Liz ([info]despotliz) wrote in [info]shortform,
@ 2005-06-11 21:04:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:hugo nominees, james patrick kelly, michael burstein, mike resnick, online, robert j sawyer, short story

Hugo Nominees 2005: Short Story



5. Shed Skin, Robert J Sawyer
In the future you can copy your mind into a superior robot body. But what happens to the old, inferior human you? That's the simple premise of Robert Sawyer's disappointing story. I like the idea, but the story seems far too pleased with itself for coming up with the idea, even though it's not particularly original and there's no interesting spin to it. It turns out the humans are shipped off to a home for old humans, where their every whim is catered to but they have no rights, no money, and no way out. That's my biggest problem with the story, that it requires me to accept that all the humans are hidden away while their robot forms take their identity, and no one seems at all bothered by this. My other problems are that the very ending seems rushed - the story seems happy to cover as many issues as it can think of, including a clumsy Civil War analogy, and then when it's done to stick a trite resolution on the end.

At this point you should go and read [info]yhlee's earlier post, which in the review and the comments pretty much sums up what I feel.

4. Decisions, Michael Burstein
This is a tricky story to review without spoilers, but I'm going to attempt to not give too much away. The story opens with astronaut Aaron Eliassen locked in a cell when he returns from his mission to the edges of the solar system. He's locked up to try and prevent him causing paradoxes, as he's returned from his mission a week earlier than he left. The story then takes a couple of twists, both not entirely unpredictable, and steers straight for an ending that I really disliked. On the whole I had the feeling I was reading a story which might have made a decent episode of classic Trek, both in plot and in the straightforward nature of the stories, as well as the hero astronaut who saves the day.

3. A Princess of Earth, Mike Resnick
Resnick has two nominations this year, and the stories shame some similarities. The nameless narrator has lost his wife and his will to life, until a chance encounter with a man who may or may not be John Carter of Mars leads him to new hope. That's about it, really. Most of the story is the conversation between the two, as Carter is looking for his lost princess as the narrator searches for his lost love. Maybe I'm missing out on a extra dimension by not having read any of the adventures of John Carter. I hope so, as without it the story is straightforward, and pretty dull.

2. Travels with my Cats, Mike Resnick
In this story, the narrator Ethan has led an unfulfilled and aimless life, and longs for love. He remembers a book from his youth, the titular Travels with My Cats, and receives a series of visitations from the author of the book, who knows nothing of her life or the world past the last page of her book. I liked this more than the above story - it has a more of the lightness and magic that a story of this type requires, with a very slim plot and the success of the story hanging largely on our empathy with the main character. I can see why people would like this story, but it does nothing for me whatsoever.

1. The Best Christmas Ever, James Patrick Kelly
Despite cutesy robots and a last-man-on-earth scenario that isn't very new, this is the best story of the lot. It's the only story that evoked any feelings of being a different world to our own, it doesn't get too bogged down in sentimentality, and the ending's quite good. I don't have that much to say about it, because not that much happens, and it get first place mainly because of the writing, which I liked more than the other stories. As far as Christmas stories go, I much preferred Greg van Eekhout's In the Late December.

This might sound like I don't really think much of this set of Hugo nominees, and you would be entirely correct. I toyed with writing the one word review of "meh" instead of the paragraphs above. It's not that I actively disliked any of these stories, I just didn't find them interesting. They're all competently written, and they all feel safe and straightforward and easy to read. There's nothing experimental or exciting or really novel about any of them. I think it's trickier to write a really good short story than a novella or novelette, as you have so much less space to play with for worldbuilding and characterisation, but the Kelly is the only piece that comes close to building an alien Earth. I don't read a huge amount of short fiction, but I can think of at least half a dozen stories I enjoyed more than these: Luciferase by Bruce Sterling, Women are Ugly by Eliot Fintushel, Delhi by Vandana Singh,  Five Irrational Histories by David Moles, The Annals of Eelin-Ok by Jeffrey Ford. My main problem when filling in ballot is going to be where I put "No Award".

[info]nhw has reviewed the short stories along with the rest of the Hugo fiction nominees here and includes links to other reviews as well.



(Post a new comment)


[info]chance88088
2005-06-11 11:22 pm UTC (link)
Wow- I agree with your rankings exactly. (I also agree that there were a lot of stories I'd rather have seen on the ballot than most of these.)

My take:

Shed skin - Banal story with no real creative elements in it. I never bought into the whole "once you give up your body you get locked away forever" And the ending, well it was simply horrid.

Decisions - Michael Burstein is probably one of the nicest SF writers around, but I am at a loss on why he shows up on award ballots repeatedly. I couldn't shake the sensation that Kodos and Kang were narrating at the end. Foolish Humans.

A Princess of Earth - Nostalgia porn. And no it doesn't get better if you've read A Princess of Mars. Maybe it gets worse since the Carter dialogue attempts to mimic Burroughs style and doesn't really succeed. Boring musings on love and the ending was really obvious.

Travels with My Cats - I can't believe I have a Resnick story ranked this high. (Which really means I am going straight into "No Award". I found the voice of this story unconvincing. I didn't enjoy the story.

The Best Christmas Ever - I'll admit I have more than a little love for this story since Jim was working on it while he was my instructor at Clarion and read us some snippets. It's got some really good energy and I you can feel the trust he has in the reader. He doesn't SPELL THINGS OUT in that annoyingly obvious way that most of the other nominated stories did.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]despotliz
2005-06-12 12:24 am UTC (link)
I couldn't shake the sensation that Kodos and Kang were narrating at the end.

