| Katey ( @ 2005-12-21 00:33:00 |
Wales whitewashes his own article.
Wales has violated a very clear Wikipedia guideline and decided to edit his own article to whitewash facts. He made several changes to exclude the very important role of Larry Sanger, including denying that he's a co-founder. He also edited it, to state as a matter of fact, that Bomis had no soft pornography. Looking through the google cache, somehow I have to wonder how he defines pornography if here are buck naked women in provactive poses and ones chewing on each other's teets. His only defense is that he dosen't think that R-rated movies can be pornographic, but given the obvious R-rated soft pornographic movies on Showtime and Cinemax late at night, his point doesn't stand.
As a result, Wales made alterations to the Bomis website to erase all the evidence. The babes.bomis.com site has now been taken down to hide its content and he altered the robots.txt so that it would be excluded from archive.org. There are still some images in google's image cache (which I now saved), but they will be gone from the cache since his modification. He's obviously trying to engage in revisionsit history, it's hypocrisy of the worst kind.
Wikipedia Founder Edits Own Bio
Wales has violated a very clear Wikipedia guideline and decided to edit his own article to whitewash facts. He made several changes to exclude the very important role of Larry Sanger, including denying that he's a co-founder. He also edited it, to state as a matter of fact, that Bomis had no soft pornography. Looking through the google cache, somehow I have to wonder how he defines pornography if here are buck naked women in provactive poses and ones chewing on each other's teets. His only defense is that he dosen't think that R-rated movies can be pornographic, but given the obvious R-rated soft pornographic movies on Showtime and Cinemax late at night, his point doesn't stand.
As a result, Wales made alterations to the Bomis website to erase all the evidence. The babes.bomis.com site has now been taken down to hide its content and he altered the robots.txt so that it would be excluded from archive.org. There are still some images in google's image cache (which I now saved), but they will be gone from the cache since his modification. He's obviously trying to engage in revisionsit history, it's hypocrisy of the worst kind.
Wikipedia Founder Edits Own Bio