're descended from dragons from Betelgeuse 3 for all I care provided they don't want me to change what I'm doing to suit them. I loathe evangelical activities regardless of where they come from - I don't need to visit church, read the pamphlet or try to contact my past life to see if it 'suits' me. Leave my beliefs alone and I won't start to look for flaws I could perceive in yours.

I am an apatheist. I honestly don't care if there is a god. It's an irrelevant question. I'm not interested in 'proofs' one way or another. There's better things to worry about. My life would be the same if I believed in god.

I believe in Heaven and Hell. This is the tricky one.

Death comes for everyone and it's nice to think we could just not think about it but of course, we do. The traditional atheist belief is that when we die that's it. One can never experience what it is like to be dead because, well, we'd be dead and consequently our capacity for noticing things would be nil.

I believe that. Told you it was tricky.

I believe in a Heaven where we go after we die. I don't think of it as a place where we can walk around or chat to dead people. After all, legs and mouths are part of the physical body and those get left behind. Nor is it a place where we can make decisions, interact or think - those are all functions of the brain.

Heaven is somewhere we stay in for a while and then fade - but while we burn brightly we can affect the living. You see, the afterlife I am talking about is the memory of those we live behind. People do really live on in our memories.

For when I'm gone:
What would Marcus do?
Ones I have had:
Oh, Grandma always liked chutney, I remember her making it. Must get some soon.
Mickey hated noisy children. I think he'd have liked how contented our baby is.
And conversely (though stereotypical and not one of my own):
Harold Shipman ruined my life, I'll never stop hating him.

While our memory lives on in the minds of those that love us, we are in heaven. While it lives on in the minds of those who hate us we are in hell. Yes, that means that when someone famous dies, like the late Princess of Wales, they arrive in a million different heavens and hells depending on how they're remembered. One of the reassuring things for me is that while a spiritual afterlife is a great unknowable, a memorial afterlife can be a certainty. You may get both, you may get one, but you won't get neither.

So there you have it. Both Heaven and Hell really are other people.

I'm confident I'm going to many Heavens, though I'm aware I'm probably going to at least one Hell. Not a bad balance, I feel. I'll never be conscious of being there, but I draw great strength from knowing it awaits me.

Which is, after all, the whole point of an afterlife - yes?

ETA: See also: This Post for a maybe more pretty version!

Comments

( Comment )
[info]djm4 wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 06:27 am (UTC)
That's ... beautiful.
[info]adjectivemarcus wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 06:28 am (UTC)
Thank you. I suddenly glimpsed it on a bus journey about three months ago, and I'd been waiting for the right moment to share it.
[info]griffen wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 06:58 am (UTC)
I'm impressed.
[info]aegidian wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 09:57 am (UTC)
*nods in agreement through pricking tears*
[info]ciphergoth wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 07:37 am (UTC)
"I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it through not dying." -- Woody Allen
[info]adjectivemarcus wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 03:13 am (UTC)
Obviously that'd be nice - but it's not going to happen.

I'm comfortable with mortality now though the sheer terror of the abyss made me Xian when I was a teenager.
[info]just_becky wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2006 12:37 pm (UTC)
I consider myself immortal. The prime requirement for being immortal is not dying, and on that front I have a 100% success rate. :-D

Your view of Heaven sounds a lot like Valhalla. We have had it portrayed to us in films rather too literally as an actual place, but I have had it explained to me that Valhalla is metaphorically a realm of song and battle, of celebration and victory where only those worthy will live on. So people who were note worthy and memorable were remembered and lived on in Valhalla as examples to the rest of us, not because they satisfied the "You must be this mighty to enter" requirement, but because the adequate and mediocre would simpley be forgeotten. This seems to fit what you were saying rather nicely. So perhaps you are a Viking atheist?
:-)
[info]some_fox wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 07:40 am (UTC)
[info]djm4 said just what I was going to say. Honestly. I would have written exactly the same words in exactly the same way.

Thank-you for this. It's absolutely brilliant.

I personally regard myself as a 'deep agnostic' (which seems somewhat similar to your 'soft atheism') From 'Buddism without beliefs' this means I'm:
'As reluctant to regard the universe as devoid of meaning as endowed with meaning. For to deny either god or meaning is simply the antithesis of affirming them. Yet such an agnostic stance is not based on disinterest. It is founded on a passionate recognition that I do not know. It confronts the enormity of having been born instead of reaching for the consolation of a belief. It strips away, layer by layer, the views that conceal the mystery of being here - either by affirming it as something or denying it as nothing.'

I also think that questions about whether there is a god/afterlife are irrelevant. I think more important questions to continually ask are about how we should live given that we are going to die and we have no idea when (not that there is any one, clear answer to this question.

I look forward to talking with you about this some time. I wrote this story once called 'The Land of Lost Things' which you might be interested in reading as it touches on some sort of similar issues. I might put it up on LJ.
[info]jhg wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 07:43 am (UTC)
Ooh, yes please!


