| The Gadfly ( @ 2005-07-09 17:24:00 |
B.S.G and sexism
Hey! I've been a random lurker for ages, but finally I have something to post.
I don't know if anyone has read the odious Dirk Benedict (original Starbuck) article, but if you haven't, prepare yourself for rampant sexism and anti-progressive thought.
It's funny when he mentioned Hamlet because Shakespeare himself employed gender bending on numerous occasions. I wonder if he has ever heard of Rosalind in As You Like It, who disguises herself as a male. George Sand, a female writer of the 19th century, smoked cigars and played cards with men. Women have been written as warriors since at least the Amazons of the ancient Greeks. Women haven’t been just having babies “for thousands of years.” Besides that, the new BSG really is a reimagining and it happens to include a character called Starbuck who is loosely based on the old one, but who is far more complex. Besides bending her gender, TNBSG also bends some other gender related concepts with co-ed bathrooms (a la certain Ivy League schools) and calling women "sir" in the military. Starbuck wasn't just randomly gender switched for shocks, the gender issue in TNBSG is part of a complex commentary on politics and society.
Another lovely comment by Benedict:
Huh? It has to be based on hope, spiritual faith, and family to be good? Well, Benedict might be happy with Pollyanna!BSG, but good art is not always nice. Emile Zola, Camus, Faulkner, and most of the modern greats were devoted to the not always nice complexities of science, faith, politics, and family. Perhaps if Benedict has his way Faulkner would have written nice clear tales of nuclear families that go to church every Sunday instead of gritty existentialist narratives. The original BSG had ties to Mormonism and the creator wanted to portray Mormonism favorably. The new BSG does religion no favors, it ruthlessly dissects it in a way that makes some people uncomfortable. Even though I adhere to religion, I'd rather have that tension, since it actually makes you think.
Well, if you are as horrified by Mr. Benedicts comments as I am and you'd like to read something a bit more sophisticated on the subject of Starbuck and political allegory, then head over to Salon's article Where no TV show has gone before.
Hey! I've been a random lurker for ages, but finally I have something to post.
I don't know if anyone has read the odious Dirk Benedict (original Starbuck) article, but if you haven't, prepare yourself for rampant sexism and anti-progressive thought.
Women are from Venus. Men are from Mars. Hamlet does not scan as Hamletta. Nor does Han Solo as Han Sally. Faceman is not the same as Facewoman. Nor does a Stardoe a Starbuck make. Men hand out cigars. Women `hand out' babies. And thus the world, for thousands of years, has gone round.
It's funny when he mentioned Hamlet because Shakespeare himself employed gender bending on numerous occasions. I wonder if he has ever heard of Rosalind in As You Like It, who disguises herself as a male. George Sand, a female writer of the 19th century, smoked cigars and played cards with men. Women have been written as warriors since at least the Amazons of the ancient Greeks. Women haven’t been just having babies “for thousands of years.” Besides that, the new BSG really is a reimagining and it happens to include a character called Starbuck who is loosely based on the old one, but who is far more complex. Besides bending her gender, TNBSG also bends some other gender related concepts with co-ed bathrooms (a la certain Ivy League schools) and calling women "sir" in the military. Starbuck wasn't just randomly gender switched for shocks, the gender issue in TNBSG is part of a complex commentary on politics and society.
Another lovely comment by Benedict:
"Re-imagining", they call it. "un-imagining" is more accurate. To take what once was and twist it into what never was intended. So that a television show based on hope, spiritual faith, and family is unimagined and regurgitated as a show of despair, sexual violence and family dysfunction.
Huh? It has to be based on hope, spiritual faith, and family to be good? Well, Benedict might be happy with Pollyanna!BSG, but good art is not always nice. Emile Zola, Camus, Faulkner, and most of the modern greats were devoted to the not always nice complexities of science, faith, politics, and family. Perhaps if Benedict has his way Faulkner would have written nice clear tales of nuclear families that go to church every Sunday instead of gritty existentialist narratives. The original BSG had ties to Mormonism and the creator wanted to portray Mormonism favorably. The new BSG does religion no favors, it ruthlessly dissects it in a way that makes some people uncomfortable. Even though I adhere to religion, I'd rather have that tension, since it actually makes you think.
Well, if you are as horrified by Mr. Benedicts comments as I am and you'd like to read something a bit more sophisticated on the subject of Starbuck and political allegory, then head over to Salon's article Where no TV show has gone before.