How much better would it have been if it was Kang and Kodos? I found the naming of the aliens a bit irritating, and I'm not sure why since I'm quite happy for Ted Chiang to name his aliens "Flapper" and "Raspberry" (IIRC).

I found the voice of this story unconvincing.

[info]nhw said the protagonist was very passive, which I agree with.

you can feel the trust he has in the reader. He doesn't SPELL THINGS OUT in that annoyingly obvious way that most of the other nominated stories did.

Yes. That's largely what puts it at the top of my list - it trusts me to put two and two together and work out what happened rather than wasting part of the wordcount telling me. Plus of all the depressed and unsatisfied male characters these stories have, I felt more sympathy with Albert.. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]coalescent
2005-06-12 09:10 am UTC (link)
How much better would it have been if it was Kang and Kodos?

<-------------------------- this much -------------------------->

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]nhw
2005-06-12 06:56 am UTC (link)
My main problem when filling in ballot is going to be where I put "No Award".

I bit the bullet and put it ahead of all the stories.

(Reply to this)


[info]fjm
2005-06-12 08:31 am UTC (link)
I would swap the Resnick and the Kelly stories around but otherwise agreed with you. It was like a flashback to the 1950s.

(Reply to this)


[info]coalescent
2005-06-12 09:15 am UTC (link)
Having read them all now, I agree with your ranking. I think I'll put the Kelly ahead of 'No Award', but only just. You're completely right that none of them do anything at all interesting or original. It baffles me that the same voting population (in theory) came up with the other short fiction lists. I can't imagine anyone who nominated these stories also nominating Ben Rosenbaum's story, for instance, and neither can I really imagine many people who nominted Ben Rosenbaum's story also nominating any of these.

(Oh, and: I think 'Delhi' was a novellette rather than a short. And 'The Annals of Eelin-Ok' is online here.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]despotliz
2005-06-12 10:13 am UTC (link)
Locus reckon Delhi is a short, and I bow to their superior knowledge.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]coalescent
2005-06-12 10:17 am UTC (link)
Wordcount says it's 7k, which means Locus is right and I am an idiot. D'oh.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]despotliz
2005-06-12 11:12 am UTC (link)
It felt a lot longer than that when I was reading it, I admit.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]coalescent
2005-06-12 11:22 am UTC (link)
But in a good way.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]chance88088
2005-06-12 02:06 pm UTC (link)
Some comments on the fiction nominees (and a couple other categories) by Locus reviewer Rich Horton are here.

(Reply to this)

My opinion may b e skewed
[info]johnnyeponymous
2005-06-12 07:19 pm UTC (link)
I like a lot of Bobby J. Sawyer's stuff, and I like dShed Skin, though I admit that it wasn't the best of the nominees (and there were a half-dozen other pieces that I thought would make better wins). When I got to meet him at Norwescon (and originally we were both going to be Guests of Honour at BayCon) I mentioned that I thought he Neanderthal stories were his best adn he said "that is an unpopular, though accurate, opinion." I have a lot of trouble with Renick's fiction, though his fan writing is exceptional.

Gotta go with Burstein. I love the stories that feel like that are reaching back a bit.
Chris

(Reply to this)

My Opinion
[info]leokor
2005-06-22 06:07 am UTC (link)
My ranking is quite similar.

Personally, I'm puzzled how Sawyer's story got nominated at all. It has a feel of a social pamphlet rather than fiction. The author's desire to make a statement is palpable. There is almost no characterization whatsoever. I have no idea why the characters do what they do, for the lack of motivation. This especially applies to the ending.

Decisions has some interesting twists that rely on the reader getting clues from seeming contradictions. But the ending doesn't work for me. To me, the story reads like a story about the freedom of choice (even if the author doesn't think that himself). If we ever discover intelligent alien species, this ending may no longer be politically correct.

I only disagree with your placement of Kelly's story. The ending felt inconclusive to me. Personally, I rank Resnick's stories in the first two places. You may be right, however, that they rely on the emotional impact. I'm a sucker for strong emotional impact, but it may not work for everyone.

Note, however, how two of this year's Hugo nominated stories (not by Resnick) make passing references to robot's tears. Last year, I predicted that Robots Don't Cry would become a classic, even if it doesn't win the award. It does seem like it has made a certain impression.

Leo

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: My Opinion
[info]despotliz
2005-06-22 12:41 pm UTC (link)
Good point about the lack of motivations int he Sawyer story - I felt some of the actions were motivated not by what the characters would do, but with what issues Sawyer wanted to cover in the story and how he could get it to a position to do so.

I agree that the ending of the Kelly isn't anything special, but the rest of the story puts it at the top of the list for me.

I went and found my reviews of last year's Hugo short stories, and I wasn't very impressed by Robots Don't Cry either. I am a curmudgeonly Hugo voter who is not swayed by emotional impact or robot tears :) I should search out some of Resnick's longer works and see if they work better for me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: My Opinion
[info]leokor
2005-06-22 05:09 pm UTC (link)
I went and found my reviews of last year's Hugo short stories, and I wasn't very impressed by Robots Don't Cry either. I am a curmudgeonly Hugo voter who is not swayed by emotional impact or robot tears :)

Ah, but the robot in the story never cries, does he? :)

Leo

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…