J
[info]some_fox wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 07:56 am (UTC)
It's up :-D
[info]hfnuala wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 08:18 am (UTC)
I love that book - it really helped me balance my what other people were telling me were 'spirtual' urges with my basic 'why do we need to invent a god?' atheism.
[info]some_fox wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 02:07 am (UTC)
Great to find someone else who likes it. I carry it around with me all the time. I often find just reading a chapter can calm me. It's my dream to write a book like that :-)
[info]lizw wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 10:02 am (UTC)
Yet such an agnostic stance is not based on disinterest. It is founded on a passionate recognition that I do not know.

I've actually encountered very similar statements from Christians who are passionate about the strand of Christian theology that stresses the unknowability of G-d.
[info]adjectivemarcus wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 03:15 am (UTC)
Yes, it'll be an excellent conversation. Do you lend the book out or guard it ferociously?
[info]some_fox wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 03:56 am (UTC)
I'll lend you it no problem. Fancy arranging a lunch/dinner date sometime so I can pass it on we can chat about such things? :-)
[info]adjectivemarcus wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 04:01 am (UTC)
What an excelelnt idea. Are you in the (guest) pub Friday, we could compare calendars?
[info]some_fox wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 04:07 am (UTC)
Probably not coz [info]werenerd gets here today and we haven't got a great deal of one-to-one time this visit. But I'm at the massage party and God is so we can compare then. Look forward to it.
[info]jhg wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 07:42 am (UTC)
Leave my beliefs alone and I won't start to look for flaws I could perceive in yours.

Hah! Yes, must try to restrict my flaw-searching to those instances.

While our memory lives on in the minds of those that love us, we are in heaven. While it lives on in the minds of those who hate us we are in hell. Yes, that means that when someone famous dies, like the late Princess of Wales, they arrive in a million different heavens and hells depending on how they're remembered.

I have encountered similar philosophies in the past; that's pretty close to my own actually. Gives two big fingers to those who say that an atheist has no reason to act well.

Oh, and: Yes, that's (one of many reasons) why you're one of my favourite people.

Looking forward to more happy times together,


James.
[info]adjectivemarcus wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 03:16 am (UTC)
Gives two big fingers to those who say that an atheist has no reason to act well.

Precisely. Could be summarised if I'm feeling capricious as "Actually, good works are the whole deal. Sorry!"
[info]duranorak wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 08:08 am (UTC)
That's brilliant.

I've not sorted out what I believe yet (currently I suspect I'll end up coming to the conclusion that different things happen to different people) but this was fascinating and wonderful to read. Thank you. :)

Damn, you rock so very very hard. :)

E.
x
[info]adjectivemarcus wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 03:17 am (UTC)
Heh, you're welcome! See you Friday?
[info]panther wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 08:11 am (UTC)
Interestingly, I am DEEPLY spiritual and somewhat religious, I've been a Priestess of Epona for most of the last two decades - and yet your description of Heaven and Hell is very, very similar to what I believe, only you stated it FAR more eloquently.

Thank you.
[info]adjectivemarcus wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 03:14 am (UTC)
Wow, thank you. (c:

I'm not familiar with Epona...
[info]panther wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 10:38 am (UTC)
Do a google search. She's a Welsh Goddess, sometimes associated with the ocean and with horses.

*smile*
[info]kelemvor wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 09:11 am (UTC)
Damn you - every time I think I've got a handle you, you reveal ANOTHER side!
You've given me something else to think about on the train tonight...
[info]adjectivemarcus wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 03:11 am (UTC)
No-one knows just how many sides I have! (c;
Pay no attention to the userpic. Move along please!
[info]emmy_mallow wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 09:12 am (UTC)
I like that, and you, very much.
[info]adjectivemarcus wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 03:18 am (UTC)
*blush* Thank you. Looking forward to seeing you soon! The G:TM party - yes?
[info]emmy_mallow wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 03:33 am (UTC)
Oh yes indeed!
Be good to see you too!
[info]plumsbitch wrote:
Mar. 23rd, 2004 03:19 pm (UTC)
Heaven is somewhere we stay in for a while and then fade - but while we burn brightly we can affect the living. You see, the afterlife I am talking about is the memory of those we live behind. People do really live on in our memories

Wonderful.

Leave my beliefs alone and I won't start to look for flaws I could perceive in yours.

This too. Thanks heaps for sharing that.
[info]adjectivemarcus wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 03:18 am (UTC)
Thank you. You're welcome!
[info]plumsbitch wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 04:35 am (UTC)
Mind if I borrow that second quote? I want a rubber stamp made of it, so i can print it on people's foreheads.
[info]adjectivemarcus wrote:
Mar. 24th, 2004 04:39 am (UTC)
Oh feel free! (c:
( Comment )