Writer's Block

Soul together

Soul together

If you could have the ability to hear everything your best friend or romantic partner was thinking, but you couldn't switch it off (or tell them), would you want it?

taisei_ Writer's Block: Soul together
I wouldn't be for or against it. If I had to tell them, that would be something different, but I can't really turn down the opportunity for more information.

On the other hand, privacy is impor
 
krovopiytsa Вопрос дня: Родственные души
мабуть, так.
 
mrintim Вопрос дня: Родственные души
я уже это делаю!
 
simonejester Writer's Block: Soul together

Hell yes! Though I'm not sure which I'd pick if I could only pick one. I think I'd have to tell them, though.

---
 
engelflugel My grandfather was Swedish, and my grandmother was actually a tiny little bunny

No. That would be super-tempting, but I think it would be such a violation, there could never be surprises, and you would be bound to have your feelings hurt. I know I would hate it if anyone could he
 
igor2121 Вопрос дня: Родственные души

Нет не хотел бы. Обладая такой способностью легко растерять лучших друзей.
 
vasilisavi Вопрос дня: Родственные души

я бы не хотела,т.к.не все мысли хочется услышать.
 
strawberrydusk Writer's Block: Soul together

Yes I would, to know my partners true character and if they're truely worth it. I would also like to know what I could do better on or what to keep the way it is.
 
latyshev_a_v Вопрос дня: Родственные души

Думаю,это было бы не тактично,и могло бы привести к потере друзей.
 
kvazimoda24 Вопрос дня: Родственные души

Если и слышать чужие мысли, то только очень близкого человека, но если человек действительно очень близок, то эта способность и не нужно, потому что и так знаешь о чем он думает.....
 
hn100702 Writer's Block: Soul together
Hha. I would like that. Even if I can't switch it off, no problem. ^-^
 
qana Writer's Block: Soul together

Definitely. This way, we'll both understand each others all the time, and we wouldn't keep anything from each other. Even if we split in the future, the fact that we can read each other easily would p
 
berry_eyes Writer's Block: Soul together

pros and cons.

yes: for one, honesty. two, to be able to fix problems that i might have caused unintentionally or to get past road blocks.

no: for one, it's 24/7. how annoying could that get? two, priva
 
azndude10 Writer's Block: Soul together

I would definitely abuse this. I wouldn't want it if I couldn't switch it off, but if I just couldn't tell anyone, I would want it. Things in life would go so much easier haha. You'd be able to tell w
 
spodrobnostjami Вопрос дня: Родственные души
нет, определённо нет.даже бы на время не захотела читать мысли.  это слишком сложно. так можно сойти с ума, перестать доверять людям, в конце ко
 
alexis679 Writer's Block: Soul together


Even though you may hear things that you don't want to hear, wouldn't you want to hear what they really think about you? I would. It would be nice to hear some honestly for once
 
lika111 Вопрос дня: Родственные души

Нет! Нет! и Нет! Если только иногда, но если постоянно, то нет. Примерная ситуация описана в фильме"Что хотят женщины." И для главного героя слышать их мысли-просто ужас. Тем более это не вс
 
completemyself Writer's Block: Soul together

hell.no.
 
natahasi Вопрос дня: Родственные души

да но только друга или подруги     не близкого человека не родню
 
riikoisme Writer's Block: Soul together

In a way, yes.  But in the bad light, no, because duh.  It might ruin everything between you two buddies, right? I'm sure everyone thinks about each person in a bad way (even the slightest m
 
kittys_tale Writer's Block: Soul together


No. The mind is a scary place. They might be saying something but thinking something totally different. Depressing, maybe disturbing, stupid. Useless.
 
zydrate_kiss Writer's Block: Soul together

NOT A CHANCE IN HELL! Everyone has thoughts and feelings, to put it bluntly, are best kept to oneself. For example, yesterday my boyfriend told me I'm hotter than Megan Fox. Now, we all know that's no