Previous Entry | Next Entry

Sean article

  • Dec. 23rd, 2004 at 2:51 PM
Sean ~ squee!
[info]bluespirit_star
Just scanned this from the Feb issue of Total Film - issue 98.





No hot-linking please. Thanks!



X-posted: [info]bean_daily [info]bean_uncensored [info]bean_squee




  • Mood: cheerful

Comments

( Leave a comment )
[info]andien wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 03:31 pm (UTC)
Full Monty
Do you know I've always wondered why he wasn't first choice for the Full Monty - I mean it always seemed the most obvious bit of casting. Over and above Robert Carlyle - whose Scots for heaven's sake. Maybe SB wanted too much money!
| Reply | Thread
[info]bluespirit_star wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 04:09 pm (UTC)
Re: Full Monty
Perhaps he was already signed up to do something else at the time? :-(
What a missed opportunity!
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]andien wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 04:12 pm (UTC)
Re: Full Monty
I remember sitting in the Cinema watching it and thinking - that part was written for Bean where the fucking hell is he!
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]lethendy wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 04:29 pm (UTC)
Re: Full Monty
Personally, I think Sean is too good looking for the movie. You're supposed to suspend your disbelief that these men could be strippers - with Sean it would be really easy to believe that he could be a stripper
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]bluespirit_star wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2004 08:28 am (UTC)
Re: Full Monty
Hmmm...there is that! (g)
:-)
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]greencat3 wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 04:01 pm (UTC)
Sheep *are* weird.
| Reply | Thread
[info]bluespirit_star wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 04:09 pm (UTC)
LOL :-)
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]evesharmony wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 04:09 pm (UTC)
The Sheep

Hmm...no wonder they decided to rename the movie "The Dark"

Thanks for posting! There are some strange questions in there, but I appreciated the one about Frodo and Sam. Lol.
| Reply | Thread
[info]bluespirit_star wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 04:11 pm (UTC)
You're most welcome. :-)
I didn't know the mag was asking for questions to be submitted or I would've sent one in too!
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]thyrfing wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 04:21 pm (UTC)
*lol*
he's adorable, i love his answers. and agree on the full monty bit. why the heck wasn't he in it, darn it? sheffield men, no pants on them, it's so obvious!
and agree also on the Odyssey part as well... *grumbles* but it'd be such a bliss to have him as Odysseus again... 'perverse delight'... he's one to talk about perverse delights
| Reply | Thread
[info]bluespirit_star wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2004 08:29 am (UTC)
Yeah, I loved reading his ideas on such a range of things. :-)
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]viggosangel wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 04:31 pm (UTC)
Lovely! Thank you for scanning/posting this :D
| Reply | Thread
[info]bluespirit_star wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2004 08:30 am (UTC)
You're most welcome. :-)
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]queenofthorns wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 05:07 pm (UTC)
Just when I thought I couldn't possibly be MORE of a Beanstalker, he proves to be a delightful interviewee as well ;) Heh! So much more fun than all those women's mag interviews where they ask about his girlfriend blahblahblah - I totally agree with the oddness of sheep! And if anyone but him plays Odysseus it will be a (Greek) tragedy!
| Reply | Thread
[info]queenofthorns wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 05:07 pm (UTC)
Um, I'm a dolt and I forgot to say, thanks so much for posting this!
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]bluespirit_star wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2004 08:31 am (UTC)
LOL No problem! :-)
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]ms_nerd wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 06:56 pm (UTC)
Thank you!!!
| Reply | Thread
[info]dairwendan wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 08:38 pm (UTC)
Thank you so so much bluespirit!

He would be an EXCELLENT Bond! And we know that because 006 was a perfect Bond! Suave, stylish, elegant, deadly, witty, handsome, sexy . . .

Hey, we accept that bond looks like four different men right now, why not a Bond who looks like a Bond villain?

Beanie! I know Orlando calls him that!

Now then, excuse me Miss Katie Nelson of Glasgow, but "You've starred in some rubbish in your time"? Rude much? I hate people who pretend to be witty by insulting other people, especially when they can hide behind the written word. I'd like to see her say that to his face! I'd like even more for her to then have to show him her CV/resume. Bet she's no brain surgeon.

And shame on Total Film for the exact same reasons.
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]queenofthorns wrote:
Dec. 23rd, 2004 08:50 pm (UTC)
"You've starred in some rubbish in your time"?

Heh! Considering that I may be scarred for life from having watched “A Woman’s Guide to Adultery”, I really can’t say I disagree with that statement ;) And Sean apparently did too, although he didn’t mention any names. Sadly, I can think of several things where he was the best actor in a very bad movie, and it appears the comment was intended and taken as a humorous one.
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]bluespirit_star wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2004 08:33 am (UTC)
You're welcome. :-)

Total Film is quite light-hearted at times & it looks like Sean took it with good humour. Another reason to love him! :-)
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]bluespirit_star wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2004 08:31 am (UTC)
You're so welcome. :-)
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]nathilie wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2004 12:25 am (UTC)
Thanks very much for posting this! Always great
to read stuff like that. ANd Mike Tooley asked something
I had always wanted to know..:-)
| Reply | Thread
[info]bluespirit_star wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2004 08:34 am (UTC)
You're most welcome.
Yeah - that was a good question, I thought. :-)
| Reply | Parent | Thread
[info]stumphed wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2004 05:18 pm (UTC)
Thanks for that. It was fun to read ;)
| Reply | Thread
[info]bluespirit_star wrote:
Dec. 24th, 2004 05:46 pm (UTC)
You're most welcome. :-)
| Reply | Parent | Thread
( Leave a comment )